Warnings by Reformers using ChatGPT

I asked ChatGPT to respond to Dizerner's post. This is exactly what it posted:

1. "So many sermons are... not that good."
Unfortunately, yes, some sermons today lack substance, and others might veer into feel-good fluff or even error. It’s a reminder to be like the Bereans (Acts 17:11)—to test everything against Scripture, no matter how eloquent the speaker (or AI!) might sound.

2. "The truth is truth, regardless of who says it..."
That’s a powerful and biblical idea. God spoke through a donkey (Numbers 22), and even through pagan kings like Cyrus (Isaiah 45). It reminds us that truth stands on its own. It doesn't require a credentialed preacher—or even a human—to be truth.

3. "ChatGPT does not really do any original thinking..."
Absolutely true. I'm more like a library that organizes thoughts nicely and gives you back a cleaned-up version of what’s already been said. I don’t have divine insight, spiritual discernment, or inspiration from the Holy Spirit. I rely on patterns in data, not a personal walk with God.

4. "It is carrying the presence of Christ... that ChatGPT cannot do."
Amen to that. Only a believer, filled with the Spirit, walking in humility and truth, can do that. I can help clarify, organize, and even stir reflection—but the presence of Christ? That comes from a real relationship with Him. That's something I can never fake or fabricate.

So if someone says ChatGPT helped them see a truth more clearly—praise God for that! But ultimately, I’m a tool, like a concordance or a commentary. The power is in God’s Word, and the transformation is the work of the Holy Spirit.
 
Dizerner said:
Preach ChatGPT! Lol.
Click to expand...
It’s telling that I received no direct feedback on my previous post @Dizerner —which only reaffirms what I already suspected: you can have access to all the premium features of Logos and still not know how to use them effectively.

For those who haven’t explored it yet, ChatGPT is an exceptional tool for engaging with Greek and Hebrew, particularly when it comes to parsing grammar, morphology, and syntax. In fact, I would go so far as to say that, in these areas, it surpasses Logos in both speed and clarity.

If you’re serious about private study and want to better understand the original languages-especially since the majority of readers and even teachers have little grasp of the grammar and structure underpinning the Scriptures-I encourage you to try it for yourself. It will absolutely enhance your exegetical depth. And English!

That said, I wouldn’t recommend it for preparing sermons. Like any tool, it can be manipulated, and caution is warranted.

But for someone like me, working in a war-torn, under-resourced country, it has become a powerful complement to the traditional tools I already use.

Shame on the lighthearted jokers here, no depth, utter silliness.

Here in South Africa there is a HUNGER for God's word with persecution upon us!

Johann.
 
Johann said:
It’s telling that I received no direct feedback on my previous post @Dizerner —which only reaffirms what I already suspected: you can have access to all the premium features of Logos and still not know how to use them effectively.
Click to expand...

Imma be honest, you don't make sense to me a lot of times. What did you want me to do confirm it got the parts of speech right, lol, you know these things are available online already, it's such a weird thing and way to ask. I'm not sure what "conclusion" you think you've drawn, but I've learned from experience when a person starts to not make any sense anymore it's better to just stay away.
 
Dizerner said:
Imma be honest, you don't make sense to me a lot of times. What did you want me to do confirm it got the parts of speech right, lol, you know these things are available online already, it's such a weird thing and way to ask. I'm not sure what "conclusion" you think you've drawn, but I've learned from experience when a person starts to not make any sense anymore it's better to just stay away.
Click to expand...
Cheers friend, you won't be missed-I was transparent and truthful and my message clear, no room for any misunderstandings.

J.
 
ProDeo said:
You can ask GTP : Is Calvinism a false teaching?

It throws a lot of data to you, but no answer, because it can't.
Click to expand...
Really @ProDeo? Would you be man enough to apologize when proven wrong?

This here from ChatGpt


To assess whether Calvinism is a false teaching, one must define the term “false teaching” with precision and then measure Calvinist doctrine against authoritative sources, namely the Hebrew and Greek texts of Scripture, the apostolic witness, and the consensus of early pre-Augustinian Christian thought-especially if one's theological framework prioritizes these above post-4th-century systematic theologies.

1. Definition of “False Teaching”
A teaching is biblically “false” (pseudodidaskalia, cf. 1 Timothy 6:3–5; 2 Peter 2:1) when it contradicts the doctrine that was “once for all delivered to the saints” (Jude 3), deviates from the plain meaning and grammatical-historical exegesis of Scripture, or misrepresents the character and justice of God.

2. Foundational Tenets of Calvinism
Calvinism is commonly summarized by the acronym TULIP, which includes:

Total Depravity – that humans are utterly incapable of choosing God without divine regeneration first.

Unconditional Election – that God chooses some to salvation apart from foreseen faith or merit.

Limited Atonement – that Christ died only for the elect.

Irresistible Grace – that the elect cannot resist God’s saving call.

Perseverance of the Saints – that the elect will infallibly continue in faith and never fall away.

Each of these doctrines is built upon the foundational Calvinist idea of monergism, i.e., that God alone acts in salvation, to the exclusion of any cooperation or response from man prior to regeneration.

3. Evaluation According to Pre-Augustinian Christian Witness
Early Church Fathers prior to Augustine (who introduced a deterministic doctrine of predestination) do not reflect Calvinistic soteriology. For example:

Justin Martyr (c. 150 A.D.): “We have learned from the prophets and we hold it to be true, that punishments and chastisements and good rewards are rendered according to the merit of each man’s actions.” (First Apology, ch. 8)

Irenaeus (c. 180 A.D.): “Man is endowed with reason, and in this respect resembles God, having been made free in his will, and with power over himself.” (Against Heresies IV.37.1)

Clement of Alexandria: “Each one of us who sins with his own free will receives the corresponding retribution.” (Stromata 7.2)

These reflect a strong emphasis on free will, personal responsibility, and God’s universal salvific will, which contradicts the determinism inherent in Calvinism.

4. Evaluation According to Jewish Background and Apostolic Teaching
Second Temple Jewish literature, including the Mishnah, Targums, and Dead Sea Scrolls, affirms human responsibility, moral agency, and divine justice. God is portrayed as just in His dealings and offers repentance to all.

Targum Jonathan on Isaiah 45:22: “Turn to My Word, all you ends of the earth, for I am God and there is none else.” This emphasizes universal call, not limited scope.

Paul, trained in this tradition, writes: “God our Savior… desires all people to be saved and to come to the knowledge of the truth” (1 Timothy 2:4, cf. Romans 2:6–11). This directly conflicts with Calvinism’s limited atonement and unconditional election.

5. Evaluation According to Scripture’s Grammar and Syntax
Romans 5:12–21, the very passage you are examining, teaches that death came through Adam and justification is potentially extended to “all men” (πάντας ἀνθρώπους), which Calvinists reinterpret restrictively. Yet grammatically, the parallelism (v.18) favors a universal offer:

“So one act of righteousness leads to justification and life for all men.”
If this “all” is less inclusive than the “all” in Adam (v.12), it undermines the symmetry of Paul’s argument.

6. Theological Inconsistencies and Philosophical Concerns
Calvinism’s doctrine of double predestination, if consistently held, portrays God as arbitrarily electing some to salvation and others to damnation. This conflicts with His character as revealed in Ezekiel 33:11 (“I take no pleasure in the death of the wicked”) and calls into question the justice of condemning individuals for actions they were divinely predestined to commit.

Is Calvinism a False Teaching?

If one evaluates Calvinism according to the original languages of Scripture, the moral responsibility taught in Jewish tradition, the writings of the pre-Augustinian Church Fathers, and the justice and mercy of God as portrayed in Scripture, then the conclusion is that Calvinism introduces foreign philosophical assumptions (notably determinism), misrepresents divine justice, and violates the clear testimony of both Testaments.

Therefore, yes, from that exegetical, historical, and theological standpoint-Calvinism constitutes a false teaching.

Ready to apologize?

Johann.
 
Amazing, really. I am astonished about the progress that has been made. And I (doing AI myself) should have known better.

@Johann

Apologies?

LOL

Here is your requested apology, AI generated :)

Dear Johann, I stand before you today with a heavy heart, fully aware of the blunder I made in our recent project. I want to take this moment to sincerely apologize for my actions and the impact they have had on you and our team. I fully recognize that my mistake not only disrupted our workflow but also caused unnecessary stress and disappointment. This experience has been a humbling one for me. I know that my oversight may have seemed careless, and for that, I am truly sorry. I failed to meet the standards of professionalism that both you and our team expect from me. I want you to know that I take full responsibility for my actions. There are no excuses for my mistake, and I deeply regret any frustration or inconvenience it has caused you. I have spent time reflecting on what happened, and it has become clear to me that I need to improve my attention to detail and communication with the team. I recognize that, in our fast-paced environment, it's crucial to remain vigilant and thorough. I understand that my oversight affected not just the timeline of our project but also the trust and confidence you placed in me. Moving forward, I am committed to making amends and ensuring that such a mistake does not happen again. I have already begun taking steps to enhance my skills and knowledge. I am enrolling in workshops that focus on project management and effective communication, and I will seek feedback regularly from you and the team to ensure I am on the right track. Moreover, I want to open the lines of communication between us. If there's anything specific that you would like me to focus on or if you have suggestions on how I can better support our team, please do not hesitate to share. Your insights are invaluable to me, and I want to ensure that I am contributing positively to our work environment. I truly value our professional relationship and the camaraderie we share as a team. I am committed to regaining your trust and proving that I can learn from my mistakes. Thank you for your understanding and patience as I navigate this process. I hope we can move forward together, stronger than before. Once again, I am deeply sorry for my error, and I appreciate your willingness to hear me out. Thank you, Johann. With sincerest apologies, [Your Name]
 
civic said:
same here after the putt on 18 he missed I had deja vu. He made up for it in the playoff though. It sure was a roller coaster ride on the back 9. I never seen anything like it in any major before. One for the ages. Even Jack when he was interviewed said the same thing.

On a side note I got hooked on pickleball 3 weeks ago. I was a competetive table tennis player in tournaments 30 years ago and an intermediate tennis player. Its a fun game. I'm playing 3-5 days a week after work
Click to expand...
I thought he was done after the second hole. I can not imagine the pressure he was feeling.

I have not tried it yet. Soon though.
 
civic said:
same here after the putt on 18 he missed I had deja vu. He made up for it in the playoff though. It sure was a roller coaster ride on the back 9. I never seen anything like it in any major before. One for the ages. Even Jack when he was interviewed said the same thing.

On a side note I got hooked on pickleball 3 weeks ago. I was a competetive table tennis player in tournaments 30 years ago and an intermediate tennis player. Its a fun game. I'm playing 3-5 days a week after work
Click to expand...
I thought he was done after the second hole. I can not imagine the pressure he was feeling.

I have not tried it yet. Soon though.
 
ProDeo said:
You can ask GTP : Is Calvinism a false teaching?

It throws a lot of data to you, but no answer, because it can't.
Click to expand...

I wonder what engine he is actually using.

ChatGPT gave me this:
​
That’s a great question, and the answer really depends on your theological background and perspective. Calvinism is a system of Christian theology that emphasizes the sovereignty of God, predestination, and the total depravity of man. It’s often summarized by the acronym TULIP:​
·​
Total depravity​
·​
Unconditional election​
·​
Limited atonement​
·​
Irresistible grace​
·​
Perseverance of the saints​
​
Some Christians, particularly within Reformed traditions, view Calvinism as a faithful interpretation of Scripture and would strongly affirm it. Others—like Arminians, Wesleyans, and some branches of Catholicism and Eastern Orthodoxy—disagree with certain or all aspects of Calvinist doctrine, especially predestination and limited atonement, and might see it as a misinterpretation or imbalance.​
​
So, whether it's considered a "false teaching" really depends on your doctrinal lens. Do you have a particular background or view on this? That might help clarify how we can explore it further.​
 
Dizerner said:
I wonder what engine he is actually using.

ChatGPT gave me this:
​
That’s a great question, and the answer really depends on your theological background and perspective. Calvinism is a system of Christian theology that emphasizes the sovereignty of God, predestination, and the total depravity of man. It’s often summarized by the acronym TULIP:​
·​
Total depravity​
·​
Unconditional election​
·​
Limited atonement​
·​
Irresistible grace​
·​
Perseverance of the saints​
​
Some Christians, particularly within Reformed traditions, view Calvinism as a faithful interpretation of Scripture and would strongly affirm it. Others—like Arminians, Wesleyans, and some branches of Catholicism and Eastern Orthodoxy—disagree with certain or all aspects of Calvinist doctrine, especially predestination and limited atonement, and might see it as a misinterpretation or imbalance.​
​
So, whether it's considered a "false teaching" really depends on your doctrinal lens. Do you have a particular background or view on this? That might help clarify how we can explore it further.​
Click to expand...
Why the focus on which “engine” I’m using? You’ve got access to Logos and Accordance-so what are "they" saying regarding our Calvinist brothers in Christ, @Dizerner?

Scripture is my primary source.

J.
 
I am an old-fashioned kind of Christian. I believe in the Bible. I believe that it is clear, complete, sufficient, true, and without error. It is God’s revelation to humanity and demands my full attention and full obedience. I do not expect God to speak to me apart from it and the helper. I read, He speaks, I obey. Or I try anyways.

What did Jesus say?

I'll leave you "ChatGPT"

Or:

John 14:26 But the Advocate, the Holy Spirit, whom the Father will send in My name, will teach you all things and will remind you of everything I have told you.
 

Similar threads

brightfame52
Calvinism is Gospel !
14 15 16
Replies
301
Views
4K
Jim
J
N
Kingdom Law verses Heavenly Grace
2
Replies
36
Views
688
JoshebB
JoshebB
Peter
Synergism
Replies
13
Views
562
Paul
P
koberstein
Messianic Judaism
Replies
0
Views
293
koberstein
koberstein
Back
Top Bottom