Is it okay if I find it comical that Unitarians often insist that Jesus never explicitly called Himself "God"......
Well. Might a person consider the fariscal nature of the teachings of Jews during the first century of not "uttering" the very name of God? Which is referenced as "YHWH" (written as יהוה) or the "Tetragrammaton"?
Any Unitarians want to address the obvious?
GINOLJC, to all
101G is not a Unitarians, but YHWH, or I Am, or I AM THAT I AM OR H1961 הָיָה hayah (haw-yaw) is not God personal name as to "WHO" he is vs as to "WHAT he is. and the Names derived from the tetragrammaton, ARE FALSE. The word/name "JEHOVAH" was formed by merging the three vowels (e, o, and a) into the Romanized (Latinized) four letter version JHVH to get, JeHoVaH. and the word "YAHWEH" was formed by merging the vowels (a, and e), into the four letter version to get, YaHWeH. so we have the English man made, and the Hebrew man made form of God's supposed unpronounced name. both are false.
here is the mistake. they, (the translator), The Masoretic Jews who was European Jews who translated the Hebrew texts, into what we have today, the bible. by adding vowels to the Tetragrammaton and arriving at a made up name, they guessed at what the unpronounced name of God should be. added vowels to the four letter consonant, to make up a name to pronounce. one can never add or take away from the WORD of God. they added vowels to give God a personal name to pronounce, because they knew that YHWH
is a verb, and not a noun. and because the suppose name was lost, which the Jews said was forbidden to pronounce, they made a guess at the name where the vowel pointers should be. this was a grave mistake on their part. when you add to the word of God you just put the spiritual noose around your spiritual neck. arbitrarily, the translators injected the vowels into the four letter consonant to come up with the names, "YaHWeH", and, "JeHoVaH". as said which both are false.
101G.
