brightfame52
Active Member
Not in the context of Rom 8:8 This is in a Salvation context.It has to do with flesh.
If you put loving mom in a salvation context, thats law keeping salvation. good luck with that
Not in the context of Rom 8:8 This is in a Salvation context.It has to do with flesh.
Good luck with your law keeping, loving your mom in the flesh Salvation. At the day of Judgment, but lord, I loved my mom in the flesh, that counted for somethingSure it does. You don't know love at all without nature. Are living in a test tube with a laptop and wifi?
Yep... a lot of daddys told that to their young uns.We should love our natural relations before saved, it shows natural affection 2 Tim 3 3
Without natural affection, trucebreakers, false accusers, incontinent, fierce, despisers of those that are good,
To have natural affections for our friends and family is normal, has nothing to do with Salvation though. If you base any part of your salvation on your natural affections, you are lost, not saying you arent an elect, but at this juncture a person who bases any part of their salvation on their natural affection of loving their parents , children and so forth, are lost and in darkness.
You understand this do you? Romans 1:16 states that the gospel is the power of God for salvation to everyone who believes, first to the Jew and then to the Gentile. This verse emphasizes the importance of faith in receiving God's grace and the universal availability of salvation.I do know the Gospel. I can read. Anyone that can read can know the Gospel.
I read Romans 1:16 decades ago. I didn't need you to explain it away. Why do you not believe Roman 1:16? Have you been enlightened? Your unbelief doesn't equal my unbelief.
You and your companions have no clue what Paul is saying in Romans 1:16 ~listen very carefully and see:Romans 1:16 is exactly on point. Paul does not describe the gospel as powerless or meaningless to the unregenerate; he calls it the power of God unto salvation to everyone who believes.
Whatever conclusions we draw about regeneration and faith, they must account for the apostolic claim that God uses the gospel itself as His saving instrument, not merely as a post-regeneration announcement.
I'm a Non-Calinist (Free range Charismatic eclectic).I'm not going to take a stand on whether or not atonement is limited or sufficient for all because I honestly don't know.
I'd just like to hear from non-Calvinists as to how they reconcile their view of atonement with the fact that not all people will be saved. Isn't that, by definition, limited atonement? Or is there another explanation?
I didn't say you couldn't read, you seem to read fine to me, but I said you dont know the Gospel, and when you hear it, its scoffed at.
Red, this reading does not follow Paul’s argument in Romans.@FreeInChrist
You and your companions have no clue what Paul is saying in Romans 1:16 ~listen very carefully and see:
Romans 1:16 ~ “For I am not ashamed of the gospel of Christ: for it is the power of God unto salvation to every one that believeth; to the Jew first, and also to the Greek.”
The gospel of Jesus Christ is the power of God unto salvation (practically speaking) to "WHO"? Only unto believers, that that God has given the power/right to believe, per John 1:11,12; Philippians 1:29, etc.
Continue on to:
Romans 1:17 ~ “For therein is the righteousness of God revealed from faith to faith: as it is written, The just shall live by faith.”
Meaning, that the gospel within the gospel the truth of how God imputes righteousness is revealed form a person who has faith to another person who has faith! It is impossible to reveal the gospel form a person who has faith to a sinners dead in trespasses and sin ~ IMPOSSIBLE, for it is foolishness unto them per 1st Corinthians 1 where the same truth is taught.
1st Corinthians 1:18 ~ “For the preaching of the cross is to them that perish foolishness; but unto us which are saved it is the power of God.”
Those who are born again, it is the power of God! "but unto us which are saved it is the power of God.”
Why preach the gospel? Let Paul tell us:
1st Corinthians 1:21 ~ “For after that in the wisdom of God the world by wisdom knew not God, it pleased God by the foolishness of preaching to save them that believe.”
It please God, to save (in a practical sense) those that he had begotten again unto a lively hope. The preaching of the gospel is the means for God's elect practical salvation of increasing in the knowledge of the truth, thereby, our teaching and preaching must be gear toward them, not sinners who consider the gospel foolishness, we do not cast our pearls before swines~God forbid.
You are like many who preach that salvation is by grace alone, and then quickly depart from that by telling sinners what they must do before they can be born again! I have listened to your teaching for over fifty plus years. So, yes I do know perfectly from whence you come from.@Red Baker,
You keep saying you know what I believe, yet you continue to argue against positions I have explicitly denied. If you want to engage, please respond to what I am actually saying, not to a version of my view you’ve constructed.
Why do you not go through my post as I do yours and prove me wrong? You saying I'm wrong proves not one thing. Use scriptures to disprove my teachings and to prove your position, it as simple as that.Your own statements demonstrate the issue.
Go back and read again what I said~I was referring to what YOU believe not what I believe!You first asserted that without a person agreeing to believe and repent, the new birth will not happen.
Because that is what the scriptures teach, so why would I not agree with that? You got the first part wrong when I was speaking about what "YOU" believe.... of course I would never assert: "without a person agreeing to believe and repent, the new birth will not happen."Yet you then correctly affirmed Romans 8:7–8, stating that those who are in the flesh cannot perform spiritual acts such as believing or repenting.
You are preaching to choir! I know this, you do not, nor does your companions. You will never find me being inconsistent, never.Those two claims cannot both be true. If believing and repenting are impossible prior to regeneration, they cannot also be prerequisites for regeneration.
Of course no one except @synergy and @Studyman to name a few would do so boldly.I have not argued that faith is meritorious,
So, what you do, which is just as evil and wicked, is that you make them co-partner. Your position and the two mentioned above are the same. Both fall under the curse of God, you need to seriously consider this fact.nor that the flesh produces faith apart from the Spirit.
It is not just an "Spirit-enablement" gift; it is a fruit of the new man that the Spirit created within God's elect at regeneration. A huge difference ~ the difference is one's a true doctrine of the gospel of Jesus Christ, the other is a fruit of a false gospel.I have argued that Scripture presents faith as a real, Spirit-enabled response to the gospel, not merely a post-regeneration diagnostic that may or may not occur.
I might be misunderstanding you. I do believe I understand the Gospel well. I wouldn't reference what you're calling the Peshitta. There really isn't much meaningful about the "Peshitta" that is superior to any Greek source. The "Peshitta" means different things to different people. There are many Aramaic manuscripts from different sources that are slightly different. I very seldom consider a "Aramaic" reading of any sort.You understand this do you? Romans 1:16 states that the gospel is the power of God for salvation to everyone who believes, first to the Jew and then to the Gentile. This verse emphasizes the importance of faith in receiving God's grace and the universal availability of salvation.
Do you understand it in the Peshitta (Aramaic)?
16For I am not ashamed of The Gospel, because it is the power of God for the life of all who believe in it, whether of The Judeans first, or of the Aramaeans.
Where it clearly states it is the power of God for the life of all who believe in it.
It does not say it is the power of God for the life of all the God predestined it says for the life of all who believe in it. Meaning by their own free will they have learned and believe.
Spin it any way you want you cannot make it say what it does not
I'm a Non-Calinist (Free range Charismatic eclectic).
Atonement is definitly "Limited" even though it is potentially sufficient for all humanity. Romans 9 presents one set of data which appears to support God's intention NOT to convict everybody of their SIN (The beginning of Biblical FAITH). However humans who ARE "convicted of SIN" still have the free will to refuse it, and run back into death. I refused it several time, until the last time.
Calvinism also has the "I" (Irresistable) fantasy, which removes "Free Will" from possibility. Does God Convict EVERYBODY of SIN?? I don't know - He Convicted me several times which is all that personally matters. The rest is nothing more than "Theology".
You know I've been around your teachers my entire life. I know exactly what I'm saying. So don't start this nonsense with me.@FreeInChrist
You and your companions have no clue what Paul is saying in Romans 1:16 ~listen very carefully and see:
Romans 1:16 ~ “For I am not ashamed of the gospel of Christ: for it is the power of God unto salvation to every one that believeth; to the Jew first, and also to the Greek.”
The gospel of Jesus Christ is the power of God unto salvation (practically speaking) to "WHO"? Only unto believers, that that God has given the power/right to believe, per John 1:11,12; Philippians 1:29, etc.
Continue on to:
Romans 1:17 ~ “For therein is the righteousness of God revealed from faith to faith: as it is written, The just shall live by faith.”
Meaning, that the gospel within the gospel the truth of how God imputes righteousness is revealed form a person who has faith to another person who has faith! It is impossible to reveal the gospel form a person who has faith to a sinners dead in trespasses and sin ~ IMPOSSIBLE, for it is foolishness unto them per 1st Corinthians 1 where the same truth is taught.
1st Corinthians 1:18 ~ “For the preaching of the cross is to them that perish foolishness; but unto us which are saved it is the power of God.”
Those who are born again, it is the power of God! "but unto us which are saved it is the power of God.”
Why preach the gospel? Let Paul tell us:
1st Corinthians 1:21 ~ “For after that in the wisdom of God the world by wisdom knew not God, it pleased God by the foolishness of preaching to save them that believe.”
It please God, to save (in a practical sense) those that he had begotten again unto a lively hope. The preaching of the gospel is the means for God's elect practical salvation of increasing in the knowledge of the truth, thereby, our teaching and preaching must be gear toward them, not sinners who consider the gospel foolishness, we do not cast our pearls before swines~God forbid.
Good luck with your law keeping, loving your mom in the flesh Salvation. At the day of Judgment, but lord, I loved my mom in the flesh, that counted for something
So where did you learn to love? Come on, lets get into this in a meaningful way.Not in the context of Rom 8:8 This is in a Salvation context.
If you put loving mom in a salvation context, thats law keeping salvation. good luck with that
It is preached accurately. You want to go over the points of TULIP? Now you may already understand them enough to express your rejection of them But if the Gospel isnt received after hearing it and understanding it enough to reject its Truth, thats on you.When you preach the Gospel is it your intent to preach it accurately so others can understand?
So what does this have to do with man being in the flesh and cannot please God in a Salvation sense ?I didn't say that. I said you can't understand love without nature/natural things.
What does that have to do with mans inability to please God while unregenrate/in the flesh ? Rom 8:8So where did you learn to love?
You're assuming that I'm not born of the Spirit, right?It is preached accurately. You want to go over the points of TULIP? Now you may already understand them enough to express your rejection of them But if the Gospel isnt received after hearing it and understanding it enough to reject its Truth, thats on you.
Granted if you dont understand it to some degree, you would not have rejected it and dont believe it.
The context of this entire conversation is about "Salvation".So what does this have to do with man being in the flesh and cannot please God in a Salvation sense ?
I dont know what you are, Im going back and forth with your ideasYou're assuming that I'm not born of the Spirit, right?