Open Debate on the "Eternal Sonship vs Incarnate Sonship which is biblical?"

I can say the same things about your religion. You make many assumptions. Maybe you are the one who is deceived and do not know it.

I wasn't promoting or defending a religion. Feel free to point out where I was if you can. I was pointing out undeniable facts about the religious system of this world that you are promoting. A world God placed me in. Yes, you can "wrest" some scriptures to justify your rejection of God's Judgments and Statutes the same as the promoters of this world's religious system did in Jesus' Time. And you will no doubt, continue promoting a "Jesus" that was Not "a man of Faith".

These are doctrines and philosophies of this world, not of the Christ "of the Bible".

You are right about one thing though, a person who is deceived, by the very definition, doesn't believe he is deceived.
 
I wasn't promoting or defending a religion. Feel free to point out where I was if you can. I was pointing out undeniable facts about the religious system of this world that you are promoting. A world God placed me in. Yes, you can "wrest" some scriptures to justify your rejection of God's Judgments and Statutes the same as the promoters of this world's religious system did in Jesus' Time. And you will no doubt, continue promoting a "Jesus" that was Not "a man of Faith".

These are doctrines and philosophies of this world, not of the Christ "of the Bible".

You are right about one thing though, a person who is deceived, by the very definition, doesn't believe he is deceived.
Sure you are promoting a religion your own manmade one called Unitarianism
 
There are TWO/ 2 sitting on the one throne.
well then you contradict the bible, scripture, Revelation 4:2 "And immediately I was in the spirit: and, behold, a throne was set in heaven, and one sat on the throne." Revelation 4:3 "And he that sat was to look upon like a jasper and a sardine stone: and there was a rainbow round about the throne, in sight like unto an emerald."

see civic there is a difference in signification in sitting "ON" the throne vs sitting "IN" the throne ... "WITH" some one else.... (smile) lol, lol, lol, lol.

now that you have injected yourself into the conversation, good now answer 101G this. "if both the Father and the Son sits on the throne here. so, WHO IS STANDING BEFORE IT?" meaning the LAMB. so who is the LAMB, since you SAY THAT THE SON IS SITTING, your answer please..... (smile). can't wait for that answer.

101G
 
I like you. I really do. However, it is hard for me to communicate with you. I don't think you understand much of any of this. That is okay. You don't have to. You should consider what I said and make your own decision. Like I've told you before, I take solace in the fact you honor Jesus Christ more than many.
so, again, we can take this as you have no answer to who sits on the throne in Revelation chapter 4, and 5. you might need to help out your buddy civic.

101G.
 
He can handle himself fine. I consider you "my buddy" too .. :)
same here, and look we as children of God should not argue among ourselves. peace is the goal. and when it come to the word of God, we should do as our Father do, "REASON" ... "TOGETHER". scripture, Isaiah 1:18 "Come now, and let us reason together, saith the LORD: though your sins be as scarlet, they shall be as white as snow; though they be red like crimson, they shall be as wool."

reason: the power of the mind to think, understand, and form judgments by a process of logic.

101G
 
lol I raised my sons and daughters that way, they learned not to fear snakes. My wife is a different story 😂
Your wife is a very smart lady.

I was within 6 feet of a rattler once and I hope never again.
 
It is the separation that the Eternal Son brings to humanity. It is all about character. The Son reveals what people are and what they're not.

Most people don't like this at all. It is a revelation they don't want to see or know.

Luk 12:51 Suppose ye that I am come to give peace on earth? I tell you, Nay; but rather division:
Luk 12:52 For from henceforth there shall be five in one house divided, three against two, and two against three.
Luk 12:53 The father shall be divided against the son, and the son against the father; the mother against the daughter, and the daughter against the mother; the mother in law against her daughter in law, and the daughter in law against her mother in law.

The relationship between the Father and the Son is Perfect. United in perfect Character with one another.

Have you ever tried to pass your character to another? A nearly impossible task. It is doomed from the beginning if you're not really what you say you are. They present God as a hypocrite in relationship.

God didn't "Pass His Character" on to Jesus, according to what is actually written in Scriptures. According to the Holy Scriptures, Jesus "Adopted", of His Own Free will, the Character of God as His Own. HE Humbled Himself to HIS God, and His God's Will. This brought about a perfect God-Son relationship. He encouraged me to adopt the same "Mind", so as to become "ONE" with them, as HE is One with His God.
 
@civic if you're willing, we can REASON OUT who is sitting on the throne in Revelation chapter 4 and 5
God didn't "Pass His Character" on to Jesus, according to what is actually written in Scriptures. According to the Holy Scriptures, Jesus "Adopted", of His Own Free will, the Character of God as His Own. HE Humbled Himself to HIS God, and His God's Will. This brought about a perfect God-Son relationship. He encouraged me to adopt the same "Mind", so as to become "ONE" with them, as HE is One with His God.
not saying that you're right or wrong, but consider this, "is not the Lord Jesus God's "OWN ARM?". and do an arm act on it's own or is directed by the head?

101G.
 
GINOLJC, to all.
Well, let God speak to this then. this is God speaking. Isaiah 1:14 "Your new moons and your appointed feasts my soul hateth: they are a trouble unto me; I am weary to bear them."

are you calling God a liar?

101G.
In both the OT and the NT the words soul and spirit are used interchangeably when referring either to human beings or divinity. God's use of the word soul in that verse is not indicating something separate or different from His being Spirit. It is not indicating that God the Spirit is a soulish being as normally is meant by the Hebrew word nephesh.
 
@Red Baker I will let Dr MacArthur correct your erroneous view of the Son. He once held to your false beliefs. But unlike you he was teachable and open to correction.
I just read this, and actually read this a few years back when he first put this out around twenty-five or so years ago.

I'll come back and speak in depth on this post. Mr. MacArthur went to BJU which was very close to my house and at one time before I moved farther out, I was within walking distance of BJU when I first moved to Greenville, S.C., back in 1972 from Winston-Salem. N.C. Born and raised very close to where Billy Graham was born and raised. I have lived on the very buckle of the Bible Belt all my life. Within a two hundred mile (using Greenville as the hub) radius there more churches than homes are in the Big Sky country of Montana, where my wife came from, and that truly is the truth.

I need to rest.... still sick with what I believe now is a full blown flu bug.
 
I just read this, and actually read this a few years back when he first put this out around twenty-five or so years ago.

I'll come back and speak in depth on this post. Mr. MacArthur went to BJU which was very close to my house and at one time before I moved farther out, I was within walking distance of BJU when I first moved to Greenville, S.C., back in 1972 from Winston-Salem. N.C. Born and raised very close to where Billy Graham was born and raised. I have lived on the very buckle of the Bible Belt all my life. Within a two hundred mile (using Greenville as the hub) radius there more churches than homes are in the Big Sky country of Montana, where my wife came from, and that truly is the truth.

I need to rest.... still sick with what I believe now is a full blown flu bug.
Get better !!!
 
I just read this, and actually read this a few years back when he first put this out around twenty-five or so years ago.

I'll come back and speak in depth on this post. Mr. MacArthur went to BJU which was very close to my house and at one time before I moved farther out, I was within walking distance of BJU when I first moved to Greenville, S.C., back in 1972 from Winston-Salem. N.C. Born and raised very close to where Billy Graham was born and raised. I have lived on the very buckle of the Bible Belt all my life. Within a two hundred mile (using Greenville as the hub) radius there more churches than homes are in the Big Sky country of Montana, where my wife came from, and that truly is the truth.

I need to rest.... still sick with what I believe now is a full blown flu bug.
Oh my @Red Baker, You mean you dragged your wife out of the gloriously beautiful western state of Montana to have to live in the drudgery of the Southeast? Just jerking your chain, my friend; just jerking your chain. :ROFLMAO:
 
What you say I believe is not what I believe but rather how you incorrectly interpret what I post. But you do that a lot.

Sure it is. Do you think what you believe is really complicated to the point no one can understand what you actually say? It isn't.

Maybe you're like Peter....

Luk 9:33 And it came to pass, as they departed from him, Peter said unto Jesus, Master, it is good for us to be here: and let us make three tabernacles; one for thee, and one for Moses, and one for Elias: not knowing what he said.

Very next verse....

Luk 9:34 While he thus spake, there came a cloud, and overshadowed them: and they feared as they entered into the cloud.
Luk 9:35 And there came a voice out of the cloud, saying, This is my beloved Son: hear him.

So do tell......

Jesus was transfigured before them and it so bumfuzzled Peter that he really shouldn't have said what He said. The Father corrects Peter for wanting to treat Christ like Moses and Elijah......

Read verse 34 and 35 again.....

Notice the Father and the Son both speaking and communication with each other, Moses and Elijah.... You would have everyone believe that is One Person carrying on a "show" and speaking in the "third person".....

You're presenting a schizophrenic narrative.
 
I just read this, and actually read this a few years back when he first put this out around twenty-five or so years ago.

I'll come back and speak in depth on this post. Mr. MacArthur went to BJU which was very close to my house and at one time before I moved farther out, I was within walking distance of BJU when I first moved to Greenville, S.C., back in 1972 from Winston-Salem. N.C. Born and raised very close to where Billy Graham was born and raised. I have lived on the very buckle of the Bible Belt all my life. Within a two hundred mile (using Greenville as the hub) radius there more churches than homes are in the Big Sky country of Montana, where my wife came from, and that truly is the truth.

I need to rest.... still sick with what I believe now is a full blown flu bug.

Dr Greene? You've sounded like an Independent Baptist for some time now to me. I know them well.
 
In both the OT and the NT the words soul and spirit are used interchangeably when referring either to human beings or divinity. God's use of the word soul in that verse is not indicating something separate or different from His being Spirit. It is not indicating that God the Spirit is a soulish being as normally is meant by the Hebrew word nephesh.

Glad you're going there.....

John 5:26 For as the Father hath life in himself; so hath he given to the Son to have life in himself;
 
Sure it is. Do you think what you believe is really complicated to the point no one can understand what you actually say? It isn't.
Then agree or disagree but stop that infuriating habit of telling me and others what I believe or what others believe. I do think it is a weakness in your character and probably your own mode of thinking to keep trying to tell others what they believe. If you are married, I would guess that weakness of character is really a monstrous irritation to your wife.
 
Back
Top Bottom