Newtonian eschatology

[TomL]

You gave me YOUR reasons.
That doesn't mean you're actually correct.
It just means you have your perspective.

Let's see just how well you understand the situation.

According to Hebrews 6, and 1 Corithians 3, we're to mature in out faith. Then in Isaiah 28:9-13, we are told God will teach us.
It took me a number of years, and it was finally during my junior year in college (my early 40's), my physics professor told the class, we learned the foundations of physics and once we experience that they are true, and correct, we can set those aside, knowing how they work, and move on to more weighty matters.
I learned eschatology early on in my walk in Christ, and have been focusing on other things.
Love, Wisdom, Grace, etc...
I was taught about non-dispensational ideas, and then explained...
The following is why we believe that dispensationalism is a more accurate perspective of the biblical narrative.
And the following is why we reject preterism, midtrib, posttrib, post-mill, amill,...
So, you're more than welcome to believe whatever you want.
I've explained it, you've chosen to disregard it. You've further chosen to disregard the people from whom I've learned who are highly educated theologians and teachers, with doctorates, etc..

Personally, I'm fine with that. You obviously have convinced yourself that you d'man, and all wisdom and knowledge dwells with you.

as such, there's no room for anyone else in your sandbox.




No. I addressed the issues.
You disregarded, dismissed and ignored me.
After a dozen or so posts, it became quite obvious, so I invited you to go play in your own sandbox.
You refused.
Now you're being immature, rude, demanding, manipulative, and a few other ungodly practices.

Bottomline

Absolutely nothing discussing the New testament data showing what happens on Christs return

You did not address the various ops posted then and never have

 

[TomL]

Well, since you fail to grasp why I am not here to argue, and have repeatedly demonstrated that you have no clue why you've never actually demonstrated why I'm wrong, I'm thinking that we have no further reason to converse.

See you in eternity.
Ciao!

Actually you failed to engage with multiple ops which demonstrate your dispensationism is an error

 

[SteveB]

Bottomline

You've made yourself irrelevant to any further discussion

Absolutely nothing discussing the New testament data showing what happens on Christs return

Then one would think you'd have taken the repeated opportunities to walk away.
But you obviously have been unwilling to do so.

You did not address the various ops posted then and never have

This just tells me that you have never once paid any attention whatsoever.

You really should walk away.
Go boast to your buddies how you succeeded in convincing others that you are superior and know everything.

 

[Frank Russell]

Apparently you don't want people talking to each other.

Strawmen make good targets for flames, but not all strawmen need to be flamed.

 

[SteveB]

Actually you failed to engage with multiple ops which demonstrate your dispensationism is an error

Have a great life Tom.
We're done here.

 

[TomL]

Have a great life Tom.
We're done here.

Bye. You also

 

[TomL]

You've made yourself irrelevant to any further discussion

Then one would think you'd have taken the repeated opportunities to walk away.
But you obviously have been unwilling to do so.

This just tells me that you have never once paid any attention whatsoever.

You really should walk away.
Go boast to your buddies how you succeeded in convincing others that you are superior and know everything.

That is not my style

that you would imagine such shows you are out of touch