List of Totally and Partially Omitted Passages in the Modern Translations

[NetChaplain]

These need to be referenced with a modern translation by comparing them. All modern translations (except ones like the NKJV) have the primary Trinity passage omitted; 1Jn 5:7. If this is missing in your translation, so is the below passages, either totally or partially! If you don't have all the Word it's not God's Word, just an admixture of truth anf error.


Totally Omitted Passages
Matthew 17:21
Matthew 18:11
Mat 23:14
Mark 7:16
Mark 9:44
Mark 9:46
Mark 11:26
Mark 15:28
Luke 23:17
Acts 24:7
1Jn 5:7


List of omitted Bible phrases
3 Matthew 1:25
4 Matthew 5:22
5 Matthew 5:44
6 Matthew 6:4
7 Matthew 6:6
8 Matthew 6:13
9 Matthew 6:18
10 Matthew 9:13
11 Matthew 15:8
12 Matthew 15:6
13 Matthew 16:3
14 Matthew 16:20
15 Matthew 18:35
16 Matthew 19:9
17 Matthew 19:17
18 Matthew 20:7
19 Matthew 20:16
20 Matthew 20:22, 23
21 Matthew 21:12
22 Matthew 22:13
23 Matthew 23:4
24 Matthew 23:8
25 Matthew 23:19
26 Matthew 24:7
27 Matthew 25:13
28 Matthew 26:28
29 Matthew 26:60
30 Matthew 27:24
31 Matthew 27:35
32 Matthew 27:64
33 Matthew 28:2
34 Matthew 28:6
35 Matthew 28:9
36 Mark 1:2
37 Mark 1:14
38 Mark 1:31
39 Mark 3:15
40 Mark 4:24
41 Mark 5:36
42 Mark 6:33
43 Mark 6:11
44 Mark 6:51
45 Mark 7:8
46 Mark 8:26
47 Mark 9:23
48 Mark 9:29
49 Mark 9:45
50 Mark 9:49
51 Mark 10:21
52 Mark 10:24
53 Mark 11:10
54 Mark 12:23
55 Mark 12:29-30
56 Mark 12:33
57 Mark 13:8
58 Mark 13:33
59 Mark 13:14
60 Mark 14:22
61 Mark 14:27
62 Mark 14:68
63 Mark 14:70
64 Luke 1:28
65 Luke 2:33
66 Luke 2:40
67 Luke 2:43
68 Luke 4:8
69 Luke 4:4
70 Luke 4:18
71 Luke 4:41
72 Luke 5:38
73 Luke 6:10
74 Luke 7:31
75 Luke 8:43
76 Luke 8:48
77 Luke 8:54
78 Luke 9:10
79 Luke 9:54
80 Luke 9:55
81 Luke 9:56
82 Luke 9:57
83 Luke 10:19
84 Luke 11:2
85 Luke 11:11
86 Luke 11:29
87 Luke 11:44
88 Luke 11:54
89 Luke 12:31
90 Luke 12:39
91 Luke 17:3
92 Luke 17:9
93 Luke 18:24
94 Luke 19:45
95 Luke 20:13
96 Luke 20:30
97 Luke 20:33
98 Luke 21:4
99 Luke 22:31
100 Luke 22:64
101 Luke 22:68
102 Luke 23:23
103 Luke 23:38
104 Luke 23:42
105 Luke 24:1
106 Luke 24:42
107 Luke 24:49
108 Luke 24:53
109 John 1:14
110 John 1:18
111 John 1:27
112 John 3:13
113 John 3:15
114 John 3:16
115 John 4:42
116 John 5:16
117 John 6:11
118 John 6:47
119 John 8:9
120 John 8:59
121 John 9:35
122 John 11:41
123 John 12:1
124 John 16:16
125 John 17:12
126 John 19:16
127 John 20:29
128 Acts 2:30
129 Acts 2:31
130 Acts 3:11
131 Acts 3:26
132 Acts 7:30
133 Acts 7:37
134 Acts 9:5,6
135 Acts 10:6
136 Acts 9:29
137 Acts 10:21
138 Acts 10:30
139 Acts 15:18
140 Acts 15:24
141 Acts 15:37
142 Acts 16:31
143 Acts 17:5
144 Acts 18:17
145 Acts 18:21
146 Acts 20:15
147 Acts 20:24
148 Acts 20:25
149 Acts 20:32
150 Acts 21:8
151 Acts 21:22
152 Acts 21:25
153 Acts 22:9
154 Acts 23:9
155 Acts 24:6
156 Acts 24:8
157 Acts 24:15
158 Acts 24:26
159 Acts 25:16
160 Acts 26:30
161 Acts 28:16
162 Romans 1:16
163 Romans 8:1
164 Romans 9:28
165 Romans 10:15
166 Romans 11:6
167 Romans 13:9
168 Romans 14:6
169 Romans 14:21
170 Romans 15:29
171 1 Corinthians 2:4
172 1 Corinthians 4:6
173 1 Corinthians 6:20
174 1 Corinthians 7:29
175 1 Corinthians 10:28
176 1 Corinthians 11:24
177 1 Corinthians 11:29
178 1 Corinthians 15:47
179 1 Corinthians 16:22-23
180 2 Corinthians 4:4
181 2 Corinthians 4:10
182 Galatians 3:1
183 Galatians 4:7
184 Galatians 5:21
185 Galatians 6:15
186 Ephesians 3:9
187 Ephesians 3:14
188 Ephesians 5:30
189 Ephesians 6:10
190 Philippians 3:16
191 Colossians 1:2
192 Colossians 1:14
193 Colossians 2:2
194 Colossians 2:18
195 Colossians 3:6
196 1 Thessalonians 1:1
197 1 Thessalonians 5:27
198 2 Thessalonians 1:8
199 1 Timothy 3:16
200 1 Timothy 4:12
201 1 Timothy 5:16
202 1 Timothy 6:5
203 2 Timothy 1:11
204 2 Timothy 2:9
205 2 Timothy 4:22
206 Philemon 1:12
207 Titus 1:4
208 Hebrews 1:3
209 Hebrews 2:7
210 Hebrews 7:21
211 Hebrews 10:9
212 Hebrews 10:30
213 Hebrews 10:34
214 Hebrews 11:11
215 Hebrews 11:37
216 Hebrews 12:20
217 1 Peter 1:22
218 1 Peter 4:1
219 1 Peter 4:14
220 1 Peter 5:5
221 1 Peter 5:10-11
222 2 Peter 1:21
223 2 Peter 2:17
224 2 Peter 3:10
225 1 John 1:7
226 1 John 2:7
227 1 John 4:3
228 1 John 4:9
229 1 John 4:19
230 1 John 5:7,8
231 1 John 5:13
232 2 John 1:9
233 Jude 1:25
234 Revelation 1:8
235 Revelation 1:11
236 Revelation 1:20
237 Revelation 2:13
238 Revelation 2:15
239 Revelation 5:14
240 Revelation 6:1,3,5,7
241 Revelation 11:17
242 Revelation 12:12
243 Revelation 12:17
244 Revelation 14:5
245 Revelation 15:2
246 Revelation 16:17
247 Revelation 18:20
248 Revelation 20:9
249 Revelation 20:12
250 Revelation 21:24
251 Revelation 22:19

 

[civic]

Glad you made it

 

[NetChaplain]

Glad you made it

Thanks!

 

[EclipseEventSigns]

It would be interesting to know where this list is from and the purpose behind listing it. I don't think you really want to open this can of worms and get into deep textual criticism.

Just a single example using Matthew 1:25 stating that modern translations are missing a partial phrase. Actually, the King James Version is also missing a partial phrase in this verse. As is evident from examining the Textus Receptus:
Matthew 1:25

It should have been translated as:
And knew her not till she had brought forth her son: her firstborn; and he called his name Jesus.

 

[NetChaplain]

It would be interesting to know where this list is from and the purpose behind listing it. I don't think you really want to open this can of worms and get into deep textual criticism.

Just a single example using Matthew 1:25 stating that modern translations are missing a partial phrase. Actually, the King James Version is also missing a partial phrase in this verse. As is evident from examining the Textus Receptus:
Matthew 1:25

It should have been translated as:
And knew her not till she had brought forth her son: her firstborn; and he called his name Jesus.

The RT, Antiochian, Beza, Stephens and Majority Text all contextually compliment one another and mostly agree. Unlike the three in the primary (Vaticanus, Sinaticus, Alexandrinus) Critical Text, all in disagreement with one one another, esp. the Alexandrinus with the problems in the Gospels (missing 1 Sam 12:17–14:9 (1 leaf); Ps 49:20–79:11 (9 leaves); Matt 1:1-25:6 (26 leaves); John 6:50-8:52 (2 leaves); and the inclusion of noncanonical books (1 Clement 57:7-63 (1 leaf) and 2 Clement 12:5a-fin. (2 leaves).

They do not even use the Alexandrinus codex because of much on omissions. The entire Alexandrian text base codices are corrupt, mixing truth with much error of the Gnostics, who do not even believe the Lord Jesus is deity.

Appreciate your reply and God bless!

 

[EclipseEventSigns]

The RT, Antiochian, Beza, Stephens and Majority Text all contextually compliment one another and mostly agree. Unlike the three in the primary (Vaticanus, Sinaticus, Alexandrinus) Critical Text, all in disagreement with one one another, esp. the Alexandrinus with the problems in the Gospels (missing 1 Sam 12:17–14:9 (1 leaf); Ps 49:20–79:11 (9 leaves); Matt 1:1-25:6 (26 leaves); John 6:50-8:52 (2 leaves); and the inclusion of noncanonical books (1 Clement 57:7-63 (1 leaf) and 2 Clement 12:5a-fin. (2 leaves).

They do not even use the Alexandrinus codex because of much on omissions. The entire Alexandrian text base codices are corrupt, mixing truth with much error of the Gnostics, who do not even believe the Lord Jesus is deity.

Appreciate your reply and God bless!

But again, what is the source of the list you pasted. You came up with that list yourself?
You'd better be careful if you are somehow claiming the inclusion of apocryphal and noncanonical books is some sign of corruption. The 1611 King James Version contained these noncanonical books as well.
I notice that you did not address the fact that the KJV did not translate the Textus Receptus accurately or completely in my example. Which by the way, the Aramaic Peshitta has it correct and complete.
Matthew 1:25 Peshitta

 

[civic]

But again, what is the source of the list you pasted. You came up with that list yourself?
You'd better be careful if you are somehow claiming the inclusion of apocryphal and noncanonical books is some sign of corruption. The 1611 King James Version contained these noncanonical books as well.
I notice that you did not address the fact that the KJV did not translate the Textus Receptus accurately or completely in my example.

Yes curious minds would like to know.

 

[Fred]

omitted Bible phrases

Acts 7:20
NASB: It was at this time that Moses was born; and he was lovely in the sight of God, and he was nurtured three months in his father’s home.
KJV: In which time Moses was born, and was exceeding fair, and nourished up in his father's house three months
Question: Why is "in the sight of God" removed from the KJV when in the Greek text "God" (θεῷ) appears?

Acts 16:7
NASB: and after they came to Mysia, they were trying to go into Bithynia, and the Spirit of Jesus did not permit them
KJV: After they were come to Mysia, they assayed to go into Bithynia: but the Spirit suffered them not.
Question: Why is "of Jesus" removed from the KJV?

Acts 24:24
NASB: But some days later Felix arrived with Drusilla, his wife who was a Jewess, and sent for Paul and heard him speak about faith in Christ Jesus.
KJV: And after certain days, when Felix came with his wife Drusilla, which was a Jewess, he sent for Paul, and heard him concerning the faith in Christ.
Question: Why is "Jesus" removed from the KJV?

Romans 8:11
NASB: But if the Spirit of Him who raised Jesus from the dead dwells in you, He who raised Christ Jesus from the dead will also give life to your mortal bodies through His Spirit who dwells in you.
KJV: But if the Spirit of him that raised up Jesus from the dead dwell in you, he that raised up Christ from the dead shall also quicken your mortal bodies by his Spirit that dwelleth in you.
Question: Why is the second usage of "Jesus" removed from the KJV?

Romans 11:22
NASB: Behold then the kindness and severity of God; to those who fell, severity, but to you, God's kindness, if you continue in His kindness; otherwise you also will be cut off.
KJV: Behold therefore the goodness and severity of God: on them which fell, severity; but toward thee, goodness, if thou continue in his goodness: otherwise thou also shalt be cut off.
Question: Why is "God's" removed from the KJV?

1 Corinthians 1:29
NASB: so that no man may boast before God.
KJV: That no flesh should glory in his presence.
Question: Why is "God" removed and replaced with a "his" instead?

1 Corinthians 6:11
NASB: Such were some of you; but you were washed, but you were sanctified, but you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and in the Spirit of our God.
KJV: And such were some of you: but ye are washed, but ye are sanctified, but ye are justified in the name of the Lord Jesus, and by the Spirit of our God.
Question: Why is "Christ" removed from the KJV?

Galatians 5:24
NASB: Now those who belong to Christ Jesus have crucified the flesh with its passions and desires.
KJV: And they that are Christ's have crucified the flesh with the affections and lusts.
Question: Why is "Jesus" removed from the KJV?

Ephesians 3:6
NASB: to be specific, that the Gentiles are fellow heirs and fellow members of the body, and fellow partakers of the promise in Christ Jesus through the gospel.
KJV: That the Gentiles should be fellowheirs, and of the same body, and partakers of his promise in Christ by the gospel.
Question: Why is "Jesus" removed from the KJV?

James 4:12
NASB: There is only one Lawgiver and Judge, the One who is able to save and to destroy; but who are you who judge your neighbor?
KJV: There is one lawgiver, who is able to save and to destroy: who art thou that judgest another?
Question: Why is "and Judge" removed from the KJV?

1 Peter 2:2
NASB: like newborn babies, long for the pure milk of the word, so that by it you may grow in respect to salvation
KJV: As newborn babes, desire the sincere milk of the word, that ye may grow thereby
Question: Why is "in respect to salvation" removed from the KJV?

Revelation 3:2
NASB: Wake up, and strengthen the things that remain, which were about to die; for I have not found your deeds completed in the sight of My God.
KJV: Be watchful, and strengthen the things which remain, that are ready to die: for I have not found thy works perfect before God.
Question: Why is "My" removed from the KJV?

Revelation 4:11
NASB: Worthy are You, our Lord and our God, to receive glory and honor and power; for You created all things, and because of Your will they existed, and were created.
KJV: Thou art worthy, O Lord, to receive glory and honour and power: for thou hast created all things, and for thy pleasure they are and were created.
Question: Why is "and our God" removed from the KJV?

Revelation 14:1
NASB: Then I looked, and behold, the Lamb was standing on Mount Zion, and with Him one hundred and forty-four thousand, having His name and the name of His Father written on their foreheads.
KJV: And I looked, and, lo, a Lamb stood on the mount Sion, and with him an hundred forty and four thousand, having his Father's name written in their foreheads.
Question: Why is "His name" (in reference to the Son) removed from the KJV?



Where are the "omitted Bible phrases" from your list in the following passages?
Acts 15:37 NASB
Barnabas wanted to take John, called Mark, along with them also.
Acts 15:37 KJV
And Barnabas determined to take with them John, whose surname was Mark.

Colossians 3:6 NASB
For it is because of these things that the wrath of God will come upon the sons of disobedience
Colossians 3:6 KJV
For which things' sake the wrath of God cometh on the children of disobedience

1 John 4:9 NASB
By this the love of God was manifested in us, that God has sent His only begotten Son into the world so that we might live through Him.
1 John 4:9 KJV
In this was manifested the love of God toward us, because that God sent his only begotten Son into the world, that we might live through him.



In terms of Jude 25 from your list:
If you think this is an example because the KJV has the word "wise" then I can also use this very same passage and say the KJV removed "through Jesus Christ our Lord".
KJV
To the only wise God our Saviour, be glory and majesty, dominion and power, both now and ever. Amen.

NASB
to the only God our Savior, through Jesus Christ our Lord, be glory, majesty, dominion and authority, before all time and now and forever. Amen.

 

[Diserner]

And how many of the so-called omissions are redundancies?

Do you even know?

 

[Fred]

Both the NASB and the KJV clearly present the Deity of the Lord Jesus Christ, but I think the NASB is better.

John 14:14
NASB: If you ask Me anything in My name, I will do it.
KJV: If ye shall ask any thing in my name, I will do it.
My comment: Since only God is the proper recipient of prayer demonstrates the Lord Jesus is God.

Ephesians 5:21
NASB: and be subject to one another in the fear of Christ.
KJV: Submitting yourselves one to another in the fear of God.
My comment: To fear the Lord involves worshiping the Lord (cf. (Deuteronomy 6:13). Since the Lord Jesus is to be 'feared' (cf. Acts 9:31; 2 Corinthians 5:11) demonstrates that He is to be worshiped. And since only God is to be worshiped demonstrates the Lord Jesus is God.

Colossians 3:22
NASB: Slaves, in all things obey those who are your masters on earth, not with external service, as those who merely please men, but with sincerity of heart, fearing the Lord.
KJV: Servants, obey in all things your masters according to the flesh; not with eyeservice, as menpleasers; but in singleness of heart, fearing God
My comment: See Ephesians 5:21 above. The 'Lord' in Colossians 3:22 refers to the Lord Jesus (vv. 23-24)

Titus 2:13
NASB: looking for the blessed hope and the appearing of the glory of our great God and Savior, Jesus Christ
KJV: Looking for that blessed hope, and the glorious appearing of the great God and our Saviour Jesus Christ
My comment: The NASB more clearly refers to Jesus as being "God" than the KJV.

1 Peter 3:15
NASB: but sanctify Christ as Lord in your hearts, always being ready to make a defense to everyone who asks you to give an account for the hope that is in you, yet with gentleness and reverence.
KJV: But sanctify the Lord God in your hearts: and be ready always t ogive an answer to every man that asketh you a reason of the hope that is in you with meekness and fear.
My comment: The same Greek word for "sanctify" ("hallowed" in the KJV) is used in reference to prayer to the Father in Matthew 6:9.
Thus, the Lord Jesus is equally the proper recipient of prayer.
Furthermore, Peter quotes Isaiah 8:13 and applies the Lord (YHWH) from that text in reference to Jesus here.
Thus, proving Jesus is YHWH.

2 Peter 1:1
NASB: Simon Peter, a bond-servant and apostle of Jesus Christ, To those who have received a faith of the same kind as ours, by the righteousness of our God and Savior, Jesus Christ
KJV: Simon Peter, a servant and an apostle of Jesus Christ, to them that have obtained like precious faith with us through the righteousness of God and our Saviour Jesus Christ
My comment: The NASB more clearly refers to Jesus as being "God" than the KJV.

Jude 4
NASB: For certain persons have crept in unnoticed, those who were long beforehand marked out for this condemnation, ungodly persons who turn the grace of our God into licentiousness and deny our only Master and Lord, Jesus Christ.
KJV: For there are certain men crept in unawares, who were before of old ordained to this condemnation, ungodly men, turning the grace of our God into lasciviousness, and denying the only Lord God, and our Lord Jesus Christ.
My comment: The NASB correctly applies "Master" (from the Greek word, despotēs) in reference to the Lord Jesus. The KJV does not. This is a powerful proof that Jesus is God, since the "Master" of every Christian is in reference to Jesus (Jude 4) in equality with that of the Father (cf. Acts 4:24).

Revelation 14:1
NASB: Then I looked, and behold, the Lamb was standing on Mount Zion, and with Him one hundred and forty-four thousand, having His name and the name of His Father written on their foreheads.
KJV: And I looked, and, lo, a Lamb stood on the mount Sion, and with him an hundred forty and four thousand, having his Father's name written in their foreheads.
My comment: Since the name of the Lamb will be on their foreheads is a much stronger proof that the Lord Jesus is the proper recipient of latreuō in Revelation 22:3 (cf. 'His name' in Revelation 22:4). This is very important concerning the Deity of the Lord Jesus, because latreuō is properly due unto God alone (Matthew 4:10; Luke 4:8).

 

[NetChaplain]

Both the NASB and the KJV clearly present the Deity of the Lord Jesus Christ, but I think the NASB is better.

Still missing the passages the Traditional Text has! These modern translations have to mix truth with error, it's Satan's mo. "Yea hath God said" (Gen 3:1). It must be all the truth (plenary), and also nothing but truth (omissions fail the truth (Mt 4:4), and so do interpolations and transpositions!

 

[Fred]

Still missing the passages the Traditional Text has! These modern translations have to mix truth with error, it's Satan's mo. "Yea hath God said" (Gen 3:1). It must be all the truth (plenary), and also nothing but truth (omissions fail the truth (Mt 4:4), and so do interpolations and transpositions!

You asserted this in post 5:
The entire Alexandrian text base codices are corrupt, mixing truth with much error of the Gnostics, who do not even believe the Lord Jesus is deity.


And yet the NASB, even better than the KJV, teaches the Deity of Christ.

 

[EclipseEventSigns]

Still missing the passages the Traditional Text has! These modern translations have to mix truth with error, it's Satan's mo. "Yea hath God said" (Gen 3:1). It must be all the truth (plenary), and also nothing but truth (omissions fail the truth (Mt 4:4), and so do interpolations and transpositions!

Be VERY careful assigning this issue with Satan's work. That is on the edge of blaspheming the Word of God. You may have issues with things but you should not paint something you disagree with as Satanic. You might not know what you don't know.

 

[NetChaplain]

And how many of the so-called omissions are redundancies?

Do you even know?

Hi, and I like your question, very searching! I suppose one can consider repeating information redundant, but not with the Word. Scripture often repeats itself for encouragement; for the more Word you see, the more encouraged you'll be. The greatest offense is detracting from the Word. No translation is perfect in content, but God's Word is complete within the translation, if it's all there (Mat 4:4); and this is the worse failure all of these modern translations, which are the omissions, besides their interpolations and transpositions, which results in a different thought other than the original expression.

Many it not most don't read much of the Word anyway, and it's my belief that the Body of Christ will be at its lowest maturity when He gets here; but that's ok because He expected such, and He will bring all up to par!!

 

[NetChaplain]

Be VERY careful assigning this issue with Satan's work. That is on the edge of blaspheming the Word of God. You may have issues with things but you should not paint something you disagree with as Satanic. You might not know what you don't know.

You're not offending God when sharing what you think is truth. To offend it must be intentional, not out of ignorance. If we don't find truth, it's only because we're not genuinely seeking it ("seek and ye shall find").

 

[EclipseEventSigns]

You're not offending God when sharing what you think is truth. To offend it must be intentional, not out of ignorance. If we don't find truth, it's only because we're not genuinely seeking it ("seek and ye shall find").

Read your posts again. You assign Satan as the author of "modern translations". That is your intentional statement. That is why you should be careful because you might just find out that the KJV translators are the ones who have been in error all these centuries.

 

[NetChaplain]

You asserted this in post 5:
The entire Alexandrian text base codices are corrupt, mixing truth with much error of the Gnostics, who do not even believe the Lord Jesus is deity.


And yet the NASB, even better than the KJV, teaches the Deity of Christ.

Every time the Word makes a declaration concerning Christ's deity, it should be present. All the modern translations omit the phrase "who is in heaven" which is in the Traditional Text at John 3:13. This confirms His deity as being omnipresent, in heaven while on earth.

Often the errors seem negligible, but it's never a small thing to detract from God's word! Christians aren't wrong in using the wrong translation, they just won't grow like they should. Satan knows he can't effect one's salvation, he knows it's permanent; but he can delay one's growth so God can't use him like He wants to.

If you put a frog in boiling water it will jump out. But it won't jump out if the water is good and warm; then you can slowly turn up the heat and it will stay in, even to the point of boiling it alive.

 

[EclipseEventSigns]

Every time the Word makes a declaration concerning Christ's deity, it should be present. All the modern translations omit the phrase "who is in heaven" which is in the Traditional Text at John 3:13. This confirms His deity as being omnipresent, in heaven while on earth.

Often the errors seem negligible, but it's never a small thing to detract from God's word! Christians aren't wrong in using the wrong translation, they just won't grow like they should. Satan knows he can't effect one's salvation, he knows it's permanent; but he can delay one's growth so God can't use him like He wants to.

If you put a frog in boiling water it will jump out. But it won't jump out if the water is good and warm; then you can slowly turn up the heat and it will stay in, even to the point of boiling it alive.

Please confirm that you understand the concept behind textual criticism. It would seem from your comments, that this is something which which you are not familiar. You keep repeating your same arguments over and over without addressing the comments which refute them.

 

[NetChaplain]

Please confirm that you understand the concept behind textual criticism. It would seem from your comments, that this is something which which you are not familiar. You keep repeating your same arguments over and over without addressing the comments which refute them.

I suppose you are not reading my posts correctly.

 

[Fred]

Every time the Word makes a declaration concerning Christ's deity, it should be present. All the modern translations omit the phrase "who is in heaven" which is in the Traditional Text at John 3:13. This confirms His deity as being omnipresent, in heaven while on earth.

I supplied several examples.
You gave only one in your response here.

Not even close.