civic
Active Member
so only unitarians are saved in your belief system ?I agree. I will be here if you change your mind. See you around.
so only unitarians are saved in your belief system ?I agree. I will be here if you change your mind. See you around.
It's a rhetorical question. Jesus knew He is God in human form.It has been recorded that Jesus denied that he is God in the verses below from the KJV:
Matthew 1917 And he said unto him, Why callest thou me good? there is none good but one, that is, God: but if thou wilt enter into life, keep the commandments.Mark 1018 And Jesus said unto him, Why callest thou me good? there is none good but one, that is, God.Luke 1819 And Jesus said unto him, Why callest thou me good? none is good, save one, that is, God.
Based on the above Scripture, we can find the following information:
Jesus rhetorically questions why he is being called "good" and says that only God is good. This means that Jesus is distinguishing himself from God and that absolute goodness belongs exclusively to God. In saying this, Jesus denies that he possesses the absolute goodness that God has.
This distinction that Jesus pointed out between himself and God is evident in his rhetorical question about why he is being called good. If Jesus were God, then it would not be consistent for him to deny being called good and thus deny having this divine attribute of God.
Since Jesus denied having the absolute goodness of God, Jesus strongly inferred that he is just a teacher and a prophet. In John 8:28, Jesus stated, "I do nothing of myself; but as my Father hath taught me, I speak these things." Therefore, Jesus was himself taught by his God and Father. Needing to be taught by God means that Jesus is not omniscient and didn't inherently know the things he himself was teaching until he was taught.
Therefore, Jesus denied being God.
That's for God to decide but there is nothing about believing in the trinity as part of the gospel. In scripture, your teachings are not recognizable as what Jesus or the disciples said leads to salvation.so only unitarians are saved in your belief system ?
Cherry pick all you want from Jimmy's translation..... you always ignore the following when I bring it up to you.It has been recorded that Jesus denied that he is God in the verses below from the KJV:
Matthew 1917 And he said unto him, Why callest thou me good? there is none good but one, that is, God: but if thou wilt enter into life, keep the commandments.Mark 1018 And Jesus said unto him, Why callest thou me good? there is none good but one, that is, God.Luke 1819 And Jesus said unto him, Why callest thou me good? none is good, save one, that is, God.
Based on the above Scripture, we can find the following information:
Jesus rhetorically questions why he is being called "good" and says that only God is good. This means that Jesus is distinguishing himself from God and that absolute goodness belongs exclusively to God. In saying this, Jesus denies that he possesses the absolute goodness that God has.
This distinction that Jesus pointed out between himself and God is evident in his rhetorical question about why he is being called good. If Jesus were God, then it would not be consistent for him to deny being called good and thus deny having this divine attribute of God.
Since Jesus denied having the absolute goodness of God, Jesus strongly inferred that he is just a teacher and a prophet. In John 8:28, Jesus stated, "I do nothing of myself; but as my Father hath taught me, I speak these things." Therefore, Jesus was himself taught by his God and Father. Needing to be taught by God means that Jesus is not omniscient and didn't inherently know the things he himself was teaching until he was taught.
Therefore, Jesus denied being God.
Jesus said salvation is going in Him and He is the Savior if all men. By default that makes Him God since God declared in the OT many times He alone is the Savior and Lord but in the NT it’s Christ alone who is Savior/ Lord.That's for God to decide but there is nothing about believing in the trinity as part of the gospel. In scripture, your teachings are not recognizable as what Jesus or the disciples said leads to salvation.
Not according to Scripture.It's a rhetorical question. Jesus knew He is God in human form.
No he didn't.Jesus claimed to be God in John 10:30
They had already been seeing Jesus for awhile up until this point when Jesus said in John 14:7 "If you had known Me, you would know My Father as well. From now on you do know Him and have seen Him.”when He said, “I and the Father are one.” He repeated this claim on the night of His betrayal when He told Philip, “If you’ve seen me you have seen the Father” (John 14:9).
That doesn't mention Jesus' name.John said that Jesus is God in the first verse of his Gospel, calling Jesus “the Word”.
In the beginning was the Word and the Word was with God, and the Word was God (John 1:1).
1 John 1:1-2 says the Word of life is an it. John 1:14 is about something that changed from one state to another, i.e., the word "became" flesh. This isn't the same idea as an incarnation. The word incarnation isn't in Scripture.To verify that he was talking about Jesus, he said, “The Word became flesh and made His dwelling among us. We have seen his glory, the glory of the One and Only, who came from the Father, full of grace and truth” (John 1:14).
This proves that Jesus isn't God. Verse 15 calls him the "image of the invisible God" and yet 1 Timothy 1:17 says the invisible God is the only God. Since Jesus isn't the invisible God then he isn't God.Paul agreed with John. In Colossians 1:15-16 he wrote;
The Son is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation. For by him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things were created by him and for him.
This proves Jesus is not the Creator. The Creator created through Jesus, not Jesus doing the creating. Furthermore, Hebrews 1:1-3 says the God did not speak through the Son until these last days. Therefore speaking through the Son is not a way God spoke in the past. God spoke in the past through the prophets. When God spoke to create the universe in the past it wasn't through Jesus and the universe was not created "in these last days."The writer to the Hebrews essentially said the same thing in Hebrews 1:2-3, calling Jesus the one through whom God made the universe, the radiance of God’s glory and the exact representation of His being.
This is quoted from Psalm 45:6 where in the original context the one it was talking about had a queen. God or Jesus don't have a queen. This is originally referring to a human king, most likely Solomon, and the Psalmist was not referring to Solomon as Lord God Almighty. When the writer transferred Psalm 45:6 to Jesus in Hebrews 1:8, it doesn't transfer that Jesus is God. It is most likely a bad translation, but I will accept Jesus is a little god with strong emphasis on the lower case g.God Himself agreed with this in Hebrews 1:8. Speaking of His Son He said. “Your throne, O God, will last for ever and ever; a scepter of justice will be the scepter of your kingdom.”
This isn't Jesus talking. Him "which is, and which was, and which is to come"in Rev. 1:8 is only mentioned in Revelation 1:4 in distinction from Jesus in Rev. 1:5. I also might add, most modern Bible do not make the words of Revelation 1:8 red letters. Therefore Jesus isn't the Almighty in Revelation 1:8.Finally, In Revelation 1:8, God said, “I am the Alpha and the Omega” and in Rev. 22:13, Jesus said, “I am the Alpha and the Omega.” The only way this could be true of both is if they are one and the same.
Not many people are convinced by what you presented. In my evangelism I have found more people convert to the Unitarian perspective of God because it's easy to understand, scriptural, and easy to digest that a human isn't God, but rather a man through whom God chose, anointed, empowered, and worked through.In these verses the Bible makes a convincing case for the fact that Jesus is God in human form.
The Bible's Authority Archives – Grace thru faith
gracethrufaith.com
I wouldn't use the false accusations of Jesus' enemies for the basis of your doctrines. It's telling that you need to quote Jesus' enemies and what they said rather than anything Jesus said.Cherry pick all you want from Jimmy's translation..... you always ignore the following when I bring it up to you.
Jimmy also has this....
John 10:
30 “I and My Father are one.”
Said convincingly enough that
31 Then the Jews took up stones again to stone him.
32 Jesus answered them, Many good works have I shewed you from my Father; for which of those works do ye stone me?
33 The Jews answered him, saying, For a good work we stone thee not; but for blasphemy; and because that thou, being a man, makest thyself God.
Jesus said salvation is going in Him and He is the Savior if all men. By default that makes Him God since God declared in the OT many times He alone is the Savior and Lord but in the NT it’s Christ alone who is Savior/ Lord.
Down goes your theology in one post on this forum
nope He has always been Savior/Lord- HE is the LORD of GLORY who is called our Great God and Savior.According to Jesus, the Father granted him the authority to give eternal life. Down goes your theology with just one verse from the Bible.
John 17
2For You granted Him authority over all people, so that He may give eternal life to all those You have given Him.
Not according to Scripture. Acts says God made Jesus Lord and Christ. Means he was made Lord and Christ at some point when previous he wasn't.nope He has always been Savior/Lord- HE is the LORD of GLORY who is called our Great God and Savior.
Sorry 1 Cor was written a decade before Acts. Paul called Him the Lord of Glory.Not according to Scripture. Acts says God made Jesus Lord and Christ. Means he was made Lord and Christ at some point when previous he wasn't.
Acts 2
36Therefore let all Israel know with certainty that God has made this Jesus, whom you crucified, both Lord and Christ!”
He pre exists His birth as a man whom after the resurrection declared Him Lord.Not according to Scripture. Acts says God made Jesus Lord and Christ. Means he was made Lord and Christ at some point when previous he wasn't.
Acts 2
36Therefore let all Israel know with certainty that God has made this Jesus, whom you crucified, both Lord and Christ!”
Jesus claimed to be God in John 10:30
Runningman
No he didn't.
Acts occurs before 1 Corinthians chronologically.Sorry 1 Cor was written a decade before Acts. Paul called Him the Lord of Glory.
next fallacy
Refers to unity in the same Spirit with God and Jesus prayed for his disciples to have it in John 17:21-22. This is the very same thing we can have. Most people do not understand that Jesus was simply showing us what is attainable for the child of God. He was the first, there will be many with him.
So are you claiming Jesus was not good?It has been recorded that Jesus denied that he is God in the verses below from the KJV:
Matthew 1917 And he said unto him, Why callest thou me good? there is none good but one, that is, God: but if thou wilt enter into life, keep the commandments.Mark 1018 And Jesus said unto him, Why callest thou me good? there is none good but one, that is, God.Luke 1819 And Jesus said unto him, Why callest thou me good? none is good, save one, that is, God.
Based on the above Scripture, we can find the following information:
Jesus rhetorically questions why he is being called "good" and says that only God is good. This means that Jesus is distinguishing himself from God and that absolute goodness belongs exclusively to God. In saying this, Jesus denies that he possesses the absolute goodness that God has.
This distinction that Jesus pointed out between himself and God is evident in his rhetorical question about why he is being called good. If Jesus were God, then it would not be consistent for him to deny being called good and thus deny having this divine attribute of God.
Since Jesus denied having the absolute goodness of God, Jesus strongly inferred that he is just a teacher and a prophet. In John 8:28, Jesus stated, "I do nothing of myself; but as my Father hath taught me, I speak these things." Therefore, Jesus was himself taught by his God and Father. Needing to be taught by God means that Jesus is not omniscient and didn't inherently know the things he himself was teaching until he was taught.
Therefore, Jesus denied being God.
Nope it was written 10 years laterActs occurs before 1 Corinthians chronologically.
Next fallacy.