Isaiah 53:10 and the LXX

[Dizerner]

Take their position. There are far too many efforts/writings such as this to deal with them all.

Quote them. I have no desire to read their writings on a subject I know from the sources.

This sounds a bit lazy honestly.

 

[praise_yeshua]

This sounds a bit lazy honestly.

Lazy? You have the PDF and claim you know the work. Copy. Paste.

What effort does that take. Since you know the topic so well, it should right at your "fingertips".

I don't have accept your authors of choice. I care about details.

 

[praise_yeshua]

It's not the first video I've watched on Hebrew and Aramaic, friend...

You haven't defended any of your positions with that knowledge.

 

[Dizerner]

Lazy? You have the PDF and claim you know the work. Copy. Paste.

What effort does that take. Since you know the topic so well, it should right at your "fingertips".

I don't have accept your authors of choice. I care about details.

Here, if you want a condensed version on a website, this is fairly well done:

List of 300 Old Testament quotes in New Testament

www.bible.ca

 

[Dizerner]

You haven't defended any of your positions with that knowledge.

I don't know exactly what you mean, but it feels like you are taking random potshots in the dark at unrelated things.

Seems strange.

 

[praise_yeshua]

Here, if you want a condensed version on a website, this is fairly well done:

List of 300 Old Testament quotes in New Testament

www.bible.ca

You maybe on your phone or whatever... but I'm not going to accept that as evidence. Choose 5 that can only possibly come from the MT and stick around for the details.

 

[praise_yeshua]

I don't know exactly what you mean, but it feels like you are taking random potshots in the dark at unrelated things.

Seems strange.

As you did with your 300 verse link.... You simply point to something and never defend it yourself.

 

[Dizerner]

You maybe on your phone or whatever... but I'm not going to accept that as evidence. Choose 5 that can only possibly come from the MT and stick around for the details.

Are you after winning some kind of argument, or increasing your knowledge.

Seems like only one of them.

This seems to be something like what you are after:

The Septuagint in the New Testament

web.archive.org

 

[Dizerner]

As you did with your 300 verse link.... You simply point to something and never defend it yourself.

False equivalence fallacy.

Hey, if you just want "to win," congrats, buddy!

You win!

Hope you feel better.

 

[praise_yeshua]

Are you after winning some kind of argument, or increasing your knowledge.

Seems like only one of them.

This seems to be something like what you are after:

View attachment 408

The Septuagint in the New Testament

web.archive.org

Again. References to other people's work that you haven't vetted yourself. You've done this over and over again now.

Commit to a claim with details and defend it.

 

[praise_yeshua]

False equivalence fallacy.

Hey, if you just want "to win," congrats, buddy!

You win!

Hope you feel better.

I want details from YOU. Not someone else. FROM YOU. Make the argument your own.

You don't know the time I've wasted in my life dealing with references like you're using.... to only have that person deny they believe what they posted as evidence.

You can mock all you want. Go for it. It is not about winning for me. It is about the Truth. Evil sometimes wins.

 

[praise_yeshua]

Are you after winning some kind of argument, or increasing your knowledge.

Seems like only one of them.

This seems to be something like what you are after:

View attachment 408

The Septuagint in the New Testament

web.archive.org

I'm going to "bite" just once and ask a very simple question.....

What was their criteria for establishing their conclusion? Did they base it solely on grammar? literal representation, script matching or what?

 

[praise_yeshua]

LOL. The irony is thick with this one.

I thought I was on ignore? That only works when you don't want to respond.... right?

 

[Dizerner]

I'm going to "bite" just once and ask a very simple question.....

What was their criteria for establishing their conclusion? Did they base it solely on grammar? literal representation, script matching or what?

There's a link attached.

 

[praise_yeshua]

LOL. The irony is thick with this one.

Do you include the Diatessaron in your Peshitta?

 

[praise_yeshua]

There's a link attached.

You can copy and paste what you believe to be relevant. I'm not going to read through it to find it. I looked at the details of some of their references. I at least did that. I'm not going any further till you make a choice to claim what they've said by making it your own.

 

[EclipseEventSigns]

I thought I was on ignore? That only works when you don't want to respond.... right?

Don't worry, nothing you write is important.

 

[praise_yeshua]

Don't worry, nothing you write is important.

Do you include the Diatessaron in your Peshitta?

 

[Dizerner]

Commit to a claim with details and defend it.

Okay, let's go one at a time.

You tell me, which do think think this quotation favors:

 

[The Rogue Tomato]

How about this?

Psalm 68:18
18 You have ascended on high,
You have led captivity captive;
You have received gifts among men,

Eph 4:8
“When He ascended on high,
He led captivity captive,
And gave gifts to men.”

And those are both English.

Septuagint Psalm 68:18
Thou art gone up on high,
thou hast led captivity captive,
thou hast received gifts for man

Seems to me the Septuagint matches more closely what Paul said in Ephesians.​