High Christology in Gal 3:19-20

[mikesw]

I show that Paul had a High Christology contribution in Gal 3:19-20. The verse only makes sense when the promise from God to Christ cannot have a mediator since a mediator is not of one. Christ and God are one in the godhead. See the summary explanation in the Book of Galatians subheading here.

 

[Frank Russell]

Usually people say a passage has high Christology as an excuse to not listen to the verse. i.e. someone other than Paul wrote it.

 

[mikesw]

Usually people say a passage has high Christology as an excuse to not listen to the verse. i.e. someone other than Paul wrote it.

I'm not aware of anyone writing Paul's letters but himself. Where does that unexpected concept originate? The scholars pretty much recognize Galatians as authentically Paul's writing. It would be hard to imagine that someone else wrote this riddled passage to convey the divinity of Christ. So, the normal option is to say Paul wrote it.

 

[Frank Russell]

I'm not aware of anyone writing Paul's letters but himself. Where does that unexpected concept originate? The scholars pretty much recognize Galatians as authentically Paul's writing. It would be hard to imagine that someone else wrote this riddled passage to convey the divinity of Christ. So, the normal option is to say Paul wrote it.

The unexpected concept is common of textual criticism. Thank you for clarifying.

 

[mikesw]

The unexpected concept is common of textual criticism. Thank you for clarifying.

But that does not make your view correct. It has to fit with Paul's style. Do you have anything to support your hypothesis?

 

[Frank Russell]

But that does not make your view correct. It has to fit with Paul's style. Do you have anything to support your hypothesis?

It's not my view. It's an observation of what that tends to mean when people say "High Christology"

 

[mikesw]

It's not my view. It's an observation of what that tends to mean when people say "High Christology"

I'm not sure what that has to do with my point. I don't try to follow the reasoning of other people who say something about High Christology. You are simply making a hypothetical objection.