praise_yeshua
Well-known member
I didn't claim that he invented the concept, but that he coined the phrase. So I was curious, do you think that that Luther's position that an idle faith is not a justifying faith is in accordance with or in rejection of Sola Fide?
That is how you "treated" the phrase in your comments. You can't judge actual history
Luther started out well but bowed to peer pressure. Much like you're doing now. My faith doesn't stand in your approval of me. Luther lost that later in his life. He had significant pressure from many Calvinists during his time to embrace what they believed about the writing of James. He folded.
Others consider it canonical, which is why it is included in Catholic and Protestant Bibles. In any case, the Bible does not directly state that we are justified by faith alone.
I don't care what Catholics ultimately choose to do. I make my own choices. I'll answer to God for those choices but I will not answer to YOU. It is small thing for me to be judged by you.... Do you remember those words? Did James tell you those words. James didn't understand those words.
I'll be glad to discuss the canon with you. I started a thread hoping that several would join the discussion. You didn't. I know the details. I've debated it for years. I rejected James as a young man. I'm much older now and nothing has changed my mind. Feel free to try.
Repentance is inherently an act of faith and it is by that faith that God is pleased. The Jews who sought to murder Jesus also ate food and breathed air, so you might want to be careful with doing that. The issue of whether we should repent from our sins is not the same as believing whether Jesus is the Messiah.
You have not denied that you believe repentance is embracing your potential. You're blatantly ignoring what I said. What a silly comparison. I dealt with what they believed. Not what they are or breathed. What are you going to use next in defense? The sky blue and the grass is green?
You're dead wrong. Repentance can not happen until a person expresses faith. Your mind can not see yourself for what you truly are without the Spirit of God. Repentance is granted. You don't earn repentance. Repentance is not embracing your potential to keep the law... you can't keep the law. None of your ancestors have. You're not any better than them.
You are blatantly taking that of out context. The fact that he said that the people he was speaking to have not obeyed the law does not mean that he was saying that no one has kept it. Moreover, notice that he connected those who have uncircumcised hearts and who resist the Spirit with not keeping God's law.
If someone has keep the law, then Christ died in vain. Your own requirement dictates this. You believe that man is capable of keeping the law. Contrary to you OWN ACTIONS IN BREAKING THE LAW, you believe you are capable of keeping the law. Which is being divorced from reality.
Pray tell. Who has keep the law? Till you produce someone that has, all you have is an opinion. A hypothesis rooted in an unidentified anomaly.
God is gracious to us by teaching us to obey His law (Psalms 119:29-30, Exodus 33:13, Genesis 6:8-9, Romans 1:5, Titus 2:11-14), yet you resist His grace while telling me that I need it.
And here once again... on full display... is you dishonoring Jesus Christ.
Joh 1:17 For the law was given by Moses, but grace and truth came by Jesus Christ.
Thank God for the Scriptures. Through the Scriptures we can recognize your mistake. You dishonor Christ by destroying His rightful place and actions of bring Grace to humanity.