civic
Well-known member
adams sin brought death , destruction and decay to the entire creation.Romans 5:12 is speaking of spiritual, not physical death. Babies die even though it is not possible for them to commit trespasses and sins.
adams sin brought death , destruction and decay to the entire creation.Romans 5:12 is speaking of spiritual, not physical death. Babies die even though it is not possible for them to commit trespasses and sins.
I encourage you to present arguments in support of your position. Here is one from my side:
Trilobites went extinct about 250 million of years before man appeared. That is a long time, regardless of any margin or error in datation by any technique.
Therefore, there was death, and a lot of it, before Adam. It was not the result of sin.
View attachment 1178
Keep in mind that having death before sin also undermines the very gospel, where Jesus Christ stepped into history to conquer sin and death. In doing so, He graciously offered the free gift of salvation to all who receive him.It is better to trust in God, than to trust in man. (Psalm 118:8)
How, exactly, did that happen. Are you suggesting that God allowed someone else to completely disrupt His creation? Who was that someone else? Clearly Adam did not possess any such power. That leaves only Satan. Did God give that power to Satan?adams sin brought death , destruction and decay to the entire creation.
Okay.Death is a result of sin, Adams sin effected the entire creation
Romans 8How, exactly, did that happen. Are you suggesting that God allowed someone else to completely disrupt His creation? Who was that someone else? Clearly Adam did not possess any such power. That leaves only Satan. Did God give that power to Satan?
God created man, not controlled man ( as in calvinism, determinism causing man to sin ) . Gods foreknowledge knew the fall would occur and put things into place for the redemption of man.Okay.
Here is a question to consider.
If Death resulted from Adams sin... then was original intent to have man live forever?
If that was so then when did the idea come into being that a Savior (ieJesus) was going to be needed?
I do not think there is a right or wrong answer....
I was always told and understood that at some point before the Spirit was hovering over the waters that "the plan" was all laid out basically.
There are only 2 options I see and that is either His foreknowledge allowed God to know that Adam would disobey.... (just like Lucifer)
or in His predestined plan God wanted man to fall, so He could ultimately save some.
Either way, God could have stopped man from sinning. But he did not.
So apperently God either expected Adam to sin, threrby bringing death to all, or death to all was in His original intent.
Where am I wrong?
The Greek word that is translated as creation is ktisis. It can mean creation or creature. In this passage, the context is best accounted for with ktisis translated as creature, i.e, mankind, human beings. Translated as creation it makes no sense whatsoever. The only part of creation that "waits in eager expectation for the children of God to be revealed" are human beings. Not even the animals are capable of such; and certainly nothing of the brute creation, the planets, stars, mountains, etc. have any capacity for that.Romans 8
I consider that our present sufferings are not worth comparing with the glory that will be revealed in us. 19 For the creation waits in eager expectation for the children of God to be revealed. 20 For the creation was subjected to frustration, not by its own choice, but by the will of the one who subjected it, in hope 21 that[h] the creation itself will be liberated from its bondage to decay and brought into the freedom and glory of the children of God.
22 We know that the whole creation has been groaning as in the pains of childbirth right up to the present time. 23 Not only so, but we ourselves, who have the firstfruits of the Spirit, groan inwardly as we wait eagerly for our adoption to sonship, the redemption of our bodies. 24 For in this hope we were saved. But hope that is seen is no hope at all. Who hopes for what they already have? 25 But if we hope for what we do not yet have, we wait for it patiently.
Nope that’s false there was no death of anything prior to Adam’s sin. You bought into a lie.
Read Gen 3;19. That's where the physical death sentence (separation of body and soul) is explicitly pronounced on man. That is a fact. There is no getting away from that fact.No civic, you are the one who has bought into the lie. The fruit of the tree of life was there to keep Adam from living forever, i.e., to keep him from dying physically (Gen 3:22). Nothing in the whole of creation physically changed because Adam sinned.
The Resurrection of Christ neutralizes that argument.Nothing physically is eternal. Nothing physically is immortal.
These are the facts: the death that God pronounced for man in Gen 3:19 was a separation of body and soul. As for plant life, it will be less yielding in its fruits.11 And God said, Let the earth bring forth grass, the herb yielding seed, and the fruit tree yielding fruit after his kind, whose seed is in itself, upon the earth: and it was so.
12 And the earth brought forth grass, and herb yielding seed after his kind, and the tree yielding fruit, whose seed was in itself, after his kind: and God saw that it was good.
Are you really preaching to the world that the "seed" of a plant was never intended to "die" before a new life "after its kind" began? Were there no "Seasons" on earth, where plant life died, and was reborn in the spring through its seed? My goodness Civic, what website do you get these ideas from?
21 And God created great whales, and every living creature that moveth, which the waters brought forth abundantly, after their kind, and every winged fowl after his kind: and God saw that it was good. 22 And God blessed them, saying, Be fruitful, and multiply, and fill the waters in the seas, and let fowl multiply in the earth.
Are you really preaching that if Eve had not listened to the "other voice" in the garden that whales and all fish would just multiply but never die? That before Adam sinned, whales didn't eat krill, because that would kill Krill, and there was no death prior to Adam's sin? That grass never died, or was eaten by another animal?
That's out there even for you Civic.
And thorns were a result of sin and its effect on creation.These are the facts: the death that God pronounced for man in Gen 3:19 was a separation of body and soul. As for plant life, it will be less yielding in its fruits.
(Gen 3:19) In the sweat of your face you shall eat bread
Till you return to the ground,
For out of it you were taken;
For dust you are,
And to dust you shall return.”
I agree that a nature lifecycle does exist. Nevertheless, taking into consideration that the Garden of Eden was a Garden and not a Universe, there could have been physiological differences between the natural state of the Garden and the natural state of the Universe. That is pure speculation. I don't speculate as to the state of things before the Garden and the Fall as many are so eager to do.
Correct. People forget the fact that the Garden of Eden was a Garden where God was setting up a unique environment for this unique intriguing creature called Adam.And thorns were a result of sin and its effect on creation.
Exactly- and we know death is not good and everything God created was good.Correct. People forget the fact that the Garden of Eden was a Garden where God was setting up a unique environment for man.
Allah, on the other hand, glorifies death. Did you see how @Pancho Frijoles was singing the praises of death as a top student of the god of death called allah.Exactly- and we know death is not good and everything God created was good.
So it was not then was original intent to have man live forever.God created man, not controlled man ( as in calvinism, determinism causing man to sin ) . Gods foreknowledge knew the fall would occur and put things into place for the redemption of man.
These are the facts: the death that God pronounced for man in Gen 3:19 was a separation of body and soul. As for plant life, it will be less yielding in its fruits.
(Gen 3:19) In the sweat of your face you shall eat bread
Till you return to the ground,
For out of it you were taken;
For dust you are,
And to dust you shall return.”
I agree that a nature lifecycle does exist. Nevertheless, taking into consideration that the Garden of Eden was a Garden and not a Universe, there could have been physiological differences between the natural state of the Garden and the natural state of the Universe.
That is pure speculation. I don't speculate as to the state of things before the Garden and the Fall as many are so eager to do.
Pure humanism , Darwinism , secularism etc…….I appreciate your opinion here, and thanks for the reply. But the statement I was replying to was "there was no death of anything prior to Adam’s sin".
This is just foolishness to preach such a thing which requires "SEED" to continue the species.
So then, when you have toast for breakfast, does your face sweat? Or do you think this verse has a spiritual meaning that transcends the literal meaning of "sweat" and "bread"? I think God is speaking to us in parables here. But to each his own, Yes?
But wasn't Adam's flesh created from dirt before he sinned? This doesn't say that "BECAUSE" he sinned, his flesh shall return to the ground from which it was taken. Only that his LIFE would be more difficult "Till he returns to the ground" from which he was taken.
And the LORD God said, Behold, the man is become as one of us, to know good and evil: and now, lest he put forth his hand, and take also of the tree of life, and eat, and live for ever:
You guys are trying to promote the philosophy that Adam and Eves flesh was created to live forever until they sinned.
But that isn't what the Scriptures are saying at all. They never took of the tree of life, not before they had sinned anyway. I think these Scriptures mean something, even if they contradict popular religious philosophies of the garden God placed us in.
True, the earth is in the Universe, but so is the moon, and Mars. However, there is very little evidence that God created life on either one of these planets, even though they are in the same universe. But He did, on the planet he placed Adam and Eve in, which is the same planet God placed you and I in. Outside our atmosphere, there is no known evidence of a "natural state" of life at all. At least none that I am aware of. If you have evidence of such a thing, I would be interested in seeing it.
I don't have to speculate, I can simply read what is written, without injecting popular traditions or philosophies promoted by the many different religious sects and businesses in the world/garden that God placed me in.
Gen 3:16 proves that there was no human death (separation of body and soul) before Adam's sin. Do you agree?I appreciate your opinion here, and thanks for the reply. But the statement I was replying to was "there was no death of anything prior to Adam’s sin".
This is just foolishness to preach such a thing which requires "SEED" to continue the species.
I already explained how I interpreted that passage. I wrote: "as for plant life, it will be less yielding in its fruits". Since you didn't argue against it, it looks like you agree with me.So then, when you have toast for breakfast, does your face sweat? Or do you think this verse has a spiritual meaning that transcends the literal meaning of "sweat" and "bread"? I think God is speaking to us in parables here. But to each his own, Yes?
So why did God decree the separation of Adam's soul from his body at that specific moment of time? He just felt like doing that one day? Is that what you're saying?But wasn't Adam's flesh created from dirt before he sinned? This doesn't say that "BECAUSE" he sinned, his flesh shall return to the ground from which it was taken. Only that his LIFE would be more difficult "Till he returns to the ground" from which he was taken.
You forget about Adam's soul. Are you an soul annihilationist that believes that his soul is annihilated when he dies? You have a tendency to follow popular worldly philosophies. To each his own.And the LORD God said, Behold, the man is become as one of us, to know good and evil: and now, lest he put forth his hand, and take also of the tree of life, and eat, and live for ever:
You guys are trying to promote the philosophy that Adam and Eves flesh was created to live forever until they sinned.
But that isn't what the Scriptures are saying at all. They never took of the tree of life, not before they had sinned anyway. I think these Scriptures mean something, even if they contradict popular religious philosophies of the garden God placed us in.
You forget that the Garden of Eden is a Garden. There could have been physiological differences between the natural state of the Garden and the natural state of the rest of the Earth and Universe.True, the earth is in the Universe, but so is the moon, and Mars. However, there is very little evidence that God created life on either one of these planets, even though they are in the same universe. But He did, on the planet he placed Adam and Eve in, which is the same planet God placed you and I in. Outside our atmosphere, there is no known evidence of a "natural state" of life at all. At least none that I am aware of. If you have evidence of such a thing, I would be interested in seeing it.
Your philosophical belief of soul annihilationism is one of your worldly beliefs. To each his own.I don't have to speculate, I can simply read what is written, without injecting popular traditions or philosophies promoted by the many different religious sects and businesses in the world/garden that God placed me in.
JWs believe in annihilationism too. He shares many of their false teachingsGen 3:16 proves that there was no human death (separation of body and soul) before Adam's sin. Do you agree?
I already explained how I interpreted that passage. I wrote: "as for plant life, it will be less yielding in its fruits". Since you didn't argue against it, it looks like you agree with me.
So why did God decree the separation of Adam's soul from his body at that specific moment of time? He just felt like doing that one day? Is that what you're saying?
You forget about Adam's soul. Are you an soul annihilationist that believes that his soul is annihilated when he dies? You have a tendency to follow popular worldly philosophies. To each his own.
You forget that the Garden of Eden is a Garden. There could have been physiological differences between the natural state of the Garden and the natural state of the rest of the Earth and Universe.
Your philosophical belief of soul annihilationism is one of your worldly beliefs. To each his own.
This seems to deny the goodness of GOD, and HIS being light as light destroys dark, it does not create it by any means. HE is also love which does not apply the effects of sinfulness to the innocent.Death is a result of sin, Adams sin effected the entire creation