Council of Nicea and Constantinople

that happened in the 1500s and accidentally led to the break from the Roman Catholicism. That is far later than everything you have been talk about.
The protestants only had Catholicism translating to go by= filled with errors. They could not fix most things.
 
The Apostles refered to God as κύριος (Lord) throughout the entire Greek NT. All Cults, like yours, think they know better than the Apostles.
Sorry that was Joel 2:31-32
Catholicism translating used Lord in the NT. Scholars say--Gods name belongs in the NT.
 
No because they don't like the bible the way it reads. So they change it to suit themselves

Even they have not changed

(NWT)Joh 1:10 He was in the world, and the world came into existence through him, but the world did not know him.

Hello
Fact--Catholicism changed Gods word to fit false council teachings. They removed his name against his will. Satan owned them. he did it to mislead.
 
The protestants only had Catholicism translating to go by= filled with errors. They could not fix most things.
Funny. The Erasmus' Greek New Testament had been available based mostly on Greek language sources. Erasmus also looked to writings of the early church fathers in the process. So the Greek sources came from many directions. It seems that you always miss the historical details when you share your ideas.
 
Funny. The Erasmus' Greek New Testament had been available based mostly on Greek language sources. Erasmus also looked to writings of the early church fathers in the process. So the Greek sources came from many directions. It seems that you always miss the historical details when you share your ideas.
That's because his ideas are Watchtower spin
 
That's because his ideas are Watchtower spin
I think after he does a few more posts he will be ready to acknowledge that the Trinitarian view makes most sense. It is simply amazing the depths of the roots of Christianity. Every angle you examine it from has infinite fractals of detail.
 
Funny. The Erasmus' Greek New Testament had been available based mostly on Greek language sources. Erasmus also looked to writings of the early church fathers in the process. So the Greek sources came from many directions. It seems that you always miss the historical details when you share your ideas.
The earliest known Greek copy is from the 4th century= Catholicism translating- Its called the codex sinacticus. Write ups say Constantine took it and removed some passages. There are a very few fragments known from earlier than that, but not very much.
 
The earliest known Greek copy is from the 4th century= Catholicism translating- Its called the codex sinacticus. Write ups say Constantine took it and removed some passages. There are a very few fragments known from earlier than that, but not very much.
Really?? You have "write ups" that tell this. And perhaps they point to ancient and diverse manuscripts to give you evidence that Constantine ever saw a manuscript? I am so waiting for you to share where that evidence can be found.
The benefit of Christianity is that you do not have to depend on some odd write ups by a small group. There is evidence spread across many thousands of years.
 
Last edited:
Really?? You have "write ups" that tell this. And perhaps they point to ancient and diverse manuscripts to give you evidence that Constantine ever saw a manuscript? I am so waiting for you to share where that evidence can be found.
The benefit of Christianity is that you do not have to depend on some odd write ups by a small group. There is evidence spread across many thousands of years.
100% fact--Every translation on Gods earth with Gods name removed in over 7000 places against his will was done by satans will to mislead-through Catholicism centuries ago. Everyone's religion( Christian) shows God exactly whose will they give support to on that matter. Whose will do you think Jesus would give his support to on that most important matter?
 
100% fact--Every translation on Gods earth with Gods name removed in over 7000 places against his will was done by satans will to mislead-through Catholicism centuries ago. Everyone's religion( Christian) shows God exactly whose will they give support to on that matter. Whose will do you think Jesus would give his support to on that most important matter?
You really like the idea of Satan being more powerful than God And the Son who created him. I think the one who is glorifying the creature is going to fare less well in judgment than those who know Christ in his divinity within the Godhead. By the way, where are those write-ups that are so impressive that they counter the testimony of 1000s of years of scripture?
 
The NWT fixed the errors and put Gods name back-the darkness condemns it.
Hello

This is the NWT

Joh 1:10 He was in the world, and the world came into existence through him, but the world did not know him.
Joh 1:11 He came to his own home, but his own people did not take him in.

Even your NWT has the Word as creator and demonstrates his pre-existance
 
I think after he does a few more posts he will be ready to acknowledge that the Trinitarian view makes most sense. It is simply amazing the depths of the roots of Christianity. Every angle you examine it from has infinite fractals of detail.
I don't know. These posters deny even obvious details
 
You really like the idea of Satan being more powerful than God And the Son who created him. I think the one who is glorifying the creature is going to fare less well in judgment than those who know Christ in his divinity within the Godhead. By the way, where are those write-ups that are so impressive that they counter the testimony of 1000s of years of scripture?
Satan isn't more powerful. God fixed his bible here in the last days= The New world translation. The great apostasy = Catholicism( the ones who altered the bible) 2Thess 2:3 was foretold by God.
 
Satan isn't more powerful. God fixed his bible here in the last days= The New world translation. The great apostasy = Catholicism( the ones who altered the bible) 2Thess 2:3 was foretold by God.
you make Roman Catholicism your "opponent" in a fashion that does not fit the historical record. So much has been shared about the errors of your history and doctrine that it is amazing you have not rejected the JW system.
 
Hello

This is the NWT

Joh 1:10 He was in the world, and the world came into existence through him, but the world did not know him.
Joh 1:11 He came to his own home, but his own people did not take him in.

Even your NWT has the Word as creator and demonstrates his pre-existance
See the word-through?????= another did the creating.= HE of Gen 1:27--Prov 8:27-28--Isaiah 40:26= HE not WE what don't you understand about that bible truth?
 
Back
Top Bottom