praise_yeshua
Active Member
Py,
I only use the best one. Microsoft Co-pilot. The largely ignored one.
I do like its summary. Over all, I'm not fond of it. I prefer Grok but to each his own.... Thanks for sharing.
Py,
I only use the best one. Microsoft Co-pilot. The largely ignored one.
He emptied himself of his divine rights and powers. He was the second Adam who chose not to sin.Christ, the second Adam was much more than what Adam was made.
Cain and Abel were after Adam! QEDIn review to a previous conversation we had....
Rom 3:10 As it is written, There is none righteous, no, not one:
Rom 3:11 There is none that understandeth, there is none that seeketh after God.
Rom 3:12 They are all gone out of the way, they are together become unprofitable; there is none that doeth good, no, not one.
Rom 3:13 Their throat is an open sepulchre; with their tongues they have used deceit; the poison of asps is under their lips:
This is a reference to humanity much later than Adam. You can't trace these words back to Adam himself. You're referencing the words of David concerning the foolishness of mankind long after Adam.
Man became worse and worse.
The context are the fools of Psa 14:1.
Psa 14:1 To the chief Musician, A Psalm of David. The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psa 14:3 They are all gone aside, they are all together become filthy: there is none that doeth good, no, not one.
Py,I do like its summary. Over all, I'm not fond of it. I prefer Grok but to each his own.... Thanks for sharing.
I didn’t say that at all! So the rest of your comment is irrelevant.So Adam didn't sin?
I didn’t say that at all! So the rest of your comment is irrelevant.
Doug
I agree with you completely! But changing their mind is not the primary goal of my debating. I argue to verify the validity of my own thinking, and secondly to simply give an alternative perspective on the subject matter. Sometimes, however, the opposing view is just wrong, sometimes dangerously so, and I cannot just let it ride!Doug,
That's all you can do, then you can just walk away. Sometimes you can't change people and their minds. No matter how much effort you put in.
TDI agree with you completely! But changing their mind is not the primary goal of my debating. I argue to verify the validity of my own thinking, and secondly to simply give an alternative perspective on the subject matter. Sometimes, however, the opposing view is just wrong, sometimes dangerously so, and I cannot just let it ride!
Doug
Cain and Abel were after Adam! QED
Doug
He emptied himself of his divine rights and powers. He was the second Adam who chose not to sin.
Doug
Perfection? God said it was “very good”, not that it was perfection. Eternal glorification is absolute perfection, but that is not the case with Adam. It wasn’t intended to be! Adam was not impeccable!So Adam must have been able to lust ..... right?
So how is that perfection? Do you plan to face Eternity glorified along with Christ and still face imperfection?
Perfection? God said it was “very good”, not that it was perfection. Eternal glorification is absolute perfection, but that is not the case with Adam. It wasn’t intended to be! Adam was not impeccable!
Doug
That’s exactly what I said! Thanks for agreeing with me, now we’re getting somewhere!He never lost His power. He just didn't use it.
That’s exactly what I said! Thanks for agreeing with me, now we’re getting somewhere!
Doug
False! Adam was personable, creative, intelligent, and free to do whatever he wanted to do. He was given freedom to choose as he saw fit. Just like his creator!Then Adam wasn't made in the image of God right?
False! Adam was personable, creative, intelligent, and free to do whatever he wanted to do. He was given freedom to choose as he saw fit. Just like his creator!
Doug
False! Adam was personable, creative, intelligent, and free to do whatever he wanted to do. He was given freedom to choose as he saw fit. Just like his creator!
Doug
Yep, after Adam sinned!
Doug
Adam was not and could not ever be exactly like God, simply because he was created. But he was created to be compatible with God:Similar but not identical. Can we agree?