No, you are not the one who subscribes to Replacement Theology. You are the one who subscribes to a racist theology, in spite of God's declaring quite the opposite.
Bible Contradictions (ever heard this one before from skeptics?)
- Thread starter Victoria
- Start date
If that were the case, then there would be no need for any version, English, Greek, Hebrew or any other. That you think that to be so explains why you get so much wrong in what the Bible says and means.
And you seriously believe those verses apply to you. How funny. How sad.
jeremiah1five
Active Member
Your conclusions do not follow.
The Holy Spirit directs the believer to the truth of the Word of God. He doesn't use error to grow a believer.
God is a God of order. Confusion is not of God. And with the many hundreds of English translations out there translated from the Revised Version of 1881, confusion has entered the Church. Before that the translation authorized by God to and for the English-speaking people is the KJV.
Just one more example of your seriously confused rendering of God's word.
jeremiah1five
Active Member
There is no rationale to do any more. There comes a time when the only thing left do is to shake the dust off of the feet.
jeremiah1five
Active Member
Your ignorance precedes you. You never do that to born-again Christians. That’s a sin against Christ.
Why is it you and @FreeInChrist don't know these elementary things? Even baby Christians I know are knowing of this.
You both talk a lot about the body of Christ but fall short in the things a true believer would know from the gate.
Last edited:
FreeInChrist
Active Member
You have condemned a lot of people here. You judge and you have been told not to. As far as @Jim goes... he is beyond reproach.
As far as I go... I have already added you to the list of those who claim I will never be saved.
But don't you ever challenge either one of us about falling short in knowledge.
We know so much more then you do it makes my head spin because your eyes are veiled and ears so clogged you cannot see it.
I don't think Paul spent much time trying to convince the Judaizers in his day of their ignorance of the gospel truths and I think I will mimic him as far as you, also a Judaizer lacking in the gospel truths, are concerned.
jeremiah1five
Active Member
I am a Biblical Christian. I am under instruction and guidance from Scripture to judge between good and evil:
12 For when for the time ye ought to be teachers, ye have need that one teach you again which be the first principles of the oracles of God; and are become such as have need of milk, and not of strong meat.
13 For every one that useth milk is unskilful in the word of righteousness: for he is a babe.
14 But strong meat belongeth to them that are of full age, even those who by reason of use have their senses exercised to discern both good and evil. Hebrews 5:12–14.
Between true and false:
1 Beloved, believe not every spirit, but try the spirits whether they are of God: because many false prophets are gone out into the world. 1 John 4:1.
But you don't know these things. Your false Gentile theology you learned from mainline "Christianity" is not Biblical for if it was you would know these things.
I can tell you've never been discipled. That's too bad. You drink milk when you should be consuming meat and come under the anointing in your studies. But you are resisting of the deeper things of God. I can't help you.
jeremiah1five
Active Member
You still haven't shown me a Scripture of a covenant between God and non-Hebrew Gentiles.
Jesus taught the Law and the Prophets just as Saul did. Both were rabbis, both were Judaizers.
All the twelve disciples were Judaizers. And they didn't change after they became born-again.
Saul, for one, remained a rabbi and Pharisee until the day he died. You want proof? Let's see if you are honest with Scripture:
24 Them take, and purify thyself with them, and be at charges with them, that they may shave their heads: and all may know that those things, whereof they were informed concerning thee, are nothing; but that thou thyself also walkest orderly, and keepest the law. Acts 21:24.
26 Then Paul took the men, and the next day purifying himself with them entered into the temple, to signify the accomplishment of the days of purification, until that an offering should be offered for every one of them.
Ac 21:25–26.
Purification rites under the Law. What? I thought some said the Law was "abolished" and "obsolete"? Nope. Not according to Scripture.
14 But this I confess unto thee, that after the way which they call heresy, so worship I the God of my fathers, believing all things which are written in the law and in the prophets: Acts 24:13–14.
5 Which knew me from the beginning, if they would testify, that after the most straitest sect of our religion I lived a Pharisee. Acts 26:5.
23 And when they had appointed him a day, there came many to him into his lodging; to whom he expounded and testified the kingdom of God, persuading them concerning Jesus, both out of the law of Moses, and out of the prophets, from morning till evening. Acts 28:22–23.
Saul, like Jesus, taught out of the Law and the Prophets.
Tell me...am I lying?
No, I am not.
Your bias against Jesus and Saul because they taught out of the Law is to stand in opposition to God.
Victoria
Active Member
If you could show me the corruption on sound doctrine in the KJB, then we could go from there.
What's so racist about believing God is NOT a covenant breaker, an adulterer, unfaithful, & untrue?
Isn't it the other way around snuffing out national Israel? I would think so.
There's a huge difference between Biblical Zionism, & Political Zionism.
Fleshly speaking, I'm a Gentile, btw.
Similar threads
