Is that your promise to God?
Let me tell you what God says about your antiGod, antichristian promise.
Number lone, you don't belong to yourself. You are BOUGHT with a price. You don't have the authority to separate yourself from a member of the body like you want to because as the Bride of Christ we are so joined to Christ and no one can put asunder what God has joined together.
18 But now hath God set the members every one of them in the body, as it hath pleased him. 1 Corinthians 12:18.
To make such a decision as you have in your heart made towards me is an offense against what God has done with regard to Christ's body. It's way above your pay grade to decide to reject Christ who dwells in me, to deny yourself of the gifts I have in Christ that are meant for the other parts of the body.
21 And the eye cannot say unto the hand, I have no need of thee: nor again the head to the feet, I have no need of you. 1 Corinthians 12:21.
Your attitude and spirit are of the antichrist. As Festus said to Saul, "Saul, thou art beside thyself; much learning doth make thee mad!" Acts 26:24.
And you are mad. A word that means "crazy" (Greek "mania.")
But your attitude I have seen before from those professing Christ but are not of Christ to exhibit such an antichristian spirit. Your false Constantinian Gentile theology you hold in your heart is formed by you thinking you have rights in the body of Christ when you don't. Servants of God have no rights. The freedoms you have in this country have infected your so-called "Christianity" and cause you to err against God and His Christ. Read: AGAINST.
Pay attention:
24 For our comely parts have no need: but God hath tempered the body together, having given more abundant honour to that part which lacked:
25 That there should be no schism in the body; but that the members should have the same care one for another.
26 And whether one member suffer, all the members suffer with it; or one member be honoured, all the members rejoice with it. 1 Corinthians 12:24–26.
Do you understand "schism"? You obviously don't. It means, "split or gap." It's found in the New Testament. It's like taking an axe to the body of Christ with your antichrist spirit and creating a split or gap in a piece of wood that cannot be healed. Not immediately. There are only two things that bring division to the body of Christ. Heresy and schism is what brings division to the body of Christ by its own members. While heresy causes division through doctrine, schism is caused by lack of love. And therein resides your problem. It's a heart issue. You lack love. This tells me and others the God is love does not rule your life for while He attempts to join His body together you take an axe to the body and create division. Go ahead, antichrist. Do what your wicked heart desires to do. All it shows me is that you are not a true born-of-God Christian. I have no patience with those who claim the Name of my Savior - and there are a great many in the world - but are fake, false.
Let this be a lesson to you and others who are ignorant of the privilege of being saved by God and who has baptized 'you' into His body. You are bought with a price, you don't belong to you anymore, "so glorify God in your body, and in your spirit, which are God’s." 1 Corinthians 6:20.
This, folks, is the spirit of antichrist John told us about. See it. Recognize it. And shun it.
I promise to God that I wont answer another of your threads.... EVER
I do not break my promises to God. He holds me to them.
But without answering the words you have posted I have one question.
How can you possibly think this " You don't have the authority to separate yourself from a member of the body like you want to because as the Bride of Christ we are so joined to Christ and no one can put asunder what God has joined together.
What is your goal?
By your own words you have insisted that you are above me, (I will not judge your meaning for others) and as such we are not
joined.
You have gone above and beyond to make it known to me exactly where I stand.
Following are some of your statements from just 1 page in a search under you....... I hope you read this to the end, as a remember and my final words.
Do you remember what you said here
Precious friends, Please be Very Richly Encouraged And Edified
Where do you get "if you reject Christ..." garbage. Anyone who is in covenant with God - the Hebrew people - are deemed to salvation as each covenant builds upon the last to make it happen.
God is the One who holds all the cards. God is the One who has all the souls. He is the One who has already chosen who will get into His house. Beginning with the Abrahamic Covenant God promised Abraham that his seed "shall be a stranger in a land not theirs (Egypt)" and "shall serve them and who will afflict them for four...
If you did you would know that those in covenant with God did not seek a covenant with God but was told by God, this is the way it's going to be, and you have no choice in the matter!
If a person's name is in the book of life of the lamb slain from [BEFORE] the foundation (creation) of the world then that person will be saved at their appointed time. No one has such power to overrule God's will in the matter.
If "you" are in covenant, then you shall be saved. God was the One who scattered His people into Gentile lands. Twice! Do you think they had a choice in the matter? No, they didn't. When the Assyrians came there was no one to stop them. Everyone in Israel proper fled and those that were too stubborn or blind to see, they got taken into exile. And for 29-35 generations the Jews lived in Gentile land. For 700 years the people God scattered had no choice in the matter. There was no "accept Jesus" or "reject Jesus" because in the end God will make everyone willing. "Thy will be done on earth, "what?
As it is in heaven!"
You have no understanding of proper exegesis
Involving yourself in negative inference fallacy
Sorry but all these verses are in the bible
Sorry, but when additional information is added, it is not necessarily a contradiction unless it directly falsifies original information.
That is an erroneous assumption on your part.
Therefore it is you who contradicts multiple verses of scripture in the old and the New testaments
If you read the New Testament you see gentiles included
Gal 3:7–9 Therefore, be sure that it is those who are of faith who are sons of Abraham...
I've been here with you before. You do not understand what the New Covenant writings say about Israel's redemption and salvation. You keep trying to add Gentiles into God's covenants when there are no Gentiles anywhere in Scripture in covenant with God.
There is no covenant between God and Gentiles in the Old Testament. But you misinterpret the NT to include Gentiles in the covenant of salvation between God and Israel.
You add to the Bible.
The New Covenant promises to Israel includes Gentiles, that was the Mystery Eph 3
You can interpret Ephesians any way you want but Jeremiah's prophecy does not include Gentiles, and you have to break with Scripture and violate the Word of God in order to add them after the fact and without Biblical support.
Any interpretation in and of the New Testament that does not have Old Testament precedent and support should be rejected as false teaching. And that's what you have: False teaching that adds to the Bible things that are unsupported by Scripture.
Jeremiah's New Covenant...
You can interpret Ephesians any way you want but Jeremiah's prophecy does not include Gentiles, and you have to break with Scripture and violate the Word of God in order to add them after the fact and without Biblical support.
Any interpretation in and of the New Testament that does not have Old Testament precedent and support should be rejected as false teaching. And that's what you have: False teaching that adds to the Bible things that are unsupported by Scripture.
Jeremiah's New Covenant prophecy found in 31:31-34 does not mention or include Gentiles. There is no "mystery" in his prophecy as everything he said is clear and above-board and easily understood by those who receive the Word of God as written without having to add things and ideas that are not there.
In doing a search oon you I find you saying....
If there is no precedent in the Old Testament, then there is no reality in the New Testament.
The Law, the Psalms, and the Prophets are the totality of God's Word to the Hebrew people.
And none of the prophets of God sent to Israel never prophesied of a "rapture."
The New Covenant writings from Matthew to Revelation are gospels and letters by Jewish Christians to Jews and fellow Jewish Christians and their writings are only a discussion and interpretation of the Old Testament writings of the New Covenant era Israel found itself in after Christ ascended. Therefore, if there is no precedent in the Old Testament, then there is no New Testament reality.
For nearly six thousand years God is deeply involved in the blessing and protection, and salvation of the Hebrew people and God breaks that covenant after Jesus' resurrection and ascension just so He can address Gentiles first rather than His covenant people the Jews?
__________________
I said you add to the Bible and I proved it.
You claim non-Hebrews are part of the Hebrew covenants (Abraham, Mosaic, and New) for their salvation and redemption but there is no Scripture in the Old Testament of a God-non-Hebrew salvation covenant nor are non-Hebrew Gentiles included in any of the three Hebrew covenants.
You can't produce Scriptural evidence of a covenant between God and non-Hebrews for their salvation as the covenant of salvation God made with Abraham, Moses, and Jesus Christ. The Abrahamic Covenant is found in Genesis 12, 15, and 17, and
there are no non-Hebrews named, mentioned or included in this covenant.
____________________
Salvation didn't rest with
the believer or
covenant member; it rested with God who made
the promise(s.) As Jonah says, "Salvation is of
the LORD" (Jonah 2:9.) And
no,
salvation was not through faith, it was through covenant as a box, a grace from God, and
the salvation,
the mercy,
the...
_________________________
You take the word "Gentile" and think it refers to non-Hebrews when God never made covenant with non-Hebrews. If there is no covenant, then there is no salvation. This is why 39 "books" of the Old Testament has Israel as central to Hebrew history? The Law, the Psalms, and the Prophets IS the Hebrew Scripture. Then we have letters written by Jews to other Jews to help explain the New Covenant era Israel was suddenly involved in and why only the House of Israel and the House of Judah are recipients of the New Covenant and why only Israel has been forgiven by God.
____________________________
The New Testament is only as valid as it
interprets
the Old
Testament. We true born-again Christian s do
not have any right to add to
the Bible of
the Old
Testament things
not
there. Jeremiah speaks about a
New Covenant and
there are
no Gentiles named, mentioned, or
included
in this
covenant...
______________________________
Au Contraire, Mr. Wick Stick. The prophets operated (prophesied) while being part of the Mosaic Covenant, which covenant was superseded by the New Covenant when the Holy Spirit of Promise PROMISED TO ISRAEL began with the Holy Spirit's advent in Acts 2.
_____________________________________
Jeremiah says the New Covenant is between God and the House of Israel (ten northern kingdom tribes), and the House of Judah (two southern kingdom tribes.)
God, through Jeremiah says, the New Covenant is between God and the House of Israel and the House of Judah.
There are NO GENTILES included in this covenant. There are NO GENTILES included in any of the other two covenants: Abrahamic and Mosaic.
YOU are adding to the Bible. And what does God say about adding to His Word spoken or written:
You have all along been into the no covenant no salvation and the non-Hebrew Gentiles.. )Gentiles in General) have no covenant
which the only conclusion is No salvation for the Gentiles....
________________________________
You can
interpret Ephesians any way you want but Jeremiah's prophecy does
not
include Gentiles, and you have to break with Scripture and violate
the Word of God
in order to add
them after
the fact and without Biblical support. Any
interpretation
in and of
the New Testament that does
not have...
___________________________________
No, it is
not.
There is
no covenant in the Old
Testament between God and
non-Hebrew Gentiles. If
there were we would know
the person's name with whom God made promises. But
there is
none.
The blood of
the sacrifice for sins - temporary or eternal - must be applied to
the Mercy Seat which is part...
__________________________________________________
It is relevant. It goes directly to the core of the identity of who "Gentiles" referred to. If there is no covenant in the Old Testament of a covenant between God and Gentiles, then you cannot make one up or twist Scripture to fit your pet theories. True born-again Christians do not add to the Bible.
If there is no Old Testament precedent, then there is no New Testament reality. In other words, if it's not bible and verse then it is chatter or worse.
________________________________________
In keeping with God's promise of giving His Spirit to Israel and only Israel as prophesied by Joel, I would have to have at least one Hebrew
in my ancestry because I know without a doubt, I was given God's Spirit
the moment I was born-again. My
theology is Biblical. It is
not Protestant...
____________________________________________
Jews called mixed heritage Jews Samaritan and not Jew, the same that Jews call mixed heritage Jews "Gentile" and not Jew because they didn't see these mixed heritage Jews as fully Jewish.
The bottom line is that God made no covenant with non-Hebrew Gentiles. Therefore, these "Gentiles" of the New Testament cannot be non-Hebrew for God made no covenant with non-Hebrew Gentiles for their salvation.
______________________________________________
I asked
in the Old
Testament. If
there is
no Old
Testament precedence
there is
no New Testament reality. And Jeremiah says
NOTHING about Gentiles being
included
in the New Covenant. Stop adding to
the Bible. Try again.
__________________________
You are adding to
the Bible. Gentiles are
not
included
in the New Covenant. And when Jesus ritually
included
the twelve Jewish men
into
the "new
testament"
in His blood
there were
no Gentiles
there representing
the uncircumcised,
non-
covenant, idol worshiping Gentiles. Only twelve Jewish men...
____________________________________
Nowhere
in the Old
Testament does God call
non-Hebrew Gentiles Olive tree or Olive branches. But God does call His people Israel Olive tree and branches. You are adding to
the Bible something that does
not exist
in the Old
Testament record.
___________________________________________
Still waiting for
the Old
Testament reference or prophecy of a
covenant between God and
non-Hebrew Gentiles and
the name of
the Gentile who was recipient of said
covenant and details of this
covenant. God made
covenant with Abram
the Hebrew and such
covenant is described
in the Old
Testament...
===================================
Your conclusion.... The Gentiles according to you... have no covenant so... I'll leave the reader to their own conclusions.
Even Ai agrees with you, that
ChatGPT
Short answer,
biblically: no — salvation is always covenantal.
Grok
In Christian theology, salvation is inherently tied to God's covenants with humanity. The Bible presents God's plan of redemption as unfolding through a series of divine covenants, which serve as the framework for how God relates to people and offers salvation.
YOU CLAIM THERE IS NO COVENANT BETWEEN GOD AND GENTILES AND AS MUCH AS PEOPLE HAVE ARGUED THERE IS
YOU STAND FIRM....
So
@jeremiah1five ... we are not joined to Christ (together) because you have told me personally that basically I dont make the grade.
So I am sure the heavenly Father understands why I would not respond to you. It may even be his desire for me to run away from you lest I somehow contaminate you.
IT IS by your own doing and YOU PERSONAL beliefs that has me on one side of the gulf and you on the other .....DO I NEED TO EXPLAIN THAT TO YOU? ....For it has been you that has place me here.
