Wilber
Active member
When? No Peter is not God.Then? Peter is God.
But he did make a choice, to believe and obey God.
When? No Peter is not God.Then? Peter is God.
There is a school of thought that considers that Christ did in fact, expressly depend on the Holy Spirit for all things.
He did not do this because he had no power, but rather because he stood our behalf to fulfill the Law as one of us.
You will notice in all places, Jesus gives credit to the Spirit and Father for all miracles, and expresses dependence on them.
You said Jesus walked on water because he is God.When? No Peter is not God.
But he did make a choice, to believe and obey God.
See what you told me?The reason Jesus could walk on water is because he is God. That is to say Jesus is God incarnate: The Second Person of the Trinity descended from heaven and became human.
Thanks I have yet to make a bad postgood post
Thanks I have yet to make a bad post
Are there more than one Synergy here?I tend to believe that Jesus is our Exemplar, in addition to everything else He is. He did say greater things we could possibly do. That's mind blowing to read that in Scripture.
I don't think it has anything to do with legalism. I think it has everything to do with us allowing the Holy Spirit to shine through from within us and from our actions.
Right.
It's not come on man! It's come on maaaaan!To quote our President Biden, "Come on, man!"
Manmade IDOLATRY. Obviously, your definitional understanding of ‘fully’ is elastic.From some who refuse to come to grips with that Jesus is not only fully God. But, He is simultaneously fully man.
Appeal to Ignorance.Since the "totality of God" is well beyond human understanding
Again proving Jesus is not God but a container where God dwells.Deity was always indwelling Christ.....
No... That proves that he truly does have two natures.Manmade IDOLATRY. Obviously, your definitional understanding of ‘fully’ is elastic.
What you say is anti-Scriptural. There is one God, the Father. There is only God the father.
Jesus died. That proves he is not God.
Again proving Jesus is not God but a container where God dwells.
Nope.Are there more than one Synergy here?
Unfortunately no. I told sawdust that when he claims that the Preincarnate Word has a soul, he is effectively saying that the Preincarnate Word's soul is separate from his body (which is only acquired at the Incarnation) and that's the definition of physical death. IOW, both you and sawdust are doing nothing less than ascribing physical death to the Preincarnate Word. I told sawdust that any attempt to redefine physical death, in an attempt to escape this predicament that he finds himself in, will be immediately denied.Now you are in agreement with all the things you were saying was wrong with my thinking...
Perhaps we can take this beyond just a school of thought?There is a school of thought that considers that Christ did in fact, expressly depend on the Holy Spirit for all things.
Nope.
Unfortunately no. I told sawdust that when he claims that the Preincarnate Word has a soul, he is effectively saying that the Preincarnate Word's soul is separate from his body (which is only acquired at the Incarnation) and that's the definition of physical death. IOW, both you and sawdust are doing nothing less than ascribing physical death to the Preincarnate Word. I told sawdust that any attempt to redefine physical death, in an attempt to escape this predicament that he finds himself in, will be immediately denied.
I told you that any attempt to redefine physical death will be immediately denied. Resistance to that universal definition is futile and you ascribing physical death to the Preincarnate Word is undeniable. You can deal with it or not. The choice is yours.His life was in God... not in a body... while in Heaven before the Incarnation.
You keep drawing your concept from how man relates to God.
We are not God and Soul in Union.
At best, we can be the Holy Spirit and soul in fellowship.
I told you that any attempt to redefine physical death will be immediately denied. Resistance to that universal definition is futile and you ascribing physical death to the Preincarnate Word is undeniable. You can deal with it or not. The choice is yours.
Yeah well when I said perhaps we can what I really meant is to appeal to ones who haven't considered what we're saying. I have believed what I've shared in my posts (on this particular subject) for many, many years.perhaps we can
are we brave enough?