Dizerner
Well-known member
whereas a threat is meant to intimidate or coerce.
I don't agree that is necessarily true. You can threaten for other reasons.
And clearly something can be BOTH a warning AND a threat at the same time.
whereas a threat is meant to intimidate or coerce.
Yes Pancho.
We could discuss free will.
But I'm here because I was closing down my computer...it's almost midnight.
Please post what you will and I'll reply tomorrow morning.
Good night.
Why preach the gospel at all IF God is going to choose the saved and the lost???Are the "brick and mortar" churches full of unsaved?
Then they need the GOSPEL preached (both HELL and SALVATION).
Are the "brick and mortar" churches full of "Laodiceans"?
Then do they not need a different message? (Rev 3:14-22)
@GodsGrace is not a Calvinist, and I’ll take it a step further-if my free will is not aligned with Christ and the Holy Spirit, I remain in my sins and have not been reborn.If you are a Calvinist, please going on acting as if free will were actually true.
It is a "blessed inconsistency."
@GodsGrace is not a Calvinist
and I’ll take it a step further-if my free will is not aligned with Christ and the Holy Spirit, I remain in my sins and have not been reborn.
We are supposed to be dead to the ego eimi according to the Scriptures-our will swallowed up in the sweet will of Christ Jesus.Every Christian willfully sins at times, we are not kicked out of Christ and losing our new birth every time we mess up.
Why preach the gospel at all IF God is going to choose the saved and the lost???
It is an oxymoron.If you are a Calvinist, please going on acting as if free will were actually true.
It is a "blessed inconsistency."
Why did Paul preach to Lydia in Acts 16:14 if the LORD was going to open her heart?Why preach the gospel at all IF God is going to choose the saved and the lost???
free will as i moral abilities to choose between right and wrong for example, to choose to follow Christ or reject Him as a couple examples. I also have the free will choice to poison myself with drugs and alcohol or not take them and be healthy. I can choose to eat healthy or not. We have many free will choices that we make in our daily lives.Thank you, sister.
Well, free will, as any other human capacity, is limited.
We certainly know this from examining the development of free will in children, and how mentally disabled people have reduced autonomy and depend in different degrees from the will of their caretakers.
To make a choice, we consider our primary impulses (fear, hunger, sex drive, etc) as well as our cognitive processes. Both are important.
Our cognitive processes are limited. We get persuaded more easily that we would like to admit, to do both good things and bad things.... contrary to what we wanted to do in the beginning.
We know that children and some mentally disabled people are more easily persuaded because their cognitive processes are both immature and devoid of the specific content they would sometimes need to do a better choice (ie, what we call experience).
In neurologically healthy people like you and me, cognition is also limited.
Many times we think we thought out a decision, when in reality we are being guided in part by our primary impulses, and our rationale is just post hoc (we build an excuse to support the choice we made, that make us feel good about our successful choice or not too bad of our wrong choice). To some extent, we are still partially slave of our flesh... seeking for God's freedom.
If our free will were informed by perfect cognition, infinite wisdom, perhaps we wouldn't need God's grace.
Are you sure it is GOD that has blinded you to the truth? [2 Corinthians 4:4]Despite my best efforts, God apparently monergistically caused me to reject Calvinism.
Seems like a very strange game.
Are you sure it is GOD that has blinded you to the truth? [2 Corinthians 4:4]
Within reformed theology there are many different views of sovereignty and predestination- not everyone holds to the same ideas and many believe calvin was 4 point not 5.So you're not a monergist anymore.
Good step in the right direction!
Within reformed theology there are many different views of sovereignty and predestination- not everyone holds to the same ideas and many believe calvin was 4 point not 5.
You'll have to define free will because we had agreed on a definition and the above commentThank you, sister.
Well, free will, as any other human capacity, is limited.
Could we discuss adults here?We certainly know this from examining the development of free will in children, and how mentally disabled people have reduced autonomy and depend in different degrees from the will of their caretakers.
Agreed.To make a choice, we consider our primary impulses (fear, hunger, sex drive, etc) as well as our cognitive processes. Both are important.
Agreed.Our cognitive processes are limited. We get persuaded more easily that we would like to admit, to do both good things and bad things.... contrary to what we wanted to do in the beginning.
My ganddaughter is on the spectrum (autism) and, believe me, she has free will.We know that children and some mentally disabled people are more easily persuaded because their cognitive processes are both immature and devoid of the specific content they would sometimes need to do a better choice (ie, what we call experience).
I believe that once we accept God's direction...we become free of satan's grip.In neurologically healthy people like you and me, cognition is also limited.
Many times we think we thought out a decision, when in reality we are being guided in part by our primary impulses, and our rationale is just post hoc (we build an excuse to support the choice we made, that make us feel good about our successful choice or not too bad of our wrong choice). To some extent, we are still partially slave of our flesh... seeking for God's freedom.
Couldn't disagree more.If our free will were informed by perfect cognition, infinite wisdom, perhaps we wouldn't need God's grace.
His game. He makes the rules. Free will people must be more fun to him.... I would thinkDespite my best efforts, God apparently monergistically caused me to reject Calvinism.
Seems like a very strange game.
Once we define any human capacity, the definition does not imply that the capacity is unlimited.You'll have to define free will because we had agreed on a definition and the above comment
falls away from that definition.
Unless you mean that we are limited and are not able decide whether or not we should kill a person.
Well, I would gently suggest to keep small children and mentally disabled people in the loop within any discussion about free will.Could we discuss adults here?
We do.The question at hand is: Do we have free will?
I believe you for sure.My ganddaughter is on the spectrum (autism) and, believe me, she has free will.