Yes, Calvinists—free will IS in the Bible.

So is it kind to tell me that I'm not answering when I have?

So is it kind to tell repeat yourself over and over again with clearly defining what you're presenting? While telling others meaningful aspects of "life" is irrelevant?

Then still insist I'm wrong? How about a "false witness"?
Have it your way
 
That is funny

I posted Arminian, Calvinist , Baptist, Church Fathers views on the subject

Seeing your response as rather irrelevant does nothing at all to make me unlearned

Did you quote the person who's view you posted? Have you seen me quote someone else? Any of them?

I don't need them Tom. You do. You've changed significantly in the last couple of years.

You know what that indicates? Immaturity.

Tell me where I've changed since you've known me?
 
And I think you provide the delusional statement here.

You have continually invoked nastiness and character assassination.

Oh and BTW I have not called a single Calvinist evil or dishonnest

Doctrine not personal character is my focus.

So tell me Tom. Be honest. How do you feel about what I've said? It doesn't matter if you "bite your tongue" or "keep your cool". How you feel. How you would act if others wouldn't watching. How you claim I'm wrong matters me because it isn't true.

I'd rather have a man curse me to my face than to do what you're doing here. At least I'd know what he was thinking.

People pretend all the time. All the time. They play characters. They pretend to be things they're not. With me, you get exactly who I am. If you want to believe I'm in sin how I've responded to you, then make the charge. Provide the evidence.

You should call Calvinists evil and dishonest. Cowards act like you're acting.
 
ok you win

I don't want to win. Just don't see things for any way other than what is real. I know I annoy people. I make them angry. I say things they don't like. The issue that people have with me isn't how I respond. It is necessary to humble people. It is necessary to challenge people to the point they really face their bias.

I don't avoid the Truth with friends.

Treat me however you want. Just don't claim I can't tell who you're choosing in this dispute.
 
Spiritual death in Arminian theology
https://berean-apologetics.communit...YSTHEO02|ResourceVersion=2014-10-08T00:58:21Z
Chapter I: The Peril of Sin
The same thing may be said of what is called spiritual death—the separation of the soul from God. It is a deprivation in which the intercourse and communion between man and his Maker cease; the Holy Spirit is withdrawn; God refuses to manifest himself as a loving Father dispensing blessings; if manifest at all, he is a sovereign judge, executing…
Systematic Theology, Volume II, p 175
Death as the Penalty of Sin
The second consequence is, therefore, death spiritual, that moral state which arises from the withdrawment of that intercourse of God with the human soul, in consequence of its becoming polluted, and of that influence upon it which is the only source and spring of the right…
Christian Theology, Volumes I–III, V 2, p 91
2. Penalty of the Sinning
There is also a spiritual death in distinction from the spiritual life—such as man originally possessed.4 This death is inseparably connected with sin, and must have been the immediate consequence of sin in Adam.5 His spiritual life was fully realized only in union with the Holy Spirit. Sin was the…
John Miley’s Systematic Theology, Volume 1, p 431
The Punishment
The soul that sinneth is guilty of death, or of being sundered from the Holy Spirit of life: the death of the spirit separated from God, involving the separation of soul and body, and in its issue eternal. This is a hard saying, taken alone; but its mitigation will come in due time. I. Spiritual death is the departure of the Holy Spirit as the…
A Compendium of Christian Theology, V 2, p 36
Physical, Spiritual, and Eternal Death Distinguished
Grace through faith is victorious over spiritual death even in this life by means of the new birth, so that even while temporal death is occurring, it is being transformed into a spiritual blessing…
Life in the Spirit: Systematic Theology, Volume Three, p 381
§ 2. Critical Examination of 2 Cor. 5:14, 15
He thus clearly refers to the death of sin—not to death temporal or eternal, the consequence of sin, but to spiritual death, the moral state of all men who are dead in trespasses and sins—involving, of course, temporal and eternal death, unless it be removed by the salvation which Christ died to procure for all men, if they will only avail themselves…
Systematic Theology: A Complete Body of Wesleyan Arminian Divinity Consisting of Lectures on the Twenty-Five Articles of Religion, Vols. I & II, V 1, p 231
Chapter XVIII: Fall of Man—Doctrine of Original Sin
For if a state of sin in them is a state of spiritual death, then a state of sin in him was a state of spiritual death; and that both by natural consequence, the same cause producing the same effect, and also by the appointment of God, who departs from sinful men, and, withdrawing himself from all communion with the guilty, withdraws thereby the…
Theological Institutes: Or, a View of the Evidences, Doctrines, Morals, and Institutions of Christianity, p 361

Yeah. Go ahead and post it at 4PM today and pretend you've been posting it all along.
 
I've said all I'm going to say. I'll not do what is being done to me.

Go ahead and repeat over and over all the arguments of thousands of years pasts like good traditionalists. See where that gets you.

I mean could not waste your time and just read. Copy. Paste.....

Oh. Sorry. I think that is what happening over and over again. Nothing does anywhere. Just same ole same ole.
 
I don't want to win. Just don't see things for any way other than what is real. I know I annoy people. I make them angry. I say things they don't like. The issue that people have with me isn't how I respond. It is necessary to humble people. It is necessary to challenge people to the point they really face their bias.

I don't avoid the Truth with friends.

Treat me however you want. Just don't claim I can't tell who you're choosing in this dispute.
All I'm saying is that Tom is not an evil man so I don't think you have to worry about that. But it up to you how you want to deal with things here. I have nothing against you. I don't think you annoy people intentionally.

You say it is necessary to humble people. Have you ever done time? Because that sounds a lot like cellblock mentality.
 
Yeah. Go ahead and post it at 4PM today and pretend you've been posting it all along.
Spiritual death as posted all along

 
So tell me Tom. Be honest. How do you feel about what I've said? It doesn't matter if you "bite your tongue" or "keep your cool". How you feel. How you would act if others wouldn't watching. How you claim I'm wrong matters me because it isn't true.
You want me to tell you that I believe what you posted is not honnest and very disrespectful?

And that, in fact, I clearly believe you wrong.

That you have an understanding contrary to what has been held historically and throughout the various Christian denominations.
I'd rather have a man curse me to my face than to do what you're doing here. At least I'd know what he was thinking.

People pretend all the time. All the time. They play characters. They pretend to be things they're not. With me, you get exactly who I am. If you want to believe I'm in sin how I've responded to you, then make the charge. Provide the evidence.

You should call Calvinists evil and dishonest. Cowards act like you're acting.
I do not believe a Calvinist must be evil or even dishonnest

And I still do not believe you can account for the different types of death and life.
 
Did you quote the person who's view you posted? Have you seen me quote someone else? Any of them?

I don't need them Tom. You do. You've changed significantly in the last couple of years.

You know what that indicates? Immaturity.

Tell me where I've changed since you've known me?
I posted plenty of verses supporting my argument, and demonstrating what has been held historically and interdenominationally can hardly be called immaturity.

And it is a rather disrespectful approach, which speaks of very many people.
 
Can't you both "pat each other on the back" privately?

Ultimately, there will inevitably be a doctrinal separation that takes place here. I care about doctrine.
Couldn't you have withheld your very disrespectful comments so that there would have been no motivation for such a response?
 
Gen 18:27 And Abraham answered and said, Behold now, I have taken upon me to speak unto the Lord, which am but dust and ashes:

So was Abraham alive? Was Abraham spiritual alive?

Why dust and ashes? If I were to take your position, then I must claim that Abraham was spiritual dust.
He is showing his comparative insignificance. He was however at the beginning created using dust and at the end of physical life he will be dust

But tell me, do you then believe that is all that remains of humans at their death.


The Rich Man and Lazarus
19 “Now a certain man was rich, and dressed in purple cloth and fine linen, feasting sumptuously every day. 20 And a certain poor man ⌊named⌋ Lazarus, covered with sores, lay at his gate, 21 and was longing to be filled with what fell from the table of the rich man. But even the dogs came and* licked his sores. 22 Now it happened that the poor man died, and he was carried away by the angels to ⌊Abraham’s side⌋. And the rich man also died and was buried. 23 And in Hades he lifted up his eyes as he* was in torment and* saw Abraham from a distance, and Lazarus ⌊at his side⌋. 24 And he called out and* said, ‘Father Abraham, have mercy on me, and send Lazarus so that he could dip the tip of his finger in water and cool my tongue, because I am suffering pain in this flame!’ 25 But Abraham said, ‘Child, remember that you received your good things during your life, and Lazarus likewise bad things. But now he is comforted here, but you are suffering pain. 26 And in addition to all these things, a great chasm has been established between us and you, so that those who want to cross over from here to you are not able to do so,* nor can they cross over from there to us.’ 27 So he said, ‘Then I ask you, father, that you send him to my father’s house, 28 for I have five brothers, so that he could warn them, in order that they also should not come to this place of torment!’ 29 But Abraham said, ‘They have Moses and the prophets; they must listen to them.’ 30 And he said, ‘No, father Abraham, but if someone from the dead goes to them, they will repent!’ 31 But he said to him, ‘If they do not listen to Moses and the prophets, neither will they be convinced if someone rises from the dead.’


W. Hall Harris III et al., eds., The Lexham English Bible (Bellingham, WA: Lexham Press, 2012), Lk 16:19–31.
 
Back
Top Bottom