Women.

MTMattie

Active Member
@360watt , @dwight92070

I have been following everyone's conversations with @charismaticlady in the thread "Is anyone else a seer."

Not going back past the last page or so @dwight92070 reply 701 there you stated ~When a pastor, such as Jack Hayford, directly contradicts Paul's words here - and tells us that it's okay for women to teach in the assembly of believers,

Are you specifically speaking of the assembly of believers as being that of a "church congregation " when they meet for their worship sessions or of the church congregation, no matter where meeting for instruction? (ie Sunday Schools, Bible Camps, Retreats, et al?

@360watt , in the same thread, you posted reply #705 with One thing about women keeping silent in the church..is the context is about speaking out of turn and speaking in tongues....It is still saying for woman not to hold the position of pastor/bishop, and ask their hubby at home about disputations, but isn't about not speaking at all.

So what I said above you do mention church congregation meeting for worship and I cannot help but wonder it also means no woman should speak in tongues?

Funny that the idea of women in the pulpit has fallen apart within my life time.

And more so when you have the likes of Marylyn Hickey and , heaven help us all, Paula White that are in so many homes today....
And the one I cannot understand that an entire church was built around "Ellen G White"... to name a few.

IOW. Are women ok if they are not in a pulpit? And should women not participate in forums such as these?
 
@360watt , @dwight92070

I have been following everyone's conversations with @charismaticlady in the thread "Is anyone else a seer."

Not going back past the last page or so @dwight92070 reply 701 there you stated ~When a pastor, such as Jack Hayford, directly contradicts Paul's words here - and tells us that it's okay for women to teach in the assembly of believers,

Are you specifically speaking of the assembly of believers as being that of a "church congregation " when they meet for their worship sessions or of the church congregation, no matter where meeting for instruction? (ie Sunday Schools, Bible Camps, Retreats, et al?

@360watt , in the same thread, you posted reply #705 with One thing about women keeping silent in the church..is the context is about speaking out of turn and speaking in tongues....It is still saying for woman not to hold the position of pastor/bishop, and ask their hubby at home about disputations, but isn't about not speaking at all.

So what I said above you do mention church congregation meeting for worship and I cannot help but wonder it also means no woman should speak in tongues?

Funny that the idea of women in the pulpit has fallen apart within my life time.

And more so when you have the likes of Marylyn Hickey and , heaven help us all, Paula White that are in so many homes today....
And the one I cannot understand that an entire church was built around "Ellen G White"... to name a few.

IOW. Are women ok if they are not in a pulpit? And should women not participate in forums such as these?
Well if men that think and act like they are wemen can preach and teach, then real wemen should be able to . And do it better since the are not being deceived.
 
Well if men that think and act like they are wemen can preach and teach, then real wemen should be able to . And do it better since the are not being deceived.
Well, be that as it may...

8I desire then that in every place the men should pray, lifting holy hands without anger or quarreling; 9likewise also that women should adorn themselves in respectable apparel, with modesty and self-control, not with braided hair and gold or pearls or costly attire, 10but with what is proper for women who profess godliness—with good works.11Let a woman learn quietly with all submissiveness.12I do not permit a woman to teach or to exercise authority over a man; rather, she is to remain quiet.13For Adam was formed first, then Eve; 14and Adam was not deceived, but the woman was deceived and became a transgressor.
1 Timothy 2:8–14

An argument could be made that Eve was deceived by the serpent, then she deceived her husband into eating that fruit.
 
Well, be that as it may...

8I desire then that in every place the men should pray, lifting holy hands without anger or quarreling; 9likewise also that women should adorn themselves in respectable apparel, with modesty and self-control, not with braided hair and gold or pearls or costly attire, 10but with what is proper for women who profess godliness—with good works.11Let a woman learn quietly with all submissiveness.12I do not permit a woman to teach or to exercise authority over a man; rather, she is to remain quiet.13For Adam was formed first, then Eve; 14and Adam was not deceived, but the woman was deceived and became a transgressor.
1 Timothy 2:8–14

An argument could be made that Eve was deceived by the serpent, then she deceived her husband into eating that fruit.
So Adam disobeyed God intentionally.

Adam disobeyed God and caused many others to be sinners. But Jesus obeyed him and will make many people acceptable to God.
Romans 5:19

As for 1 Timothy 2:8–14

The woman was deceived, but the man was not. Eve was tricked, but Adam rebelled outright. Yes, both the man and woman sinned, but Paul drew a fine point of distinction between Adam’s sin and the sin of Eve. This distinction relates to God’s order of authority. God is the ultimate head over Adam. As the head of his wife and family, Adam was spiritually responsible to God for them. But Adam rejected God’s order. He gave heed to his wife instead of obeying God and brought sin and death into the world (Romans 5:12; 1 Corinthians 15:21–22). God’s ideal design for order and authority was completely upended. Ever since the fall, this violation has spread throughout all society. But the Bible calls believers to honor God’s pattern for order and authority in the church.
They can still teach. Many women excel in gifts of hospitality, mercy, teaching, evangelism, and helping/serving. Much of the ministry of the local church depends on women.

 
@360watt , @dwight92070

I have been following everyone's conversations with @charismaticlady in the thread "Is anyone else a seer."

Not going back past the last page or so @dwight92070 reply 701 there you stated ~When a pastor, such as Jack Hayford, directly contradicts Paul's words here - and tells us that it's okay for women to teach in the assembly of believers,

Are you specifically speaking of the assembly of believers as being that of a "church congregation " when they meet for their worship sessions or of the church congregation, no matter where meeting for instruction? (ie Sunday Schools, Bible Camps, Retreats, et al?

@360watt , in the same thread, you posted reply #705 with One thing about women keeping silent in the church..is the context is about speaking out of turn and speaking in tongues....It is still saying for woman not to hold the position of pastor/bishop, and ask their hubby at home about disputations, but isn't about not speaking at all.

So what I said above you do mention church congregation meeting for worship and I cannot help but wonder it also means no woman should speak in tongues?

Funny that the idea of women in the pulpit has fallen apart within my life time.

And more so when you have the likes of Marylyn Hickey and , heaven help us all, Paula White that are in so many homes today....
And the one I cannot understand that an entire church was built around "Ellen G White"... to name a few.

IOW. Are women ok if they are not in a pulpit? And should women not participate in forums such as these?

I mean in the assembly for worship. I think it would also apply to a camp.. home study..if that is still members meeting in the church capacity.

The church isn't the building but the members of that local body (although it's local in nature as a body anyway)

A forum such as this..we are not gathered. It's not church. The Holy Spirit is not 'in the midst' of digital i and o.

But .. yeah .. I would contend the passage does mean women should not speak in tongues. But I also contend that prophecy and tongues have done there job anyway and ceased. So nowadays...neither would men.

The comparison in the scriptures is of disorder at the church at Corinth.. which had many problems. Confusion was there..disorder..too many people speaking in tongues.. Lord's Supper done indecent etc

And its that back drop..in which we have Paul saying women to be silent.
 
I mean in the assembly for worship. I think it would also apply to a camp.. home study..if that is still members meeting in the church capacity.

The church isn't the building but the members of that local body (although it's local in nature as a body anyway)

A forum such as this..we are not gathered. It's not church. The Holy Spirit is not 'in the midst' of digital i and o.

But .. yeah .. I would contend the passage does mean women should not speak in tongues. But I also contend that prophecy and tongues have done there job anyway and ceased. So nowadays...neither would men.

The comparison in the scriptures is of disorder at the church at Corinth.. which had many problems. Confusion was there..disorder..too many people speaking in tongues.. Lord's Supper done indecent etc

And its that back drop..in which we have Paul saying women to be silent.
Thank you @360watt ,

Makes perfect sense.... kind of.

I, am a woman... if you have not read my signature.... and at one time I daily spoke in tongues. Not in church, and not to people but only to God. Now this was not something that had church roots for me, because I can almost double over laughing
that until recently... (last 50 years or so) the congregation was so straightlaced that it would have been simply unacceptable.

Then came the day that the church got a more progressive pastor, and lost a few members from attendance when it did
the unheard of " alter call". Eventually, about 30 years ago the church started to progress toward "woke" ( sssshs... this was Presbyterian).. and while my church never has had a woman in the pulpit they have women in other areas.. and teaching the children... sometimes in the sanctuary... Another story for another day.

Back to tongues. My time with God and me speaking in them usually was when I was alone and driving and having some time
with Him.

Anyway, you said "A forum such as this..we are not gathered. It's not church. The Holy Spirit is not 'in the midst' of digital i and o."

While this is very truth... the Holy Spirit is present if through no other means then being within us if we have Him.
There have been times when it has been the Holy Spirit who has formed my responses in certain threads.

Thanks again for replying
 
Thank you @360watt ,

Makes perfect sense.... kind of.

I, am a woman... if you have not read my signature.... and at one time I daily spoke in tongues. Not in church, and not to people but only to God. Now this was not something that had church roots for me, because I can almost double over laughing
that until recently... (last 50 years or so) the congregation was so straightlaced that it would have been simply unacceptable.

Then came the day that the church got a more progressive pastor, and lost a few members from attendance when it did
the unheard of " alter call". Eventually, about 30 years ago the church started to progress toward "woke" ( sssshs... this was Presbyterian).. and while my church never has had a woman in the pulpit they have women in other areas.. and teaching the children... sometimes in the sanctuary... Another story for another day.

Back to tongues. My time with God and me speaking in them usually was when I was alone and driving and having some time
with Him.

Anyway, you said "A forum such as this..we are not gathered. It's not church. The Holy Spirit is not 'in the midst' of digital i and o."

While this is very truth... the Holy Spirit is present if through no other means then being within us if we have Him.
There have been times when it has been the Holy Spirit who has formed my responses in certain threads.

Thanks again for replying

Yeah..a believer has the Holy Spirit indwelling them . They can post in here empowered by Him :)

'In the midst ' is where the Holy Spirit is among a church...in His other role. Such as when He blesses the process of church members coming together to sort out disputes. (Matthew 18)

But with tongues.. how does your personal experience compare to the way it is laid out in scripture?
 
Yeah..a believer has the Holy Spirit indwelling them . They can post in here empowered by Him :)

'In the midst ' is where the Holy Spirit is among a church...in His other role. Such as when He blesses the process of church members coming together to sort out disputes. (Matthew 18)

But with tongues.. how does your personal experience compare to the way it is laid out in scripture?
I did not have a cognitive experience of the Holy Spirit imparting tongues on me.

It came about as I was watching one of my televangelists that I used to follow fairly regularly only because
he would take a book of the Bible, Start at the beginning and read the scripture and comment on each that was read.

When he was teaching on tongues, from the bible, it was after that that I could.

My admitted problem is I do not interpret and I know no one who does and that is why I only will pray to or talk to God that way.
In private so no one will hear or judge.

Do I know that it is real? Yes. For the simple reason that I almost flunked high school French for my inability to roll my Rs and
on the occasions I have been taught , or tried to be taught some basic Italian phrases I could never roll my Rs.

Yet one day as I was talking to God clear as a bell I was rolling my R's with no difficulty. It was one time only.

Back when I first started and not knowing what I might be saying I tried to type how it sounded to me in the computer and search. I did not get a translation but I did get that it was likely some old mideastern language.

Thant was about 20 years ago. But I have not stopped, but slowed as there is no one that can translate and since 12 or so years ago there has been such a negative attitude among online forums that I usually let it slide unless something ... such as your comment.. moves me to comment.

AND the fact that I began to and continued on with virtually the same words each time, now, which I assume is a prayer to God
I do not daily like I used to.

Just now I searched how I feel some of the words would be written for this and this is what came back from Wiki

Sal languages


Branch of Sino-Tibetan languages
The Sal languages, also known as the Brahmaputran languages, are a branch of Tibeto-Burman languages spoken in northeast India, as well as parts of Bangladesh, Myanmar, and China.

Are tongues for today. IDK. I would say they are rare, unless you attend a Billy Burke healing service where they abound.... either before or after folks are slain in the Spirit. (No I never was) (But have attended)

But I do not think they are just for men. The bible is quite silent on that and as it does center on the men and if part of a religious service perhaps.

We do know that we are told

1 Corinthians 14:2​

“For one who speaks in a tongue speaks not to men but to God; for no one understands him, but he utters mysteries in the Spirit.”

I do believe this as when I have tried to find out what I have said I only get something like what WIKI said. NO translation.

Other then this I cannot comment as it is a complicated subject in a way, and biblically it seemed as if the gift was given when
the Holy Spirit came... That was not my experience.

Make no mistake. I have the Holy Spirit. How to say this????avi_headscratch.gif

He came softly when I first got my New birth and started an indepth and intense growth toward God and with God for 24 years.
I MUST ADD IN HERE THAT WHEN I SAY "GOD" I AM INCLUDING MY BELIEF OF THE TRINITY OF GOD THE FATHER, GOD THE SON AND GOD THE HOLY SPIRIT....... (Now, I had had my sins that I did not overtly recognize at the time but I did repent of what I knew I must at the time. ) Then something happened after 24 years and I slipped up. (That is between God and me) But after a long while it was like something smacked me upside the head and the Holy Spirit convicted me of every possible thing you can imagine. It was an experience that was both good and bad... so he was still with me, even though I may have turned his hair grey. It left now room for doubt that I must get on the straight and narrow...... right then.

But I always had the tongues ability even when I was not deserving.

OK... Ive talked on and on and probably did not tell you anything you wanted to know.

Sorry,

Blessings
 
I did not have a cognitive experience of the Holy Spirit imparting tongues on me.

It came about as I was watching one of my televangelists that I used to follow fairly regularly only because
he would take a book of the Bible, Start at the beginning and read the scripture and comment on each that was read.

When he was teaching on tongues, from the bible, it was after that that I could.

My admitted problem is I do not interpret and I know no one who does and that is why I only will pray to or talk to God that way.
In private so no one will hear or judge.

Do I know that it is real? Yes. For the simple reason that I almost flunked high school French for my inability to roll my Rs and
on the occasions I have been taught , or tried to be taught some basic Italian phrases I could never roll my Rs.

Yet one day as I was talking to God clear as a bell I was rolling my R's with no difficulty. It was one time only.

Back when I first started and not knowing what I might be saying I tried to type how it sounded to me in the computer and search. I did not get a translation but I did get that it was likely some old mideastern language.

Thant was about 20 years ago. But I have not stopped, but slowed as there is no one that can translate and since 12 or so years ago there has been such a negative attitude among online forums that I usually let it slide unless something ... such as your comment.. moves me to comment.

AND the fact that I began to and continued on with virtually the same words each time, now, which I assume is a prayer to God
I do not daily like I used to.

Just now I searched how I feel some of the words would be written for this and this is what came back from Wiki

Sal languages


Branch of Sino-Tibetan languages
The Sal languages, also known as the Brahmaputran languages, are a branch of Tibeto-Burman languages spoken in northeast India, as well as parts of Bangladesh, Myanmar, and China.

Are tongues for today. IDK. I would say they are rare, unless you attend a Billy Burke healing service where they abound.... either before or after folks are slain in the Spirit. (No I never was) (But have attended)

But I do not think they are just for men. The bible is quite silent on that and as it does center on the men and if part of a religious service perhaps.

We do know that we are told

1 Corinthians 14:2​



I do believe this as when I have tried to find out what I have said I only get something like what WIKI said. NO translation.

Other then this I cannot comment as it is a complicated subject in a way, and biblically it seemed as if the gift was given when
the Holy Spirit came... That was not my experience.

Make no mistake. I have the Holy Spirit. How to say this????View attachment 1747

He came softly when I first got my New birth and started an indepth and intense growth toward God and with God for 24 years.
I MUST ADD IN HERE THAT WHEN I SAY "GOD" I AM INCLUDING MY BELIEF OF THE TRINITY OF GOD THE FATHER, GOD THE SON AND GOD THE HOLY SPIRIT....... (Now, I had had my sins that I did not overtly recognize at the time but I did repent of what I knew I must at the time. ) Then something happened after 24 years and I slipped up. (That is between God and me) But after a long while it was like something smacked me upside the head and the Holy Spirit convicted me of every possible thing you can imagine. It was an experience that was both good and bad... so he was still with me, even though I may have turned his hair grey. It left now room for doubt that I must get on the straight and narrow...... right then.

But I always had the tongues ability even when I was not deserving.

OK... Ive talked on and on and probably did not tell you anything you wanted to know.

Sorry,

Blessings

Doesn't really matter what I want to know so much.

I was a charismatic in my youth.. I would get into a kind of heightened state mentally in worship service and then do sort of word free association that sounded like gibberish/gabble.

I don't think that was tongues. But I'm with you on the Trinity.. I don't get why alot of forums let members on who deny it.. I understand with this one..because I know it's got areas set aside to discuss for those who don't hold to it.
 
Doesn't really matter what I want to know so much.

I was a charismatic in my youth.. I would get into a kind of heightened state mentally in worship service and then do sort of word free association that sounded like gibberish/gabble.

I don't think that was tongues. But I'm with you on the Trinity.. I don't get why alot of forums let members on who deny it.. I understand with this one..because I know it's got areas set aside to discuss for those who don't hold to it.
Interesting.

"that sounded like gibberish/gabble."

I would assume tongues was exactly that to the speakers ears.... gibberish because it sounds that way to me.

And is exactly why I first tried to find out what I was saying almost 2 decades ago. And came away with just reading it was
a form od old mideastern language.... no interpretation.... Not that it was not anything... but satisfied me.

Then the one time I was so perfectly rolling my Rs, in my own ear might have sounded Spanishy... I do not doubt.

I will tell you that before I pray in tongues, or talk with God, or even have been known to sing I always declare I want to pray to him in the unknown tongue that the Holy Spirit will keep me from making a mistake in. Be that right or wrong, having no one to talk to on the subject I just want to be certain that nothing else is interfering with my time and God, if you understand my meaning on that.

Thank you so much for sharing with me.

May blessings abound for you and your family.
 
Interesting.

"that sounded like gibberish/gabble."

I would assume tongues was exactly that to the speakers ears.... gibberish because it sounds that way to me.

And is exactly why I first tried to find out what I was saying almost 2 decades ago. And came away with just reading it was
a form od old mideastern language.... no interpretation.... Not that it was not anything... but satisfied me.

Then the one time I was so perfectly rolling my Rs, in my own ear might have sounded Spanishy... I do not doubt.

I will tell you that before I pray in tongues, or talk with God, or even have been known to sing I always declare I want to pray to him in the unknown tongue that the Holy Spirit will keep me from making a mistake in. Be that right or wrong, having no one to talk to on the subject I just want to be certain that nothing else is interfering with my time and God, if you understand my meaning on that.

Thank you so much for sharing with me.

May blessings abound for you and your family.
HI MT....
I see that this thread has ended but I did want to post my beliefs on this issue.

I would have to agree that a woman should not precide over a man in any situation in which there is teaching.
Speaking at meetings, instead, is perfectly fine IMO. If not, this would make church affairs very difficult to discuss since women do so much work.

I'd also like to add that they do most of the Sunday lessons for children....
And I don't know how a church could possibly get along without the contribution from women.

I say no to women preachers.

That's all I wanted to say.
The Apostles were men...I take my belief system from there.
 
Last edited:
GINOLJC, to all,
Women can PREACH in and OUTSIDE of the church. Galatians 3:28 "There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus." and the very first Spiritual Gift on the List in 1 Corinthians 12:7 "But the manifestation of the Spirit is given to every man to profit withal." 1 Corinthians 12:8 "For to one is given by the Spirit the word of wisdom; to another the word of knowledge by the same Spirit;" here we have the Pastoral Gift, and the Spiritual Gifts are for all.

if for men only, then God would be a respecter of person..... but he's not.

101G.
 
as a matter of fact, it was a woman who first preached redemption in Israel concerning the messiah at his Birth, after Simeon blessed God, Anna come in afterward. supportive scripture, Luke 2:36 "And there was one Anna, a prophetess, the daughter of Phanuel, of the tribe of Aser: she was of a great age, and had lived with an husband seven years from her virginity;" Luke 2:37 "And she was a widow of about fourscore and four years, which departed not from the temple, but served God with fastings and prayers night and day." Luke 2:38 "And she coming in that instant gave thanks likewise unto the Lord, and spake of him to all them that looked for redemption in Jerusalem."

here the word, “Spake” is the Greek word, Preach, G2980 λαλέω laleo (lal-ye'-ō) v.
to talk, i.e. speak words.
[a prolonged form of an otherwise obsolete verb]
KJV: preach, say, speak (after), talk, tell, utter

ad there are many more references to women in office ... in the church, the body of Christ.

101G.
 
GINOLJC, to all,
Women can PREACH in and OUTSIDE of the church. Galatians 3:28 "There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus." and the very first Spiritual Gift on the List in 1 Corinthians 12:7 "But the manifestation of the Spirit is given to every man to profit withal." 1 Corinthians 12:8 "For to one is given by the Spirit the word of wisdom; to another the word of knowledge by the same Spirit;" here we have the Pastoral Gift, and the Spiritual Gifts are for all.

if for men only, then God would be a respecter of person..... but he's not.

101G.

Galatians 3:28​

28There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor free, there is neither male nor female; for you are all one in Christ Jesus.​

First Corinthians 14:33–35 states, “As in all the congregations of the saints, women should remain silent in the churches. They are not allowed to speak, but must be in submission, as the Law says. If they want to inquire about something, they should ask their own husbands at home; for it is disgraceful for a woman to speak in the church” (ESV). In 1 Timothy 2:11–12, there is a similar instruction: “A woman should learn in quietness and full submission. . . . She must be quiet.”

I, as a woman, personally do not like the idea of women in the pulpit.

Not matter how this is phrased... women and men are different. And each has their own roles in life.

You say that makes God a respecter of persons. I dont see it that way. After all, he gifted women with the ability to give birth and
few men I know of could withstand that. He gifted men with the brawn necessary to ...can I say basically wear the pants of the family?

That does not dimmish either side, It is beautiful in its simplicity.

Of those women preachers... this could well be an example.....

Ecumenical conferences often come and go with little notice.

But the fallout from last fall’s “Re-Imagining” event has continued to escalate as more people have discovered the depth of its unorthodox feminist worship and teaching.


During one session, a controversial incantation was used, including the words: “Our maker, Sophia, we are women in your image, with the hot blood of our wombs we give form to new life … with nectar between our thighs we invite a lover … with our warm body fluids we remind the world of its pleasures and sensations.”


Rainbow-stoled church activists woke early in Pittsburgh to attend the Presbyterian Voices for Justice breakfast during General Assembly. Voices for Justice boasts a controversy-laden history. The caucus represents a merger between two far-left lobbying groups: Voices of Sophia and the Witherspoon Society. This morning’s event focused on the legacy of the former organization.

Entitled “Re-Imaging ‘Re-Imagining’ and the Next 20 Years,” the service centered on the influence and affects of the infamous feminist theology conference that took place in 1993. The event—funded and organized by the PCUSA and the UMC Women’s Division—shocked mainline Protestant moderates and traditionalists alike. The Re-Imagining insisted on referring to God in feminine terms. Although names like “Warm Baker God” and “Loving Mother God” stood as legitimate theological parlance, these were mere one-hit-wonders when contrasted with the eminently popular “Sophia,” in which God manifests…Herself…in a feminine deity of wisdom. Thus, the PCUSA Voices of Sophia was born. Other notable accomplishments included holding a communion service with elements of milk and honey, several female clergy publicly coming out as lesbians, and a rejection of the atonement (where Dr. Dolores Williams audaciously declared, “I don’t think we need folks hanging on crosses, and blood dripping, and weird stuff”). These statements and activities quickly drew accusations of pantheism, goddess worship, and heresy from orthodox Protestants. In the years following, the re-imaginers committed themselves to such heretical causes as purging church documents and Bible translations of gendered pronouns and replacing the Trinitarian formula of “Father, Son, and Holy Spirit” with “Creator, Redeemer, and Sustainer.” In the meeting’s aftermath, the PCUSA organizer of the conference, Mary Ann Lundy, was summarily fired from her post.

Time has not boded well for the Re-Imagining movement. Most of the 130 or so attendees were over the age of sixty; only five or six were under thirty. After More Light Presbyterians executive director Patrick Evans led them in music, the participants enacted the mystical “Sophia blessing.” The lyrics were the following: “Bless Sophia, dream the vision, share the wisdom dwelling deep within.” The unsettling, semi-occultic liturgical dance moves seemed to combine the hokey-pokey with the Macarena.

At last, Sylvia Thorson-Smith approached the lectern to offer the message. She described herself as “the centerfold for [the conservative] Presbyterian Layman,” recounting that she discovered “how devoted people are to tradition and how determined others are to innovating it.” Remembering the Re-Imagining golden age, Thorson-Smith proclaimed, “the idea of powerful women was such a turn in traditional roles.” She accused orthodox church members with seeing powerful women as “icky.” “Why would a church be so exercised over a feminist conference?” she asked. After portraying Mary Ann Lundy as a martyr, Thorson-Smith bemoaned “the pressure to keep women silent over the next four years.” According to the speaker, the theological battles resulted in “an aversion of risk-taking.” Nevertheless, the feminist theologian still hoped for a bright future: “Our herstory is our prayer.”

After referencing emergent thinker Phyllis Tickle, Thorson-Smith judged that the PCUSA was at a moment “where the church discards outmoded ideas.” “We who hold to the Re-Imagining heritage have a few ideas for the rummage sale,” she announced. The feminist speaker wistfully remembered, “At Re-Imagining, we experienced an entire space as sacred…God herself is experienced.” She also advised, “The church needs to speak truth to power,” challenging the “Pax Americana” and the “exploitation of the environment.” “We need to build coalitions with other re-imaginers in other denominations and across the world,” she concluded, “We need to reconnect ourselves to risk-taking.”

Not all was good news for the Voices of Justice. The spokeswoman mourned, “We’ve really lost ground on the language on how we address God and worship.” It seems that mainline Protestants of all stripes still refer to God in the traditional terms as outlined in Scripture. Perhaps old habits just die hard; on the other hand, perhaps some theological fads are blatantly silly.

The aging re-imaginers left with a sizable feminist benediction. It ended with the command “Go into this General Assembly with your Sophia spirit.” One enthusiastic participant exclaimed, “A-women!”

Reveal Comments Reveal Tags
Related Reads

I will stop with the references because they make me want to vomit.

From the Sophia garbage to their "ReImagining God" Conferences, that are not church specific....

NO WOMEN IMO... I have enough trouble with women elders.
 
GINOLJC, to all,
Women can PREACH in and OUTSIDE of the church. Galatians 3:28 "There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus."

All are equally Christians, but this doesn't mean they have the same functions.


New International Dictionary of New Testament Theology (NIDNTT): This, however, is not a call to abolish all earthly relationships. Rather, it puts these relationships in the perspective of salvation history. As Paul goes on to say, "And if you are Christ's then you are Abraham's offspring, heirs according to promise" (Gal. 3:29; cf. also Rom. 10:2). All who are in Christ have the same status before God; but they do not necessarily have the same function. In the context of the circumcision question in Gal., the assertion is doubly relevant. For women could not be recipients of the sign which Judaizers were insisting as a prerequisite for full salvation (2:570, Man, C. Brown).

Mounce's Complete Expository Dictionary of Old and New Testament Words: In the church of God, when dealing with salvation, there are no barriers (Man, page 435).
 

Galatians 3:28​

28There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor free, there is neither male nor female; for you are all one in Christ Jesus.​

First Corinthians 14:33–35 states, “As in all the congregations of the saints, women should remain silent in the churches. They are not allowed to speak, but must be in submission, as the Law says. If they want to inquire about something, they should ask their own husbands at home; for it is disgraceful for a woman to speak in the church” (ESV). In 1 Timothy 2:11–12, there is a similar instruction: “A woman should learn in quietness and full submission. . . . She must be quiet.”

I, as a woman, personally do not like the idea of women in the pulpit.

Not matter how this is phrased... women and men are different. And each has their own roles in life.

You say that makes God a respecter of persons. I dont see it that way. After all, he gifted women with the ability to give birth and
few men I know of could withstand that. He gifted men with the brawn necessary to ...can I say basically wear the pants of the family?

That does not dimmish either side, It is beautiful in its simplicity.

Of those women preachers... this could well be an example.....

Ecumenical conferences often come and go with little notice.

But the fallout from last fall’s “Re-Imagining” event has continued to escalate as more people have discovered the depth of its unorthodox feminist worship and teaching.


During one session, a controversial incantation was used, including the words: “Our maker, Sophia, we are women in your image, with the hot blood of our wombs we give form to new life … with nectar between our thighs we invite a lover … with our warm body fluids we remind the world of its pleasures and sensations.”


Rainbow-stoled church activists woke early in Pittsburgh to attend the Presbyterian Voices for Justice breakfast during General Assembly. Voices for Justice boasts a controversy-laden history. The caucus represents a merger between two far-left lobbying groups: Voices of Sophia and the Witherspoon Society. This morning’s event focused on the legacy of the former organization.

Entitled “Re-Imaging ‘Re-Imagining’ and the Next 20 Years,” the service centered on the influence and affects of the infamous feminist theology conference that took place in 1993. The event—funded and organized by the PCUSA and the UMC Women’s Division—shocked mainline Protestant moderates and traditionalists alike. The Re-Imagining insisted on referring to God in feminine terms. Although names like “Warm Baker God” and “Loving Mother God” stood as legitimate theological parlance, these were mere one-hit-wonders when contrasted with the eminently popular “Sophia,” in which God manifests…Herself…in a feminine deity of wisdom. Thus, the PCUSA Voices of Sophia was born. Other notable accomplishments included holding a communion service with elements of milk and honey, several female clergy publicly coming out as lesbians, and a rejection of the atonement (where Dr. Dolores Williams audaciously declared, “I don’t think we need folks hanging on crosses, and blood dripping, and weird stuff”). These statements and activities quickly drew accusations of pantheism, goddess worship, and heresy from orthodox Protestants. In the years following, the re-imaginers committed themselves to such heretical causes as purging church documents and Bible translations of gendered pronouns and replacing the Trinitarian formula of “Father, Son, and Holy Spirit” with “Creator, Redeemer, and Sustainer.” In the meeting’s aftermath, the PCUSA organizer of the conference, Mary Ann Lundy, was summarily fired from her post.

Time has not boded well for the Re-Imagining movement. Most of the 130 or so attendees were over the age of sixty; only five or six were under thirty. After More Light Presbyterians executive director Patrick Evans led them in music, the participants enacted the mystical “Sophia blessing.” The lyrics were the following: “Bless Sophia, dream the vision, share the wisdom dwelling deep within.” The unsettling, semi-occultic liturgical dance moves seemed to combine the hokey-pokey with the Macarena.

At last, Sylvia Thorson-Smith approached the lectern to offer the message. She described herself as “the centerfold for [the conservative] Presbyterian Layman,” recounting that she discovered “how devoted people are to tradition and how determined others are to innovating it.” Remembering the Re-Imagining golden age, Thorson-Smith proclaimed, “the idea of powerful women was such a turn in traditional roles.” She accused orthodox church members with seeing powerful women as “icky.” “Why would a church be so exercised over a feminist conference?” she asked. After portraying Mary Ann Lundy as a martyr, Thorson-Smith bemoaned “the pressure to keep women silent over the next four years.” According to the speaker, the theological battles resulted in “an aversion of risk-taking.” Nevertheless, the feminist theologian still hoped for a bright future: “Our herstory is our prayer.”

After referencing emergent thinker Phyllis Tickle, Thorson-Smith judged that the PCUSA was at a moment “where the church discards outmoded ideas.” “We who hold to the Re-Imagining heritage have a few ideas for the rummage sale,” she announced. The feminist speaker wistfully remembered, “At Re-Imagining, we experienced an entire space as sacred…God herself is experienced.” She also advised, “The church needs to speak truth to power,” challenging the “Pax Americana” and the “exploitation of the environment.” “We need to build coalitions with other re-imaginers in other denominations and across the world,” she concluded, “We need to reconnect ourselves to risk-taking.”

Not all was good news for the Voices of Justice. The spokeswoman mourned, “We’ve really lost ground on the language on how we address God and worship.” It seems that mainline Protestants of all stripes still refer to God in the traditional terms as outlined in Scripture. Perhaps old habits just die hard; on the other hand, perhaps some theological fads are blatantly silly.

The aging re-imaginers left with a sizable feminist benediction. It ended with the command “Go into this General Assembly with your Sophia spirit.” One enthusiastic participant exclaimed, “A-women!”

Reveal Comments Reveal Tags
Related Reads

I will stop with the references because they make me want to vomit.

From the Sophia garbage to their "ReImagining God" Conferences, that are not church specific....

NO WOMEN IMO... I have enough trouble with women elders.
@101G has a very good point.

But I'll have to agree with what you've stated above.

Jesus picked all men.
The disciples He sent out were men.

In the early church, men were the heads of churches.

God is not a respector of persons in salvation theology....
but it's probably not a good idea to send women out into the world to preach.

And, I agree that women are different and are not cut out to be pastors.
 
@101G has a very good point.

But I'll have to agree with what you've stated above.

Jesus picked all men.
The disciples He sent out were men.

In the early church, men were the heads of churches.

God is not a respector of persons in salvation theology....
but it's probably not a good idea to send women out into the world to preach.

And, I agree that women are different and are not cut out to be pastors.
Not only did Jesus pick all men, but if you have watched any of the Chosen we see that the women traveled with the men, but
did the cooking, etc.
 
The first Christian Preacher was a woman! That's right In John’s Gospel, the Samaritan woman at the well is the first Christian preacher.

Let me introduce you to one of the most unexpected evangelists in the Bible—the Samaritan woman at the well.

Her story in John 4 is a powerful reminder that God can use anyone—yes, even you!—to spread His message of love and salvation.

The narrative of the Samaritan Woman is the first incident in the bible where a person’s interaction with Jesus leads them to go out and reveal his identity as Son of God to others. Nicodemus came secretly at night and departed while it was still dark.

In the bible he is portrayed as a man in fear.

“Moreover, the woman at once believed, and appeared wiser than Nicodemus; indeed, not only wiser, but even stronger. Four, though he heard countless things of this kind, Nicodemus neither summoned any other person to Christ, nor did he himself speak freely of him; while she engaged in apostolic work, spreading the good news to all and calling them to Jesus, drawing to him an entire city from outside the faith.”

Her first sermon went like this.

“Come and see a man who has told me everything I have ever done. Could he be the Messiah?” John 4:29

Her brief sermon was invitational (“Come and see”). It affirmed the humanity of Jesus (“Come and see the man”). Her sermon is interactive, inviting answers, inviting speculation (“Could this be the Christ?”). She gives personal testimony to her conversion, accepting her sinfulness, (“He has told me all the things I have done”). The power of her words moved the crowd to curiosity and thereby, to conversion.

"if they keep quiet, the stones will cry out" Luke 19:40
Jesus declared that even the stones would praise him if his followers remained silent, highlighting the inevitability of his divine recognition.
 
First Corinthians 14:33–35 states, “As in all the congregations of the saints, women should remain silent in the churches. They are not allowed to speak, but must be in submission, as the Law says. If they want to inquire about something, they should ask their own husbands at home; for it is disgraceful for a woman to speak in the church” (ESV). In 1 Timothy 2:11–12, there is a similar instruction: “A woman should learn in quietness and full submission. . . . She must be quiet.”
Greeting MT,
1 Corinthians 14:34 "Let your women keep silence in the churches: for it is not permitted unto them to speak; but they are commanded to be under obedience, as also saith the law."

A. this is not speaking to all women, only Married women, for the term used here is,
G1135 γυνή gune (ǰ ï-nee') n.
1. a woman.
2. (specially) a wife.
[probably from the base of G1096]
KJV: wife, woman
Root(s): G1096
Compare: G1133, G435
See also: G1134, H802

Note definition #2. and how do 101G knows that the verse is speaking ABOUT "MARRIED WOMEN/WIVES?" because of the the next verse. 1 Corinthians 14:35 "And if they will learn any thing, let them ask their husbands at home: for it is a shame for women to speak in the church."
the only woman who has a husband is a MARRIED ONE. a wife.

B. the apostle in the above two verses is not even speaking ..... "TO" .... Women at all, but to their husbands. let's read verses 34 again so that we can see it. 1 Corinthians 14:34 "Let your women keep silence in the churches: for it is not permitted unto them to speak; but they are commanded to be under obedience, as also saith the law." now for an example, if 101G was speaking to MT Mattie and say, "Let your children stop running around in the churches" who is 101G talking to? to MT Mattie or MT Mattie children? of course to MT Mattie.

holding that thought, let's go to 1 Timothy 2:11-15, which will answer why wives of the husband to be "in silence with all subjection". 1 Timothy 2:11 "Let the woman learn in silence with all subjection." 1 Timothy 2:12 "But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence."

That term "Woman" here is the same word used in 1 Corinthians 14:34 for woman, G1135 γυνή gune (ǰ ï-nee') n. and the same usage "WIFE". how do 101G know? .... let's just read the next few verses.

1 Timothy 2:13 "For Adam was first formed, then Eve." 1 Timothy 2:14 "And Adam was not deceived, but the woman being deceived was in the transgression." 1 Timothy 2:15 "Notwithstanding she shall be saved in childbearing, if they continue in faith and charity and holiness with sobriety."

"she shall be saved in childbearing?" the only kind of woman who suppose to be bearing children are .... "MARRIED" ONES. meaning "WIVES.

now, how do this tie into 1 Corinthians 14:33 and 34 at church? it is the HUSBAND responsibility, (according to the Law) at HOME, if he is in the Lord himself to TEACH his ... OWN WIFE, at home the things of God, so that when they get to church they both be one one accord saying the same thing. hence NO CONFUSION, 1 Corinthians 14:33 "For God is not the author of confusion, but of peace, as in all churches of the saints."

if a wife say one thing and the husband say another... there is no peace at Home or in the church. there is no ONENESS, hence CONFUSION. now if a woman marries a Man who is not exposed to the way of God there are scriptures for that also. but here is is for the Men who are exposed to the way of God.... and for "as also saith the law?". the key word is in 1 Timothy 2:12 "But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence." the term "OVER" is the revealing term, let's see why. Genesis 3:16 "Unto the woman he said, I will greatly multiply thy sorrow and thy conception; in sorrow thou shalt bring forth children; and thy desire shall be to thy husband, and he shall rule over thee." NOTICE, to RULE ... "OVER", and not to rule, but rule "OVER", meaning to LEAD. and this is the Law of God here in Genesis. because Genesis falls in the first five book of Moses called the Pentateuch, or the LAW.

Hope that helped.

101G.
 
Greeting MT,
1 Corinthians 14:34 "Let your women keep silence in the churches: for it is not permitted unto them to speak; but they are commanded to be under obedience, as also saith the law."

A. this is not speaking to all women, only Married women, for the term used here is,
G1135 γυνή gune (ǰ ï-nee') n.
1. a woman.
2. (specially) a wife.
[probably from the base of G1096]
KJV: wife, woman
Root(s): G1096
Compare: G1133, G435
See also: G1134, H802

Note definition #2. and how do 101G knows that the verse is speaking ABOUT "MARRIED WOMEN/WIVES?" because of the the next verse. 1 Corinthians 14:35 "And if they will learn any thing, let them ask their husbands at home: for it is a shame for women to speak in the church."
the only woman who has a husband is a MARRIED ONE. a wife.

B. the apostle in the above two verses is not even speaking ..... "TO" .... Women at all, but to their husbands. let's read verses 34 again so that we can see it. 1 Corinthians 14:34 "Let your women keep silence in the churches: for it is not permitted unto them to speak; but they are commanded to be under obedience, as also saith the law." now for an example, if 101G was speaking to MT Mattie and say, "Let your children stop running around in the churches" who is 101G talking to? to MT Mattie or MT Mattie children? of course to MT Mattie.

holding that thought, let's go to 1 Timothy 2:11-15, which will answer why wives of the husband to be "in silence with all subjection". 1 Timothy 2:11 "Let the woman learn in silence with all subjection." 1 Timothy 2:12 "But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence."

That term "Woman" here is the same word used in 1 Corinthians 14:34 for woman, G1135 γυνή gune (ǰ ï-nee') n. and the same usage "WIFE". how do 101G know? .... let's just read the next few verses.

1 Timothy 2:13 "For Adam was first formed, then Eve." 1 Timothy 2:14 "And Adam was not deceived, but the woman being deceived was in the transgression." 1 Timothy 2:15 "Notwithstanding she shall be saved in childbearing, if they continue in faith and charity and holiness with sobriety."

"she shall be saved in childbearing?" the only kind of woman who suppose to be bearing children are .... "MARRIED" ONES. meaning "WIVES.

now, how do this tie into 1 Corinthians 14:33 and 34 at church? it is the HUSBAND responsibility, (according to the Law) at HOME, if he is in the Lord himself to TEACH his ... OWN WIFE, at home the things of God, so that when they get to church they both be one one accord saying the same thing. hence NO CONFUSION, 1 Corinthians 14:33 "For God is not the author of confusion, but of peace, as in all churches of the saints."

if a wife say one thing and the husband say another... there is no peace at Home or in the church. there is no ONENESS, hence CONFUSION. now if a woman marries a Man who is not exposed to the way of God there are scriptures for that also. but here is is for the Men who are exposed to the way of God.... and for "as also saith the law?". the key word is in 1 Timothy 2:12 "But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence." the term "OVER" is the revealing term, let's see why. Genesis 3:16 "Unto the woman he said, I will greatly multiply thy sorrow and thy conception; in sorrow thou shalt bring forth children; and thy desire shall be to thy husband, and he shall rule over thee." NOTICE, to RULE ... "OVER", and not to rule, but rule "OVER", meaning to LEAD. and this is the Law of God here in Genesis. because Genesis falls in the first five book of Moses called the Pentateuch, or the LAW.

Hope that helped.

101G.
§A pastor has authority over EVERYONE in his congregation.
According to your post above....no woman should ever get married because she's better off being single and having authority over men.
 
Back
Top Bottom