What do 7th Day Adventists Believe ?

civic

Well-known member
Seventh-day Adventism is a sect of Christianity that believes, among other things, that worship services should be conducted on the “seventh day” (the Sabbath) instead of on Sunday. There seem to be different "degrees" of Seventh-day Adventism. Some Seventh-day Adventists believe identically to orthodox Christians, other than holding to the Saturday Sabbath. Other Adventists, however, go much further into aberrant doctrine.

Seventh-day Adventism has its roots in Adventism, a 19th-century movement that anticipated the imminent appearance (or advent) of Jesus Christ. The Adventists were also called Millerites because their group was founded by William Miller, a false prophet who predicted Jesus would return in either 1843 or 1844. When Miller’s prediction of Christ’s second coming failed to come to pass, the Millerites disbanded in dismay; this event became known as the “Great Disappointment.” But then a couple of Miller’s followers claimed to have visions to account for the failed prophecy. Instead of coming to earth, Jesus had entered the heavenly temple—thus, Miller was right, after all, they said, except his prophecy had a spiritual fulfillment instead of a physical one. One of the seers who covered for Miller was 17-year-old Ellen G. Harmon, who had her first of 2,000 purported visions in a prayer meeting shortly after Miller’s disgrace. With her vision, Ellen soon became a beacon of hope for disillusioned Millerites. She united Adventist factions and became the spiritual guide for a new religious group.

In 1846, Ellen married James White, an Adventist preacher. Soon they became convinced that Sabbath-keeping was for all Christians. In 1847, Ellen G. White had another vision—this one confirming her new belief that Sabbath-keeping was to be a primary doctrine. The Adventists under Ellen G. White’s influence became Seventh-day Adventists. Ellen G. White’s many visions and writings—she was a prolific writer—greatly shaped the doctrine of Seventh-day Adventism. Today, most Seventh-day Adventists still consider Ellen White to be a prophetess of God, even though many of her prophecies failed to come true. In fact, Seventh-day Adventists consider Revelation 19:10 (“the testimony of Jesus is the spirit of prophecy”) to be a reference to Ellen G. White’s writings.

In 1855, the Seventh-day Adventists settled in Battle Creek, Michigan, and in May 1863 the General Conference of Seventh-day Adventists was officially incorporated. In the next five decades, Ellen G. White wrote nearly 10,000 pages of prophetic material. Included in the visions was the doctrine of “The Great Controversy,” a cosmic war being waged between Jesus and His angelic army and Satan and his. Other visions dealt with healthy eating habits, which Mrs. White called “the gospel of health” (Testimonies for the Church, Vol. 6, p. 327). Seventh-day Adventism places restrictions on consuming meat, or “flesh food,” as Adventists call it. “Flesh food is injurious to health, and whatever affects the body has a corresponding effect on the mind and the soul” (The Ministry of Healing, Chapter 24: “Flesh as Food,” p. 316). It is no surprise that, after requiring Sabbath-keeping, Adventists began to add other elements of legalism into their creed.

Interestingly, Kellogg’s Corn Flakes was an Adventist creation: John Harvey Kellogg was a Seventh-day Adventist doctor in Battle Creek who wanted to manufacture a “healthy” vegetarian alternative to “unhealthy” breakfasts containing meat. Meanwhile, Mrs. White kept having visions, and she began teaching the unorthodox doctrines of soul sleep and annihilationism (which contradicts Matthew 25:46).

Other problematic doctrines in Seventh-day Adventism include the teaching that Satan is the “scapegoat” and will bear believers’ sins (The Great Controversy, p. 422, 485)—this is the opposite of what the Bible says about who bore our sins (1 Peter 2:24). Seventh-day Adventism also identifies Jesus as Michael the archangel (Jude 1:9, Clear Word Bible, published by Review and Herald Publishing Association, 1994)—a doctrine that denies the true nature of Christ—and teaches that Jesus entered a second phase of His redemptive work on October 22, 1844, as prophesied by Hiram Edson. And, of course, the Adventist promotion of Sabbath-keeping as a primary doctrine goes against the teaching of Scripture on the matter (see Romans 14:5).

Seventh-Day Adventism is a diverse movement, and not all SDA groups hold to all the doctrines mentioned above. But all Seventh-Day Adventists should seriously consider the following: a recognized prophetess in their church was a teacher of aberrant doctrine, and their church has its roots in the failed prophecies of William Miller.

So, should a Christian attend a Seventh-day Adventist church? Due to the penchant of Adventists to accept extra-biblical revelation and the doctrinal issues mentioned above, we would strongly encourage believers to not get involved in Seventh-day Adventism. Yes, a person can be an advocate of Seventh-day Adventism and still be a believer. At the same time, there are enough potential risks to warn us against joining a Seventh-day Adventist church.got ?

hope this helps!!!
 
Seventh-day Adventism is a sect of Christianity that believes, among other things, that worship services should be conducted on the “seventh day” (the Sabbath) instead of on Sunday. There seem to be different "degrees" of Seventh-day Adventism. Some Seventh-day Adventists believe identically to orthodox Christians, other than holding to the Saturday Sabbath. Other Adventists, however, go much further into aberrant doctrine.

Seventh-day Adventism has its roots in Adventism, a 19th-century movement that anticipated the imminent appearance (or advent) of Jesus Christ. The Adventists were also called Millerites because their group was founded by William Miller, a false prophet who predicted Jesus would return in either 1843 or 1844. When Miller’s prediction of Christ’s second coming failed to come to pass, the Millerites disbanded in dismay; this event became known as the “Great Disappointment.” But then a couple of Miller’s followers claimed to have visions to account for the failed prophecy. Instead of coming to earth, Jesus had entered the heavenly temple—thus, Miller was right, after all, they said, except his prophecy had a spiritual fulfillment instead of a physical one. One of the seers who covered for Miller was 17-year-old Ellen G. Harmon, who had her first of 2,000 purported visions in a prayer meeting shortly after Miller’s disgrace. With her vision, Ellen soon became a beacon of hope for disillusioned Millerites. She united Adventist factions and became the spiritual guide for a new religious group.

In 1846, Ellen married James White, an Adventist preacher. Soon they became convinced that Sabbath-keeping was for all Christians. In 1847, Ellen G. White had another vision—this one confirming her new belief that Sabbath-keeping was to be a primary doctrine. The Adventists under Ellen G. White’s influence became Seventh-day Adventists. Ellen G. White’s many visions and writings—she was a prolific writer—greatly shaped the doctrine of Seventh-day Adventism. Today, most Seventh-day Adventists still consider Ellen White to be a prophetess of God, even though many of her prophecies failed to come true. In fact, Seventh-day Adventists consider Revelation 19:10 (“the testimony of Jesus is the spirit of prophecy”) to be a reference to Ellen G. White’s writings.

In 1855, the Seventh-day Adventists settled in Battle Creek, Michigan, and in May 1863 the General Conference of Seventh-day Adventists was officially incorporated. In the next five decades, Ellen G. White wrote nearly 10,000 pages of prophetic material. Included in the visions was the doctrine of “The Great Controversy,” a cosmic war being waged between Jesus and His angelic army and Satan and his. Other visions dealt with healthy eating habits, which Mrs. White called “the gospel of health” (Testimonies for the Church, Vol. 6, p. 327). Seventh-day Adventism places restrictions on consuming meat, or “flesh food,” as Adventists call it. “Flesh food is injurious to health, and whatever affects the body has a corresponding effect on the mind and the soul” (The Ministry of Healing, Chapter 24: “Flesh as Food,” p. 316). It is no surprise that, after requiring Sabbath-keeping, Adventists began to add other elements of legalism into their creed.

Interestingly, Kellogg’s Corn Flakes was an Adventist creation: John Harvey Kellogg was a Seventh-day Adventist doctor in Battle Creek who wanted to manufacture a “healthy” vegetarian alternative to “unhealthy” breakfasts containing meat. Meanwhile, Mrs. White kept having visions, and she began teaching the unorthodox doctrines of soul sleep and annihilationism (which contradicts Matthew 25:46).

Other problematic doctrines in Seventh-day Adventism include the teaching that Satan is the “scapegoat” and will bear believers’ sins (The Great Controversy, p. 422, 485)—this is the opposite of what the Bible says about who bore our sins (1 Peter 2:24). Seventh-day Adventism also identifies Jesus as Michael the archangel (Jude 1:9, Clear Word Bible, published by Review and Herald Publishing Association, 1994)—a doctrine that denies the true nature of Christ—and teaches that Jesus entered a second phase of His redemptive work on October 22, 1844, as prophesied by Hiram Edson. And, of course, the Adventist promotion of Sabbath-keeping as a primary doctrine goes against the teaching of Scripture on the matter (see Romans 14:5).

Seventh-Day Adventism is a diverse movement, and not all SDA groups hold to all the doctrines mentioned above. But all Seventh-Day Adventists should seriously consider the following: a recognized prophetess in their church was a teacher of aberrant doctrine, and their church has its roots in the failed prophecies of William Miller.

So, should a Christian attend a Seventh-day Adventist church? Due to the penchant of Adventists to accept extra-biblical revelation and the doctrinal issues mentioned above, we would strongly encourage believers to not get involved in Seventh-day Adventism. Yes, a person can be an advocate of Seventh-day Adventism and still be a believer. At the same time, there are enough potential risks to warn us against joining a Seventh-day Adventist church.got ?

hope this helps!!!
Thanks for all that information on the SDA Church. Do you or anyone else have more information on what exactly the following SDA belief/statement is all about:

"that Jesus entered a second phase of His redemptive work on October 22, 1844, as prophesied by Hiram Edson."
 
The Great Disappointment
Thanks for the link. The following is mentioned in that link:

They came to the conclusion that Miller's assumption that the sanctuary represented the earth was in error. "The sanctuary to be cleansed in Daniel 8:14 was not the earth or the church, but the sanctuary in heaven." Therefore, the October 22 date marked not the Second Coming of Christ, but rather a heavenly event.

Question: why does a heavenly sanctuary need cleansing? Sounds strange. Maybe there's an SDA believer that can answer that?
 
"that Jesus entered a second phase of His redemptive work on October 22, 1844, as prophesied by Hiram Edson."
Wasn't this the excuse for the reason Jesus didn't come back on the day they said.....and when he didn't they got this "new revelation" that he did but they just didn't understand what it meant until this Edson statement?
 
Thanks for the link. The following is mentioned in that link:

They came to the conclusion that Miller's assumption that the sanctuary represented the earth was in error. "The sanctuary to be cleansed in Daniel 8:14 was not the earth or the church, but the sanctuary in heaven." Therefore, the October 22 date marked not the Second Coming of Christ, but rather a heavenly event.

Question: why does a heavenly sanctuary need cleansing? Sounds strange. Maybe there's an SDA believer that can answer that?
Yes as I mentioned. Well it seems they were pushing every button and pulling every lever to escape having to admit the simple truth that THEY WERE WRONG. I think they would have been just better off to admit this then to dream up some weird, esoteric way of reasoning that something in Heaven needed to be cleansed and now in the 1800's? Just so very off the wall and strange.
 
Yes as I mentioned. Well it seems they were pushing every button and pulling every lever to escape having to admit the simple truth that THEY WERE WRONG. I think they would have been just better off to admit this then to dream up some weird, esoteric way of reasoning that something in Heaven needed to be cleansed and now in the 1800's? Just so very off the wall and strange.
That is a common misconception. The Bible teaches Jesus is in the heavenly sanctuary and people are getting saved until he returns. The judgement clearly is finalized before Jesus comes and someone is giving that message before the mark of the beast happens. So. "they" were faithful to scripture, Be careful or you might say something you don't know enough to comment about.
 
That is a common misconception. The Bible teaches Jesus is in the heavenly sanctuary and people are getting saved until he returns. The judgement clearly is finalized before Jesus comes and someone is giving that message before the mark of the beast happens. So. "they" were faithful to scripture, Be careful or you might say something you don't know enough to comment about.
So there's no cleansing of a heavenly sanctuary - only a cleansing of an earthly sanctuary. Something like that did happen in history with the abomination act of the Greek King Antiochus Epiphanes. We can leave it as a failed attempt by SDA believers to save face.
 
That is a common misconception. The Bible teaches Jesus is in the heavenly sanctuary and people are getting saved until he returns. The judgement clearly is finalized before Jesus comes and someone is giving that message before the mark of the beast happens. So. "they" were faithful to scripture, Be careful or you might say something you don't know enough to comment about.
So what was all this talk that the heavenly sanctuary needed cleansed in the 1800's. I've read that in SDA material and I have to question now REALLY? If you're SDA where in the world do you get such a concept.
 
Thanks for the link. The following is mentioned in that link:

They came to the conclusion that Miller's assumption that the sanctuary represented the earth was in error. "The sanctuary to be cleansed in Daniel 8:14 was not the earth or the church, but the sanctuary in heaven." Therefore, the October 22 date marked not the Second Coming of Christ, but rather a heavenly event.

Question: why does a heavenly sanctuary need cleansing? Sounds strange. Maybe there's an SDA believer that can answer that?
The earthly sanctuary and the round of feast days and services culminated in the Day of Atonement. Throughout the religious year the sins of Israel were taken into the sanctuary through the medium of the blood spilt by the sacrifices. The DoA was the celebration and ritual by which all the sins of the previous year were "cleansed" when the High Priest entered the Most Holy Place with the blood of the Lord's goat upon which no sins had been confessed. The sins in the sanctuary were taken in type and placed upon the scape goat, Satan, who them bore the guilt for all that He has been responsible for.
This ritual of the cleansing of the heavenly sanctuary is what had been taking place since 1844. It is a final act on the work of the gospel that completes the work of God in redeeming man and preparing him for the fellowship of God and the angels. It is the final work in preparing the bride to meet her coming King. In the original, Israel was called to a solemn time of searching of heart and mind before the High Priest finished His work. . So also should we imitate that example for the day out High Priest exits the sanctuary and comes to take His bride home.
 
Thanks for all that information on the SDA Church. Do you or anyone else have more information on what exactly the following SDA belief/statement is all about:

"that Jesus entered a second phase of His redemptive work on October 22, 1844, as prophesied by Hiram Edson."
That had to do with Jesus as our High Priest entering into the Heavenly Sanctuary to perform His Investigative Judgment.
 
This ritual of the cleansing of the heavenly sanctuary is what had been taking place since 1844. It is a final act on the work of the gospel that completes the work of God in redeeming man and preparing him for the fellowship of God and the angels.
That's really all one needs to know about it right there to see and understand that it MUST be error. Are we to believe God waited for about 1, 844 years to prepare men to have fellowship with him??? Why shouldn't you consider that was all done at the cross.

That which we have seen and heard we proclaim also to you, so that you too may have fellowship with us; and indeed our fellowship is with the Father and with his Son Jesus Christ. 1 Jn 1:3
 
That's really all one needs to know about it right there to see and understand that it MUST be error. Are we to believe God waited for about 1, 844 years to prepare men to have fellowship with him??? Why shouldn't you consider that was all done at the cross.

That which we have seen and heard we proclaim also to you, so that you too may have fellowship with us; and indeed our fellowship is with the Father and with his Son Jesus Christ. 1 Jn 1:3

Cause a "prophetess" made a mistake, and they had to clean it up somehow.
 
And why October 1844 in which a failed prophecy needed to be redeemed somehow?

Why not January 1352? Why not December 561?

Wiki? You go to a secular site to discover the truth concerning religion? Why not go to an Adventists site... We have more media, educational, ministry web sites than any other single denomination on the planet.
 
Back
Top Bottom