Johann
Well-known member
Go and play games somewhere else and don't forget to take your "sweets" before going to bed.Not a single point on mine was even close to being refuted. Nothing but eisegesis.
J.
Go and play games somewhere else and don't forget to take your "sweets" before going to bed.Not a single point on mine was even close to being refuted. Nothing but eisegesis.
ProjectingGo and play games somewhere else and don't forget to take your "sweets" before going to bed.
J.
the scapegoat theory is EISEGESIS not Exegesis.Go and play games somewhere else and don't forget to take your "sweets" before going to bed.
J.
You are correct and @Johann is wrong.The debate on whether Jesus was or was not prefigured in the scapegoat released to Azazel speaks loudly about the fact that the associations between the symbols/rituals of Leviticus and the life and mission of Jesus Christ is something performed retrospectively, not prospectively.
What I mean is that it is not the YHWH established rituals for Israel to make them fit every aspect of the future Messiah.
Rather, it was the other way round. Many centuries later, God inspired the apostles to seize the symbols/rituals that their Jewish readers were familiar to, and that fitted the narrative of Jesus mission, to use them as illustrations.
It is impossible to make every single part of the Leviticus ritual fit Jesus' life or mission, because those rituals WERE NOT designed to prefigure every part of Jesus life or mission. Those symbols and rituals were designed, primarily, to fit the culture, myths and spiritual needs of ancient Israel.
Why didn't the apostles referred specifically to Jesus as the scapegoat released to the desert?
Because the events associated with his death happened in Passover.... because Jesus had died shedding his blood and not sent to exile.
If Jesus had been sent to exile, probably they would have seized the figure of the scapegoat to explain his mission.
These are valid points I will have to examine the idea that Jesus is not the scapegoat.the scapegoat theory is EISEGESIS not Exegesis.
No one in the N.T. associates the scapegoat of Lev 14-16 with Jesus.
Jesus didin't
John the Baptist didn't
The Apostles didn't
God didn't.
Its ANTI- GOSPEL since Jesus dies for our sins according to the SCRIPTURE. He was put to death, not released.
He died for sin and was not released and set free for sin.
The Top 10 following facts you are ignoring :
1- the first goat was unto the Lord, not the scapegoat
2- the first goat died and was sacrificed unto the Lord
3- Jesus died as a sacrifice for sin unto the Lord
4- Jesus was not released and lived like the scapegoat
5- The N.T. never associates Jesus with the scapegoat that lived
6- The scapegoat theory is an unbiblical one just like PSA
7- The scapegoat did not atone for sin with blood
8- Without the shedding of blood there is no forgiveness of sins
9- Jesus was not the scapegoat since His blood was poured out for the forgiveness of sins
10- Calling Jesus the scapegoat is eisegesis, not exegesis.
Conclusion: the scapegoat cannot be Jesus since the scapegoat never died or its blood was used to make atonement for sin.
hope this helps !!!
Yet nothing prevents @Johann or anyone else to derive spiritual meanings from any fact in the Bible... as long as it is for personal spiritual development and it is not meant to be imposed to others as orthodoxy.You are correct and @Johann is wrong.
Beautifully expressed, and isn't it remarkable that I find words of encouragement from you, yet receive none from him? I see profound typologies - the scapegoat -the the two goats, fully resonating with your insights.Yet nothing prevents @Johann or anyone else to derive spiritual meanings from any fact in the Bible... as long as it is for personal spiritual development and it is not meant to be imposed to others as orthodoxy.
For example, someone could see in the event of the Israelites going across the Red Sea a prefiguration of baptism, since it occurred during the pass from slavery to freedom, just as in baptism leave a life of slavery to live a life of freedom.
As an analogy, I guess it would be valid and beautiful. But it could not be used in a debate as a proof that Israel was "baptized" collectively for the remissions of their sins.
If @Johann sees Christ in the scapegoat released to the desert, and that helps him to understand God's forgiveness, good for him.
Personally, I don't see a Person (Jesus Christ), but a process, represented in the slayed lamb and the released scapegoat.
The slayed lamb reminds me of dying (so that I can have a new life) and the released scapegoat to forgetting (letting go) the old life. Both, to me, are symbols of the same thing.
Killing my old life with a knife speaks about the immediate effect of God's grace... and killing my old life by letting it starve in the desert represents the long process of God's grace. Something like the process of forgiveness and transformation/regeneration/sanctification, that you have wisely considered as the two sides of the same coin.
Scriptures to your profound statement @Pancho FrijolesPersonally, I don't see a Person (Jesus Christ), but a process, represented in the slayed lamb and the released scapegoat.
The slayed lamb reminds me of dying (so that I can have a new life) and the released scapegoat to forgetting (letting go) the old life. Both, to me, are symbols of the same thing.
Killing my old life with a knife speaks about the immediate effect of God's grace... and killing my old life by letting it starve in the desert represents the long process of God's grace. Something like the process of forgiveness and transformation/regeneration/sanctification, that you have wisely considered as the two sides of the same coin.
It was sent off into the wilderness never to be seen again.there is no "scapegoat" mentioned in the N.T.
and in leviticus the scapegoat lived, not died.
OOPS............................
the opposite of Jesus who died , pored out His blood and was seen man many over 40 days.It was sent off into the wilderness never to be seen again.
So much for the scapegoat being a type of Jesus. No blood, no forgiveness. As the Song goes- Nothing but the Blood of Jesus !Scriptures to your profound statement @Pancho Frijoles
Leviticus 16:7-10 (LXX): The two goats on the Day of Atonement are presented before the Lord—one for sacrifice (slain) and the other as the scapegoat released into the wilderness.
Isaiah 53:6-7 (LXX): The suffering servant "as a lamb led to the slaughter" takes on the sins of many, evoking the slain lamb’s role in atonement.
John 1:29: John the Baptist identifies Jesus as the "Lamb of God, who takes away the sin of the world," linking Him to the sacrificial lamb.
Immediate Grace of Forgiveness
Hebrews 10:10-14: Christ’s once-for-all sacrifice for sin speaks to the immediate efficacy of God’s grace in granting forgiveness and sanctification.
Colossians 1:13-14: God delivers us from the power of darkness into the kingdom of His Son, highlighting the immediate transition through forgiveness.
Psalm 103:12: "As far as the east is from the west, so far has He removed our transgressions from us," illustrating the complete removal of sin, akin to the scapegoat's release.
Sanctification as a Process
Romans 12:1-2: The call to present our bodies as living sacrifices and be transformed by the renewing of our minds reflects the ongoing work of sanctification.
2 Corinthians 3:18: "We are being transformed into the same image from glory to glory," indicating the progressive nature of regeneration and sanctification.
Hebrews 10:14: "By one offering, He has perfected forever those who are being sanctified," encapsulating the dual nature of sanctification—positional and progressive.
Symbolism of Dying to Self and Letting Go
Romans 6:4-6: Baptism into Christ’s death symbolizes dying to the old self, so that we may walk in newness of life.
Galatians 2:20: "I have been crucified with Christ; it is no longer I who live, but Christ lives in me," expressing the immediate death of the old life.
Ephesians 4:22-24: The exhortation to put off the old self and be renewed speaks to the ongoing nature of letting go and embracing the new self.
Forgiveness as Release and Transformation
Micah 7:19: God casts our sins into the depths of the sea, reflecting the finality of forgiveness (linked to the scapegoat).
Philippians 3:13-14: Paul speaks of forgetting what is behind and straining toward what is ahead, encapsulating the process of moving away from the old life.
2 Corinthians 5:17: "If anyone is in Christ, he is a new creation; the old has passed away, behold, the new has come," tying together regeneration and transformation.
Johann.
Well, the NT also uses other symbols to represent the mission of Jesus, not only bloody ones.So much for the scapegoat being a type of Jesus. No blood, no forgiveness.
Thanks for making my point much appreciated. You see the 4 you listed from the OT are affirmed in the NT.Well, the NT also uses other symbols to represent the mission of Jesus, not only bloody ones.
We have
- the mana from heaven (John 6:30-35)
- the rock that Moses hit (1 Cor 10:4)
- the person of the high priest (Heb 4:14,15)
- the sabbath (Heb 4:9,10)
I appreciate words of encouragement from you, from him and from anyone.Beautifully expressed, and isn't it remarkable that I find words of encouragement from you, yet receive none from him? I see profound typologies - the scapegoat -the the two goats, fully resonating with your insights.
By their fruits you will know them.
J.
I notice @Johann did not affirm this post of yours. And your last paragraph ( 3 sentences ) were spot on btw.The debate on whether Jesus was or was not prefigured in the scapegoat released to Azazel speaks loudly about the fact that the associations between the symbols/rituals of Leviticus and the life and mission of Jesus Christ is something performed retrospectively, not prospectively.
What I mean is that it is not the YHWH established rituals for Israel to make them fit every aspect of the future Messiah.
Rather, it was the other way round. Many centuries later, God inspired the apostles to seize the symbols/rituals that their Jewish readers were familiar to, and that fitted the narrative of Jesus mission, to use them as illustrations.
It is impossible to make every single part of the Leviticus ritual fit Jesus' life or mission, because those rituals WERE NOT designed to prefigure every part of Jesus life or mission. Those symbols and rituals were designed, primarily, to fit the culture, myths and spiritual needs of ancient Israel.
Why didn't the apostles referred specifically to Jesus as the scapegoat released to the desert?
Because the events associated with his death happened in Passover.... because Jesus had died shedding his blood and not sent to exile.
If Jesus had been sent to exile, probably they would have seized the figure of the scapegoat to explain his mission.
Brother,A trust is not quite the same. A trust is not actually paying a debt or justifying one from a wrong that he or she has done.
What you said is true, but in order to receive the free gift of justification one must do something. That something is act upon faith in the Lord Jesus Christ. God laid the sins of us all, everyone, on His Son who carried them away in His body on the cross. In order to receive this wonderful grace one must hear the Good News and believe it. If one does not, they die in their sins for the gift must be received by faith. There is no automatic justification in the New Covenant; this would be universalism.The Bible is clear in Colossians 2:14. Are sins are actually taken away, being nailed to the cross. I do not believe God holds one accountable for those same sins that have been taken away. The scapegoat was never seen again.
Well said brother and a solid biblical answer.Brother,
I agree, but the concept is there between a covenant and trust, and I used trust since it is simpler to understand in our age.
A trust is a legal arrangement where a grantor gives a trustee the right to manage assets for the benefit of a beneficiary. The trustee has a fiduciary duty to act in the best interest of the beneficiaries according to the grantor of the trust
A covenant is an agreement between parties. In the New covenant God justified everyone to life in the death of His Son and appointed His Son to be the mediator/administrator of His New Covenant with mankind.
What you said is true, but in order to receive the free gift of justification one must do something. That something is act upon faith in the Lord Jesus Christ. God laid the sins of us all, everyone, on His Son who carried them away in His body on the cross. In order to receive this wonderful grace one must hear the Good News and believe it. If one does not, they die in their sins for the gift must be received by faith. There is no automatic justification in the New Covenant; this would be universalism.
God gave a New covenant to all mankind and set the parameters. A covenant is a binding agreement between parties. If you desire to enter into the New Covenant agreement with God, you must repent and believe in the Lord Jesus Christ, who then He gives one the right to become a child of God.
Jesus is the mediator/administrator of the New Covenant, "that we may lead a peaceful and quiet life, godly and dignified in every way. This is good, and it is pleasing in the sight of God our Savior, who desires all people to be saved and to come to the knowledge of the truth. For there is one God, and there is one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus, who gave himself as a ransom for all"
The new Covenant is where "declares the Lord: I will put my laws on their hearts, and write them on their minds,” then he adds, “I will remember their sins and their lawless deeds no more.” Where there is forgiveness of these, there is no longer any offering for sin."
God has justified to life everyone in the sacrificial death of His Son. This justification must be received by faith. No faith no free gift.
The Apostle Paul makes it clear in 1 Cor 5:10-21 these points.
It is impossible to separate the facts that Jesus Christ died for everyone, according to the will of God who laid upon Him the sins of us all-everyone.
- All mankind must appear before the judgement seat of Jesus Christ: "we must all appear before the judgment seat of Christ, that each one may receive the things done in the body, according to what he has done, whether good or bad. "
- Jesus Christ died for all mankind because all were dead, and He died for all so they would live for Him: "because we judge thus: that if One died for all, then all died; and He died for all, that those who live should live no longer for themselves, but for Him who died for them and rose again."
- We who live our life for Him who died for us, no longer judge anyone by the flesh (for Christ has died to save them, They are His): "Therefore, from now on, we regard no one according to the flesh. Even though we have known Christ according to the flesh, yet now we know Him thus no longer."
- If anyone believes in Jesus they are made new: "Therefore, if anyone is in Christ, he is a new creation; old things have passed away; behold, all things have become new."
- All of this is from God who reconciled us to Himself who gave the ministry of reconciliation: "Now all things are of God, who has reconciled us to Himself through Jesus Christ, and has given us the ministry of reconciliation,"
- The ministry of reconciliation: "that God was in Christ reconciling the world to Himself, not imputing their trespasses to them, and has committed to us the word of reconciliation."
- As authorized representatives of God, as though God were pleading through us: "Now then, we are ambassadors for Christ, as though God were pleading through us: we implore you on Christ's behalf, be reconciled to God."
- For Jesus Christ who never sinned offered His life for our sins to make us right with God: "For He made Him who knew no sin to be sin for us, that we might become the righteousness of God in Him."
That He died for all so they would live for Him and be made a new person.
That all of this is from God.
That God was in Christ reconciling the world to himself.
That God made His sinless Son a sin offering for us to make us right with Him (to justify us to life with His Son).
Note: In my prior post I stated, "This means God gave Him irrevocably for our sins making us justified in His sight."
I hurriedly left out "being received by faith" at the end of the sentence. It should be, "This means God gave Him irrevocably for our sins making us justified in His sight, being received by faith".
God Bless