For the most part I would agree. We have people from many diverse backgrounds and things can get heated sometimes but for the most part the majority of the members here respect the opinions of others without making things personal and attacking them with ad hominems. It does happen from time to time and when I see it I remind people of the " Golden Rule " on how to treat others.I was invited by @Gregory today. It is a friendly place I was told from Greg’s friend.
If not I'll crack the whipAnd I told you you better behave But seriously thanks for joining and it's good to see you here.
Thanking you for the welcome
What happens if I do not behave JKAnd I told you you better behave But seriously thanks for joining and it's good to see you here.
SaluteThanking you for the welcome
Thank you for the warm welcomePrecious friend, @TomL, A Very Warm Welcome!
That would be much appreciatedWelcome to our forum @TomL . It’s good to see you here brother. We have friendlier Calvinist over here
Welcome TomL! It's great to have you here. You were not appreciated.at all on CARM. All that effort you put in. Here you will definitely be much more valued and heard.That would be much appreciated
Thank you for the warm welcome. I am still posting on CARM as contrary opinion and scriptural rebuttal is much needed thereWelcome TomL! It's great to have you here. You were not appreciated.at all on CARM. All that effort you put in. Here you will definitely be much more valued and heard.
You've spent alot of time trying to make Calvinists see how TULIP severely contradicts the Bible. I'd like to ask you a question. What is it about Calvinists that psychologically forces them to believe that the average man has no more spiritual perception than a door knob? I am well aware of the verses they appeal to but time and time again you have pointed out where they falter in their presuppositions and they just won't listen. What is it about them that causes that?Thank you for the warm welcome. I am still posting on CARM as contrary opinion and scriptural rebuttal is much needed there