civic
Active Member
Which god ? Sounds like polytheismWhich God Spoke???

Which god ? Sounds like polytheismWhich God Spoke???
Elohim = sounds like "gods"Which god ? Sounds like polytheism![]()
Amen to the Eternal Son in whom is found Eternal Life.Gotta go for now
SHALOM to those who seek the Righteousness that is only found in CHRIST JESUS our LORD
You're being silly by saying that Jesus is the Word when John 1 doesn't say that. I am being rational. Where is Jesus ever called the Word even one time in all of Scripture?Now you’re just being silly…
Doug
PersonificationPsalm119:105 = "Thy Word is a Lamp unto my feet, a LIGHT unto my path"
Matthew 5JESUS = "IAM the LIGHT of the world, he who believes on ME will never walk in darkness." - John 8:12
JESUS is God = "God is Light and in Him is no darkness" - 1 John 1:5
And John 1:1 does not say the Father is God.You're being silly by saying that Jesus is the Word when John 1 doesn't say that. I am being rational. Where is Jesus ever called the Word even one time in all of Scripture?
You're being silly by saying that Jesus is the Word when John 1 doesn't say that. I am being rational. Where is Jesus ever called the Word even one time in all of Scripture?
John 1:14 can be none other than Jesus.You're being silly by saying that Jesus is the Word when John 1 doesn't say that. I am being rational. Where is Jesus ever called the Word even one time in all of Scripture?
The Eternal Sonship is a dogma that is discredited logically by self contradiction. To contend that Jesus was eternally begotten is a manifest contradiction of term. We ask: can an object begin and not begun? No. The saying within itself is most absurd. Why do not people consider this, and understand it? Acts 28:25-27 is the answer.Amen to the Eternal Son in whom is found Eternal Life.
The Word was indeed God, period....the "Word was NOT begotten" by God, Jesus the Son of God was God's only begotten Son, in the manner in which he was begotten around two thousand years ago. The Word joined Himself to the tabernacle of the Son of God and thus God was manifest in the flesh in the person of Jesus Christ, who was the express image of the Living God in the flesh...Jesus, is the ONLY God angels or man will ever see, since God is a Spirit that lives in eternity, which no man or angels can ever see and live.Only when "The Word that was God" became flesh - John 1:14 - did HE become the only begotten of the FATHER
To contend that Jesus was eternally begotten is a manifest contradiction of term.
If Monogenes is defined as unique, one of a kind or preeminent I have no problem using it that way.It's not though.
Just to the limits of the human mind.
Revelation 19 doesn't say Jesus is the rider on the white hourse. The Bible is just vague enough to be interpretted so many ways about several points. This is probably how you all are able to maintain plausibility deniability about the trinity doctrine. There is just enough obscurity to use as leverage to hide behind seemingly endless theological smoke screens.???
Revelation says his name is called The Word of God.
Hebrews also calls him the Word with whom we have to do.
Only God is eternal. If the Word was God in the beginning, then his being existent in at the point of the beginning means that he was existing in eternity before creation began. Thus he is necessarily existent!The Eternal Sonship is a dogma that is discredited logically by self contradiction.
"The Word became flesh" has no precedent for an incarnation though.John 1:14 can be none other than Jesus.
Doug
Revelation 19 doesn't say Jesus is the rider on the white hourse.
Amen in the same way the Father is Eternal so too is the SonOnly God is eternal. If the Word was God in the beginning, then his being existent in at the point of the beginning means that he was existing in eternity before creation began. Thus he is necessarily existent!
Doug
I want to show you something interesting. After that, let's see if you still think I need prayer. Beginning at Revelation 17:14, John provided a step-by-step chronologically-ordered account of what he saw, after Jesus was on earth, leading right up to the rider in heaven. Jesus on earth isn't in the same location as the rider in heaven.Absolutely amazing.
I've never seen even a single Unitarian deny this reference.
I will pray for you for sure.
Rev 19:11I saw heaven standing open and there before me was a white horse, whose rider is called Faithful and True. With justice he judges and wages war. 12His eyes are like blazing fire, and on his head are many crowns. He has a name written on him that no one knows but he himself. 13He is dressed in a robe dipped in blood, and his name is the Word of God. 14The armies of heaven were following him, riding on white horses and dressed in fine linen, white and clean. 15Coming out of his mouth is a sharp sword with which to strike down the nations. “He will rule them with an iron scepter.” He treads the winepress of the fury of the wrath of God Almighty. 16On his robe and on his thigh he has this name written:Revelation 19 doesn't say Jesus is the rider on the white hourse. The Bible is just vague enough to be interpretted so many ways about several points. This is probably how you all are able to maintain plausibility deniability about the trinity doctrine. There is just enough obscurity to use as leverage to hide behind seemingly endless theological smoke screens.