The Eternal Son

I'm not an eternally generated Trinitarian. I find that to be extra biblical teaching not affirmed in scripture.

It's bound up in the very words "Eternal Son" definitionally.

Otherwise you don't have a Father and a Son, you have a co-God and a co-God.
 
This thread is not about His Deity or preexistence. It’s about Him being the Eternal Son ( 2nd Divine Person of the Trinity) not becoming a son in time via begetting/ begotten.
How are they not inseparable? [color me confused]

The "Eternal Son" as "2nd Divine Person of the Trinity" IS both "Deity" and "preexisting", isn't he?
 
No there was no time when the Son was not the Son. The Son did not come forth from the Father as taught in the creeds.

What do you even think "Son" means, lol.

Son has no meaning if there is no derivation from a father.
 
Ridiculous.

Son has no meaning if you water it down to nothing.
Sure it does relationally . God as Father, Son, Holy Spirit has always been, never a time when the Son was not the Son. Not my problem you can’t understand or comprehend this truth.

Saying God is Eternal means God has no beginning , God remains the same before and after Creation. Nothing changes in Gods Deity, nature.

The same is True with the Father
The same is True with the Son
The same is True with the Holy Spirit

hope this helps !!!
 
Relationally, a son comes from his father.

That is where the word son comes from.
You cannot transpose humans to God.

You are working backwards from a human perspective ( manology) instead of with God ( theology ).

It’s a denial of the Trinity as Father, Son, Holy Spirit no matter how you try and say otherwise.

It makes sense that you think that way being Kenosis. :)

You error on both now with the Trinity and 2 natures in Christ.
 
Relationally, a son comes from his father.

That is where the word son comes from.
If a couple adopts an infant and raises the boy to manhood … do they, or do they not have a father/son relationship?

The relationship transcends mere origin.
 
delete double post.
 
If a couple adopts an infant and raises the boy to manhood … do they, or do they not have a father/son relationship?

The relationship transcends mere origin.

You can argue from the exception, but the basis of the relationship does come from origin. A natural father can not treat his son like a son, does that make him not a son? Treating someone like something is the exception not the rule, because it is based on the rule. I am not downplaying the spiritual significance of adoption, but I think you are downplaying the origin of the word. If son was not at all based on origin, why is that the derivation and source of the meaning? Why not just divorce son from origin altogether? Angels and humans are not sons of God just because he treats them like sons—but because they came from God. When someone says "He was like a son to me," why do they include the word "like" at all? Why not just say he was literally their son? Because there is a semantic difference between adoption and lineage, however meaningful adoption can be.

Jesus was not adopted.
 
A natural father can not treat his son like a son, does that make him not a son?
That was my point, too. They would be father-son in the biological/origin sense of the term, but they would NOT be father-son in the relational sense of the terms.

Even so, Jesus is not God’s son in the biological sense (at the risk of being crass, God did not contribute a sperm and Jesus does not have 50% God DNA and 50% Mary DNA). However, Jesus was God’s son in the RELATIONSHIP sense of the word. There is no reason to think that “relationship” is not eternal.
 
That was my point, too. They would be father-son in the biological/origin sense of the term, but they would NOT be father-son in the relational sense of the terms.

Even so, Jesus is not God’s son in the biological sense (at the risk of being crass, God did not contribute a sperm and Jesus does not have 50% God DNA and 50% Mary DNA). However, Jesus was God’s son in the RELATIONSHIP sense of the word. There is no reason to think that “relationship” is not eternal.
Ditto
 
Jesus was not adopted.

He is a legitimate Son of the Father.

Stop removing his Sonship.

He is not just "like" a Son.
 
Jesus was not adopted.

He is a legitimate Son of the Father.

Stop removing his Sonship.

He is not just "like" a Son.
In your theology he is exactly like a human son and having a human father . His father created , birthed, originated his being a son. There was a time where there was no son.

Next fallacy
 
This thread is needed to defend the historical, orthodox and biblical doctrine of the Eternal Son of God.

John 17:1, 5
“Father, the hour has come; glorify Your Son, that the Son may glorify You,

And now, Father, glorify Me in your own presence with the glory that I had with you before the world existed.

Notice above its the Son with the Father sharing the same glory together with Hm before creation, before the world came into existence. The same below. The Word who was God is the Son. Scripture interprets scripture. Hermeneutics 101.

Hebrews 1:1-2
1 In the past God spoke to our forefathers through the prophets at many times and in various ways, 2 but in these last days he has spoken to us by his Son, whom he appointed heir of all things, and through whom he made the universe.

Verse 2 is talking about the son and it says that God made the universe through him, (in the context of him being a son).

Hebrews 1:8-12
But about the Son he says,

“Your throne, O God, will last for ever and ever;
a scepter of justice will be the scepter of your kingdom.
9;You have loved righteousness and hated wickedness;
therefore God, your God, has set you above your companions
by anointing you with the oil of joy.”
10He also says,
“In the beginning, Lord, you laid the foundations of the earth,
and the heavens are the work of your hands.
11They will perish, but you remain;
they will all wear out like a garment.
12You will roll them up like a robe;
like a garment they will be changed.
But you remain the same,
and your years will never end.

Colossians 1:15-19

The Son
is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation. 16 For in him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things have been created through him and for him. 17 He is before all things, and in him all things hold together. 18 And he is the head of the body, the church; he is the beginning and the firstborn from among the dead, so that in everything he might have the supremacy. 19 For God was pleased to have all his fullness dwell in him, 20 and through him to reconcile to himself all things, whether things on earth or things in heaven, by making peace through his blood, shed on the cross.


And Here Jesus who is both God and man says that the Father sent the Son. This shows the Son existing before becoming man.

John 3:17
"For God did not send the Son into the world to judge the world, but that the world should be saved through Him.

John tells us the same below:

1 John 4:9
This is how God’s love was revealed among us: God sent His one and only Son into the world, so that we might live through Him.

1 John 4:10
10In this is love, not that we loved God, but that he loved us, and sent his Son as the atoning sacrifice for our sins.

1 John 4:14
And we have seen and testify that the Father has sent His Son to be the Savior of the world.

As does Paul below:

Romans 8:3
For what the law was powerless to do in that it was weakened by the flesh, God did by sending His own Son in the likeness of sinful man, as an offering for sin. He thus condemned sin in the flesh,

Galatians 4:4-5
But when the time had fully come, God sent His Son, born of a woman, born under the law, / to redeem those under the law, that we might receive our adoption as sons.

You cannot send Someone who does not exist, ie the Son.

Jamieson-Fausset-Brown Bible Commentary

1 John 4:9. toward us—Greek, "in our case."

sent—Greek, "hath sent."

into the world—a proof against Socinians, that the Son existed before He was "sent into the world." Otherwise, too, He could not have been our life (1Jo 4:9), our "propitiation" (1Jo 4:10), or our "Saviour" (1Jo 4:14). It is the grand proof of God's love, His having sent "His only-begotten Son, that we might live through Him," who is the Life, and who has redeemed our forfeited life; and it is also the grand motive to our mutual love.

1 John 1:1-4
That which was from the beginning, which we have heard, which we have seen with our eyes, which we have looked at and our hands have touched—this we proclaim concerning the Word of life. 2 The life appeared; we have seen it and testify to it, and we proclaim to you the eternal life, which was with the Father and has appeared to us. 3 We proclaim to you what we have seen and heard, so that you also may have fellowship with us. And our fellowship is with the Father and with his Son, Jesus Christ.

1 John 3:8- The reason the Son of God appeared was to destroy the devil’s work.



We clearly see the Father in the O.T.

Isa 64:8 But now, O LORD, thou art our father; we are the clay, and thou our potter; and we all are the work of thy hand.

Isa 63:16 Doubtless thou art our father, though Abraham be ignorant of us, and Israel acknowledge us not: thou, O LORD, art our father, our redeemer; thy name is from everlasting.

Deu 32:6 Do ye thus requite the LORD, O foolish people and unwise? is not he thy father that hath bought thee? hath he not made thee, and established thee?

Mal 2:10 Have we not all one father? hath not one God created us? why do we deal treacherously every man against his brother, by profaning the covenant of our fathers?

And the Son

Daniel 3:25
He answered and said, “Look! I see four men loosed and walking about in the midst of the fire without harm, and the appearance of the fourth is like the son of god

Psalm 2:12
Kiss his son, or he will be angry and your way will lead to your destruction, for his wrath can flare up in a moment. Blessed are all who take refuge in him.

Proverbs 30:4
Who has ascended into heaven and descended?Who has gathered the wind in His fists?Who has wrapped the waters in His garment?Who has established all the ends of the earth?What is His name or His son’s name?

Daniel 7:13
“In my vision at night I looked, and there before me was one like the son of man, coming with the clouds of heaven. He approached the Ancient of Days and was led into his presence.

Matthew 11:27: “All these things have been given to me by my Father, and no one knows the Son except the Father, and no one knows the Son except the Father and anyone to whom the Son of Man decides to reveal him.”

“Matthew’s use of ‘know’ ([epiginōskō is pronounced eh-pea-gih-noh-skoh, and the “g” is hard as in “get”] the present tense is gnomic, knowledge shared in eternal past, present, and eternal future) here is critical … it is likely that there is perfective force in the prefix [epi] –with the meaning ‘know exactly, completely, through and through’ (BAGD, 291), with the added idea of recognizing and acknowledging” (comment on 11:27).

The bottom line is that the Greek present tense is timeless and supports the notion that the Father and Son knew each other intimately for eternity, in the past, present and future—forever. Jesus did not become the Son at his birth or baptism (Matthew: Zondervan Exegetical Commentary on the New Testament [Zondervan, 2010], p. 440). https://drjimsebt.com/2023/04/17/when-did-jesus-become-the-son-of-god/



John 5:26: For as the Father has life in himself, so he has granted the Son also to have life in himself. (John 5:26)

This grant cannot be temporary because the Father also has life in himself eternally. Therefore the Son also has life in himself eternally–just as the Father has this.


John 17:24:
24 Father, those whom you have given me, I want them to be with me where I am, so that they may see my glory which you have given me because you have loved me before the foundation of the world. (My translation)

Being a Father implies a Son. What was the Father doing before the foundation or creation of the world? He was loving his Son.

John 1:18 says: “No one has ever seen God, but the one and only Son, who is himself God and is in closest relationship with the Father, has made him known.” Jesus more fully reveals their status and nature–Father and Son–beyond God and Logos. Therefore the Father was in heaven with his Son before the incarnation and birth.

Jesus says that he was in the presence of the Father: “I am telling you what I have seen in the Father’s presence” […] (John 8:38). The term “presence” can be translated as “alongside” or “next to” the Father. The point: they were in close relationship as we see in John 1:1-2, 14 and 17:5. This relationship in the Father’s presence happened before the incarnation. To be the Father, he had to have at least one son in his presence. That Son is Jesus.

Hebrews 1:2 says: “but in these last days he has spoken to us by his Son, whom he appointed heir of all things, and through whom also he made the universe.” That verse says that the Son was the person through whom God made the universe. He was the Son before creation, long before his birth. That verses also identifies who the Logos was in John 1:1-4.

Hebrews 1:3:
The Son is the radiance of God’s glory and the exact representation of his being […] (Heb. 1:3)

God’s radiance and his being are eternal because light that does not radiate is not light, and God’s being is not temporary with a beginning; therefore the Son is also eternal

Lets discuss the Eternal Son of God.

hope this helps !!!
Just now noticed this - thank you
 
Back
Top Bottom