The Eternal Son

Agreed we will be with God in all His fulness in Eternity- Father, Son and Holy Spirit- we will have the spiritual eyes to see. :) that we do not have now. :)
Scripture explicitly says that the Son is not permanently at the right hand of God.

Psalm 110
1 The LORD said to my Lord:
“Sit at My right hand
until I make Your enemies
a footstool for Your feet.”
 
Psalms 110:1 "The Lord said unto my Lord, "Sit Thou at My right hand, Until I make Thine enemies Thy footstool."

Jesus also quoted this passage from David in the book of Matthew 22:41-46: Here it is:
Matthew 22:41-46 (NKJV) 41 While the Pharisees were gathered together, Jesus asked them, 42 saying, “What do you think about the Christ? Whose Son is He?” They said to Him, “[The Son] of David.” 43 He said to them, “How then does David in the Spirit call Him ‘Lord,’ saying: 44 ‘The LORD said to my Lord, “Sit at My right hand, Till I make Your enemies Your footstool” ’ ? 45 “If David then calls Him ‘Lord,’ how is He his Son?” 46 And no one was able to answer Him a word, nor from that day on did anyone dare question Him anymore.

The time that our Lord Jesus Christ makes His enemies His footstool will be when He returns at the 7th trump and all evil will be done away with and Satan will be bound in the pit for a thousand years.

s e l a h
 
1- God is eternal that’s a fact , indisputable if you are a Christian, a Trinitarian

2- God is 3 Divine Persons. God is Father, Son, Holy Spirit.

3- There was never a time when God was not Father, Son, Holy Spirit. God is Eternal, without beginning.

Conclusion: if you or anyone else doesn’t believe the above stop calling yourself a Trinitarian because you are not one.

hope this helps !!!

The teaching of a triune God has been around for a long time, but wasn't introduced into Christianity until some 350 years after the death of the last apostle.

It began in the time of Nimrod, and the Tower of Babel, and spread throughout the world when God confused them so they couldn't understand each other and scattered them. It's a fascinating study, but one must go outside the Holy Scriptures because the Trinity, a word never used in Scriptures, is not taught in them.

Long before Moses, Egypt also had a "Triune god". It consisted of god Osiris, goddess Isis, and their son god Horus.

1751129157350.png

The India Pagans had theirs.

1751129724573.png Comprised of Brahma (the creator), Vishnu (the preserver), and Shiva (the destroyer and regenerator)

Then, some 350 years after the Death and Resurrection of the Christ, the RCC adopted and promoted their version of their triune god. The Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. One of many doctrines and traditions adopted by the Protestant religious sects who broke away from them.

1751131543140.png 1751131622417.png

So for me, I can see how popular these images of a "triune god" has become with the religious system of this world throughout all of history. And can understand why the Jesus "of the Bible" said to take heed of the "many" who come in His Name to promote them.

But given that both God and His Son were Holy Spirits before His Son became a mortal human, it seems kind of silly to promote "another" Spirit, separate from them, as an equal to God. Especially since the bible itself, doesn't support such a teaching.

John 17: 3 And this is life eternal, that they might know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom thou hast sent.

Did Jesus forget that life eternal must also know of this separate but equal to God "Holy Spirit" that the Catholic's say make up the Godhead?

Of course, as in all of history, those who don't go along with popular mainstream religious philosophy and traditions of men promoted by the religions of the world God placed us in, will be judged and labeled as heretics.

But I am told to keep in remembrance, "For consider him that endured such contradiction of sinners against himself, lest ye be wearied and faint in your minds. Ye have not yet resisted unto blood, striving against sin."

And I become thankful that name calling is all I receive.
 
Scripture explicitly says that the Son is not permanently at the right hand of God.

It only specifies what happens up to a certain point. It leaves what happens after unstated here.

We see in 1 Corinthians 15:28 which addresses this verse (the most quoted verse in the NT), that the Son will remain subject to the Father permanently.
 
We are not talking about experiencing God, whatever you means with that statement~fellowshipping, yes, but no man will ever see God except in seeing Jesus Christ. God is a Spirit that no man can ever see, even in our gloried body, except in the person of the Man Christ Jesus who is God!

I would agree we can only see God through Jesus Christ, but we are fundamentally spirit beings, not flesh. Job said he knew when skin was destroyed, he knew that apart from his flesh he shall see God (Job 19:26). Even Moses was permitted to behold God's glory in part before Christ had even come, so much so, that he was literally shining a few times.

Theologically, we would say there is an aspect of God's essential nature no person can know, because it is simply beyond creation. However, this is not to say there are not fundamental aspects of God that can indeed be known by us. Yes, this requires redemption and atonement as seen in the picture of the Tabernacle and its priests, but we are all priests now.

I see no indication in Scripture that we can only know the Son this way, in fact I see the exact opposite. And it has also been my personal experience throughout life, that those who seek God in truth will indeed find him, and not just one of him. Each of the Trinity carries a distinct role, personality, relation and glory. The Spirit helps us know Christ, Christ helps us know the Father.
 
Last edited:
@civic
Would you give me a brief biblical definition of what it means to be the Eternal Son of God? Use scriptures to support you understanding so they can be tested. Eternal Son what does it entails? Do you mean that he is God's eternal Son only according to God's eternal purposes concerning what he would do in time? Be as specific as you can.
In this posit, I asked you to give me a brief biblical definition of what it means according to your understanding to be the Eternal Son of God, and you came back with this:
1- God is eternal that’s a fact , indisputable if you are a Christian, a Trinitarian

2- God is 3 Divine Persons. God is Father, Son, Holy Spirit.

3- There was never a time when God was not Father, Son, Holy Spirit. God is Eternal, without beginning.

Conclusion: if you or anyone else doesn’t believe the above stop calling yourself a Trinitarian because you are not one.

hope this helps !!!
I did not ask you to give a definition of the "externality of God," which we all believe in that truth, that's not even up for debate.
I made it very clear in the other thread when I ask the question: "What is real Divinity of the Most High God? The following attributes have ever been conceived as essential to it: Self-existence, Infinity, Independence, Omniscience, Omnipotence, Omnipresence, Immutability, eternal both ways, and Infinite in every way possible that is imaginable to the human mind.

Your points in order: 1) 1- God is eternal that’s a fact , indisputable if you are a Christian, a Trinitarian. Agreed that God is eternal. A Trinitarian, only according to the redemption of God's elect is He revealed as such. The incarnate Sonship of Jesus Christ does not deny or weaken the Trinity at all. It establishes it. Only the ignorant or malicious will accuse the incarnate Sonship position of denying the Trinity. The Trinity of the Bible is superior to the speculative Trinity of the Nicene Creed and followers. The Bible makes all three Persons without any distinction in their nature whatsoever. The Bible knows nothing of “God of God” and other philosophical speculations of men. The Bible knows nothing of a begotten god, which confuses the Trinity into paganism. Scripture teaches one God. There is only one Supreme Being (Deuteronomy 6:4; Isaiah 43:10; 44:6,8; Ist Corinthians 4:8-6). God is self-subsistent and independent of others; He is eternal in both directions (Ex 3:14; Ps 90:2). As I said already, the nature of God is that complete collection of attributes that makes Him distinctly God (Galatians 4:8). Three Persons participate in this single Divine nature without any degree of difference whatsoever. The three Persons are the Highest, the Word, and the Spirit (Luke 1:32; John 1:1; Isaiah 48:16). And the three Persons are the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost (Matthew 3:16-17; 28:19-20; 2nd Corinthians 13:14). And they are Spirit, Lord, and God (Ist Corinthians 12:4-6), or Ancient of Days and Son of man (Daniel 7:13). The doctrine of a three-in-one God is revealed plainly in Scripture (Ist John 5:7), The Word and Spirit are wholly “I AM THAT I AM.” The Word is not what the Father begat! The Word, Who became flesh in the Lord Jesus Christ, was fully God (John 1:1 cp Colossians 2:9).

2)
2- God is 3 Divine Persons. God is Father, Son, Holy Spirit.
There is ONE God revealed as three "only" according to the work of the redemption of God's elect. Jesus Christ in his deity as the God Genesis 1:1 is the everlasting Father, according to Isaiah the prophet, was he is error for saying this? You tell me, and explain how this is possible. Btw, you are doing very little of explaining your position, almost not a word.

Isaiah 9:6​

“For unto us a child is born, unto us a son is given: and the government shall be upon his shoulder: and his name shall be called Wonderful, Counsellor, The mighty God, The everlasting Father, The Prince of Peace.”
2- God is 3 Divine Persons. God is Father, Son, Holy Spirit.
Before moving on, let me ask you this question: Are you saying that the Son is eternal BECAUSE HE IS GOD, is that what you mean by the eternal son of God? The way you worded this makes me think that's what you are attempting to say. You tell me what you means by using the phrase "eternal Son" ~ you have not even try to explain this so far.
3- There was never a time when God was not Father, Son, Holy Spirit. God is Eternal, without beginning.
True only according to God's eternal purposes that he purposed within Himself, not true as far as actuality. God did not have a Son until the birth of Jesus Christ recorded for us in Luke's gospel.

Luke 2:11-21~"For unto you is born this day in the city of David a Saviour, which is Christ the Lord.
And this shall be a sign unto you; Ye shall find the babe wrapped in swaddling clothes, lying in a manger. And suddenly there was with the angel a multitude of the heavenly host praising God, and saying, Glory to God in the highest, and on earth peace, good will toward men. And it came to pass, as the angels were gone away from them into heaven, the shepherds said one to another, Let us now go even unto Bethlehem, and see this thing which is come to pass, which the Lord hath made known unto us. And they came with haste, and found Mary, and Joseph, and the babe lying in a manger. And when they had seen it, they made known abroad the saying which was told them concerning this child. And all they that heard it wondered at those things which were told them by the shepherds. But Mary kept all these things, and pondered them in her heart. And the shepherds returned, glorifying and praising God for all the things that they had heard and seen, as it was told unto them. And when eight days were accomplished for the circumcising of the child, his name was called JESUS, which was so named of the angel before he was conceived in the womb."

That's the Holy Ghost's record concerning when God's Son was born and came into being the Son of God in actuality. There is no other record for us to believe.
3- There was never a time when God was not Father, Son, Holy Spirit. God is Eternal, without beginning.
civic, again it seems to me that by the very fact you believe God is eternal then based upon that, The Son, who was God, is eternal in this sense, is this what you are trying to say?

There was a time when God was NOT Jesus Christ and that would be during his time on earth during his humanity, as concerning the Son of Man. Jesus was indeed God, yet God was not Jesus Christ!
Conclusion: if you or anyone else doesn’t believe the above stop calling yourself a Trinitarian because you are not one.
I fully believe in One LORD GOD, who manifested Himself as three, ONLY for the purpose of the redemption of his people, yet in glory, we shall only see JESUS CHRIST, who is the true God and eternal life.
 
It only specifies what happens up to a certain point. It leaves what happens after unstated here.

We see in 1 Corinthians 15:28 which addresses this verse (the most quoted verse in the NT), that the Son will remain subject to the Father permanently.
Exactly, so he is not co-equal with God. Thank you for pointing this out. Not many will touch it with a 10 foot poll on this board.
 
Exactly, so he is not co-equal with God. Thank you for pointing this out. Not many will touch it with a 10 foot poll on this board.

There are different senses of co-equal, in nature and in rank.

Like husband and wife, or parents and children, etc.
 
@civic

In this posit, I asked you to give me a brief biblical definition of what it means according to your understanding to be the Eternal Son of God, and you came back with this:

I did not ask you to give a definition of the "externality of God," which we all believe in that truth, that's not even up for debate.
I made it very clear in the other thread when I ask the question: "What is real Divinity of the Most High God? The following attributes have ever been conceived as essential to it: Self-existence, Infinity, Independence, Omniscience, Omnipotence, Omnipresence, Immutability, eternal both ways, and Infinite in every way possible that is imaginable to the human mind.

Your points in order: 1) 1- God is eternal that’s a fact , indisputable if you are a Christian, a Trinitarian. Agreed that God is eternal. A Trinitarian, only according to the redemption of God's elect is He revealed as such. The incarnate Sonship of Jesus Christ does not deny or weaken the Trinity at all. It establishes it. Only the ignorant or malicious will accuse the incarnate Sonship position of denying the Trinity. The Trinity of the Bible is superior to the speculative Trinity of the Nicene Creed and followers. The Bible makes all three Persons without any distinction in their nature whatsoever. The Bible knows nothing of “God of God” and other philosophical speculations of men. The Bible knows nothing of a begotten god, which confuses the Trinity into paganism. Scripture teaches one God. There is only one Supreme Being (Deuteronomy 6:4; Isaiah 43:10; 44:6,8; Ist Corinthians 4:8-6). God is self-subsistent and independent of others; He is eternal in both directions (Ex 3:14; Ps 90:2). As I said already, the nature of God is that complete collection of attributes that makes Him distinctly God (Galatians 4:8). Three Persons participate in this single Divine nature without any degree of difference whatsoever. The three Persons are the Highest, the Word, and the Spirit (Luke 1:32; John 1:1; Isaiah 48:16). And the three Persons are the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost (Matthew 3:16-17; 28:19-20; 2nd Corinthians 13:14). And they are Spirit, Lord, and God (Ist Corinthians 12:4-6), or Ancient of Days and Son of man (Daniel 7:13). The doctrine of a three-in-one God is revealed plainly in Scripture (Ist John 5:7), The Word and Spirit are wholly “I AM THAT I AM.” The Word is not what the Father begat! The Word, Who became flesh in the Lord Jesus Christ, was fully God (John 1:1 cp Colossians 2:9).

2)

There is ONE God revealed as three "only" according to the work of the redemption of God's elect. Jesus Christ in his deity as the God Genesis 1:1 is the everlasting Father, according to Isaiah the prophet, was he is error for saying this? You tell me, and explain how this is possible. Btw, you are doing very little of explaining your position, almost not a word.

Isaiah 9:6​

“For unto us a child is born, unto us a son is given: and the government shall be upon his shoulder: and his name shall be called Wonderful, Counsellor, The mighty God, The everlasting Father, The Prince of Peace.”

Before moving on, let me ask you this question: Are you saying that the Son is eternal BECAUSE HE IS GOD, is that what you mean by the eternal son of God? The way you worded this makes me think that's what you are attempting to say. You tell me what you means by using the phrase "eternal Son" ~ you have not even try to explain this so far.

True only according to God's eternal purposes that he purposed within Himself, not true as far as actuality. God did not have a Son until the birth of Jesus Christ recorded for us in Luke's gospel.

Luke 2:11-21~"For unto you is born this day in the city of David a Saviour, which is Christ the Lord. And this shall be a sign unto you; Ye shall find the babe wrapped in swaddling clothes, lying in a manger. And suddenly there was with the angel a multitude of the heavenly host praising God, and saying, Glory to God in the highest, and on earth peace, good will toward men. And it came to pass, as the angels were gone away from them into heaven, the shepherds said one to another, Let us now go even unto Bethlehem, and see this thing which is come to pass, which the Lord hath made known unto us. And they came with haste, and found Mary, and Joseph, and the babe lying in a manger. And when they had seen it, they made known abroad the saying which was told them concerning this child. And all they that heard it wondered at those things which were told them by the shepherds. But Mary kept all these things, and pondered them in her heart. And the shepherds returned, glorifying and praising God for all the things that they had heard and seen, as it was told unto them. And when eight days were accomplished for the circumcising of the child, his name was called JESUS, which was so named of the angel before he was conceived in the womb."

That's the Holy Ghost's record concerning when God's Son was born and came into being the Son of God in actuality. There is no other record for us to believe.

civic, again it seems to me that by the very fact you believe God is eternal then based upon that, The Son, who was God, is eternal in this sense, is this what you are trying to say?

There was a time when God was NOT Jesus Christ and that would be during his time on earth during his humanity, as concerning the Son of Man. Jesus was indeed God, yet God was not Jesus Christ!

I fully believe in One LORD GOD, who manifested Himself as three, ONLY for the purpose of the redemption of his people, yet in glory, we shall only see JESUS CHRIST, who is the true God and eternal life.
Sis, you’re very confused about so many things.
 
The teaching of a triune God has been around for a long time, but wasn't introduced into Christianity until some 350 years after the death of the last apostle.

It began in the time of Nimrod, and the Tower of Babel, and spread throughout the world when God confused them so they couldn't understand each other and scattered them. It's a fascinating study, but one must go outside the Holy Scriptures because the Trinity, a word never used in Scriptures, is not taught in them.

Long before Moses, Egypt also had a "Triune god". It consisted of god Osiris, goddess Isis, and their son god Horus.

View attachment 2100

The India Pagans had theirs.

View attachment 2101 Comprised of Brahma (the creator), Vishnu (the preserver), and Shiva (the destroyer and regenerator)

Then, some 350 years after the Death and Resurrection of the Christ, the RCC adopted and promoted their version of their triune god. The Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. One of many doctrines and traditions adopted by the Protestant religious sects who broke away from them.

View attachment 2103 View attachment 2104

So for me, I can see how popular these images of a "triune god" has become with the religious system of this world throughout all of history. And can understand why the Jesus "of the Bible" said to take heed of the "many" who come in His Name to promote them.

But given that both God and His Son were Holy Spirits before His Son became a mortal human, it seems kind of silly to promote "another" Spirit, separate from them, as an equal to God. Especially since the bible itself, doesn't support such a teaching.

John 17: 3 And this is life eternal, that they might know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom thou hast sent.

Did Jesus forget that life eternal must also know of this separate but equal to God "Holy Spirit" that the Catholic's say make up the Godhead?

Of course, as in all of history, those who don't go along with popular mainstream religious philosophy and traditions of men promoted by the religions of the world God placed us in, will be judged and labeled as heretics.

But I am told to keep in remembrance, "For consider him that endured such contradiction of sinners against himself, lest ye be wearied and faint in your minds. Ye have not yet resisted unto blood, striving against sin."

And I become thankful that name calling is all I receive.
Here is a question for you, and not a name calling.

If there is no Trinity... can you hazzard a guess as to why Jesus commanded them to baptize in the name of the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit?

Even though they continued for an extremely long time to only baptize in Jesus' name... that was not what He told them to do,

Matt 28:19 Go therefore and make disciples of all the nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit,
 
Back
Top Bottom