No, he made excellent questions to which you chose to run away from as fast as your legs can carry you.
Bright, I am not making a statement at all. I am asking you two questions:
I'm still waiting for the scripture that says specifically Christ died for every human being, all mankind without exception. Can you provide it?
It's check mate for calvinism. BF52 just won't admit it. He'd rather hold on to his calvinist heresies.
Yes you did make a statement and very specific.
Forget about any other comment, statement, or whatever. Just answer these two questions:
What scriptures explicitly says that?
Says what? All? The whole world? Who cares right now.
Are you ready to confess that there's no verses that explicitly says what you said?
As soon as you answer these two questions, we can address that:
Oh no, but if you confess that there's no scripture stating explicitly:
Then I will give my understanding of all and whole world, but not until then.
What a crock. bf, I can tell that you know that you are full of nonsense. Define the terms "all" and "the whole world" as you think they should be used. Define them according to your doctrine. Define them as the dictionary defines them. But give me a fixed meaning we can start from when reading the words in Scripture.
Look, I know it can be terrifying to admit that you were wrong, especially about spiritual things, but the sooner you admit that your doctrine does not fit what Scripture says the sooner you can start growing in the truth.
Well, his statement was
See how Paul uses it versus how James uses the word, especially in his example of demons believing and shuddering.
You are ignoring scripture
I agree with those scriptures
2 Cor 5:14 For the love of Christ controls us once we have reached the conclusion that one man died for all and therefore all mankind has died.
Do you agree with the ones you are ignoring?
Nowhere does scripture specifically says Christ died for all mankind,or everyone without expectation
