No person can come to Christ by their own freewill !

Okay good. Christ Death is just that, His Death Justified them He died for and His resurrection causes the same to be born again. That's why they believe
Everything you said is exactly backwards. Talking to you has become as productive as talking to a brick wall: pointless. When you truly want to discuss truth, and learn of God, we can talk some more. 'Till then, you are a waste of time.
 
It took me all of 2 minutes to come up with passages that disprove PCE.
Eisegetics may be fun but it hardly points the way into the truth. Personal faith in an interpretation of scripture is not strengthened by the numbers of followers of that conviction.

Starting with the rabbis studying Moses who decided that Adam and all men were created on earth, the church has had thousands of years to define their truth about our creation such that when a person reads the versess, they do not realize they are reading an interpretation in their head but think they are reading a truth on the page.

In other words, any verse that conveys the idea of our pre-earth existence has rarely been interpreted this way before because almost every reader automatically looks for a different interpretation when they read such an interpretation. This being the case, a mere list of Scriptures will not constitute proof of scriptural support for this doctrine but, to provide such proof, such a list will have to be accompanied by an in-depth exegesis of the said Scriptures and then fight the uphill battle of explanation.


That you have never seen an interpretation of our pre-earth existence in the bible does NOT mean it is not there when it is just as possible that our being created on earth bias has taken over as the ONLY interpretation. A verse that can be interpreted to infer our pre-earth existence but which is ignored because of our created on earth bias is called a hint, just like the Divine suffering Messiah was hinted at throughout the scripture but not recognized due to the bias of the rabbis.

Take the most well know verse that HINTS at our pre-earth life: Jeremiah 1:5 "Before I formed you in the womb I knew you, before you were born I set you apart; I appointed you as a prophet to the nations." Everyone when they first read this says, "Hey, does this say we were alive before we were in the womb?" and quickly learns that not only does it not mean this but is maybe even a hated Mormon doctrine. An obvious meaning that is rejected due to a theological position is a hint. It is obvious that the verse can have this meaning but theology has chosen to ignore it for another meaning - GOD only knew us pre-earth in HIS imagination - otherwise it upsets orthodox doctrine which means doctrine is used to find a verse's meaning rather than the meaning being found in the verse to create doctrine...

That all verses that are hints to pce have been interpreted as something else for centuries means that you can read them and never even see that they might contain a hint to pce, nor can you find a commentary that accepts our pre-conception existence though the best will mention it.
 
But God Created some men for eternal glory and some men for eternal damnation Rom 9
Romans 9 does not teach that God arbitrarily manufactures certain people for hell; rather, it shows that God, in His sovereignty, permits those who persistently reject Him to become vessels of wrath. The text says God “endured with much longsuffering the vessels of wrath prepared for destruction,” implying that they fitted themselves for that fate through rebellion, while God actively “prepared beforehand” the vessels of mercy for glory.

Moreover, Scripture consistently affirms that God “desires all men to be saved” (1 Tim. 2:4) and is “not willing that any should perish” (2 Pet. 3:9). Therefore, Romans 9 portrays God’s sovereign patience toward the rebellious and His mercy toward believers, not a fatalistic decree of eternal destinies fixed at creation.

So stop with the propagating of your damning calvinist heresies which you are responsible for.
 
Eisegetics may be fun but it hardly points the way into the truth. Personal faith in an interpretation of scripture is not strengthened by the numbers of followers of that conviction.

Starting with the rabbis studying Moses who decided that Adam and all men were created on earth, the church has had thousands of years to define their truth about our creation such that when a person reads the versess, they do not realize they are reading an interpretation in their head but think they are reading a truth on the page.

In other words, any verse that conveys the idea of our pre-earth existence has rarely been interpreted this way before because almost every reader automatically looks for a different interpretation when they read such an interpretation. This being the case, a mere list of Scriptures will not constitute proof of scriptural support for this doctrine but, to provide such proof, such a list will have to be accompanied by an in-depth exegesis of the said Scriptures and then fight the uphill battle of explanation.


That you have never seen an interpretation of our pre-earth existence in the bible does NOT mean it is not there when it is just as possible that our being created on earth bias has taken over as the ONLY interpretation. A verse that can be interpreted to infer our pre-earth existence but which is ignored because of our created on earth bias is called a hint, just like the Divine suffering Messiah was hinted at throughout the scripture but not recognized due to the bias of the rabbis.

Take the most well know verse that HINTS at our pre-earth life: Jeremiah 1:5 "Before I formed you in the womb I knew you, before you were born I set you apart; I appointed you as a prophet to the nations." Everyone when they first read this says, "Hey, does this say we were alive before we were in the womb?" and quickly learns that not only does it not mean this but is maybe even a hated Mormon doctrine. An obvious meaning that is rejected due to a theological position is a hint. It is obvious that the verse can have this meaning but theology has chosen to ignore it for another meaning - GOD only knew us pre-earth in HIS imagination - otherwise it upsets orthodox doctrine which means doctrine is used to find a verse's meaning rather than the meaning being found in the verse to create doctrine...

That all verses that are hints to pce have been interpreted as something else for centuries means that you can read them and never even see that they might contain a hint to pce, nor can you find a commentary that accepts our pre-conception existence though the best will mention it.
ROTFLMBO

So you are saying that you personally have more insight into Scripture the Christ the Lord? Or His Apostles to whom He opened the Scriptures so that they had understanding? No, my poor deluded friend, Jer 1:5 does not even hint at pce. We know that God knew the results of His creation before He created anything. He knew and made plans for the Fall, the coming of Jesus, His death and resurrection, and this conversation. When and where does Jer 1:5 say that Jeremiah was formed? IN THE WOMB. He wasn't formed in Heaven and then placed into the womb. Read the full passage, even the full verse, and then formulate your doctrine. SMH
 
Romans 9 does not teach that God arbitrarily manufactures certain people for hell; rather, it shows that God, in His sovereignty, permits those who persistently reject Him to become vessels of wrath. The text says God “endured with much longsuffering the vessels of wrath prepared for destruction,” implying that they fitted themselves for that fate through rebellion, while God actively “prepared beforehand” the vessels of mercy for glory.
Yes Romans 9 does teach that God as the great Potter, made some of mankind for honor and Glory and some of mankind for wrath and destruction. The vessels of wrath are fitted for destruction, that word fitted in the original is also said to be in the passive voice either way they do fit themselves because they have no choice, since God purpose when he made them they would be vessels of wrath fitted for destruction
 
You ignored the fact Calvinism teaches God does make alive those who do not believe.

Christ only died for believers, if you never become a believer ,Christ could not have died for you
Huh? I thought John said: "... and He Himself is the propitiation for our sins; and not for ours only, but also for those of the whole world." Would you care to correct your statement?
 
Back
Top Bottom