Isaiah and the trinity

Quick question that perhaps I have missed, because so far what I made red is not clear.......to me.
I did not find a question mark, but this seems to be in the form of a question, "If John was wrong in 1:1 how can you prove it when no one else seems to agree."

AS YOU CAN SEE... Every translation has the word Word, capitalized, and I am sure that terms like that never are, unless you are screaming at someone.
Ya but what are they screaming, truth, or a lie. What about the 400 lying prophets, and the 1 Micaiah that spoke the truth 1 Kings 22.
Are you making an argument for doctrine out of single letter of a word, a capital letter that does not even exist in k.Greek?

But now look through the qupted section below. And Again pay attention to the highlighted words
and I do believe you will have to agree they are referencing a person.
Yes, I would agree they are referencing a person.

If John was wrong in 1:1 how can you prove it when no one else seems to agree. Those who have
studied the languages and translations.
But if you can... then we can wipe his book out of the gospels because if he is wrong in one thing,
could well be wrong in others....
First, I do not claim John was wrong in 1:1, nor do I wish to. I claim Trinitarians, and oneness, and Unitarians, and J.W. and the like are wrong.
There are no capital letters in k.Greek, so, how could John be wrong in 1:1, when he did not write a capital letter? You switch it from being the translators error to being John's error. It was the translators that added to what John wrote in the Bible.

But, you'll have to ask the translators why they chose to do what they did. In my John MacArthur Study Bible it states "Personal pronouns are capitalized when pertaining to deity." And at Jn 1:1 MacArthur has a nice little write up about the word "Word," as essentially impersonal, but then concludes by his own reasoning that John meant it personal, if you can get your hands on a copy, or maybe somehow I could help. So, it is a personal choice, maybe they were influenced by "and the word was God," and the pronoun "him" in verse 3, and already believed in advance that the word was a person, would be some of my guesses.

Those who have studied the languages and translations, also do things like this also, for example...

John 3:13 And no man hath ascended up to heaven, but [or: if not] he that came down from heaven, even [this word is add to the text, and with no justification for it being there, and what does "even the Son of man" even mean in this context, were there other men, I thought "no man hath"?! it makes it confusing in this context] the Son of man which isG5607 [this is the word "being"G5607. this is the participle of the word "is"G1510, but we would not say "ising," we would say "being" and it fits perfectly in the sentence, and I think it makes it more understandable, so why did they not use that word? I have my own opinions] in heaven.

There is no perfect Scroll or translation, but it does not matter, if one has the right foundation.

And that would mean that ... wait for it.... that if it was God's own spoken word that spoke creation into being... then every time we read or hear that the word became flesh (ie Jesus) that God would in fact he His own son. And that would be the miracle and accomplishment to to end all.

Obviously He or The Same was with... could not be the same as....it is separate.
I'm not sure how you came to this conclusion.
Do you understand Adam And Eve? Adam is not Eve, and Eve is not Adam, yet, Adam is Eve, and Eve is Adam!

I'm not absolutely sure what you are trying to say hear.. "that if it was God's own spoken word that spoke creation into being... then every time we read or hear that the word became flesh (ie Jesus) that God would in fact he His own son." ..it is cute though, why is God's spoken word speaking? And why do you say the Father is the son, it's not clear to me how you got there, or what exactly you mean by this?

Anyway, this is probably what you are looking for, some scriptures as to why I believe Jesus was not a person before He became man (though He was living).

Psa 33:6 By the word [Logos in k.Greek version the Septuagint] of the LORD the heavens were made, and by the breath of his mouth all their host.
Jn 1:14 "And the Word became flesh.."
Jn 6:51 I am the living bread which came down from heaven: if any man eat of this bread, he shall live for ever: and the bread that I will give is my flesh
[the word/bread that came down from heaven that was a person, became flesh, is flesh?!], which I will give for the life of the world.
This is the same word "become/became" (εγενετοG1096 V-2ADI-3S) in Jn 1:14 that is used when Satan tempts Christ saying, “..If you are the Son of God, command this stone to become (γενηταιG1096 V-2ADS-3S) bread.” - Luke 4:3.
Do you think Satan meant put a coat of bread around a stone?

Isa 55:10 “For as the rain and the snow [referring to God's spoken word] come down from heaven and do not return there but water the earth, making it bring forth and sprout, giving seed to the sower and bread to the eater,
Isa 55:11 so shall my word be that goes out from my mouth; it shall not return to me empty, but it shall accomplish that which I purpose, and shall succeed in the thing for which I sent it
[Jn 17:3].
Reading with all of John 6, focusing on Jn 6:51, even Jn 1:1, 14.

Psa 22:9-10 But thou art he that took me out of the womb: thou didst make me hope when I was upon my mother's breasts. 10 I was cast upon thee from the womb: thou art my God from my mother's belly.
Luk 2:52 And Jesus increased in wisdom and stature, and in favour with God and man.

Are these referring to flesh, a body, nature, or a being becoming a person.

Isa 45:4 For the sake of my servant Jacob, and Israel my chosen, I call you by your name, I name you, though you do not know me.
Isa 45:5 I am the LORD, and there is no other, besides me there is no God; I equip you, though you do not know me,
1 Pet 1:20 He was foreknown [not know but foreknown] before the foundation of the world but was made manifest in the last times for the sake of you
1 Pet 1:21 who through him are believers in God [the Father], who raised him from the dead and gave him glory, so that your faith and hope are in God [the Father].
 
MANY, Listen really close. "Begotten", It should be understood that monogenes is not referring to being created or conceived as if Jesus wasn’t eternal, for Jesus always has and will always be God eternal. Listen, the Lord Jesus said to them, “Truly, truly, I say to you, before Abraham was, I am. (John 8:58)...... so what do the term "Only Begotten means here?

in the Bible, "Begotten" is used to describe the unique relationship between God the Father and Jesus Christ, His Son, (according to the flesh). This term is used to clarify the special nature of Jesus's relationship with God, and to distinguish Him from created beings.

what do 101G means here. the Nature of God is the ECHAD of himself ... "SHARED" ... in flesh. the flesh was conceived. not the spirit, understand again, "monogenes is not referring to being created or conceived"... but in relationship. and in that relationship, he God JESUS, the Ordinal Last did as 101G said, bring MANY sons and daughters into GLORY in him. supportive scripture, Hebrews 2:9 "But we see Jesus, who was made a little lower than the angels for the suffering of death, crowned with glory and honour; that he by the grace of God should taste death for every man." Hebrews 2:10 "For it became him, for whom are all things, and by whom are all things, in bringing many sons unto glory, to make the captain of their salvation perfect through sufferings."

bring how many? "MANY". 7x did you not read? listen, 2 Corinthians 6:17 "Wherefore come out from among them, and be ye separate, saith the Lord, and touch not the unclean thing; and I will receive you," 2 Corinthians 6:18 "And will be a Father unto you, and ye shall be my sons and daughters, saith the Lord Almighty."

now do you know what that word "receive" means here as in " and I will receive you?" when used as a VERB "To assimilate into one's understanding or comprehension". ...... "conceive", and you do know what that means.... but it is also synonyms with "become conscious", or as the bible say, to come "ALIVE" to God...... better known as "BORN AGAIN" .... hello. supportive scripture, John 3:3 "Jesus answered and said unto him, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born again, he cannot see the kingdom of God." and born again is synonyms with conceive. HELLO, and conceive is another word for "receive" as stated by the word of God, 2 Corinthians 6:17 "Wherefore come out from among them, and be ye separate, saith the Lord, and touch not the unclean thing; and I will receive you,"
7x you need to look up words and "BECOME ALIVE" again. see, when Adam fell because of sin, he just need to be ...... BORN AGAIN.... regenerated ..... other words, "become conscious" again. Oh how simple the bible is.

now go back over this post and "become conscious" unto God in Christ Jesus .... the Gospel. just as BAPTISM do, 1 Peter 3:21 "The like figure whereunto even baptism doth also now save us (not the putting away of the filth of the flesh, but the answer of a good conscience toward God,) by the resurrection of Jesus Christ:" .... HELLO, "a good conscience" ..... toward God. yes,

101G.
"G3439 monogenēs: From G3441 and G1096; only born, that is, sole: - only (begotten, child)."

ESV - Heb 11:17 By faith Abraham, when he was tested, offered up Isaac, and he who had received the promises was in the act of offering up his only sonG3439,
KJV - Heb 11:17 By faith Abraham, when he was tried, offered up Isaac: and he that had received the promises offered up his only begottenG3439 son,
 
John 16:25–31 (KJV 1900) — 25 These things have I spoken unto you in proverbs: but the time cometh, when I shall no more speak unto you in proverbs, but I shall shew you plainly of the Father. 26 At that day ye shall ask in my name: and I say not unto you, that I will pray the Father for you: 27 For the Father himself loveth you, because ye have loved me, and have believed that I came out from God. 28 I came forth from the Father, and am come into the world: again, I leave the world, and go to the Father. 29 His disciples said unto him, Lo, now speakest thou plainly, and speakest no proverb. 30 Now are we sure that thou knowest all things, and needest not that any man should ask thee: by this we believe that thou camest forth from God. 31 Jesus answered them, Do ye now believe?

One cannot be a father without a son

thats two

I did not find a question mark, but this seems to be in the form of a question, "If John was wrong in 1:1 how can you prove it when no one else seems to agree."


Ya but what are they screaming, truth, or a lie. What about the 400 lying prophets, and the 1 Micaiah that spoke the truth 1 Kings 22.
Are you making an argument for doctrine out of single letter of a word, a capital letter that does not even exist in k.Greek?


Yes, I would agree they are referencing a person.


First, I do not claim John was wrong in 1:1, nor do I wish to. I claim Trinitarians, and oneness, and Unitarians, and J.W. and the like are wrong.
There are no capital letters in k.Greek, so, how could John be wrong in 1:1, when he did not write a capital letter? You switch it from being the translators error to being John's error. It was the translators that added to what John wrote in the Bible.

But, you'll have to ask the translators why they chose to do what they did. In my John MacArthur Study Bible it states "Personal pronouns are capitalized when pertaining to deity." And at Jn 1:1 MacArthur has a nice little write up about the word "Word," as essentially impersonal, but then concludes by his own reasoning that John meant it personal, if you can get your hands on a copy, or maybe somehow I could help. So, it is a personal choice, maybe they were influenced by "and the word was God," and the pronoun "him" in verse 3, and already believed in advance that the word was a person, would be some of my guesses.

Those who have studied the languages and translations, also do things like this also, for example...

John 3:13 And no man hath ascended up to heaven, but [or: if not] he that came down from heaven, even [this word is add to the text, and with no justification for it being there, and what does "even the Son of man" even mean in this context, were there other men, I thought "no man hath"?! it makes it confusing in this context] the Son of man which isG5607 [this is the word "being"G5607. this is the participle of the word "is"G1510, but we would not say "ising," we would say "being" and it fits perfectly in the sentence, and I think it makes it more understandable, so why did they not use that word? I have my own opinions] in heaven.

There is no perfect Scroll or translation, but it does not matter, if one has the right foundation.


I'm not sure how you came to this conclusion.
Do you understand Adam And Eve? Adam is not Eve, and Eve is not Adam, yet, Adam is Eve, and Eve is Adam!
A few comments only because you have me thoroughly confused.

First. You are right. For whatever reason no question mark. Sorry.

Next. Do I understand Adam and Eve? I do as much as anyone else does....

"
23And Adam said, This is now bone of my bones, and flesh of my flesh: she shall be called Woman, because she was taken out of Man."

Is clearly and understandable stated, however....

24Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife: and they shall be one flesh.

Is out in left field because Adam did not have a mother. Eve did not have a mother. But since it also is found in the New Testament
Mathew 19:5 and said, ‘FOR THIS REASON A MAN SHALL LEAVE HIS FATHER AND MOTHER AND BE JOINED TO HIS WIFE, AND THE TWO SHALL BECOME ONE FLESH ‘?"

I used this because if a man and a woman marry they become 1 flesh. The man is still a man and the woman is still a woman yet two are one.

If ... lets say that capital W is a small w that a lot of folk believe. We have been told the word/Word was in the beginning creating. John 1:3 is usually used for support. Most will say the word, small w.... is separate from God.

So if it was not a person as in Word, but if it was word, little w.. then we have the word and God both creating along with the Holy Spirit.
therefore we have 3 that are one.

I believe in the Capital W, (especially in light of the He) and to me we still have 3 that are one.

I hesitate to bring another thought to this, especially since I started a thread on it this afternoon and do not want to detract from that.

But it appears that Isaiah had prophetic knowledge about Jesus and who He would be.

Isaiah 9:6 KJV (used only because many will read nothing else...frown.gif
For unto us a child is born, unto us a son is given: and the government shall be upon his shoulder: and his name shall be called Wonderful, Counseller, The mighty God, The everlasting Father, The Prince of Peace.

To me, this says there were at least 2 in the Godhead. You don't believe in a Trinity....

Why do you believe in John 1:1?
 
"G3439 monogenēs: From G3441 and G1096; only born, that is, sole: - only (begotten, child)."

ESV - Heb 11:17 By faith Abraham, when he was tested, offered up Isaac, and he who had received the promises was in the act of offering up his only sonG3439,
KJV - Heb 11:17 By faith Abraham, when he was tried, offered up Isaac: and he that had received the promises offered up his only begottenG3439 son,
You really don't understand .... do you? my God, do you really want to used those scripture. you have never been taught this, has you? THINK, please THINK, 7x, was Isaac Abraham ONLY BEGOTTEN son? no, Ishmael was his son, as a matter of fact his FIRST and only begotten son before Isaac came afterward. ...... :oops: YIKES!

NOW, as for the Christ. according to the Flesh, and not the spirit. Listen and LEARN....... LEARN,
one scripture for that. Isaiah 9:6 "For unto us a child is born, unto us a son is given: and the government shall be upon his shoulder: and his name shall be called Wonderful, Counsellor, The mighty God, The everlasting Father, The Prince of Peace."

a child is born, unto us a son is given? do you understand this. let 101G help you out. flesh and bone and blood is begotten, but not the spirit that dwells in it. was the Lord Jesus the ONLY BEGOTTEN in, in, in, in, the flesh? NO. for Adam was a Son of God. now get this, Job who is not of Isaac direct line was a son of God...... say what? yes, JOB was a son of God, and he was not of the covenant to Israel...... Got that? yes, Job was a son of God, READ Job CHAPTER 1...... (smile)..... :eek: YIKES!

so, 101G is telling you to read up on this "ONLY BEGOTTEN Son". ..... ok, READ ..... with understanding.

101G.
 
You really don't understand .... do you? my God, do you really want to used those scripture. you have never been taught this, has you? THINK, please THINK, 7x, was Isaac Abraham ONLY BEGOTTEN son? no, Ishmael was his son, as a matter of fact his FIRST and only begotten son before Isaac came afterward. ...... :oops: YIKES!

NOW, as for the Christ. according to the Flesh, and not the spirit. Listen and LEARN....... LEARN,
one scripture for that. Isaiah 9:6 "For unto us a child is born, unto us a son is given: and the government shall be upon his shoulder: and his name shall be called Wonderful, Counsellor, The mighty God, The everlasting Father, The Prince of Peace."

a child is born, unto us a son is given? do you understand this. let 101G help you out. flesh and bone and blood is begotten, but not the spirit that dwells in it. was the Lord Jesus the ONLY BEGOTTEN in, in, in, in, the flesh? NO. for Adam was a Son of God. now get this, Job who is not of Isaac direct line was a son of God...... say what? yes, JOB was a son of God, and he was not of the covenant to Israel...... Got that? yes, Job was a son of God, READ Job CHAPTER 1...... (smile)..... :eek: YIKES!

so, 101G is telling you to read up on this "ONLY BEGOTTEN Son". ..... ok, READ ..... with understanding.

101G.
Within the prophecy Ishmael was not the son of promise, Ishmael represents the son of Law by Hagar (Gal 4:22-24), and was sent away. Isaac was the son of promise by Sarah, who laughed when hearing she was going to have a child well passed her child bearing years; this representing God's only son, and not only this, but had no earthly father. We have earthly fathers. Abraham representing God the Father was offering his only son, or only begotten son through Sarah, because there was no other son of promise. Isaac was unique, no one else like him, like the Son of God, born of a virgin, and not only, but first before anything created, and by which all things were created, and much more! You don't believe the same of yourself do you? And because we are the body of Christ, in Christ, we are also of promise. We are sons because of Christ!

Let me get this straight, you believe Jesus is God the Father person, yet, you are arguing that Jesus, who you say is the Father person, who is a son of God and a son of man, who thought of himself as equal to God, is like other men who are sons of God? How is the Father person, even if in flesh made of the earth, is like any other man, or son? So, if we are the exact same kind of son as God's only son, that would make us equal to God the Father (Jn 5:18), if Jesus who is God and also the Father, is the same kind of son as us. Do you believe this? I do not believe I am equal to the Father, or His Son!
There must be some reason why He is the only, the only son, right.

Would this work for you.
Luke 7:12 Now when he came nigh to the gate of the city, behold, there was a dead man carried out, the onlyG3439 sonG5207 of his mother, and she was a widow: and much people of the city was with her.
There must be some reason why this man is her only son. For whatever reason, this man is the only one, and he is different from all other men in that way.
And I am pointing out that the scriptures teach, that there is a reason Jesus is call God's only son, making Him different, unique, from all other men in some way.
And the scriptures teach the word became flesh, became a human being, born an infant, grew in understanding, just as humans do, the difference was, His flesh is from heaven, not earth.

Jn 1:1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.
Jn 1:14 And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth.
Jn 6:51 I am the living bread which came down from heaven: if any man
eat of this bread [Isa 55:10 "bread to the eater"], he shall live for ever: and the bread that I will give is my flesh, which I will give for the life of the world.

Jn 8:42 Jesus said unto them, If God were your Father, ye would love me: for I
proceeded forthG1831[From G1537 and G2064; Isa 55:11] and cameG2240 fromG1537[out of; out from; Isa 55:11] God; neither cameG2064 I of myself, but he sent me. [Isa 55:11]
Jn_16:27 For the Father himself loveth you, because ye have loved me, and have believed that I came outG1831 from God.
Jn 17:8 For I have given unto them the words which thou gavest me; and they have received them, and have known surely that I came outG1831 from thee, and they have believed that thou didst send me.
Isa 55:10 For as the rain cometh down, and the snow from heaven, and returneth not thither, but watereth the earth, and maketh it bring forth and bud, that it may give seed to the sower, and bread to the eater:
Isa 55:11 So shall my word be that
goeth forth [G1831 Septuagint; Jn 8:42] out of [G1537 Septuagint; Jn 8:42] my mouth: it shall not return unto me void, but it shall accomplish that which I please, and it shall prosper in the thing whereto I sent it. [Jn 8:42]

Where God reveals and explains His image, and His image equals two Isa 40:18-22 wih Gen 1:2, 26-27; 2:21-23.
Jesus cannot be the only true God who sent Jn 17:3 with 7:28, 29; 8:42.

This is a solid foundation, and I know it oh so very well.
 
Next. Do I understand Adam and Eve? I do as much as anyone else does....

"
23And Adam said, This is now bone of my bones, and flesh of my flesh: she shall be called Woman, because she was taken out of Man."

Is clearly and understandable stated, however....

24Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife: and they shall be one flesh.

Is out in left field because Adam did not have a mother. Eve did not have a mother. But since it also is found in the New Testament
Mathew 19:5 and said, ‘FOR THIS REASON A MAN SHALL LEAVE HIS FATHER AND MOTHER AND BE JOINED TO HIS WIFE, AND THE TWO SHALL BECOME ONE FLESH ‘?"

I used this because if a man and a woman marry they become 1 flesh. The man is still a man and the woman is still a woman yet two are one.
This is why I asked about Adam and Eve "Obviously He or The Same was with... could not be the same as....it is separate."
Do you understand that Adam is Eve, and Eve is Adam, and yet, Adam is not Eve, and Eve is not Adam? This is referring to their bodies and persons.
Do you understand this, before I carry on, and answer the rest of your questions?
 
Within the prophecy Ishmael was not the son of promise, Ishmael represents the son of Law by Hagar (Gal 4:22-24), and was sent away. Isaac was the son of promise by Sarah, who laughed when hearing she was going to have a child well passed her child bearing years; this representing God's only son, and not only this, but had no earthly father. We have earthly fathers. Abraham representing God the Father was offering his only son, or only begotten son through Sarah, because there was no other son of promise. Isaac was unique, no one else like him, like the Son of God, born of a virgin, and not only, but first before anything created, and by which all things were created, and much more! You don't believe the same of yourself do you? And because we are the body of Christ, in Christ, we are also of promise. We are sons because of Christ!
son by promise..... or by Law, or WITHOUT THE LAW? listen and learn, Romans 2:14 "For when the Gentiles, which have not the law, do by nature the things contained in the law, these, having not the law, are a law unto themselves:"
Let me get this straight, you believe Jesus is God the Father person, yet, you are arguing that Jesus, who you say is the Father person, who is a son of God and a son of man, who thought of himself as equal to God, is like other men who are sons of God? How is the Father person, even if in flesh made of the earth, is like any other man, or son? So, if we are the exact same kind of son as God's only son, that would make us equal to God the Father (Jn 5:18), if Jesus who is God and also the Father, is the same kind of son as us. Do you believe this? I do not believe I am equal to the Father, or His Son!
There must be some reason why He is the only, the only son, right.
once ... again, Isaiah 63:5 "And I looked, and there was none to help; and I wondered that there was none to uphold: therefore mine own arm brought salvation unto me; and my fury, it upheld me."
Would this work for you.
Luke 7:12 Now when he came nigh to the gate of the city, behold, there was a dead man carried out, the onlyG3439 sonG5207 of his mother, and she was a widow: and much people of the city was with her.
There must be some reason why this man is her only son. For whatever reason, this man is the only one, and he is different from all other men in that way.
And I am pointing out that the scriptures teach, that there is a reason Jesus is call God's only son, making Him different, unique, from all other men in some way.
And the scriptures teach the word became flesh, became a human being, born an infant, grew in understanding, just as humans do, the difference was, His flesh is from heaven, not earth.
the same as Abraham "only" begotten son? but in the resurrection (WITHOUT BLOOD), are we not like him?
Jn 8:42 Jesus said unto them, If God were your Father, ye would love me: for I proceeded forthG1831[From G1537 and G2064; Isa 55:11] and cameG2240 fromG1537[out of; out from; Isa 55:11] God; neither cameG2064 I of myself, but he sent me. [Isa 55:11]
is this not "OF" God as in Genesis 1:1?
Where God reveals and explains His image, and His image equals two Isa 40:18-22 wih Gen 1:2, 26-27; 2:21-23.
Jesus cannot be the only true God who sent Jn 17:3 with 7:28, 29; 8:42.
why not, is he not his "OWN ARM?" READ PLEASE.

101G.
 
son by promise..... or by Law, or WITHOUT THE LAW? listen and learn, Romans 2:14 "For when the Gentiles, which have not the law, do by nature the things contained in the law, these, having not the law, are a law unto themselves:"

once ... again, Isaiah 63:5 "And I looked, and there was none to help; and I wondered that there was none to uphold: therefore mine own arm brought salvation unto me; and my fury, it upheld me."

the same as Abraham "only" begotten son? but in the resurrection (WITHOUT BLOOD), are we not like him?

is this not "OF" God as in Genesis 1:1?

why not, is he not his "OWN ARM?" READ PLEASE.

101G.
These are my points..
Within the prophecy Ishmael was not the son of promise, Ishmael represents the son of Law by Hagar (Gal 4:22-24), and was sent away. Isaac was the son of promise by Sarah, who laughed when hearing she was going to have a child well passed her child bearing years; this representing God's only son, and not only this, but had no earthly father. We have earthly fathers. Abraham representing God the Father was offering his only son, or only begotten son through Sarah, because there was no other son of promise. Isaac was unique, no one else like him, like the Son of God, born of a virgin, and not only, but first before anything created, and by which all things were created, and much more! You don't believe the same of yourself do you? And because we are the body of Christ, in Christ, we are also of promise. We are sons because of Christ!

Let me get this straight, you believe Jesus is God the Father person, yet, you are arguing that Jesus, who you say is the Father person, who is a son of God and a son of man, who thought of himself as equal to God, is like other men who are sons of God? How is the Father person, even if in flesh made of the earth, is like any other man, or son? So, if we are the exact same kind of son as God's only son, that would make us equal to God the Father (Jn 5:18), if Jesus who is God and also the Father, is the same kind of son as us. Do you believe this? I do not believe I am equal to the Father, or His Son!
There must be some reason why He is the only, the only son, right.

Would this work for you.
Luke 7:12 Now when he came nigh to the gate of the city, behold, there was a dead man carried out, the onlyG3439 sonG5207 of his mother, and she was a widow: and much people of the city was with her.
There must be some reason why this man is her only son. For whatever reason, this man is the only one, and he is different from all other men in that way.
And I am pointing out that the scriptures teach, that there is a reason Jesus is call God's only son, making Him different, unique, from all other men in some way.
And the scriptures teach the word became flesh, became a human being, born an infant, grew in understanding, just as humans do, the difference was, His flesh is from heaven, not earth.

Jn 1:1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.
Jn 1:14 And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth.
Jn 6:51 I am the living bread which came down from heaven: if any man
eat of this bread [Isa 55:10 "bread to the eater"], he shall live for ever: and the bread that I will give is my flesh, which I will give for the life of the world.

Jn 8:42 Jesus said unto them, If God were your Father, ye would love me: for I
proceeded forthG1831[From G1537 and G2064; Isa 55:11] and cameG2240 fromG1537[out of; out from; Isa 55:11] God; neither cameG2064 I of myself, but he sent me. [Isa 55:11]
Jn_16:27 For the Father himself loveth you, because ye have loved me, and have believed that I came outG1831 from God.
Jn 17:8 For I have given unto them the words which thou gavest me; and they have received them, and have known surely that I came outG1831 from thee, and they have believed that thou didst send me.
Isa 55:10 For as the rain cometh down, and the snow from heaven, and returneth not thither, but watereth the earth, and maketh it bring forth and bud, that it may give seed to the sower, and bread to the eater:
Isa 55:11 So shall my word be that
goeth forth [G1831 Septuagint; Jn 8:42] out of [G1537 Septuagint; Jn 8:42] my mouth: it shall not return unto me void, but it shall accomplish that which I please, and it shall prosper in the thing whereto I sent it. [Jn 8:42]

Where God reveals and explains His image, and His image equals two Isa 40:18-22 wih Gen 1:2, 26-27; 2:21-23.
Jesus cannot be the only true God who sent Jn 17:3 with 7:28, 29; 8:42.

This is a solid foundation, and I know it oh so very well.
..if you like, you can address my points sincerely, and then I will address yours.
 
This is why I asked about Adam and Eve "Obviously He or The Same was with... could not be the same as....it is separate."
Do you understand that Adam is Eve, and Eve is Adam, and yet, Adam is not Eve, and Eve is not Adam? This is referring to their bodies and persons.
Do you understand this, before I carry on, and answer the rest of your questions?
Yes I know all that. I know that is the way I understand the Trinity also.

I do not care if you do or dont. Dont answer any the rest.

I had major problems in my life and frankly I just does not careat the moment.

Blessings
 
GINOLJC, to all.
@7xLightray, you seems like you cannot grasp the concept that God is a Plurality of ..... "HIMSELF" ..... only ONE PERSON. let 101G help you once MORE. please get it this time ... ok.

God is a "EQUAL SHARE" of, of, of, himself in FLESH. Philippians 2:6 "Who, being in the form of God, thought it not robbery to be equal with God:" STOP, LOOK, and THINK. the FORM of God is the NATURE of God.... Spirit. and the scripture states, "equal with" just as John 1:1 also states the Word is "WITH" God and is "God". so what's equal is form/Nature, not any separate and distinct person. so, God who is Spirit is in question of his, his, his, ONE person plurality. this is clearly stated in the definition of "ONE" which is the Hebrew term,
H259 אֶחָד 'echad (ech-awd') adj.
1. (properly) united, i.e. one.
2. (as an ordinal) first.
[a numeral from H258]
KJV: a, alike, alone, altogether, and, any(-thing), apiece, a certain, (dai-)ly, each (one), + eleven, every, few, first, + highway, a man, once, one, only, other, some, together.
Root(s): H258

definition #2. is our answer. (as an ordinal) first. BINGO, there is our answer, and this Ordinal designation consist of the First, the Ordinal First, the Father.... and also notice that this definition also describe this ECHAD as "ONLY" say what... "ONLY", yes, the Son is the "ONLY" designation/or Administration of God in FLESH and BONES. is this more easy to be understood?

101G.
 
Yes I know all that. I know that is the way I understand the Trinity also.
You do? I am referring to Adam's person existing first, and his rib that existed in him. Then that rib was taken out of Adam, and was used to make Eve. Both Adam and Eve are made out of the same body, but are two separate persons, and beings. Adam is head of Eve, as God is head of Christ 1 Cor 11:3 "..and the head of Christ is God."
How did you get a Trinity out of this, may I ask?

I do not care if you do or dont. Dont answer any the rest.

I had major problems in my life and frankly I just does not careat the moment.

Blessings
Not sure how to take that. You cared enough to approach me, and take the time to post all this..
Quick question that perhaps I have missed, because so far what I made red is not clear.......to me.

In John 1 vs 1 we read..... ( I have posted every translation that is common to man, these days below)

New International Version
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

New Living Translation
In the beginning the Word already existed. The Word was with God, and the Word was God.

English Standard Version
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

Berean Standard Bible
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

Berean Literal Bible
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

King James Bible
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

New King James Version
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

New American Standard Bible
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

NASB 1995
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

NASB 1977
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

Legacy Standard Bible
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

Amplified Bible
In the beginning [before all time] was the Word (Christ), and the Word was with God, and the Word was God Himself.

Christian Standard Bible
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

Holman Christian Standard Bible
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

American Standard Version
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

Contemporary English Version
In the beginning was the one who is called the Word. The Word was with God and was truly God.

English Revised Version
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

GOD'S WORD® Translation
In the beginning the Word already existed. The Word was with God, and the Word was God.

Good News Translation
In the beginning the Word already existed; the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

International Standard Version
In the beginning, the Word existed. The Word was with God, and the Word was God.

Majority Standard Bible
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

NET Bible
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was fully God.

New Heart English Bible
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

Webster's Bible Translation
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

Weymouth New Testament
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

World English Bible
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.
Literal Translations
Literal Standard Version
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God;

Berean Literal Bible
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

Young's Literal Translation
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God;

Smith's Literal Translation
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and God was the Word.
Catholic Translations
Douay-Rheims Bible
IN the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

Catholic Public Domain Version
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and God was the Word.

New American Bible
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

New Revised Standard Version
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.
Translations from Aramaic
Lamsa Bible
THE Word was in the beginning, and that very Word was with God, and God was that Word.

Aramaic Bible in Plain English
In the origin The Word had been existing and That Word had been existing with God and That Word was himself God.
NT Translations
Anderson New Testament
IN the beginning was the WORD, and the WORD, was with God, and the WORD was God.

Godbey New Testament
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

Haweis New Testament
IN the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

Mace New Testament
In the beginning was the Logos, and the Logos was with God, and the Logos was God.

Weymouth New Testament
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

Worrell New Testament
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

Worsley New Testament
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.


AS YOU CAN SEE... Every translation has the word Word, capitalized, and I am sure that terms like that never are, unless you are screaming at someone.
But now look through the qupted section below. And Again pay attention to the highlighted words
and I do believe you will have to agree they are referencing a person.
If John was wrong in 1:1 how can you prove it when no one else seems to agree. Those who have
studied the languages and translations.
But if you can... then we can wipe his book out of the gospels because if he is wrong in one thing,
could well be wrong in others....
And that would mean that ... wait for it.... that if it was God's own spoken word that spoke creation into being... then every time we read or hear that the word became flesh (ie Jesus) that God would in fact he His own son. And that would be the miracle and accomplishment to to end all.

Obviously He or The Same was with... could not be the same as....it is separate.
I have to cut the length of the following due to count... But you will get the idea

New International Version
He was with God in the beginning.

New Living Translation
He existed in the beginning with God.

English Standard Version
He was in the beginning with God.

Berean Standard Bible
He was with God in the beginning.

Berean Literal Bible
He was in the beginning with God.

King James Bible
The same was in the beginning with God.

New King James Version
He was in the beginning with God.

New American Standard Bible
He was in the beginning with God.

NASB 1995
He was in the beginning with God.

NASB 1977
He was in the beginning with God.

Legacy Standard Bible
He was in the beginning with God.

Amplified Bible
He was [continually existing] in the beginning [co-eternally] with God.

Christian Standard Bible
He was with God in the beginning.

Holman Christian Standard Bible
He was with God in the beginning.

American Standard Version
The same was in the beginning with God.

Contemporary English Version
From the very beginning the Word was with God.

English Revised Version
The same was in the beginning with God.

GOD'S WORD® Translation
He was already with God in the beginning.

Good News Translation
From the very beginning the Word was with God.

International Standard Version
He existed in the beginning with God.

Majority Standard Bible
He was with God in the beginning.

NET Bible
The Word was with God in the beginning.

New Heart English Bible
He was in the beginning with God.

Webster's Bible Translation
The same was in the beginning with God.

Weymouth New Testament
He was in the beginning with God.

World English Bible
The same was in the beginning with God.
Literal Translations
Literal Standard Version
this One was in the beginning with God;

Berean Literal Bible
He was in the beginning with God.

Young's Literal Translation
this one was in the beginning with God;

Smith's Literal Translation
This was in the beginning with God.
Catholic Translations
Douay-Rheims Bible
The same was in the beginning with God.

Catholic Public Domain Version
He was with God in the beginning.

New American Bible
He was in the beginning with God.
..Is it you do not want me to answer, or you did not like my response of tackling one at a time? It's just you had a lot of questions in your post, and a lot to clear up, and I only wanted to slow it down, and take it step by step, otherwise it probably would have taken me days to write up a reply (and then only to tell me you don't care).
Now your not sure if you want it cleared up? Up to you, just let me know, I don't mind answering!
Though, concerning "major problems," I should probably warn you then, worshipping the 3-in-1 beast can only make things a whole lot worse Rev 13:1-2, 3-4, 12 18; 14:9-11, 16:2, if you wish to spare yourself from a huge "major problem." That would be my blessing, if received.
 
GINOLJC, to all.
@7xLightray, you seems like you cannot grasp the concept that God is a Plurality of ..... "HIMSELF" ..... only ONE PERSON. let 101G help you once MORE. please get it this time ... ok.

God is a "EQUAL SHARE" of, of, of, himself in FLESH. Philippians 2:6 "Who, being in the form of God, thought it not robbery to be equal with God:" STOP, LOOK, and THINK. the FORM of God is the NATURE of God.... Spirit. and the scripture states, "equal with" just as John 1:1 also states the Word is "WITH" God and is "God". so what's equal is form/Nature, not any separate and distinct person. so, God who is Spirit is in question of his, his, his, ONE person plurality. this is clearly stated in the definition of "ONE" which is the Hebrew term,
H259 אֶחָד 'echad (ech-awd') adj.
1. (properly) united, i.e. one.
2. (as an ordinal) first.
[a numeral from H258]
KJV: a, alike, alone, altogether, and, any(-thing), apiece, a certain, (dai-)ly, each (one), + eleven, every, few, first, + highway, a man, once, one, only, other, some, together.
Root(s): H258

definition #2. is our answer. (as an ordinal) first. BINGO, there is our answer, and this Ordinal designation consist of the First, the Ordinal First, the Father.... and also notice that this definition also describe this ECHAD as "ONLY" say what... "ONLY", yes, the Son is the "ONLY" designation/or Administration of God in FLESH and BONES. is this more easy to be understood?

101G.
Yes, I have already stated that Jesus existed in the form of God.

There is only one true God, who is spirit, and if that God spoke, His word would also be God/spirit, but not the Person Himself! It's Like this..

Look, here is Jimmy's finger in the mail, were is the rest of Jimmy?
At work!
How many Jimmy's are there?
Jimmy's finger is Jimmy, it's Jimmy's finger, and it is human, but not a person.
The Jimmy that is at work is Jimmy, and is human, and is the person.
But there is only one Jimmy, which is one body and one person, and one human being.
And there is one finger, which is body only, and carries everything about Jimmy.
There is only one whole body, though in two parts, but it is only one human being, who sent his finger. Then that finger was returned to Jimmy, only now that finger became another kind of body, and another person, a mirror of the first person.

This is what you need to answer, and I know this is impossible..
Jn 17:3 with 7:28-29; 8:42-43 Explain to me how you sent yourself (meaning: you went of your own self, no one else sent you) to the store on Wed. dec. 4, 2015, at 3:19:37 pm, and yet did not send your self (meaning: someone else did send you) on Wed. dec. 4, 2015 at 3:19:37 pm.
So, who are you manipulating? Not me, but your own self!
You are in love with ECHAD, making a doctrine out of one word! Debating over one word, which cannot explain Jn 17:3 with 7:28-29; 8:42-43. Though you try, like trinitarians have been for the last 2,000 years!
 
Yes, I have already stated that Jesus existed in the form of God.
YES, Jesus is God. not separate and distinct person. when one say GOD, it is Jesus.... Good thank you.
There is only one true God, who is spirit, and if that God spoke, His word would also be God/spirit, but not the Person Himself! It's Like this..

Look, here is Jimmy's finger in the mail, were is the rest of Jimmy?
At work!
How many Jimmy's are there?
STOP RIGHT THERE, God is everywhere. now Jesus shared himself in flesh which is the "Intrinsic Spatial" of the Spirit in a body for flesh and bone.....with blood. and Intrinsic: it means 1. belonging to a thing by its very nature, (diversity). is shows ownership, or possession (Proverbs 8:22) . see, as in your example, Jimmy's finger in the mail or mall, and the rest of him at work. well God who is Spirit ..... is at the Mall and at work, at home... , is everywhere, and listen, .... and his equal "SHARE"...ie his own finger,(the Ordinal Last), is at the mall, (in a body of flesh, the Intrinsic Spatial doing his will/work) and in that shared state, he as the Ordinal First is still everywhere at the same tine...... at the mall, at work, at home.... EVERYWHERE. and it is is the PERSON of God Shared equally in that flesh body.
Jimmy's finger is Jimmy, it's Jimmy's finger, and it is human, but not a person.
ERROR, read Hebrews 1:3 again, the EXACT/EXPRESS image of, of, of, his PERSON... hello. according to W.E. Vine's Expository Dictionary of New Testament Words, "of" translates the genitive case of nouns, with various shades of meaning. Of these the subjective and objective are mentioned here, which need careful distinction. so by being in flesh, he God who is Spirit is the subject, and his finger...ie ...is the Objective. Oh my this is too easy. see, God/JESUS is abstract, (Spirit), and his OWN finger in flesh is concrete, or better known as MADE... or "MANIFESTED". other words God finger ie is the Word MADE FLESH, John 1:14 "And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth."

this is just too easy.
This is what you need to answer, and I know this is impossible..
Jn 17:3 with 7:28-29; 8:42-43 Explain to me how you sent yourself (meaning: you went of your own self, no one else sent you) to the store on Wed. dec. 4, 2015, at 3:19:37 pm, and yet did not send your self (meaning: someone else did send you) on Wed. dec. 4, 2015 at 3:19:37 pm.
So, who are you manipulating? Not me, but your own self!
You are in love with ECHAD, making a doctrine out of one word! Debating over one word, which cannot explain Jn 17:3 with 7:28-29; 8:42-43. Though you try, like trinitarians have been for the last 2,000 years!
my, my, my, last time, LISTEN real good, your John 17:3 ....... John 17:3 "And this is life eternal, that they might know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom thou hast sent." notice, "the only true God, and Jesus Christ" now scripture, Isaiah 41:4 "Who hath wrought and done it, calling the generations from the beginning? I the LORD, the first, and with the last; I am he." notice the conjunction "AND" also notice the preposition "WITH" here. 101G will kill two birds with one stone. the WITH First, the LORD is the First "WITH" the LAST, correct. just as with John 1:1. the word was WITH God, right. now the AND. scripture, Isaiah 44:6 "Thus saith the LORD the King of Israel, and his redeemer the LORD of hosts; I am the first, and I am the last; and beside me there is no God." here the LORD all caps. is the First AND, AND, AND, is the Last... the LORD, all caps is the First ..... "AND" ..... the Last, correct. is this two separate and distinct persons? let the bible speak. Isaiah 48:12 "Hearken unto me, O Jacob and Israel, my called; I am he; I am the first, I also am the last." Also? yes, for also means, in addition; too. hello, in addition to being the First, (Father), he is ..... "ALSO" the Last, (Son), SAME ONE PERSON. my God this is too easy not to understand.
Explain to me how you sent yourself (meaning: you went of your own self, no one else sent you) to the store on Wed. dec. 4, 2015, at 3:19:37 pm, and yet did not send your self (meaning: someone else did send you) on Wed. dec. 4, 2015 at 3:19:37 pm.
LISTEN and LEARN, Isaiah 48:16 "Come ye near unto me, hear ye this; I have not spoken in secret from the beginning; from the time that it was, there am I: and now the Lord GOD, and his Spirit, hath sent me." now you might say well 101G the Lord God is the Father, (one Person), and the Spirit, (two persons) sent the Son, (three persons)....... seems right... do it not .... as a trinitarian sees it, correct? well let's see what the bible say. scripture, Revelation 1:1 "The Revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave unto him, to shew unto his servants things which must shortly come to pass; and he sent and signified, it by his angel unto his servant John:" someone sent HIS angel to John right.... right. well many say it was the Father who sent his angel to John. and they base this on what the angel said as to who sent him. listen, the angel who was sent tells John who sent him. Revelation 22:6 "And he said unto me, These sayings are faithful and true: and the Lord God of the holy prophets sent his angel to shew unto his servants the things which must shortly be done."

hold it, the Lord God of the Holy Prophets, meaning the OT. and many scholars have said it was the Father of the OT. and the JW have put in their NWT the Name Jehovah sent his angel, meaning the Father sent the angel. well 101G by the TRUTH of GOD, declare all the scholars, and the JW, who made that assumption to be in ERROR. and here's why. just 10 verses later at verse 16, in the same chapter, it says this. Revelation 22:16 "I Jesus have sent mine angel to testify unto you these things in the churches. I am the root and the offspring of David, and the bright and morning star."
well then Jehovah must be the Lord God, who is Jesus. and two, the Lord God in Isaiah 48:16 must be the Lord Jesus also, for the angel said, the Lord God of the Holy Prophets, and Isaiah is one of the Holy prophets. so Isaiah 48:16 should read like this, "Come ye near unto me, hear ye this; I have not spoken in secret from the beginning; from the time that it was, there am I: and now the Lord GOD, (Jesus the Son), and his Spirit, hath sent me." so who is the ME here that was sent? now by process of elimination, (from a trinitarian point of view), The Lord God here is the "Lord God", Jesus, and the Spirit, the Holy spirit? and the me must have to be the "Father" .... well? see, that aren't even having a chance of flying, walking or crawling. for we have scripture which states, John 3:16 "For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life." John 3:17 "For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved."

well now, you, and all of the fellas who has fallen for the LIE of the DEVIL, have a dilemma. understand, the bible in NOT changing for neither 101G, nor you, or anyone else. the bible has been screaming that God is a single person who is the EQUAL SHARE of his own self, meaning he is the "ECHAD" of his own self. THIS IS NOT CHANGING. and the bible don't lie nor contradict itself.

101G cannot get any plainer than this.
You are in love with ECHAD, making a doctrine out of one word
yes, 101G is in LOVE with the TRUTH. and 101G suggest you do the same. is not trinity one word, what about oneness? see, 101G is a "Diversified Oneness", which is two words, and not one word.... (smile). but it is still based on the ECHAD..... (smile).

a word of encouragement. don't worry about 101G, ok, fear the LORD. which is the beginning of Wisdom and understanding of him, God almight, the Lord Jesus..

good day and be blessed.

101G
 
You do? I am referring to Adam's person existing first, and his rib that existed in him. Then that rib was taken out of Adam, and was used to make Eve. Both Adam and Eve are made out of the same body, but are two separate persons, and beings. Adam is head of Eve, as God is head of Christ 1 Cor 11:3 "..and the head of Christ is God."
How did you get a Trinity out of this, may I ask?


Not sure how to take that. You cared enough to approach me, and take the time to post all this..

I am trying to handle the estate of my mother who died oct 13.. slightly longer then 2 months ago, at the same time when I was talking toward you my financial advisor had a triple bypass and that has tied up a lot of issues on his end till he recovers, at the same time trying to get a pre-pay on inheritance tax in this state before the end 0f the year, at the same time trying to clear things from this house while some family thinks I should move and other thinks I should stay put while at the same time looking into online auctions.. yet knowing it is too soon and you want to know about Adam's person existing first... and that right after womans entry we get ....for this reason a man shall leave his father and his mother, and be joined to his wife; and they shall become one flesh.. and how that ties into the Trinity.

It is an example. A metaphore of sorts...

A man and a woman marry and become one flesh while they are still a man and a woman.

God the Father, and God the Son and God the Holy Spirit are one under the Godhead while they are still God the Father, and God the Son and God the Holy Spirit.

IN OTHER WORDS... IT IS POSSIBLE AND FACTUAL FOR MORE THEN ONE ENTITY TO BE ONE, YET EACH IS STILL their own with the attributes
they eash had. A man...A wonman....... or God the Father...God the Son ... God the Holy Spirit..... Each with their own responsibilities



..Is it you do not want me to answer, or you did not like my response of tackling one at a time?

You told me you would not answer until I answered above. I answered above and said answer no more because of what is on my plate.

You ask "..Is it you do not want me to answer, or you did not like my response of tackling one at a time?"

My response to that is that it is tiresome to have to come up with replying to the same thing in different ways to make one understand.



It's just you had a lot of questions in your post, and a lot to clear up, and I only wanted to slow it down, and take it step by step, otherwise it probably would have taken me days to write up a reply (and then only to tell me you don't care).
Now your not sure if you want it cleared up? Up to you, just let me know, I don't mind answering!
Though, concerning "major problems," I should probably warn you then, worshipping the 3-in-1 beast can only make things a whole lot worse Rev 13:1-2, 3-4, 12 18; 14:9-11, 16:2, if you wish to spare yourself from a huge "major problem." That would be my blessing, if received.
 
YES, Jesus is God. not separate and distinct person. when one say GOD, it is Jesus.... Good thank you.

STOP RIGHT THERE, God is everywhere. now Jesus shared himself in flesh which is the "Intrinsic Spatial" of the Spirit in a body for flesh and bone.....with blood. and Intrinsic: it means 1. belonging to a thing by its very nature, (diversity). is shows ownership, or possession (Proverbs 8:22) . see, as in your example, Jimmy's finger in the mail or mall, and the rest of him at work. well God who is Spirit ..... is at the Mall and at work, at home... , is everywhere, and listen, .... and his equal "SHARE"...ie his own finger,(the Ordinal Last), is at the mall, (in a body of flesh, the Intrinsic Spatial doing his will/work) and in that shared state, he as the Ordinal First is still everywhere at the same tine...... at the mall, at work, at home.... EVERYWHERE. and it is is the PERSON of God Shared equally in that flesh body.

ERROR, read Hebrews 1:3 again, the EXACT/EXPRESS image of, of, of, his PERSON... hello. according to W.E. Vine's Expository Dictionary of New Testament Words, "of" translates the genitive case of nouns, with various shades of meaning. Of these the subjective and objective are mentioned here, which need careful distinction. so by being in flesh, he God who is Spirit is the subject, and his finger...ie ...is the Objective. Oh my this is too easy. see, God/JESUS is abstract, (Spirit), and his OWN finger in flesh is concrete, or better known as MADE... or "MANIFESTED". other words God finger ie is the Word MADE FLESH, John 1:14 "And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth."

this is just too easy.

my, my, my, last time, LISTEN real good, your John 17:3 ....... John 17:3 "And this is life eternal, that they might know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom thou hast sent." notice, "the only true God, and Jesus Christ" now scripture, Isaiah 41:4 "Who hath wrought and done it, calling the generations from the beginning? I the LORD, the first, and with the last; I am he." notice the conjunction "AND" also notice the preposition "WITH" here. 101G will kill two birds with one stone. the WITH First, the LORD is the First "WITH" the LAST, correct. just as with John 1:1. the word was WITH God, right. now the AND. scripture, Isaiah 44:6 "Thus saith the LORD the King of Israel, and his redeemer the LORD of hosts; I am the first, and I am the last; and beside me there is no God." here the LORD all caps. is the First AND, AND, AND, is the Last... the LORD, all caps is the First ..... "AND" ..... the Last, correct. is this two separate and distinct persons? let the bible speak. Isaiah 48:12 "Hearken unto me, O Jacob and Israel, my called; I am he; I am the first, I also am the last." Also? yes, for also means, in addition; too. hello, in addition to being the First, (Father), he is ..... "ALSO" the Last, (Son), SAME ONE PERSON. my God this is too easy not to understand.

LISTEN and LEARN, Isaiah 48:16 "Come ye near unto me, hear ye this; I have not spoken in secret from the beginning; from the time that it was, there am I: and now the Lord GOD, and his Spirit, hath sent me." now you might say well 101G the Lord God is the Father, (one Person), and the Spirit, (two persons) sent the Son, (three persons)....... seems right... do it not .... as a trinitarian sees it, correct? well let's see what the bible say. scripture, Revelation 1:1 "The Revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave unto him, to shew unto his servants things which must shortly come to pass; and he sent and signified, it by his angel unto his servant John:" someone sent HIS angel to John right.... right. well many say it was the Father who sent his angel to John. and they base this on what the angel said as to who sent him. listen, the angel who was sent tells John who sent him. Revelation 22:6 "And he said unto me, These sayings are faithful and true: and the Lord God of the holy prophets sent his angel to shew unto his servants the things which must shortly be done."

hold it, the Lord God of the Holy Prophets, meaning the OT. and many scholars have said it was the Father of the OT. and the JW have put in their NWT the Name Jehovah sent his angel, meaning the Father sent the angel. well 101G by the TRUTH of GOD, declare all the scholars, and the JW, who made that assumption to be in ERROR. and here's why. just 10 verses later at verse 16, in the same chapter, it says this. Revelation 22:16 "I Jesus have sent mine angel to testify unto you these things in the churches. I am the root and the offspring of David, and the bright and morning star."
well then Jehovah must be the Lord God, who is Jesus. and two, the Lord God in Isaiah 48:16 must be the Lord Jesus also, for the angel said, the Lord God of the Holy Prophets, and Isaiah is one of the Holy prophets. so Isaiah 48:16 should read like this, "Come ye near unto me, hear ye this; I have not spoken in secret from the beginning; from the time that it was, there am I: and now the Lord GOD, (Jesus the Son), and his Spirit, hath sent me." so who is the ME here that was sent? now by process of elimination, (from a trinitarian point of view), The Lord God here is the "Lord God", Jesus, and the Spirit, the Holy spirit? and the me must have to be the "Father" .... well? see, that aren't even having a chance of flying, walking or crawling. for we have scripture which states, John 3:16 "For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life." John 3:17 "For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved."

well now, you, and all of the fellas who has fallen for the LIE of the DEVIL, have a dilemma. understand, the bible in NOT changing for neither 101G, nor you, or anyone else. the bible has been screaming that God is a single person who is the EQUAL SHARE of his own self, meaning he is the "ECHAD" of his own self. THIS IS NOT CHANGING. and the bible don't lie nor contradict itself.

101G cannot get any plainer than this.

yes, 101G is in LOVE with the TRUTH. and 101G suggest you do the same. is not trinity one word, what about oneness? see, 101G is a "Diversified Oneness", which is two words, and not one word.... (smile). but it is still based on the ECHAD..... (smile).

a word of encouragement. don't worry about 101G, ok, fear the LORD. which is the beginning of Wisdom and understanding of him, God almight, the Lord Jesus..

good day and be blessed.

101G

Just so it is clear I am not a trinitarian.

Jesus said He could pray to His father and He would send twelve legions of angels Mat 26:53. Jesus also agreed with the Centurion who said about himself and Jesus, that he was under authority, and had authority to command others Mat 8:8-10, 13. You are leaning towards only one side, but both need to work together to get the correct understanding. 1 Cor 11:3 "..and the head of Christ is God."

Nor am I asking if the Father and the Son are the same person. That is not my question.
This is my question..

"Jn 17:3 with 7:28-29; 8:42-43 Explain to me how you sent yourself (meaning: you went of your own self, no one else sent you) to the store on Wed. dec. 4, 2015, at 3:19:37 pm, and yet did not send your self (meaning: someone did send you) on Wed. dec. 4, 2015 at 3:19:37 pm."

But one difference from your example is, with Jn 17:3; 7:28-29; 8:42-43 we have Jesus Himself saying He did not send! Is that in your example, of Jesus saying He did not send that angel, and yet He did send that angel? No!
Explain using yourself in the above example as to how you yourself both sent and did not send.
 
I am trying to handle the estate of my mother who died oct 13.. slightly longer then 2 months ago, at the same time when I was talking toward you my financial advisor had a triple bypass and that has tied up a lot of issues on his end till he recovers, at the same time trying to get a pre-pay on inheritance tax in this state before the end 0f the year, at the same time trying to clear things from this house while some family thinks I should move and other thinks I should stay put while at the same time looking into online auctions.. yet knowing it is too soon and you want to know about Adam's person existing first... and that right after womans entry we get ....for this reason a man shall leave his father and his mother, and be joined to his wife; and they shall become one flesh.. and how that ties into the Trinity.

It is an example. A metaphore of sorts...

A man and a woman marry and become one flesh while they are still a man and a woman.

God the Father, and God the Son and God the Holy Spirit are one under the Godhead while they are still God the Father, and God the Son and God the Holy Spirit.

IN OTHER WORDS... IT IS POSSIBLE AND FACTUAL FOR MORE THEN ONE ENTITY TO BE ONE, YET EACH IS STILL their own with the attributes
they eash had. A man...A wonman....... or God the Father...God the Son ... God the Holy Spirit..... Each with their own responsibilities


You told me you would not answer until I answered above. I answered above and said answer no more because of what is on my plate.

You ask "..Is it you do not want me to answer, or you did not like my response of tackling one at a time?"

My response to that is that it is tiresome to have to come up with replying to the same thing in different ways to make one understand.
You approched me! Why?
Three persons judging, whether they all be in one body, or not, whether they all agree, or not, are still three judges judging!
So, we are done here, right? And I'll answer no more, as you requested.
 
Just so it is clear I am not a trinitarian.

Jesus said He could pray to His father and He would send twelve legions of angels Mat 26:53. Jesus also agreed with the Centurion who said about himself and Jesus, that he was under authority, and had authority to command others Mat 8:8-10, 13. You are leaning towards only one side, but both need to work together to get the correct understanding. 1 Cor 11:3 "..and the head of Christ is God."
GINOLJC, to all.
just one phase, "THE ARM of GOD". it explains all the .... "UNDER AUTHORITY" ... you need to KNOW and UNDERSTAND. and why he prayed to the Father. OIh my.
Nor am I asking if the Father and the Son are the same person. That is not my question.
This is my question..

"Jn 17:3 with 7:28-29; 8:42-43 Explain to me how you sent yourself (meaning: you went of your own self, no one else sent you) to the store on Wed. dec. 4, 2015, at 3:19:37 pm, and yet did not send your self (meaning: someone did send you) on Wed. dec. 4, 2015 at 3:19:37 pm."

But one difference from your example is, with Jn 17:3; 7:28-29; 8:42-43 we have Jesus Himself saying He did not send! Is that in your example, of Jesus saying He did not send that angel, and yet He did send that angel? No!
Explain using yourself in the above example as to how you yourself both sent and did not send.
Listen, Listen, Listen, ...... "I COME" ...... hello. my God from point of view. now understand, John 14:16 "And I will pray the Father, and he shall give you another Comforter, that he may abide with you for ever;" so, who sent the H.S? let the bible tell you. John 14:26 "But the Comforter, which is the Holy Ghost, whom the Father will send in my name, he shall teach you all things, and bring all things to your remembrance, whatsoever I have said unto you."

the Father sends the Holy Spirit? let's see, John 15:26 "But when the Comforter is come, whom I will send unto you from the Father, even the Spirit of truth, which proceedeth from the Father, he shall testify of me:"

WHAT! the Father Send, the Son send? well lets see who came? listen to the bible carefully. John 14:17 "Even the Spirit of truth; whom the world cannot receive, because it seeth him not, neither knoweth him: but ye know him; for he dwelleth with you, and shall be in you." John 14:18 "I will not leave you comfortless: I will come to you."

now 7x, tell us who was sent and who came? don't worry 101G will answer for you........ JESUS .... (smile) ..... did you get that? JESUS SENDS and JESUS COME. why because he is God, and there is NONE .... "Beside" .... him..... got it now? hope so.

101G.
 
Stupidity . You had said something I responded two... I did not think we would be writing war and peace.
You did not think we would...
Quick question that perhaps I have missed, because so far what I made red is not clear.......to me.

In John 1 vs 1 we read..... ( I have posted every translation that is common to man, these days below)

New International Version
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

New Living Translation
In the beginning the Word already existed. The Word was with God, and the Word was God.

English Standard Version
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

Berean Standard Bible
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

Berean Literal Bible
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

King James Bible
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

New King James Version
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

New American Standard Bible
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

NASB 1995
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

NASB 1977
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

Legacy Standard Bible
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

Amplified Bible
In the beginning [before all time] was the Word (Christ), and the Word was with God, and the Word was God Himself.

Christian Standard Bible
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

Holman Christian Standard Bible
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

American Standard Version
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

Contemporary English Version
In the beginning was the one who is called the Word. The Word was with God and was truly God.

English Revised Version
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

GOD'S WORD® Translation
In the beginning the Word already existed. The Word was with God, and the Word was God.

Good News Translation
In the beginning the Word already existed; the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

International Standard Version
In the beginning, the Word existed. The Word was with God, and the Word was God.

Majority Standard Bible
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

NET Bible
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was fully God.

New Heart English Bible
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

Webster's Bible Translation
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

Weymouth New Testament
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

World English Bible
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.
Literal Translations
Literal Standard Version
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God;

Berean Literal Bible
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

Young's Literal Translation
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God;

Smith's Literal Translation
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and God was the Word.
Catholic Translations
Douay-Rheims Bible
IN the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

Catholic Public Domain Version
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and God was the Word.

New American Bible
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

New Revised Standard Version
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.
Translations from Aramaic
Lamsa Bible
THE Word was in the beginning, and that very Word was with God, and God was that Word.

Aramaic Bible in Plain English
In the origin The Word had been existing and That Word had been existing with God and That Word was himself God.
NT Translations
Anderson New Testament
IN the beginning was the WORD, and the WORD, was with God, and the WORD was God.

Godbey New Testament
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

Haweis New Testament
IN the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

Mace New Testament
In the beginning was the Logos, and the Logos was with God, and the Logos was God.

Weymouth New Testament
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

Worrell New Testament
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

Worsley New Testament
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.


AS YOU CAN SEE... Every translation has the word Word, capitalized, and I am sure that terms like that never are, unless you are screaming at someone.
But now look through the qupted section below. And Again pay attention to the highlighted words
and I do believe you will have to agree they are referencing a person.
If John was wrong in 1:1 how can you prove it when no one else seems to agree. Those who have
studied the languages and translations.
But if you can... then we can wipe his book out of the gospels because if he is wrong in one thing,
could well be wrong in others....
And that would mean that ... wait for it.... that if it was God's own spoken word that spoke creation into being... then every time we read or hear that the word became flesh (ie Jesus) that God would in fact he His own son. And that would be the miracle and accomplishment to to end all.

Obviously He or The Same was with... could not be the same as....it is separate.
I have to cut the length of the following due to count... But you will get the idea

New International Version
He was with God in the beginning.

New Living Translation
He existed in the beginning with God.

English Standard Version
He was in the beginning with God.

Berean Standard Bible
He was with God in the beginning.

Berean Literal Bible
He was in the beginning with God.

King James Bible
The same was in the beginning with God.

New King James Version
He was in the beginning with God.

New American Standard Bible
He was in the beginning with God.

NASB 1995
He was in the beginning with God.

NASB 1977
He was in the beginning with God.

Legacy Standard Bible
He was in the beginning with God.

Amplified Bible
He was [continually existing] in the beginning [co-eternally] with God.

Christian Standard Bible
He was with God in the beginning.

Holman Christian Standard Bible
He was with God in the beginning.

American Standard Version
The same was in the beginning with God.

Contemporary English Version
From the very beginning the Word was with God.

English Revised Version
The same was in the beginning with God.

GOD'S WORD® Translation
He was already with God in the beginning.

Good News Translation
From the very beginning the Word was with God.

International Standard Version
He existed in the beginning with God.

Majority Standard Bible
He was with God in the beginning.

NET Bible
The Word was with God in the beginning.

New Heart English Bible
He was in the beginning with God.

Webster's Bible Translation
The same was in the beginning with God.

Weymouth New Testament
He was in the beginning with God.

World English Bible
The same was in the beginning with God.
Literal Translations
Literal Standard Version
this One was in the beginning with God;

Berean Literal Bible
He was in the beginning with God.

Young's Literal Translation
this one was in the beginning with God;

Smith's Literal Translation
This was in the beginning with God.
Catholic Translations
Douay-Rheims Bible
The same was in the beginning with God.

Catholic Public Domain Version
He was with God in the beginning.

New American Bible
He was in the beginning with God.
...end of part #1, could not get it all in one post...
 
Stupidity . You had said something I responded two... I did not think we would be writing war and peace.
You did not think we would... ...part #2...
A few comments only because you have me thoroughly confused.

First. You are right. For whatever reason no question mark. Sorry.

Next. Do I understand Adam and Eve? I do as much as anyone else does....

"
23And Adam said, This is now bone of my bones, and flesh of my flesh: she shall be called Woman, because she was taken out of Man."

Is clearly and understandable stated, however....

24Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife: and they shall be one flesh.

Is out in left field because Adam did not have a mother. Eve did not have a mother. But since it also is found in the New Testament
Mathew 19:5 and said, ‘FOR THIS REASON A MAN SHALL LEAVE HIS FATHER AND MOTHER AND BE JOINED TO HIS WIFE, AND THE TWO SHALL BECOME ONE FLESH ‘?"

I used this because if a man and a woman marry they become 1 flesh. The man is still a man and the woman is still a woman yet two are one.

If ... lets say that capital W is a small w that a lot of folk believe. We have been told the word/Word was in the beginning creating. John 1:3 is usually used for support. Most will say the word, small w.... is separate from God.

So if it was not a person as in Word, but if it was word, little w.. then we have the word and God both creating along with the Holy Spirit.
therefore we have 3 that are one.

I believe in the Capital W, (especially in light of the He) and to me we still have 3 that are one.

I hesitate to bring another thought to this, especially since I started a thread on it this afternoon and do not want to detract from that.

But it appears that Isaiah had prophetic knowledge about Jesus and who He would be.

Isaiah 9:6 KJV (used only because many will read nothing else...View attachment 1189
For unto us a child is born, unto us a son is given: and the government shall be upon his shoulder: and his name shall be called Wonderful, Counseller, The mighty God, The everlasting Father, The Prince of Peace.

To me, this says there were at least 2 in the Godhead. You don't believe in a Trinity....

Why do you believe in John 1:1?
...
I am trying to handle the estate of my mother who died oct 13.. slightly longer then 2 months ago, at the same time when I was talking toward you my financial advisor had a triple bypass and that has tied up a lot of issues on his end till he recovers, at the same time trying to get a pre-pay on inheritance tax in this state before the end 0f the year, at the same time trying to clear things from this house while some family thinks I should move and other thinks I should stay put while at the same time looking into online auctions.. yet knowing it is too soon and you want to know about Adam's person existing first... and that right after womans entry we get ....for this reason a man shall leave his father and his mother, and be joined to his wife; and they shall become one flesh.. and how that ties into the Trinity.

It is an example. A metaphore of sorts...

A man and a woman marry and become one flesh while they are still a man and a woman.

God the Father, and God the Son and God the Holy Spirit are one under the Godhead while they are still God the Father, and God the Son and God the Holy Spirit.

IN OTHER WORDS... IT IS POSSIBLE AND FACTUAL FOR MORE THEN ONE ENTITY TO BE ONE, YET EACH IS STILL their own with the attributes
they eash had. A man...A wonman....... or God the Father...God the Son ... God the Holy Spirit..... Each with their own responsibilities


You told me you would not answer until I answered above. I answered above and said answer no more because of what is on my plate.

You ask "..Is it you do not want me to answer, or you did not like my response of tackling one at a time?"

My response to that is that it is tiresome to have to come up with replying to the same thing in different ways to make one understand.
...end of Part #2 of 2.
 
Back
Top Bottom