Truther
Well-known member
Fred believes that Peter only recommended or slightly suggested that the gentiles be baptized in the name of the Lord and not commanded them. Fred thinks like a modernist.
All the modernist lexicons are on Fred’s side
ELI insurance policy
- Thread starter Truther
- Start date
All the modernist lexicons are on Fred’s side
...in the New Covenant if a person has the Holy Spirit they are saved. This is based on many passages.
Truther (a misnomer) denies this truth.
Truther
Well-known member
Fred believes not only baptism in the name of Jesus is nonessential, but repentance is nonessential to salvation.
He has gutted Acts 2:38 via modernistic point of view
False accusation.
I have never claimed that. You need to prove otherwise.
In fact, here's proof for you that I did claim that repentance is necessary for salvation:
And see my first sentence here:
The problem is you convinced yourself to believe too many lies.
Truther
Well-known member
Show me where they repented without baptism to receive the Holy Ghost.
You are an unrepentant false accuser.
Truther
Well-known member
No, just an observant person.
Thanks for making it easy for me to prove your accusation a false one.
Since you remain unrepentant in bearing false witness you choose to remain in darkness.
bye.
Truther
Well-known member
All I did was ask you to show me where people repented before receiving the Holy Ghost. You gave up on that.
