I was with you up to here.
Then you just throw in a huge non sequitur. Your conclusion does not follow your premises.
If we are to obey God's commands, if God tells us we are not righteous by the Law, then it becomes disobedience to God's command to insist we are still to be under the Law.
Rather, that is a non sequitur. The fact that obeying God has never been a way to earn our righteousness does not mean that we are not obligated to obey God. There can be many goals that someone could have for why we should obey God's law other than in order to earn our righteousness, especially because earning our righteousness was has always been a fundamental misunderstanding of the goal of the law. The fact that we are not under God's law for the goal for which He never commanded it does not mean that we are not under it for the goal for which He has commanded it. In Romans 3:21-22, the only way to become righteous that is testified by the Law and the Prophets is through faith in Christ for all who believe.
Under the false virtuous guise of a veneer of shallow piety, is the most insidious rebellion and pride of all, demanding we interpret God's commands in our own wilful way.
This gives birth to the delusion of self-righteous secret pride, not submitting to God's established why of righteousness, yet claiming vehemently and forcefully, that our own arbitrary way has to be God's way.
(Rom. 9:30-10:1-6)
In Exodus 33:13, Moses wanted God to be gracious to him by teaching him to His way that he might know Him and Israel too, and in Matthew 7:23, Jesus said that he would tell those who are workers of lawlessness to depart from him because he never knew them, so knowing God and Jesus is the goal of the law, which is eternal life (John 17:3), and which is why Jesus said that the way to enter eternal life is by obeying God's law (Matthew 19:17, Luke 10:25-28).
In Romans 9:30-10:4, they had a zeal for God, but it was not based on knowing Him, so they failed to attain righteousness because they misunderstood the goal of the law by pursuing it as through righteousness were earned as the result of their works rather than by pursuing it as through righteousness were by faith in Christ, for knowing Christ is the goal of the law for righteousness for everyone who has faith. In Romans 10:5-10, this faith references Deuteronomy 30:11-16 as the word of faith that we proclaim in regard to saying that God's law is not too difficult for us to obey, in regard to saying that the one who obeys it will attain life by it, in regard to what we are agreeing to obey by confessing that Jesus is Lord, and in regard to the way to believe that God rose him from the dead. So this passage has nothing to do with ending God's law, but just the opposite.
Gal. 3:21-26 )
These verses could hardly be clearly. Christ is the end of the Law, we are no longer under a tutor,
A student does not move on to algebra by disregarding everything that their tutor taught them about addition, subtraction, division, and multiplication, but rather a student who did that would be missing the whole point of a tutor. God's law leads us to Christ because it was given to teach us how to know Him, not so that we could reject what he taught and go back to living in sin.
In Galatians 3:16-19, a newer covenant does not nullify the promise of a covenant that has already been ratified, so it does not nullify our need to obey God's law in connection with the promise. Furthermore, in Galatians 3:26-29, every aspect of being children of God, in Christ, through faith, children of Abraham, and heirs of the promise is all directly connected with walking in God's way in obedience to His law. In 1 John 3:10, those who do not practice righteousness in obedience to God's law are not children of God. In 1 John 2:6, those who are in Christ are obligated to walk in the same way he walked. In Matthew 23:23, Jesus said that faith is one of the weightier matter of God's law. In John 8:39, Jesus said that if they were children of Abraham, then they would be doing the same works as him. In Genesis 18:19, Genesis 26:4-5, and Deuteronomy 30:16, the promise was made to Abraham and brought about because he walked in God's way in obedience to His law, he taught his children and those of his household to do that, and because they did that. In Psalms 119:1-3, God's law is how the children of Abraham knew how to be blessed by walking in His way, so the way that the children of Abraham are multiplied and are a blessing to the nations in accordance with the promise is not through having many physical descendants, but by teaching them the nations to do the same works as Abraham.
the Law does not bring life, and zeal for the Law just produces ignorant pride, because underneath is the denial of meeting the failure of its perfection, and insulting the Law by lowing it to what we think is reasonable and achievable, so we can feel better about ourselves.
Again the word of faith that we proclaim in Romans 10:5-8 is a reference to Deuteronomy 30:11-16, which states God's law is not too difficult for us to obey and that obedience to it brings life. In Deuteronomy 32:46-47, it is our very life and there are many other verses that repeatedly say that it brings life.
In Titus 2:14, Jesus gave himself to redeem us from all lawlessness and to purify for himself a people of his own possession who are zealous for doin good works, so becoming zealous for doing for doing good works in obedience to God's law is the way to believe in what Jesus accomplished through the cross (Acts 21:20), not the way to produce ignorant pride.
If the COMMAND of God is to no longer follow the commands of the LAW, the second command supersedes the first.
Demanding God cannot supersede his own commands, is pure and unadutlrated rebellion against the authority of God's Throne under the guise of fake piety.
All of God's righteous laws are eternal (Psalms 119:160). In Matthew 5:17-19, Jesus said that he came not to abolish the law and warned against relaxing the least part of it, interpreting the verses that you cited as saying that he abolished God's law is calling him a liar and disregarding his warning. Moreover, in Romans 3:31, Paul confirmed that our faith does not abolish God's law, but rather our faith upholds it, so that is also interpreting Paul as contradicting himself. God did not make any mistakes when He gave His law, so you should be quicker to think that you've misunderstood the verses that you've quoted than to think that it makes perfect sense for God to need to abolish His own laws.
In Matthew 4:17-23, Jesus began his ministry with the Gospel message to repent for the Kingdom of God is at hand, and God's law was how his audience knew what sin is (Romans 3:20), so repenting from our disobedience to it is a central part of the Gospel message. Moreover, Jesus set a sinless example of how to walk in obedience to God's law, and we are told to follow his example (1 Peter 2:21-22) and that those who are in Christ are obligated to walk in the same way he walked (1 John 2:6). So saying that Jesus abolished the law is saying that he abolished the Gospel, everything that he taught during his ministry, and everything he accomplished through the cross (Titus 2:14). Eternal instructions for how to testify about God's nature can't be abolished without first abolishing God and abolishing Jesus, who is the exact image of God's nature (Hebrews 1:3). In other words, God's word can't be abolished without also abolishing God's word made flesh.
