GodsGrace
Well-known member
doesn't matter to me Civic.Carbon dating has been proven wrong as demonstrated with Mt St Helens dating.
I'm not having this convo.
sorry.
doesn't matter to me Civic.Carbon dating has been proven wrong as demonstrated with Mt St Helens dating.
Carbon dating has been proven wrong as demonstrated with Mt St Helens dating.
No worries I’m fine with that my frienddoesn't matter to me Civic.
I'm not having this convo.
sorry.
You're storming through the conversation with force but no direction-breaking things without building anything.Nonsense. The Gospel contains the remedy. The Gospel tells everyone what to do.
So christ saved you against your will.
Whatever
That's a great one.Here is something to consider. God created Adam on day 6 as an full grown adult- with age.
Could God have created the universe the same way with age to confound the wise ?
It seems that easy believism and the recitation of a so-called 'sinner's prayer' have become the prevailing norm, @Kermos.Who has given to Me that I should repay him? Everything under heaven is Mine (Job 41:11).
So, you believe you gave God your consenting free-will choice to accept God.
You hold to a transaction where your free-will choosing of God purchases forgiveness of sin from God, and you would not have forgiveness of sin without your free-will choosing of God because you did not free-will choose to purchase forgiveness of sin from God.
My God holds me in His Covenant where my Benefactor Jesus Christ delivers forgiveness of sin to me, and I receive forgiveness of my sin for I am secured by the Lord God Almighty in the New Covenant in Christ's Blood wherein “This is the work of God, that you believe in Him whom He has sent” (John 6:29).
Christ overcame my will because HE IS GOD! And, I have joyously thanked Him!
I said the late 90s for the DOS...it was the late 80's!My first x86 was an IBM machine that only ran a word processing program that took 8 flops to boot to. You couldn't even save it on the MBs sized hard drive. It took 10 mins or more to boot and all I had was some IBM word processor they used in some colleges back then.
It was a problem when I went from a typewriter to a computer.Agreed. Them old "dot matrix" printers were something else. I worked professional among Unisys mainframes for several years. 1100... 2200s and then A-Series before PC shared computing took over. Networking was 10 base T half duplex with millions of packet collisions everywhere.... but they worked at the time. I believe I had $1500 in that old IBM word processer with like a 10 inch "green screen". I miss some of that myself.
Yes. The cross-referencing is good.Strongs is good to a point. It allows quick cross referencing across languages. Especially if you combine the ABP+ edition that correlations Strong's #s to the Greek OT.
Don't know about tis PY.We can do better with the Greek OT. We can trace common words at least back to the time where the sins of Israel "caught up with them". Such caused a division among those dispersed throughout all nations and the egomaniacs that stayed around in Israel. It is impossible to do this with the 9th century MT.
Infant baptism was for a very good reason in the early church.I once was strong against them. I still am relative to the priestly order and grace they teach gets transferred in infant baptism. I see nothing wrong with infant baptism itself.
Right. That's my understanding too.Got it. I for the most part, believe in if saved always saved. I do think some people believe they are saved and are not. I do also believe that I've meet people that I believe were once saved given what they believed, and have totally abandoned any sense of faith in Christ. I have hope for them but abandonment of God can become a disqualifying event. I once rejected this but I do believe this now.
OK.That is my assessment of PSA. The more PSA teaches damnation based upon the guilt of sin, the more they condemn themselves and turn their sin into the requirements of Christ's deeper sufferings.
Agreed. Paradoxical. I just don't place this at Genesis 1:1. I see no need to.
Interesting. I'm not a believer of having to choose between faith and science. I believe we can have both.The expansion of the "fabric" of elements involves a "canvas" of some sort. I don't really believe in the "big bang" so to speak. I reject the concept of having the ability to "see back in time" relative to teachings of Einstein in relativity of time and space.
I agree that we don't really know what time is.If you think of time as nothing more than sequence or progression of any sort, then I think you will understand where I'm at. What is ....as it is now ......or at any "time" in history is predicated upon prior events. The experience of time is different for some. 1000 years as one day for example. Not saying that time passes by faster. Just saying being Eternal/Immortal creates a different perspective to God. Longsuffering has a more profound meaning relative to God than it does to us.
Right. I believe Romans to be a much more difficult book than we even think.That he is. I read once somewhere, and I can't find it again, that Augustine read the book of Romans every day of his life. (might be an exaggeration). It caused me to really want to know Romans. I started digging and I believe God lead me to see things there that most people don't. Not calling "God" into my potential delusion....![]()
Just saying I've given it much thought over the years. I don't see a single weakness at the moment in my position on the subject. It is an extraordinary book/epistle. Add the book of Hebrews and I'm blown away with the profoundness of Truth that comes from the Revelation of God to poor needy men such as ourselves.
He and I have history. He usually ignores me. He can. From time to time... I poke him to see if he will respond.You're storming through the conversation with force but no direction-breaking things without building anything.
J.
I agree with you.That's a great one.
Me, I reconciled creation vs evolution in the following way, for what's it worth....
Paradise obviously was a heavenly supernatural place where A&E lived in the presence of God, there was no death, every living creature (including lions, tigers, wolfs etc.) only ate vegetables and fruit, no flesh. A&E were expelled from Paradise and landed on the evolved Earth, a total different place, away from the presence of the Lord. Death ruled on Earth, eat or be eaten, the horrible food chain. Lions and tigers on earth have big killing teeth hunting to kill in order to survive. I can't watch those animal nature documentaries any longer, it's only about death, creatures killing each other.
On the new Earth it will be the same again, the lion, the wolf will no longer kill.
Isa 65:25 The wolf and the lamb shall graze together; the lion shall eat straw like the ox, and dust shall be the serpent's food. They shall not hurt or destroy in all my holy mountain,” says the LORD.
Exactly, I spend too much time on the issue in the past.I agree with you.
It would also explain where Cain got his wife.
But I've been told this is not biblical.
I don't think about it too much actually.
Soteriology is very important to me.
Carbon dating makes no sense on dead material (rocks), only on once alive stuff, plants, wood, animals, humans, etc.Carbon dating has been proven wrong as demonstrated with Mt St Helens dating.
I wonder when this happened …"For in six days the LORD made the heavens and the earth, the sea and all that is in them, and rested on the seventh day; therefore the LORD blessed the sabbath day and made it holy" (Exodus 20:11) is so important that the Lord God Almighty wrote this as part of the Ten Commandments with His Own Finger (Exodus 31:18).
That's not "billions and billions of years old", but six days are enshrined in the Ten Commandments for the creation account recorded in Genesis chapter 1 to chapter 3.
And, Adam's son Seth was born when Adam was 130 years old, so that is not "3.5 billion years old".
These facts establish the full beginning, and when combined with genealogy and historical events recorded in the Bible, then 6,000 years old-ish for Earth is revealed up to today.
Dinosaurs were largely destroyed at the time of the flood during Noah's lifetime (the exception would be dinosaurs on the ark - think baby dinosaurs), just like all people with the exception of 8 persons per Holy Spirit inspired Apostle Peter "the days of Noah, during the construction of the ark, in which a few, that is, eight persons, were brought safely through the water" (1 Peter 3:20).
God is awesomely powerful, beyond man's understanding, yet God lovingly delivers understanding and life everlasting into God's children through God's Mighty Right Hand. Praise be to Lord and God Jesus Christ!!!
Hello, @Kermos …"For in six days the LORD made the heavens and the earth, the sea and all that is in them, and rested on the seventh day; therefore the LORD blessed the sabbath day and made it holy" (Exodus 20:11) is so important that the Lord God Almighty wrote this as part of the Ten Commandments with His Own Finger (Exodus 31:18).
That's not "billions and billions of years old", but six days are enshrined in the Ten Commandments for the creation account recorded in Genesis chapter 1 to chapter 3.
And, Adam's son Seth was born when Adam was 130 years old, so that is not "3.5 billion years old".
These facts establish the full beginning, and when combined with genealogy and historical events recorded in the Bible, then 6,000 years old-ish for Earth is revealed up to today.
Dinosaurs were largely destroyed at the time of the flood during Noah's lifetime (the exception would be dinosaurs on the ark - think baby dinosaurs), just like all people with the exception of 8 persons per Holy Spirit inspired Apostle Peter "the days of Noah, during the construction of the ark, in which a few, that is, eight persons, were brought safely through the water" (1 Peter 3:20).
God is awesomely powerful, beyond man's understanding, yet God lovingly delivers understanding and life everlasting into God's children through God's Mighty Right Hand. Praise be to Lord and God Jesus Christ!!!
I agree with you.
It would also explain where Cain got his wife.
But I've been told this is not biblical.
I don't think about it too much actually.
Soteriology is very important to me.
Even then we know there are variable conditions relative to gamma radiation throughout the Universe that affects such measurements. The idea we know everything there is to know about such things is really a farce to me.Carbon dating makes no sense on dead material (rocks), only on once alive stuff, plants, wood, animals, humans, etc.
Exactly, I spend too much time on the issue in the past.
Yep!I said the late 90s for the DOS...it was the late 80's!
Time flies by when you're having fun!
This was an American Airlines system...I forget what it was called.
Now everybody books their own flights.
yes...I remember the booting.
I also proudly owned the very first ping pong game...
from that to disliking all games!
It was a problem when I went from a typewriter to a computer.
No paper to move around.
It was really frustrating.
Hard to believe now.
Yes. The cross-referencing is good.
But it's like trying to learn a language by using a dictionary.
I just trust the translators. Although that has its problems too....
depends WHOSE bible one buys.
Jimmy Swaggarts commented bible will be different from John MacArthur's commented bible.
Don't know about tis PY.
And I'm sorry I don't.
Infant baptism was for a very good reason in the early church.
Good ole' Augustine of Hippo changed all that with his teaching that babies are born GUILTY of Adam's sin.
His teaching was accepted at the time but now even the CC states that infants are in the hands of God.
Right. That's my understanding too.
Abandonment of God is what causes the loss of saving faith...
no more saving faith....this is the problem.
Interesting. I'm not a believer of having to choose between faith and science. I believe we can have both.
It does seem that it's accepted now that the big bang did happen...that everything was compressed and it exploded and turned into what we see.
The universe is expanding and this cannot be denied.
But still a lot we don't know which is why I tend not to discuss the beginning in Genesis..it wasn't meant to be scientific.
I agree that we don't really know what time is.
We also don't really know what gravity is.
We know what it does but that's about it.
We also don't understand consciousness.
Right. I believe Romans to be a much more difficult book than we even think.
Paul is all over the place on Romans.
Did you ever see the talk on Romans by David Bercot?
It's very good...you might enjoy it.
There's a lot on YouTube: David Bercot on Romans
![]()
Yes. This is what is taught.My penny. Cain married his sister. There is no context of how many children that Adam and Eve actually had in their lives. Humanity in the context of a fleshly body were more vibrant and "healthy" then today. Mankind has devolved. Not evolved.