All Claims of The Son's Deity

The wisdom of God is not a personal thing. My wisdom is not another one of me. My wisdom and my spirit that's the spirit of Christ is an it.
The question was

How does a non personal thing or a forethought consider or think?

based on this passage

Philippians 2:5–8 (NASB95) — 5 Have this attitude in yourselves which was also in Christ Jesus, 6 who, although He existed in the form of God, did not regard equality with God a thing to be grasped, 7 but emptied Himself, taking the form of a bond-servant, and being made in the likeness of men. 8 Being found in appearance as a man, He humbled Himself by becoming obedient to the point of death, even death on a cross.

you have not addressed this point offering only bald denials.
 
What would not dodging be to you? Me saying Oh right Jesus is God who per-existenced as the passage of Philippians 2:6 clearly says?
What would not be dodging would be you responding to the point made and show how a non personal, non existent thing could have an attitude or consider

Philippians 2:5–8 (NASB95) — 5 Have this attitude in yourselves which was also in Christ Jesus, 6 who, although He existed in the form of God, did not regard equality with God a thing to be grasped, 7 but emptied Himself, taking the form of a bond-servant, and being made in the likeness of men. 8 Being found in appearance as a man, He humbled Himself by becoming obedient to the point of death, even death on a cross.

What attitude or regard could come from a non-personal or non-existent thing?
 
It seems difficult for people to understand that John 1:1 is introducing the Gospel of John, and not the Book of Genesis. The topic of John is God (the Father, the only God) at work in the ministry of the man Jesus of Nazareth, not the creation of rocks, trees and stars.
The text is

John 1:3 (NASB95) — 3 All things came into being through Him, and apart from Him nothing came into being that has come into being.

Care to show how that does not reference creation?
 
Jesus - I and the Father are one. [John 10:30]
John 10:30
There is no reason to take this verse to mean that Christ was saying that he and the Father make up "one God." The phrase was a common one, and even today if someone used it, people would know exactly what they meant... he and his Father are very much alike. When Paul wrote to the Corinthians about his ministry there, he said that he had planted the seed and Apollos had watered it. Then he said, "... he who plants and he who waters are one..." (1 Corinthians 3:8 NKJV). In the Greek texts, the wording of Paul is the same as that in John 10:30, yet no one claims that Paul and Apollos make up "one being." Christ uses the concept of "being one" in other places, and from them one can see that "one purpose" is what is meant. John 11:52 says Jesus was to die to make all God's children "one." In John 17:11, 21 and 22, Jesus prayed to God that his followers would be "one" as he and God were "one." I think it's obvious that Jesus was not praying that all his followers would become one being in "substance" just as he and his Father were one being or "substance." I believe the meaning is clear: Jesus was praying that all his followers be one in purpose just as he and God were one in purpose.
 
It's referring to God's wisdom. God created not Jesus.
Where do you see any reference to wisdom and how can you stater creation is not involved

John 1:3 (NASB95) — 3 All things came into being through Him, and apart from Him nothing came into being that has come into being.

Your beliefs are not based upon the scriptural text.
 
What would not be dodging would be you responding to the point made and show how a non personal, non existent thing could have an attitude or consider

Philippians 2:5–8 (NASB95) — 5 Have this attitude in yourselves which was also in Christ Jesus, 6 who, although He existed in the form of God, did not regard equality with God a thing to be grasped, 7 but emptied Himself, taking the form of a bond-servant, and being made in the likeness of men. 8 Being found in appearance as a man, He humbled Himself by becoming obedient to the point of death, even death on a cross.

What attitude or regard could come from a non-personal or non-existent thing?
As a son in the royal family he did not see himself on equal grounds and thus emptied his royal right and humbled himself to be a servant. How you twist and spin this into he had to be God when nothing like that is said in that verse is beyond me.
 
That is not answering the question or dealing with what is noted in the passage

you have not addressed the thoughts and existence of Christ before becoming a man in the passage Phil 2:5-8

that is simply offering bald denial not dealing with the text or the argument
There are no thoughts of Christ before becoming a man. One cannot address something that is not there.
 
Where do you see any reference to wisdom and how can you stater creation is not involved

John 1:3 (NASB95) — 3 All things came into being through Him, and apart from Him nothing came into being that has come into being.

Your beliefs are not based upon the scriptural text.
through it
 
through it

Where do you see any reference to wisdom and how can you state creation is not involved

John 1:3 (NASB95) — 3 All things came into being through Him, and apart from Him nothing came into being that has come into being.

Clearly the reference is to creation, which you denied
 
Excellent! Well, John 1:14 says it's the Word who became flesh that is the only begotten Son from the Father. So, since you believe that Jesus is the only begotten Son of the Father then logically, the Word (who became flesh) is Jesus. Case closed.

(John 1:14) And the Word became flesh, and he lived among us, and we saw his glory, glory like that of an only-begotten son from the Father, full of grace and truth.
 
There are no thoughts of Christ before becoming a man. One cannot address something that is not there.
then deal with the text

Philippians 2:5–7 (LEB) — 5 Think this in yourselves which was also in Christ Jesus, 6 who, existing in the form of God, did not consider being equal with God something to be grasped, 7 but emptied himself by taking the form of a slave, by becoming in the likeness of people. And being found in appearance like a man,'


When did Christ exist in the form of God in relation to becoming a man?

Can a non-existent, non-personal thing consider?
 
Back
Top Bottom