civic
Active Member
With a trinitarian that was the request
A request
- Thread starter FreeInChrist
- Start date
civic
Active Member
I knew that
Ok so we need two on each side. Please try to work it out.
Peterlag
Active Member
Can we get @Peterlag - @Runningman - @Keiw1
To go up against...
@Fred - @mikesw - @Doug Brents
Those who agree...
1.) Peterlag
2.)
3.)
1.)
2.)
3.)
I would say 6 people would be to many. One on One would be the best in my opinion. With six you could just as easy have a open Thread.
Peterlag
Active Member
Okay 6 is out. But I would like a partner and that would be @Runningman which would give our side 2. If it's going to be one on one will it be me or Runningman on the Unitarian side? This may take a few days to set up. I mention @Fred @mikesw and @Doug Brents because they are diehards who post daily.
Or, the deity of Jesus Christ. It's all one and the same.
Three against one is okay. Just as long as I can have equal time, or, answers and questions.
Peterlag
Active Member
If @Runningman agrees to this then I have a rule myself. We deal with one topic at a time. We stay with one verse at a time. No 35 verses at once throwing everything on the wall at once and hoping something will stick.
I saw this Friday on another site...
I WANT TO DRAW YOUR ATTENTION TO A RHETORICAL TACTIC BEING DEPLOYED HERE — KNOWN AS THE GISH GALLOP. THIS IS A DEBATE STRATEGY WHERE ONE SIDE FIRES OFF A MASSIVE NUMBER OF ARGUMENTS, POINTS, AND CLAIMS IN RAPID SUCCESSION, WITH THE CLEAR INTENT TO OVERWHELM AND EXHAUST ANYONE TRYING TO RESPOND.
THE PURPOSE OF A GISH GALLOP IS NOT TO ENGAGE IN HONEST DIALOGUE OR FAIR DISCUSSION. INSTEAD, IT SEEKS TO FLOOD THE CONVERSATION WITH SO MANY POINTS THAT NO ONE CAN REASONABLY ADDRESS THEM ALL, CREATING THE FALSE IMPRESSION THAT THE ARGUMENTS ARE INSURMOUNTABLE OR THAT THE OTHER SIDE HAS NO ANSWER.
THIS IS AN ILLEGITIMATE PRACTICE THAT UNDERMINES MEANINGFUL DEBATE, STALLS REASONABLE INVESTIGATION, AND PROMOTES CONFUSION OVER CLARITY. IF YOU VALUE INTELLECTUAL HONESTY AND SERIOUS SCRIPTURAL EXAMINATION, I URGE YOU TO RECOGNIZE THIS STRATEGY FOR WHAT IT IS AND NOT ALLOW IT TO DISTRACT FROM THE CORE ISSUES.
LET’S FOCUS ON QUALITY OVER QUANTITY AND ENGAGE WITH SCRIPTURE IN A FAIR, CLEAR, AND HONEST MANNER — NOT WITH RHETORICAL FLOODING INTENDED TO DROWN TRUTH IN A SEA OF WORDS.
Peterlag
Active Member
You're starting with nothing since the verse says Jesus is the Christ. It does not say Jesus is the God.
@Peterlag
In what manner will the latter day false prophets deceive many by saying that Jesus is the Christ?
We shall see....once the thread is open.
Maybe it would be nice if the moderator included @Studyman on your team (since he rejects the Trinity as the word of God teaches it) and then make it four for you, I still would have the majority with me............. I have God's Son and the testimony of the scriptures ~ what more would a man need than this?
Have you never read so much as these words?
Matthew 24:5
“For many shall come in my name, saying, I am Christ; and shall deceive many.”In what manner will the latter day false prophets deceive many by saying that Jesus is the Christ?
We shall see....once the thread is open.
Maybe it would be nice if the moderator included @Studyman on your team (since he rejects the Trinity as the word of God teaches it) and then make it four for you, I still would have the majority with me............. I have God's Son and the testimony of the scriptures ~ what more would a man need than this?
Bring this mind set to battle and you will soon be expose as not of God.
FreeInChrist
Active Member
@Red Baker has asked each of the ones named individually for a debate, one on one , for a long time now... and each time he does they seem to either not answer him or disappear until they counter him later on.
That is why for the specific locked debate request.
As to other participants... of which I am more then happy to engage with... I would sugget that you view the locked debate then if you so choose carry your own comments ... say here.... in a general open to all.
Without a private locked one. .... you know as do all that it is impossible to stay on topic, which normally is fine and at times entertaining, but when it comes to the importance of the Deity of the Messiah lets just see who shows up
FreeInChrist
Active Member
Wrong.... You are debating the Deity of the Messiah and you have consistently ignored @Red Baker when he has asked for a one on one debate with you.
Now you have the opportunity to be 3 on one, your side. What are you afraid of?
FreeInChrist
Active Member
NO.... This was @Red Baker's request because you 3 consistently decline his
ono on one invites in a regular thread.
YOU want to ignore him?
WHY???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
FreeInChrist
Active Member
FreeInChrist
Active Member
Why?
Similar threads
