What is the Gospel

@Red Baker and I have been battering back and forth for many years now. I really do not expect to convert him, although I do keep hoping that one day he will come to the truth that the TULIP religion is wrong and come to the truth of the Gospel of God. I do it for two main reasons. The first is that @Red is quite good at presenting his views, so through our interchanges I think a receive a very good presentation of the TULIP religious side of things. Second I continue to do it mostly so that others reading here might get a countering to the TULIP religion, even if they do not enter into a discussion themselves.

That's a great point. I think it is true, that because of my decades of discussions with Red and other promoters of Calvinism, I have become more in tune with the actual scriptures, and if asked, can better present an alternative understanding that considers the teaching of the entire bible, as opposed to the practice of avoiding scriptures that can't be used to promote TULIP philosophy.

I forget sometimes that maybe the arguments are for my edification too, and we do study the philosophy in my study group, by taking Red's presentations of TULIP and comparing it to the actual Word of God when Every Word is considered. So it has been beneficial to the whole body as well.

Finally in answer to your question, I think on the one hand there is a point at which it probably makes no sense in continuing to argue with specific promoters of Calvinism, etc., but on the other hand, that is the world and are we not to take the truth to the world? And also, quite frankly, I am not one to stand on the street corner preaching to the world; so engaging in such forums as this one and with those in my own congregation is likely the way for me to most often speak on such things.

What a wonderful mindset. I am also not one to go door to door handing out pamphlets. And the Forum does help keep me centered in Scriptures, and the topics discussed here has been a wonderful study exercise for the flock that has received me.

Plus I learn a lot about myself, and the issues in me that I need to work on.

Thanks Jim, great advice.
 
@Jim
Adam is not even mentioned in Romans 5:1-10, let alone that his sin affected us.
Sorry for the reference, not sure how I typed Romans 5:1-10 when I meant to type Romans 5:12-19, which you should have understood that, after all, I have went word for word through those verses with you over years, but maybe you have forgotten, which does come with years, and we both are getting up.
And the reference to Adam in 1 Corinthians 15:22 is only a reference to our being humans. As human beings we die physically.
Not even close Jim, but, it seems more and more to me, you just do not care, but you are more interesting in protecting your work gospel.
Jim, death came on men by one’s sin ~ Adam ~ which was counted against us (Romans 5;12-14). The resurrection to life comes by one ~ Christ ~ which will surely come to all His elect, chosen in him.

Jim, we did not request death, seek death, or earn death by our selves: it was given by legal representation~imputation.

We do desire life, seek life, and cannot earn life: and it shall be given by representation ~imputation.

Jim, 15:22 Adam and Jesus Christ have important roles as representative for their respective people.​

All that are in Adam, by natural generation, shall suffer the consequence of his sin ~ "death".
All that are in Christ, by sovereign election, shall receive the benefits of His obedience ~"life".

The two representatives do not represent the same peoples, for only some are in Jesus Christ. The death and life considered here are the death of the body (v.21) and the resurrection of the body.

The “as … even so” construction is very powerful in making the representation comparable.

Again Jim, Paul gives a full comparison of the two representatives (Romans 5:12-19).
Again another charge against God for producing human beings incapable believing what God has commanded them to do.
Jim, to whom is the word of God written and given to? Not to the inhabitants of North Sentinel Island in the Bay of Bengal!

Acts 2:39​

“For the promise is unto you, and to your children, and to all that are afar off, even as many as the Lord our God shall call.”

Acts 8:31​

“And he said, How can I, except some man should guide me? And he desired Philip that he would come up and sit with him.”

God chooses to whom the word of God will go to, and it is never to every single person of every nation, never has been, never will be.
God's sovereignty is a hated truth, even more so in our day~but so be it, it still is the truth of the word of God and we shall proclaimed on the housetop.
You are not Peter. He received divine revelation; you only receive the results of divine revelation. You need Peter and what God revealed to Peter. You need a preacher [or today the written words of Peter and the rest of the apostles and prophets] to tell you what God told Peter and the rest of the apostles and prophets.
Then you are not hearing the word of God~Jesus is building his church (called out ones) on "THIS ROCK"... which is: by divine revelation of opening their hearts to the truth, business as usual Jim. You are not hearing what the Spirit is saying, which doesn't surprise me.
The issue is not by whom we are born again; of course, we are born again by God alone. The question is who does God regenerate and how does He choose them. He chooses those who believe in Him.
So wrong! Sinners are regenerated, so that they can hear, see and believe, which apart from the Spirit no man could come, impossible.

John 6:44​

No man can come to me, except the Father which hath sent me draw him: and I will raise him up at the last day.”
 
@Studyman @Jim
That's a great point. I think it is true, that because of my decades of discussions with Red and other promoters of Calvinism,
I've made it very clear over the years, that I do not promote Calvinism per se, neither I'm I ashamed of those that do, because I do believe that lovers of the truth are among those who hold to some form of Calvinism ~ that's not to say, that all Armenians are not of God, that's not for me to say, I'm not God and cannot see the hearts of men.

Please read this to see the distinction between Calvinism, Arminianism, and the truth.

I have become more in tune with the actual scriptures, and if asked,
This is a two way street you do know that, correct?
can better present an alternative understanding that considers the teaching of the entire bible, as opposed to the practice of avoiding scriptures that can't be used to promote TULIP philosophy.
No system under heaven better considers all scriptures than those men who have taught unconditional election of pure grace, no system! I'm sorry you men have me to deal with, if you had men of God of old, you would have been expose as false prophets in a much greater way than I could have ever do so. I know, I have read behind most all of them over the last fifty plus years, many times over.

Before there was ever a John Calvin, men of God taught these great truths, even Luther who was a little older than Calvin though contemporary with him for a few years, even though they never met in person. I posted ML Bondage of Will above in a few post back. Did you read it, no, I'm sure you did not.
I forget sometimes that maybe the arguments are for my edification too, and we do study the philosophy in my study group, by taking Red's presentations of TULIP and comparing it to the actual Word of God when Every Word is considered. So it has been beneficial to the whole body as well.

Too bad I can not be there to present the truth and let them address me directly!

"by taking Red's presentations of TULIP"~Then you are not presenting what I actually teach if you are using the tulip, beside would not be best to let the person speak for himself, and get it straight from man himself?
 
Back
Top Bottom