praise_yeshua
Active Member
Stay strong brother.
Johann
Pom Poms out. Cheerleaders "rooting" for their team.
Playing the martyr is a common tactic when dealing with a losing position.
Stay strong brother.
Johann
I've been reading through the thread and thinking on what has been said. It seems to me the problem lies in considering Jesus as a human person. It was asked "is Jesus a human person?" ... Well, no He's not but during the Incarnation He was made to be as a human person. He had to be made like us in every way therefore he had to be made as if He was not God even though He is. In that sense, Jesus is a human person for all intents and purposes while on Earth.Is God a person?
Yes, God is a person, but He is not a human being as most of us would assume a "person" to be.
By "person," we mean that God is a self-aware rational Being with a personality. Some theologians
have defined personhood as "an individual being with a mind, emotions, and a will." In this case,
God is definitely a person.
https://www.compellingtruth.org/is-God-a-person.html
My sentiments perfectly expressed!
Hebrews 2:17 would have been IMPOSSIBLE if He had not succeeded to make Himself fully like a man.Jesus a human person?" ... Well, no He's not but during the Incarnation He was made to be as a human person. He had to be made like us in every way therefore he had to be made as if He was not God even though He is. In that sense, Jesus is a human person for all intents and purposes while on Earth.
Hebrews 2:17
Therefore, in all things He had to be made like His brethren, that He might be a merciful and faithful High Priest in things pertaining to God, to make propitiation for the sins of the people.
Several problems here with this view. Christ has a human will and a Divine will, He has 2 natures.To those who find it difficult to understand where my thinking rests in regards to the Trinity?
I don't base it on having to agree with creeds. For I am able to study the Word of God on my own and from men who are mature to teach with accuracy.. Not from the KJV, or English translations that will often times obscure the exactness of the meaning of words.
Here is an example of two passages that those who were trying to attack my position could not explain without garbling their thoughts:
He withdrew about a stone’s throw beyond them, knelt down and prayed, “Father,if you are willing, take this cup from me; yet not my will, but yours be done.” Luke 22:41-42
You do realize that God can not have a will opposed to God? So is Jesus being God, is only God? (as some here keep pressing home)
Then he went down to Nazareth with them and was obedient to them. But his mother treasured all these things in her heart. And Jesus grew in wisdom and stature, and in favor with God and man." Luke 2:51-52
God can not grow in wisdom, nor in favor with God. So Jesus must have two different natures in union, one being God.
The Son of God. He is now manifested as both human and God in one system of thought designed to communicate God to man,
in the fullness of power of Deity!
To qualify to die in the place of all men he needed to make himself become as a man.
To do so, he volunteered to deny Himself of his right to be as God in power, and humbled
himself to restrict himself to functioning to be within the limits of what a man would be.
Who, being in very nature God,did not consider equality with God something to be used to his own advantage;rather, he made himself nothing/but emptied himselfby taking the very nature of a servant,being made in human likeness.And being found in appearance as a man,he humbled himselfby becoming obedient to death—even death on a cross! Philippians 2:6-8
So!
What is to be?
Creeds that do not explain why they give their conclusions?
Or.. the Word of God?
I rest my case!
.
Several problems here with this view. Christ has a human will and a Divine will, He has 2 natures.
Now another problem, well several problems which I will list.
Natures do not sin- People sin, a Person sins.
Natures do not die, people die, persons die.
Natures do not get tempted, people are tempted.
Jesus Person is Divine as the Son, the 2nd Person of the Trinity who is Impeccable.
You are not going to give me your definition?
It would be the only fair way I could understand where you are coming from.
So far you gave me nothing to work with definitively, and then accuse me according to your own definition which you wish to keep hidden.
You are being unfair to someone who is asking to better understand you....
I wonder who your audience is?
Could they be a few "like minded" you have made friends with here?
I want truth. So far. You only want your little group to win. That is how you are coming across to me.
It reminds of a Calvinist forum where I was showing that Irresistible Grace was untrue.
They could not define it, but all saw it as obvious according TO THEIR OWN understanding of the Word of God.
,,,,,,,,,,,
More Kenosis heresyHebrews 2:17 would have been IMPOSSIBLE if He had not succeeded to make Himself fully like a man.
Another impossibility would be the following verse if He had in fact remained functioning as God while here on earth.....
like I said no sin nature there either you are still adding to scripture like your father Augustine did we it his false teaching he invented with a sin nature. People sin not natures. You sound like Adam who blamed Eve for his own choice to sin making an excuse.Not one chapter and verse?
Natures do not get tempted.
Yet the fallen nature can cause temptations!
Romans 7:18-19
For I know that in me (that is, in my flesh) nothing good dwells; for to will is present with me,
but how to perform what is good I do not find. For the good that I will to do, I do not do; but
the evil I will not to do, that I practice.
People who are tempted do have natures that give added impulses to sin. .
Only by walking in the Spirit will they overcome this defect they were born into.
More Kenosis heresy![]()
No I’m talking about the heresy of Kenosis . Still dodging the issue I see. Your Jesus stripped His deity from himself on earth. He acted only as a human nature and not a Divine Person.The term kenosis refers to the doctrine of Christ’s “self-emptying” in His incarnation. The word comes from the Greek of Philippians 2:7, which says that Jesus “emptied himself, by taking the form of a servant, being born in the likeness of men” (ESV). The word translated “emptied” is a form of kenoó, from which we get the word kenosis.
Here! Get some of this and View attachment 447open your Bible to Philippians 2:7!
Many translations are heretical!
https://biblehub.com/philippians/2-7.htm
You are only talking to yourself.....No I’m talking about the heresy of Kenosis . Still dodging the issue I see. Your Jesus stripped His deity from himself on earth. He acted only as a human nature and not a Divine Person.
That’s what Nestorious taught He was a human person which is heretical.I've been reading through the thread and thinking on what has been said. It seems to me the problem lies in considering Jesus as a human person. It was asked "is Jesus a human person?" ... Well, no He's not but during the Incarnation He was made to be as a human person. He had to be made like us in every way therefore he had to be made as if He was not God even though He is. In that sense, Jesus is a human person for all intents and purposes while on Earth.
Hebrews 2:17
Therefore, in all things He had to be made like His brethren, that He might be a merciful and faithful High Priest in things pertaining to God, to make propitiation for the sins of the people.
That can only be true if He was made to be as a human person.
If you can’t support your arguments from scripture that’s on you. I can support mine with scripture and don’t need my pastors sermons to defend my beliefs. I have 66 books to defend mine.You are only talking to yourself.....
I hate baby sitting.
You know?That’s what Nestorious taught He was a human person which is heretical.
Very good, little boy!If you can’t support your arguments from scripture that’s on you. I can support mine with scripture and don’t need my pastors sermons to defend my beliefs. I have 66 books to defend mine.![]()
Try using those books for once and not resorting to broad brushing by citing creeds that you keep abusing.If you can’t support your arguments from scripture that’s on you. I can support mine with scripture and don’t need my pastors sermons to defend my beliefs. I have 66 books to defend mine.![]()
Then Heb.2:17 is a lie. He didn't become as a man during the Incarnation. Either that or we are all divine persons.That’s what Nestorious taught He was a human person which is heretical.
You bring up an interesting verse. Heb 2:17 says that He had to be made like His Brethren, not as His Brethren. So Christ is not as human as us, Although He starts to possess complete human nature (body and soul) at His Incarnation, He never assumes a human person because He is already a Divine Person, the Uncreated Word of God. Hence, Heb 2:17 vaporizes Nestorianism.I've been reading through the thread and thinking on what has been said. It seems to me the problem lies in considering Jesus as a human person. It was asked "is Jesus a human person?" ... Well, no He's not but during the Incarnation He was made to be as a human person. He had to be made like us in every way therefore he had to be made as if He was not God even though He is. In that sense, Jesus is a human person for all intents and purposes while on Earth.
Hebrews 2:17
Therefore, in all things He had to be made like His brethren, that He might be a merciful and faithful High Priest in things pertaining to God, to make propitiation for the sins of the people.
That can only be true if He was made to be as a human person.
You set yourself up too easily to be ridiculed as a Nestorian.I am getting to like this Nestorius guy.![]()