They appeared as mortals down here. God stopped them doing that after the flood. They fathered the Nephlim--Every scholar on Earth knows its 100% fact.
You got that from a textbook.
Tell me, do you accept everything you read? Do you ever find comments contradicting Scripture, and when this happens what do you do? Is there no critical thinking on your part? Is there no original thinking on your part?
I used to believe those things. I don't anymore. Do you want to know why? It's because when a Scripture that is applicable contradicts long-held false Gentile theology I get to studying, to test what others have said and what has long been written in theology books. I study, like Saul, under the anointing and the Lord gives me understanding. Then He confirms it. Early on I was taught the angels that sinned were all around us, cooking up devious schemes to trap man, even "possess" a person, but there are Scriptures that such conclusions cannot get passed. Like the teaching and belief that angels can possess men. Or the teaching that angels mated with women and had giant offspring (Nephilim) like what you believe. I also used to believe what I was taught early on that "Satan" tempted Jesus, but I don't believe that anymore. According to Isaiah, Peter, and Jude, the angels that sinned are locked up and awaiting judgment.
4 For if God spared not the angels that sinned, but cast them down to hell, and delivered them into chains of darkness, to be reserved unto judgment; 2 Peter 2:4.
I ask myself when this happened and the most reasonable conclusion is before God created man. Then, I asked myself, what exactly did he do that was sinful. It can't be the angels tried to mate with women because as spirit beings and women material beings, knowing also that all God's angels are male and that there is no command to "be fruitful and multiply," no genitals, no female angels, that their number is fixed. I don't see angels participating in HOLY matrimony and marrying. Not even animals engage in marrying. Angels do not have creative abilities to create bodies, inhabit those bodies, and then marry human women. That is preposterous. Bizarro. And God would not allow it. Then, the word studies. The word "nephal" means "bullies" and "tyrant", exactly the kind of people that are lawless. Anyway, such stories must have Scripture support and there is none, nor are such stories reasonable.
Then I read this:
14 But every man is tempted, when he is drawn away
of his own lust, and enticed. James 1:14.
Strong's defines the word "lust" as "longing." Jesus Christ was God and He was man. It says He was hungered. A hungry person longs for food, and He was no different. There is no sin in that. It comes with the flesh. I concluded reasonably that Jesus the man was tested. I don't find TWO ways to be tempted according to James. And if it was Satan who tempted Him, then He was tested as we are and cannot be our Mediator and Intercessor to know what we go through similarly because if the angels that sinned are locked up, then Satan/Lucifer could not have been with Him in the desert. It was the human part of the God-man that was tested.
It's a shame many who claim to know Christ give Satan, Lucifer TOO MUCH glory and abilities. But I am not deceived. If Peter says "the angels that sinned are [locked up]" then it could not be an angel - fallen or otherwise.
I believe God is Sovereign, not man and not angels.
I know better. I study the Scripture to know what Scripture says. I have long put away childish things when I became a man. As for other peoples' bible studies? Why should we study at all? Let's all just regurgitate what we read in other people's bible studies.
Not me. I rely on Scripture, the Holy Spirit, Strong as my linguist, and a desire to know what is in Scripture and a sound mind. If you want to believe what are lies when held up to Scripture, then you go ahead. Me? I know better.
I stopped using commentaries and other people's bible studies a long time ago and trust the Lord to teach me His Word.
I am not one to give textbook responses. I know how to study and think things thru. Those that refer to other men's bible studies and commentaries are merely a man of men.
Me? I am a man of God.
Besides this, one of my spiritual gifts is exercised through reliance to God and His Word.
I am a Biblical Christian. That's the only kind of Christian there is in existence.
If one's Christianity is not Biblical, then it is NOT Christianity.
Bottom line.
Now, Go, and sin no more!