Gods Innate Attributes

so we can take this as you cannot answer, thought so.

101G.

Not "we", but "you" can take this as your heresy has to deny the reality of plural pronouns used in describing the Father and the Son together.

What a mess of heresy you embrace.

It's really disgusting.
 
Not "we", but "you" can take this as your heresy has to deny the reality of plural pronouns used in describing the Father and the Son together.

What a mess of heresy you embrace.

It's really disgusting.
(smile) ...... LOL, LOL, LOL, Oh Dear, ....... :ROFLMAO: YIKES!.
since you cannot answer a simple question, let try a reasonable deduction scripture of common sense, Hebrews 1:10 "And, Thou, Lord, in the beginning hast laid the foundation of the earth; and the heavens are the works of thine hands:"

now this, Zechariah 12:1 "The burden of the word of the LORD for Israel, saith the LORD, which stretcheth forth the heavens, and layeth the foundation of the earth, and formeth the spirit of man within him."

Fred, is the LORD, and the Lord in both scriptures, are these the same PERSON who laid the Foundation of the EARTH?.... remember no math is involved, just simple reasoning.

your answer PLEASE.

101G.
 
It's actually sad that you deny what plural pronouns mean.

Go back to school.
so, we can take this as there is no reasonable deduction of Commonsense to the scriptures either? Oh my.

and as for going back to school? Hebrews 5:12 "For when for the time ye ought to be teachers, ye have need that one teach you again which be the first principles of the oracles of God; and are become such as have need of milk, and not of strong meat." Hebrews 5:13 "For every one that useth milk is unskilful in the word of righteousness: for he is a babe." Hebrews 5:14 "But strong meat belongeth to them that are of full age, even those who by reason of use have their senses exercised to discern both good and evil." ...... (Smile) ...... Ouch! .... :ninja:

so good night....... lol, lol, lol, Oh dear.

101G.
 
Good video, recommend it.

Brings up some really important points.
Yes since my departure/deconstruction/reconstruction from calvinism I'm open to listening to these arguments now. I no longer hold to the Simplicity argument now. Its flawed.

I posted another video with idol killer and several other guests where he discusses God is not static but dynamic in the open theism debate/thread. Its a great video and once again He pawns Matt Slick in another debate. :). Slick like White resort to their usual ad hominems and name calling.
 
Yes since my departure/deconstruction/reconstruction from calvinism I'm open to listening to these arguments now. I no longer hold to the Simplicity argument now. Its flawed.

I posted another video with idol killer and several other guests where he discusses God is not static but dynamic in the open theism debate/thread. Its a great video and once again He pawns Matt Slick in another debate. :). Slick like White resort to their usual ad hominems and name calling.

The ad hominems are always a frustrating and sad way to argue.

Although I don't hold to Dynamic Omniscience, I definitely reject Divine Simplicity.
 
Back
Top Bottom