101G
Well-known member
so we can take this as you cannot answer, thought so.Once I read the sentence above, I knew to ignore the rest of the garbage you posted.
101G.
so we can take this as you cannot answer, thought so.Once I read the sentence above, I knew to ignore the rest of the garbage you posted.
so we can take this as you cannot answer, thought so.
101G.
(smile) ...... LOL, LOL, LOL, Oh Dear, ....... YIKES!.Not "we", but "you" can take this as your heresy has to deny the reality of plural pronouns used in describing the Father and the Son together.
What a mess of heresy you embrace.
It's really disgusting.
(smile) ...... LOL, LOL, LOL, Oh Dear, ....... YIKES!.
so, we can take this as there is no reasonable deduction of Commonsense to the scriptures either? Oh my.It's actually sad that you deny what plural pronouns mean.
Go back to school.
so, we
(smile), you want to KNOW?.... lol, lol, lol, ... Oh my......You are not a we.
(smile), you want to KNOW?.... lol, lol, lol, ... Oh my......
101G.
Merry Christmas to you too........ (smile). YIKES!No, I don't need to know further about your false teaching.
Merry Christmas to you too........ (smile). YIKES!
101G.
Aseity vs Divine Simplicity discussion.
Yes since my departure/deconstruction/reconstruction from calvinism I'm open to listening to these arguments now. I no longer hold to the Simplicity argument now. Its flawed.Good video, recommend it.
Brings up some really important points.
Yes since my departure/deconstruction/reconstruction from calvinism I'm open to listening to these arguments now. I no longer hold to the Simplicity argument now. Its flawed.
I posted another video with idol killer and several other guests where he discusses God is not static but dynamic in the open theism debate/thread. Its a great video and once again He pawns Matt Slick in another debate. . Slick like White resort to their usual ad hominems and name calling.
Have you listened to Warren McGrew( Idol Killer ) explain it ?The ad hominems are always a frustrating and sad way to argue.
Although I don't hold to Dynamic Omniscience, I definitely reject Divine Simplicity.
Here is a link to the discussion when you have the time.The ad hominems are always a frustrating and sad way to argue.
Although I don't hold to Dynamic Omniscience, I definitely reject Divine Simplicity.
God has contingent attributes and not all attributes are equal.
I can guess who they are tooI bet that went "over the head" of many here....
Have you listened to Warren McGrew( Idol Killer ) explain it ?