But it does not say... as YOU have proved.... it never says.
While you are so busy idolizing the RCC's teachings, ask yourself this.
You quote " Both Father and son have personal names."
We all have read the YHWH from the old testament. We all have read the I AM, from the old testament. But the son was never given a name ...only called the Word.... until the incarnation.
Yours is a very weak proof of whatever you are tryig to proove.
While you are at it... try explaining the purpose of the Father, the purpose of the Son, and the purpose of the Holy Spirit....
I can think of one reason that as yet the Holy Spirit is not on the throne... CAN YOU??
CAN ANYONE?
