Are you not born a child of wrath?
And you defy your own definition. Your not permanently a child of wrath if you are elect.
White vs Barber
- Thread starter TomL
- Start date
And you defy your own definition. Your not permanently a child of wrath if you are elect.
synergy
Active Member
Didn't say it was did I? So I will say it again, according to you it's impossible to go from a unsaved child of wrath to a born again heaven bound believer. Hence the word "permanently"
synergy
Active Member
Can we stick with the definition or do you want to change the definition to include "wrath"? Give it a shot and I'll tell you if I agree with it.
We are and I did. According to your definition we are permanently stuck in our human condition from birth.
synergy
Active Member
According to my definition, Calvinists claim that everyone is permanently stuck in an Elect or non-Elect state from birth.
Notice your definition says "from birth" and it's "permanent'. I don't believe that and neither do you.
synergy
Active Member
I don't believe in a preexistence so it's an accurate definition for me.
Are you starting to bail out on the definition because you painted yourself in a corner.
Neither do I.
synergy
Active Member
So do you agree that the Calvinist Elect/non-Elect System is a Caste System? And if so do you believe it?
No. Why you ask? Because it's not. Your assertion is non-sensical.
synergy
Active Member
So the proof of your position is "because it's not" with no explanation as to why my "assertion is non-sensical". Oh I forgot, I'm dealing with a person who flies by the seat of his pants. Go play with your toys.
The burden of proof lies with you sir. It's your assertion. That's why I let you pick the topic genius. Puts you on the defensive. A position a Provisionist does not like to be in. Your a amateur at best.
synergy
Active Member
The burden of proof of your assertions lies with you. Your assertions are "because it's not" and it "is non-sensical" with no explanation whatsoever.
I proved my assertions by presenting a definition and proved that it aligns with the Calvinist Elect/non-Elect System.
Carry on with your dirt-poor Fly by the Seat of Your Pants debating non-skills.
Genius. Your topic is Calvinism is a caste system. The burden of proof lies with you professor. I don't have to prove anything. LOL
synergy
Active Member
The burden of proof of your assertions lies with you. Your assertions are "because it's not" and it "is non-sensical" with no explanation whatsoever.
Run Presby02 Run!
I have asserted nothing. I don't have to explain anything. The positive case is your burden and so far your a joke.
synergy
Active Member
You now wish to disown your assertions of "because it's not" and it "is non-sensical".
Run Presby02 Run!
No. I explained why it's not. Your a child. Low hanging fruit.You now wish to disown your assertions of "because it's not" and it "is non-sensical".
Run Presby02 Run!
Now your on to the saving face phase.
You can pick another topic if you wish.
