The "secret" Rapture theory

I have to say here that your Preterism requires such a twisted interpretation of scripture it must be rejected and tossed in the trash bin.
What's so complicated? Revelation's introduction (Rev. 1:3) and conclusion (Rev. 22:10) both state that John's visions of the future were events that were "at hand" in his own days. That means you don't have to anticipate those disasters hanging over your head. You should be relieved.
 
2nd coming ~ No metaphorical language can be applied to this since Christ coming will be visible to all in that day.
Amen!
1st resurrection ~(once more) We know that the scripture teaches that "The First Resurrection" is the new birth, secured by Christ's resurrection from the dead. . But again, either that is true, or our God is not telling the truth when He says it! One or the other, take your pick. God's Word teaches us that Christ is the first born from the dead (he being the head of an elect body) that in all things he might have preeminence. That's the first resurrection from the dead. So the question is, "is Christ the first born from the dead or not?" Because if that's not true, then the resurrection wherein God says "we were raised up in His death," is frankly all a monumental deception. If it is true, then as Christ is the first raised from the dead, and we who were raised up with Him have part in the first resurrection. And if it's not true, then when Jesus told Martha (who thought that Lazarus would be first raised up in the last day) that, "HE was the Resurrection," it was all a lie, and all those raised in Him are not really raised up in His First Resurrection. We must then ask ourselves, "are believers raised up with Christ in a Pretend Resurrection, or was it with Christ as the first born from the dead?" Were we ever dead and raised up before Christ raised us up? The answer is no. So then this must of necessity be the "first" resurrection, just as we are told Christ is the first raised from the dead. If we really believe that Christ was the "first" from the dead, then the answers are obvious. We were raised up with Christ in his "First Resurrection." Again, maybe not according to some theologians, but according to the Holy Scriptures we were. And interpretations do belong to God.
I believe you're confusing being made "spiritually alive" (saved) w/ the future "glorified bodies" all believers will receive once caught up to meet the Lord in the air. We'll need them in order to operate in the heavens. Our bodies will be like unto His.

For our conversation (citizenship) is in heaven; from whence also we look for the Saviour, the Lord Jesus Christ:
Who shall change our vile body, that it may be fashioned like unto his glorious body, according to the
working whereby he is able even to subdue all things unto himself.
(Philippians 3:20-21)
Colossians 2:13

  • "And you being Dead in your sins, and the un-circumcision of your flesh, hath he made alive together with him, having forgiven you all trespass."
Ephesians 2:5-6
  • "Even when we were Dead in sins, hath He made us Alive together with Christ (by Grace ye are saved).
  • And hath raised us up together, and made us sit together in heavenly places in Christ Jesus:"
And so according to "scripture alone," it would seem that many are really missing the whole point about both the first resurrection from the dead, and our being raised up to reign with Him in heaven. For if it's not the first (in God's defining of the first), then we have chaos, confusion, and a contradiction in the scriptures which sticks out like a sore thumb.

Colossians 1:18

  • "And He is the Head of the Body, the Church; who is the beginning, the Firstborn from the dead that in all things He might have Preeminence."
Colossians 2:12
  • "Buried with Him in Baptism, wherein also ye were Risen with Him through the faith of the operation of God, who hath raised Him from the Dead."
Scripture teaches us of two principle resurrections of the dead. It speaks of the resurrection in Christ (John 11:25, Ephesians 2:5) which is the called the first. But it also speaks of another resurrection at the last day (John 11:24, 1st Corinthians 15:52). Only one can be the first resurrection of the saints. And I want to say that again for emphasis. ONLY ONE can be the first Resurrection. And that is what many theologians cannot seem to comprehend. You cannot have two separate events, both called the first resurrection in scripture. That is confusion and God is not the author of confusion. In Revelation 20:5, the First Resurrection refers to what has occurred that made those souls who have died able to live and reign with Christ, while the souls of those who were unsaved (the rest of the dead) could not go to live and reign with Christ. The rest of the dead (unsaved who died) "they lived not again" until the second resurrection when they must be raised from death to stand for judgment before the throne of God. What the chapter is doing is contrasting the souls of the saved, which though they are dead, yet they still live and reign with Christ in heaven, with the souls of the "rest of the dead" (the unsaved) who didn't have life again until the second Resurrection. The ones who reign with Christ after death are those who have had part in the first resurrection. The expression, the First Resurrection clearly refers to the souls of the saints that are raised first, in distinction from the raising of these wicked (rest of the dead) that occurs after the millennium. This is at the the second resurrection. It is totally consistent with the Amillennial view.

There are those who attempt to split hairs, who say that Christ's "resurrection" is not the exact same phrase as "first resurrection." And so they conclude Christ's resurrection is not the same as a first resurrection. But besides from this logic being self-serving, since Christ clearly says He's the Firstborn from the dead that He might have preeminence, it's also inaccurate. If (as righteous Joseph says), "God shall give an answer of peace, and interpretations belong to Him," then God (Sola Scriptura) must define the First Resurrection, not man. And Graciously, He does. But again, "if we will receive it!" And again, He does it unambiguously.

Acts 26:23

  • "That Christ should suffer, and that he should be the first that should rise from the dead, and should shew light unto the people, and to the Gentiles."
Christ is the "First Resurrection" from the dead according To God. From the context it should be clear to anyone with no preconceived ideas that Christ is the first resurrection, the first that should rise from the dead. And note, it's according to God's Word, not according to Amillennialists, or Augustine, or Origen. So who would dare to declare that these things are untrue? The sad truth is that many will dare to declare it, but unambiguously this is the raising of Christ from death to life. And God defines Him as the first. And so, as saith the scriptures, "Let God be True, and every man a liar (Romans 3:4)". Once again, Amillennialism triumphs biblically and is found to be nothing more than what is defined by the Word of God. The first resurrection was instituted at Christ's preeminent resurrection. His ascension to the throne was the start of the Millennial Kingdom reign, and all those who have part in that resurrection are they who reign with Him in the Kingdom. And upon these, the second death hath no part. And that is what Revelation 20 is declaring.

Revelation 20:6

  • "Blessed and holy is he that hath part in the first resurrection: on such the second death hath no power, but they shall be priests of God and of Christ, and shall reign with him a thousand years."
Red, the apostle John wasn't writing to us in Revelation, he was writing to Israel.
First bodily resurrection enters the kingdom on earth.


But the rest of the dead lived not again until the thousand years were finished. This is the first resurrection.
Blessed and holy is he that hath part in the first resurrection: on such the second death hath no power,
but they shall be priests of God and of Christ, and shall reign with him a thousand years.

(Revelation 20:5-6)


Now, onto the second bodily resurrection.

Judgment at the Throne of God

And I saw a great white throne, and him that sat on it, from whose face the earth and the heaven fled away; and there was found no place for them. And I saw the dead, small and great, stand before God; and the books were opened: and another book was opened, which is the book of life: and the dead were judged out of those things which were written in the books, according to their works. And the sea gave up the dead which were in it; and death and hell delivered up the dead which were in them: and they were judged every man according to their works. And death and hell were cast into the lake of fire. This is the second death. And whosoever was not found written in the book of life was cast into the lake of fire.
(Revelation 20:11-15)


Revelation 21 talks about Israel. No mention of the Body of Christ b/c we'll be in the heavens.
 
Last edited:
@Victoria
Oh, I thought you were being sarcastic in that reply to 3 R's.
I was just joking w/ you 😂
I was....but, it is true my grandmother was a Thomas. I was having a little fun.
The revelation of the mystery can only be found in Paul's epistles. Ephesians 2, & 3 alone won't reveal, in full, God's manifold wisdom. In my own words, I understand that God wants me to rightly divide "aka" to know the difference between the nation of Israel, & the Body of Christ. I learn that we're a spiritual body eternal in the heavens, & that born again Israel, in ages to come, will be a physical nation eternal on the earth. If we don't rightly divide, we cannot interpret the Old, & New Testaments consistently w/ accuracy.
There is only one elect body, not two, and Christ is the head of that one body. See #98 above, and I can add to it later today.
 
@Victoria
Red, the apostle John wasn't writing to us in Revelation, he was writing to Israel.
First bodily resurrection enters the kingdom on earth.

I believe you're confusing being made "spiritually alive" (saved) w/ the future "glorified bodies" all believers will receive once caught up to meet the Lord in the air. We'll need them in order to operate in the heavens. Our bodies will be like unto His.
Frist, Victoria, there is not one book in the NT, written to Israel after the flesh, not one. You need to prove this with scriptures. You did not get this from searching the scriptures, you got this by blindly believing what someone told you without searching this out to see if those things were so, this is not what noble Christians do, dear sister ~ Acts 17:11.

Secondly, I know the difference bewtween our new birth, which was indeed a resurrection from the dead by the same power that raised our Lord from the dead. I understand perfectly that the resurrection of our bodies will be on the last day, yet in the future, which will be the second resurrection.

Christ is the FIRST resurrection in the sense in which he was raised from the dead ~I said:
1st resurrection ~(once more) We know that the scripture teaches that "The First Resurrection" is the new birth, secured by Christ's resurrection from the dead. But again, either that is true, or our God is not telling the truth when He says it! One or the other, take your pick. God's Word teaches us that Christ is the first born from the dead (he being the head of an elect body) that in all things he might have preeminence. That's the first resurrection from the dead. So the question is, "is Christ the first born from the dead or not?" Because if that's not true, then the resurrection wherein God says "we were raised up in His death," is frankly all a monumental deception. If it is true, then as Christ is the first raised from the dead, and we who were raised up with Him have part in the first resurrection ~ which secured our spiritual resurrection in time. And if it's not true, then when Jesus told Martha (who thought that Lazarus would be first raised up in the last day) that, "HE was the Resurrection," it was all a lie, and all those raised in Him are not really raised up in His First Resurrection. We must then ask ourselves, "are believers raised up with Christ in a Pretend Resurrection, or was it with Christ as the first born from the dead?" Were we ever dead and raised up before Christ raised us up? The answer is no. So then this must of necessity be the "first" resurrection, just as we are told Christ is the first raised from the dead. If we really believe that Christ was the "first" from the dead, then the answers are obvious. We were raised up with Christ in his "First Resurrection." Again, maybe not according to some theologians, but according to the Holy Scriptures we were. And interpretations do belong to God, not to man.

Colossians 2:13


  • "And you being Dead in your sins, and the un-circumcision of your flesh, hath he made alive together with him, having forgiven you all trespass."
Ephesians 2:5-6
  • "Even when we were Dead in sins, hath He made us Alive together with Christ (by Grace ye are saved).
  • And hath raised us up together, and made us sit together in heavenly places in Christ Jesus:"
And so according to "scripture alone," it would seem that many are really missing the whole point about both the first resurrection from the dead, and our being raised up to reign with Him in heaven. For if it's not the first (in God's defining of the first), then we have chaos, confusion, and a contradiction in the scriptures which sticks out like a sore thumb.
Victoria, I think you are the one that is confused and you truly need to rethink what you ahve been taught~no pun intended.
 
Last edited:
3 Resurrections
This Acts 26:23 verse is translated poorly in the KJV. The literal translations do a better job. "...that the Christ is to suffer, whether first by a rising from the dead he is about to proclaim light to the people and to the nations." (YLT) This does NOT mean Christ was the first to rise, but He was first to proclaim light to the people and to the nations by His having risen from the dead. The sentence order gets twisted in the KJV and others translations. Christ was the first to initiate the evangelistic thrust of the gospel to the Gentile nations once He arose from the dead ("...go ye into all the world and preach the gospel to every creature..." - Mark 16:15.)
Later RB
 
What's so complicated? Revelation's introduction (Rev. 1:3) and conclusion (Rev. 22:10) both state that John's visions of the future were events that were "at hand" in his own days. That means you don't have to anticipate those disasters hanging over your head. You should be relieved.
Only If, there was defining proof that the book was written before 70AD and was not written in 95AD. And there is not.

You are certain the author was not the Apostle John (John of Patmos) While Irenaeus and Justin Martyr identified John the Apostle as the author of the Book of Revelation.
 
The "secret" rapture theory

The teaching of the secret rapture, or private coming of Jesus Christ for his church apart from being revealed to the rest of the world, is a teaching that was invented somewhere back in and around 1830 give or take a few short years, which doctrine was never taught to the churches until around that time.

What I will say in this thread. I first taught this in a tract form back around forty five years ago, or so. Seems so long ago, yet time has gone by so fast!

I have nine points that I will present to prove that the secret rapture theory is just that...a false theory with no biblical support whatsoever. I have never preach this, I only did this in a tract form back as a young Christian. Please consider the following none points.

1) There is not one scripture that teaches this doctrine in God's word, "not one".

Does this surprise you? It should ~ one would think that a doctrine so popular would have many scriptures to support this position, but not so with this teaching. I hear many ask: what are you going to do with 1st Thessalonians 4:13-18? Many teach that "the dead in Christ shall rise first" ~meaning the dead in Christ shall rise first, and those outside of Christ shall rise later.

But a closer examination of the verse will prove that the distinction is between those who died in Christ and those that are in Christ and alive when he comes. Paul is saying that the resurrection of the former shall occur before the change of the later~this is the meaning of the text and nothing more.

Considering the passage carefully it certainly is saying that there shall nothing private or secret about this coming. Consider: (a) there will be a shout; (b) voice of the archangel; (c) and the trump of God.

With the trump of God, consider my next point on why we must reject a secret coming of Jesus Christ for his church, apart from being revealed to teh rest of the world.

2) Paul in 1st Corinthians 15:52 makes it very plain to us that the resurrection shall take place at the last trump, which in the scriptures is the seventh and final trump in Revelation.

1st Corinthians 15:52​

“In a moment, in the twinkling of an eye, at the last trump: for the trumpet shall sound, and the dead shall be raised incorruptible, and we shall be changed.”

Can there be anymore after the last one? No, last means last, The resurrection of the saints takes place at the LAST TRUMP per Paul, premillennialism camp said that Paul is wrong. The trump here is the same trumpet as in this verse:

Matthew 24:31​

“And he shall send his angels with a great sound of a trumpet, and they shall gather together his elect from the four winds, from one end of heaven to the other.”

His elect are the church from the four winds under heaven! Both places are speaking of the same event, and the LAST trump of God. This trumpet is far from being secret and quiet.... a "great sound" of a trumpet.

The secret rapturist teachers have a major problem here to address, since they will try to convince their followers that the trumpet here occurs seven years later than the one in 1st Corinthians 15:52, yet Paul said the the trumpet in 1st Corinthians 15:52 is the LAST TRUMP of God...who shall be believe and follow? A another biblical reason why we must reject the secret rapture theory as false and a corruption of God's word.

3) The word of God teaches that the resurrection of believers will be at the LAST DAY.

Not as the secret rapturist teaches say, some 1007 before the last day!

John 6:39​

“And this is the Father's will which hath sent me, that of all which he hath given me I should lose nothing, but should raise it up again at the last day.”

See also ~verses 40, 44, and 54.

Again:

John 11:24​

“Martha saith unto him, I know that he shall rise again in the resurrection at the last day.”

Many of our modern day preachers will accuse Martha of not having very much light/understanding, concerning the resurrection of the saints, yet we know she had much more than most of have. Martha's understanding agrees with Job's teachings:

Job 14:12​

“So man lieth down, and riseth not: till the heavens be no more, they shall not awake, nor be raised out of their sleep.”

Well we see that Job was not part of the secret rapturist group! Job KNEW man lieth down, and riseth not: till the heavens be no more, they shall not awake, nor be raised out of their sleep.” Peter taught the same.

2 Peter 3:10​

“But the day of the Lord will come as a thief in the night; in the which the heavens shall pass away with a great noise, and the elements shall melt with fervent heat, the earth also and the works that are therein shall be burned up.”

One word here ~beware of adding to what God calls the last day as many do. Oliver B. Greene when commenting on John 6;, 39, 40, 44 and 5r4 said not a word about the last day, when commenting on Martha's words accuses her of having a vague understanding about the last day. He said she did not have the marvelous account of the rapture as given in (of all places) 1st Corinthians 15 and 1st Thessalonians 4. The truth is, she believed just as others in the scriptures believed~that we shall be raised at the last trump, on the last day, at a times when the heavens shall be no more!

Coming back with six more points!
Thanks for sharing your study with us, greatly appreciated.
 
Only If, there was defining proof that the book was written before 70AD and was not written in 95AD. And there is not.

You are certain the author was not the Apostle John (John of Patmos) While Irenaeus and Justin Martyr identified John the Apostle as the author of the Book of Revelation.
There is extensive internal proof within Revelation itself which pinpoints the date to somewhere between late AD 59 and early AD 60. No earlier, and no later. This inspired, internal evidence of datable events in Revelation overrides any external sources, without question. You may not remember it and may not have read it, but I posted this internal evidence at length on GCF before. Besides, it doesn't help you even if you think Revelation was written in AD 95. It would STILL be writing about events that were "at hand" in that AD 95 time frame - not for the distant future from that date. The only exception is the Revelation 10:4 verse, which was the "sealed up" prophecies that the seven thunders uttered. These are the only prophecies which were reserved for times far distant to John's own first-century generation.

I am certain that the author of Revelation was not John the son of Zebedee. Christ had promised that both sons of Zebedee would drink the same cup as He Himself would do and be "baptized" with the baptism He was going to experience (Matt. 20:23). And Herod had James son of Zebedee slain by the sword already in Acts 12:2. John son of Zebedee's martyrdom would have followed, in fulfillment of Christ's prediction. It was not the martyred John son of Zebedee who wrote Revelation, but the "beloved disciple" Lazarus / aka John Eleazar who was going to "remain till I come" (John 21:22). John son of Zebedee cannot possibly have Christ's promise of martyrdom and likewise have Christ's promise to "remain till I come". These are contradictory fates, and show us that John son of Zebedee could not possibly have been the "beloved disciple".

And there were other men named "John" connected with the early church, such as John, Peter's father in John 1:42, and "John surnamed Mark", (sister's son to Barnabas), to further cloud the issue of just which John was performing which activity and when. Eusebius' History preserved Papias' comment (a contemporary of Polycarp) that mentions two men named John distinct from each other: one John the Apostle, and one John the Elder. So, there is definitely room for challenging the usual assumption of authorship for Revelation as well as the gospel and the epistles.
 
There is only one elect body, not two, and Christ is the head of that one body. See #98 above, and I can add to it later today.
I never said there was more than one elect body.
Frist, Victoria, there is not one book in the NT, written to Israel after the flesh, not one. You need to prove this with scriptures. You did not get this from searching the scriptures, you got this by blindly believing what someone told you without searching this out to see if those things were so, this is not what noble Christians do, dear sister ~ Acts 17:11.
Red, I sense some projection happening here. Did Jesus not plainly command His disciples, & later Paul, to go to a specific audience?

The book of Acts is in the New Testament.


Therefore let all the house of Israel know assuredly, that God hath made that same Jesus, whom ye have crucified, both Lord and Christ. Now when they heard this, they were pricked in their heart, and said unto Peter and to the rest of the apostles, Men and brethren, what shall we do? Then Peter said unto them, Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for
the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost.

(Acts 2:36-38)

Peter is addressing unsaved Israelite's, in the flesh here.

As Jesus commanded the twelve, go to the lost sheep of the house of Israel...


Peter, an apostle of Jesus Christ, to the strangers scattered throughout Pontus, Galatia, Cappadocia, Asia, and Bithynia,
(1 Peter 1:1)

James, a servant of God and of the Lord Jesus Christ, to the twelve tribes which are scattered abroad, greeting.
(James 1:1)

The apostle John was one of the twelve disciples as well. Guess who he wrote to?
Secondly, I know the difference bewtween our new birth, which was indeed a resurrection from the dead by the same power that raised our Lord from the dead. I understand perfectly that the resurrection of our bodies will be on the last day, yet in the future, which will be the second resurrection.
Victoria, I think you are the one that is confused and you truly need to rethink what you ahve been taught~no pun intended.
Again, Red, you're projecting your confusion onto me. You're not rightly dividing. The first resurrection speaks of priests in
Revelation 20:6. There's absolutely no mention of the Body of Christ being priests. Again, we're a body, not scattered tribes.
 
@Victoria
I never said there was more than one elect body.
To remind you, you said this: The highlighted areas are mine for discussion.
The revelation of the mystery can only be found in Paul's epistles. Ephesians 2, & 3 alone won't reveal, in full, God's manifold wisdom. In my own words, I understand that God wants me to rightly divide "aka" to know the difference between the nation of Israel, & the Body of Christ. I learn that we're a spiritual body eternal in the heavens, & that born again Israel, in ages to come, will be a physical nation eternal on the earth. If we don't rightly divide, we cannot interpret the Old, & New Testaments consistently w/ accuracy.
So, dear soul, you did separate the church from Israel ~ one being a heavenly people, the other an earthly people. And as you have said also, the church is not the bride of Christ, Israel is, so by these unscriptural statements you have two two bodies of people separated by location and identification. This is against the prophets, Christ, and his apostles. The mystery hidden in the scriptures is the two (Jews and Gentiles) shall become one elect, holy spiritual temple, for God to dwell in the midst of forever, world without end.


Old Covenant promises to Israel, Fulfilled in New Covenant Israel The Old Testament (as understood by Premillennialists) is Israel-centered rather than God centered. But the New Testament reveals that the history, ordinances, and indeed the very nation of Israel itself were types and shadows of spiritual realities that would come in Christ (Colossians 2:17; Hebrews 8:1-5; 10:1; 1st Corinthians 10:18). Not fully understanding this most basic of Biblical principles is at the root of most of the millennial errors of theologians. When God says something is fulfilled, then it is fulfilled. The types of Old Testament Israel (Prophets, Jerusalem, Feasts, Priests, the Law, Kingdom, Land, Sacrificial System, Temple, Deliverance, etc.) were all fulfilled in Christ (Luke 24:27). The problem is that many people, whether consciously or unconsciously, refuse to accept the fact that these types were actually fulfilled in Christ. They may give lip service to understanding it, but in practice they deny it. In point of fact, the scriptures are devastating to such an unfulfilled approach to the Old Testament prophesy, for it would prolong what God has once and for all abolished by the cross. Jimmy Swaggart SBN has no clue as to what the message of the cross is since they deny just about every important truth of the cross!

The institutions and shadows that were of the nation Israel. These "types" were fulfilled.

Luke 24:44-45~"And He said to them, these are the words which I spake unto you while I was yet with you, that all things must be fulfilled, which were written in the law of Moses, and in the Prophets, and in the Psalms, concerning Me."

That all things must be fulfilled which were written in the law of Moses, the prophets and the Psalms concerning Christ. It's not insignificant that national Israel rejected Christ for the very same reasons that some theologians today reject Amillennialism. They just refused to believe God's truth that "He" was the fulfillment of Old Testament scripture that prophesied of a Messiah who would come and establish His government, rule and righteousness in the kingdom of Israel. Because their Judaic traditions put forth the idea that the prophecy was of a earthly government, ruler, and a kingdom, and that didn't fit what Jesus came to do. That wasn't the Kingdom that the "true" Christ came to establish. Premillennialism, and in a sense Postmillennialism, looks for the very same worldly (carnal) or earthly fulfillment in prophesy. They do not discern or understand that this is the "very same" error that national Israel made. In fact, Premillennialism is 'nothing less' than the old Judaic law bound earthly expectations. It is the age-old Judaic tradition that Christ's Kingdom is an earthly Kingdom taking a form just like the world's kingdoms. In other words, Christ coming to a geographical political nation on earth, to a earthly city, sitting on an physical literal earthly throne, in a literal Temple. None of this was prophesied, and none of it is true.

Acts 7:48~"Howbeit the most High dwelleth not in temples made with hands; as saith the prophet,"

Hebrews 9:11~"But Christ being come an high priest of good things to come, by a greater and more perfect tabernacle, not made with hands, that is to say, not of this building;"

Hebrews 9:24~"For Christ is not entered into the holy places made with hands, which are the figures of the true; but into heaven itself, now to appear in the presence of God for us:"

Theologians have a hard time comprehending that Christ's Kingdom is not meat and drink, and His Holy place not made with hands. These Old Testament realities were "figures" or types pointing to Christ, their fulfillment. The prophecy concerning rebuilding the Temple and the reigning of Christ in Israel were not to be interpreted as the world defines terms, but as God defined them.

We may come back and look at some of the basic Biblical foundations of Amillennialism? If the promises made to Israel were to the Church, Israel, rather than the Middle Eastern political nation or people, then we should see the fulfillment of them clearly delineated in scripture. And if we do, then these worldly doctrines are found wanting, and once again Amillennialism triumphs Biblically.
Red, I sense some projection happening here. Did Jesus not plainly command His disciples, & later Paul, to go to a specific audience?

The book of Acts is in the New Testament.
Yes he did until Acts 10, and then it all changed and the man (Paul, a Jew by nature) who God gave the mystery to begin to unfold that mystery to us.
Peter is addressing unsaved Israelite's, in the flesh here.

As Jesus commanded the twelve, go to the lost sheep of the house of Israel...


Peter, an apostle of Jesus Christ, to the strangers scattered throughout Pontus, Galatia, Cappadocia, Asia, and Bithynia,
(1 Peter 1:1)

James, a servant of God and of the Lord Jesus Christ, to the twelve tribes which are scattered abroad, greeting.
(James 1:1)

The apostle John was one of the twelve disciples as well. Guess who he wrote to?
No one is rejecting the truth that the gospel went to the Jews first, and then to the Gentiles. Neither do we reject that Peter, and James and the other apostles went to the circumcision and Paul to the uncircumcision. Even though they all (apostles) wrote to each other (saints, both Jews and Gentiles).

Galatians 2:9
“And when James, Cephas, and John, who seemed to be pillars, perceived the grace that was given unto me, they gave to me and Barnabas the right hands of fellowship; that we should go unto the heathen, and they unto the circumcision.”

But this does make them two separate bodies under NT, it shows the wisdom of God in taking the gospel to the Gentiles through Paul who was never an apostle to the circumcision, so they could not accuse him of of changing his position, by carrying out the gospel as the apostles did, proves Christ's death revealed God's full predestination plan from the beginning, taught all through their OT scriptures, but hidden until the time God purpose to reveal His eternal purpose came.
Again, Red, you're projecting your confusion onto me. You're not rightly dividing. The first resurrection speaks of priests in
Revelation 20:6. There's absolutely no mention of the Body of Christ being priests. Again, we're a body, not scattered tribes.

1 Peter 2:9​

“But ye are a chosen generation, a royal priesthood, an holy nation, a peculiar people; that ye should shew forth the praises of him who hath called you out of darkness into his marvellous light:”

Revelation 1:6​

“And hath made us kings and priests unto God and his Father; to him be glory and dominion for ever and ever. Amen.”

Revelation 5:10​

“And hast made us unto our God kings and priests: and we shall reign on the earth.”

The earth in this verse is speaking of the new earth where all of the elect Jews and Gentiles shall reign as kings and priest of God throughout eternity.

Christ is the head of one body, Jews and Gentiles, we shall sit down with our father Abraham in the kingdom of God.

Matthew 8:11​

“And I say unto you, That many shall come from the east and west, and shall sit down with Abraham, and Isaac, and Jacob, in the kingdom of heaven.”

If one is confused here it would be you dear soul. I have ponder these things for over fifty some years, over and over again.
 
I have a question if anyone feels like answering.

Is the secret rapture theory linked to dispensationalism, which divides biblical history into distinct periods or "dispensations?"
 
@Blessed
I have a question if anyone feels like answering.

Is the secret rapture theory linked to dispensationalism, which divides biblical history into distinct periods or "dispensations?"
Greetings Blessed,

Yes, it is one of their main teachings ~ when you say dispensationalism, I assuming you are referring to Premillennialism, whose system sounds more like a sci-fic movie, than biblical eschatology.
 
In response to: @Red Baker


Gentiles Cleave to Israel: Israel’s Role in Teaching and Leading the Nations

The Bible describes a future time when Gentiles will cling to Israel, seeking to learn the ways of God. This is the fulfillment of God’s ultimate plan for Israel to guide the nations. From the beginning, He gave the descendants of Jacob the responsibility to uphold and teach His laws. In the last days and throughout the millennial reign, He will give them the strength to carry out this assignment completely.

What It Means for Gentiles to Cleave to Israel

The word "cleave" in the Bible means to hold on tightly and remain connected.
Isaiah 14:1 describes this:

"For the LORD will have mercy on Jacob, and will yet choose Israel, and set them in their own land: and the strangers shall be joined with them, and they shall cleave to the house of Jacob."

This passage reveals to us that the Gentiles will hold onto Israel because they will see that God is with them. They will no longer try to create their own ways to serve Him but will look to Israel for guidance.

Israel Was Always Meant to Teach the Nations

From the beginning, GOD gave Israel the responsibility of teaching righteousness. The law was given to them, not to any other people. Isaiah 2:2-3 speaks of the nations turning to Israel for wisdom:

"And it shall come to pass in the last days, that the mountain of the LORD'S house shall be established in the top of the mountains, and shall be exalted above the hills; and all nations shall flow unto it. And many people shall go and say, Come ye, and let us go up to the mountain of the LORD, to the house of the God of Jacob; and he will teach us of his ways, and we will walk in his paths: for out of Zion shall go forth the law, and the word of the LORD from Jerusalem."

Micah 4:1-2 repeats this prophecy, making it clear that Israel will be the source of instruction for the world:

"But in the last days it shall come to pass, that the mountain of the house of the LORD shall be established in the top of the mountains, and it shall be exalted above the hills; and people shall flow unto it. And many nations shall come, and say, Come, and let us go up to the mountain of the LORD, and to the house of the God of Jacob; and he will teach us of his ways, and we will walk in his paths: for the law shall go forth of Zion, and the word of the LORD from Jerusalem."

God entrusted this role to the descendants of Jacob. The law will not come from any other source. In the last days, when order is restored, the nations will recognize that Israel was always meant to lead them in righteousness.

The Messiah’s Reign and Israel’s Leadership

Though Israel is given the responsibility to teach, Jesus is the King who will reign over all.
Zechariah 2:11 describes how
God will bring the nations to Himself:

"And many nations shall be joined to the LORD in that day, and shall be my people: and I will dwell in the midst of thee, and thou shalt know that the LORD of hosts hath sent me unto thee."

The nations will worship God, but they will not be in charge. They will follow the order that He established, with Israel leading them in obedience to His commandments.

Israel Ruling with the Messiah During the Millennial Reign

The Bible makes it clear that Israel will not only teach the nations but will also rule alongside the Messiah.
Revelation 5:10 declares this:

"And hast made us unto our God kings and priests: and we shall reign on the earth."

This verse confirms that God has appointed Israel as both rulers and priests under the authority of the Messiah. They will not just be teachers but will exercise authority over the nations. Their leadership will not come through their own power but through God's divine order. This aligns with Daniel 7:27, which states:

"And the kingdom and dominion, and the greatness of the kingdom under the whole heaven, shall be given to the people of the saints of the most High, whose kingdom is an everlasting kingdom, and all dominions shall serve and obey him."

Israel’s role will not just be one of instruction, but of active governance in righteousness. The nations will be under their rule, learning God’s laws from those He has chosen.

Gentiles Will Actively Seek Israel’s Guidance

The Gentiles will not resist Israel’s leadership. They will recognize that God is with His people and will seek to follow them.
Zechariah 8:23 speaks about this moment:

"Thus saith the LORD of hosts; In those days it shall come to pass, that ten men shall take hold out of all languages of the nations, even shall take hold of the skirt of him that is a Jew, saying, We will go with you: for we have heard that God is with you."

The world will no longer be divided in confusion. The nations will no longer create their own religious paths. They will know that God is with Israel, and they will come to them for guidance.

Israel Was Given the Oracles of God

The reason Israel holds this responsibility is made clear in Romans 3:1-2:

"What advantage then hath the Jew? or what profit is there of circumcision? Much every way: chiefly, because that unto them were committed the oracles of God."

God gave His laws, His wisdom, and His truth to Israel. That has not changed, and it never will.

Israel’s Future Role in the Kingdom

For centuries, Israel has been scattered and mistreated, but God has not forgotten His promises. In the last days and during the millennial reign, He will restore His people to their rightful place. They will no longer be oppressed or hidden. Instead, they will be the ones guiding the world in righteousness, just as God intended from the beginning.

Israel will not follow the nations. The nations will follow Israel. The law will go forth from Zion, and God’s people will be the ones teaching it. The world will not stay in disorder. God will bring everything into its proper place, and Israel will fulfill the role He gave them long ago.

Conclusion

The Bible is clear
. God chose Israel to lead the nations in righteousness. The Gentiles will cleave to them, not to change them, but to learn from them. As Israel follows the Messiah, they will teach the world what is right. In the last days, God will restore Israel to their position, and the nations will no longer follow their own ways. They will look to Zion, where the truth has always been. Through Israel, God’s laws will reach the entire world, just as He planned from the beginning.
 
Last edited:
I have a question if anyone feels like answering.

Is the secret rapture theory linked to dispensationalism, which divides biblical history into distinct periods or "dispensations?"
Greetings Blessed,

In a nutshell, it's Dispensationalism vs. Replacement Theology, where many believe the Body of Christ replaces Israel.
 
In response to: @Red Baker


Gentiles Cleave to Israel: Israel’s Role in Teaching and Leading the Nations

The Bible describes a future time when Gentiles will cling to Israel, seeking to learn the ways of God. This is the fulfillment of God’s ultimate plan for Israel to guide the nations. From the beginning, He gave the descendants of Jacob the responsibility to uphold and teach His laws. In the last days and throughout the millennial reign, He will give them the strength to carry out this assignment completely.

What It Means for Gentiles to Cleave to Israel

The word "cleave" in the Bible means to hold on tightly and remain connected.
Isaiah 14:1 describes this:

"For the LORD will have mercy on Jacob, and will yet choose Israel, and set them in their own land: and the strangers shall be joined with them, and they shall cleave to the house of Jacob."

This passage reveals to us that the Gentiles will hold onto Israel because they will see that God is with them. They will no longer try to create their own ways to serve Him but will look to Israel for guidance.

Israel Was Always Meant to Teach the Nations

From the beginning, GOD gave Israel the responsibility of teaching righteousness. The law was given to them, not to any other people. Isaiah 2:2-3 speaks of the nations turning to Israel for wisdom:

"And it shall come to pass in the last days, that the mountain of the LORD'S house shall be established in the top of the mountains, and shall be exalted above the hills; and all nations shall flow unto it. And many people shall go and say, Come ye, and let us go up to the mountain of the LORD, to the house of the God of Jacob; and he will teach us of his ways, and we will walk in his paths: for out of Zion shall go forth the law, and the word of the LORD from Jerusalem."

Micah 4:1-2 repeats this prophecy, making it clear that Israel will be the source of instruction for the world:

"But in the last days it shall come to pass, that the mountain of the house of the LORD shall be established in the top of the mountains, and it shall be exalted above the hills; and people shall flow unto it. And many nations shall come, and say, Come, and let us go up to the mountain of the LORD, and to the house of the God of Jacob; and he will teach us of his ways, and we will walk in his paths: for the law shall go forth of Zion, and the word of the LORD from Jerusalem."

God entrusted this role to the descendants of Jacob. The law will not come from any other source. In the last days, when order is restored, the nations will recognize that Israel was always meant to lead them in righteousness.

The Messiah’s Reign and Israel’s Leadership

Though Israel is given the responsibility to teach, Jesus is the King who will reign over all.
Zechariah 2:11 describes how
God will bring the nations to Himself:

"And many nations shall be joined to the LORD in that day, and shall be my people: and I will dwell in the midst of thee, and thou shalt know that the LORD of hosts hath sent me unto thee."

The nations will worship God, but they will not be in charge. They will follow the order that He established, with Israel leading them in obedience to His commandments.

Israel Ruling with the Messiah During the Millennial Reign

The Bible makes it clear that Israel will not only teach the nations but will also rule alongside the Messiah.
Revelation 5:10 declares this:

"And hast made us unto our God kings and priests: and we shall reign on the earth."

This verse confirms that God has appointed Israel as both rulers and priests under the authority of the Messiah. They will not just be teachers but will exercise authority over the nations. Their leadership will not come through their own power but through God's divine order. This aligns with Daniel 7:27, which states:

"And the kingdom and dominion, and the greatness of the kingdom under the whole heaven, shall be given to the people of the saints of the most High, whose kingdom is an everlasting kingdom, and all dominions shall serve and obey him."

Israel’s role will not just be one of instruction, but of active governance in righteousness. The nations will be under their rule, learning God’s laws from those He has chosen.

Gentiles Will Actively Seek Israel’s Guidance

The Gentiles will not resist Israel’s leadership. They will recognize that God is with His people and will seek to follow them.
Zechariah 8:23 speaks about this moment:

"Thus saith the LORD of hosts; In those days it shall come to pass, that ten men shall take hold out of all languages of the nations, even shall take hold of the skirt of him that is a Jew, saying, We will go with you: for we have heard that God is with you."

The world will no longer be divided in confusion. The nations will no longer create their own religious paths. They will know that God is with Israel, and they will come to them for guidance.

Israel Was Given the Oracles of God

The reason Israel holds this responsibility is made clear in Romans 3:1-2:

"What advantage then hath the Jew? or what profit is there of circumcision? Much every way: chiefly, because that unto them were committed the oracles of God."

God gave His laws, His wisdom, and His truth to Israel. That has not changed, and it never will.

Israel’s Future Role in the Kingdom

For centuries, Israel has been scattered and mistreated, but God has not forgotten His promises. In the last days and during the millennial reign, He will restore His people to their rightful place. They will no longer be oppressed or hidden. Instead, they will be the ones guiding the world in righteousness, just as God intended from the beginning.

Israel will not follow the nations. The nations will follow Israel. The law will go forth from Zion, and God’s people will be the ones teaching it. The world will not stay in disorder. God will bring everything into its proper place, and Israel will fulfill the role He gave them long ago.

Conclusion

The Bible is clear
. God chose Israel to lead the nations in righteousness. The Gentiles will cleave to them, not to change them, but to learn from them. As Israel follows the Messiah, they will teach the world what is right. In the last days, God will restore Israel to their position, and the nations will no longer follow their own ways. They will look to Zion, where the truth has always been. Through Israel, God’s laws will reach the entire world, just as He planned from the beginning.
Agreed. 100%
 
@Victoria
In response to: @Red Baker
I'll read this later and respond~I'm traveling to be with a small group of believers about an hour away and may be with them the greater part of the day, so not sure when I can respond, but for sure I will.

I did glance over the source of your material and see they are Mid-Acts followers who followed the teachings Charles Baker (no kin to me) who followed C.I. Scofield, and maybe (not sure 100%) went beyond Scofield's teachings making him a hyper dispensational teacher. I'll do my homework later.
 
@Victoria @Blessed @FreeInChrist @Jim @civic @dwight92070 @mikesw @3 Resurrections
In a nutshell, it's Dispensationalism vs. Replacement Theology, where many believe the Body of Christ replaces Israel.
No that's incorrect. I said above:
The promises to Israel are not now null and void as some might suppose. Nor has the Church replaced Israel as some boastfully claim. Indeed Israel has not been abandoned. The promises to Israel "stand" because they were not made to a literal earthly nation, but to a chosen people who bring forth the fruits worthy of repentance. Unfortunately, some people have no concept of the way Old Testament prophecy is fulfilled in Christ. Those promises to Israel are kept, and are fulfilled in Christ, and in whosoever God chooses to call Israel, by reason of their being in Christ. He is the true Israel of God.
You said: "where many believe the Body of Christ replaces Israel."

No, we just understand how the scriptures teaches who is the true Israel of God! We do not take the children's bread and give it to the dog, who reject Christ, as the true Messiah of God. All of God's promises are IN CHRIST, there is not one promise from God to those who are not IN CHRIST, by God's eelction of grace, all who are, are the children of God's promises be they Jews or Gentiles.

Romans 9:8“That is, They which are the children of the flesh, these are not the children of God: but the children of the promise are counted for the seed.”


Once more and please consider this prayerfully and read it slowly:

The promises to Israel are not now null and void as some might suppose. Nor has the Church replaced Israel as some boastfully claim. Indeed Israel has not been abandoned. The promises to Israel "stand" because they were not made to a literal earthly nation, but to a chosen people who bring forth the fruits worthy of repentance. Unfortunately, some people have no concept of the way Old Testament prophecy is fulfilled in Christ. Those promises to Israel are kept, and are fulfilled in Christ, and in whosoever God chooses to call Israel, by reason of their being in Christ. He is the true Israel of God.
 
Last edited:
@Victoria @Blessed @FreeInChrist @Jim @civic @dwight92070 @mikesw @3 Resurrections

No that's incorrect. I said above:

You said: "where many believe the Body of Christ replaces Israel."

No, we just understand how the scriptures teaches who is the true Israel of God! We do not take the children's bread and give it to the dog, who reject Christ, as the true Messiah of God. All of God's promises are IN CHRIST, there is not one promise from God to those who are not IN CHRIST, by God's eelction of grace, all who are, are the children of God's promises be they Jews or Gentiles.

Romans 9:8“That is, They which are the children of the flesh, these are not the children of God: but the children of the promise are counted for the seed.”


Once more and please consider this prayerfully and read it slowly:

The promises to Israel are not now null and void as some might suppose. Nor has the Church replaced Israel as some boastfully claim. Indeed Israel has not been abandoned. The promises to Israel "stand" because they were not made to a literal earthly nation, but to a chosen people who bring forth the fruits worthy of repentance. Unfortunately, some people have no concept of the way Old Testament prophecy is fulfilled in Christ. Those promises to Israel are kept, and are fulfilled in Christ, and in whosoever God chooses to call Israel, by reason of their being in Christ. He is the true Israel of God.
In 1948 when the modern state of Israel was born, it not only became an important
stage setting development but began an actual fulfillment of specific Bible prophecies
about an international regathering of the Jews in unbelief before the judgment of the
tribulation. Such a prediction is found in the following Old Testament passages: Ezek.
20:33-38; 22:17-22; 36:22-24; 37:1–14; Isa. 11:11-12; Zeph. 2:1-2 and Ezek. 38–39
presupposes such a setting.

Zephaniah 1:14-18 is one of the most colorful descriptions of “The Day of the LORD,”
which we commonly call the tribulation period. Zephaniah 2:1-2 says that there will be a
world-wide regathering of Israel before the day of the LORD. “Gather yourselves together,
yes, gather, O nation without shame, before the decree takes effect—the day passes like
the chaff—before the burning anger of the LORD comes upon you, before the day of the
LORD’s anger comes upon you.”

Ezekiel 20:33–38 speaks of a regathering, which must take place before the tribulation.
The passage speaks of bringing the nation of Israel back “from the peoples and gather you
from the lands where you are scattered, with a mighty hand and with an outstretched arm
and with wrath poured out” (Ezek. 20:34). “With wrath poured out” is a descriptive
reference to the tribulation. Thus, in order this to occur in history, Israel must be back in the
land before the tribulation. This passage clearly says that it is the Lord who is bringing them
back. The current nation of Israel is in the process of fulfilling this passage.

In a similar vein, two chapters later, Ezekiel receives another revelation about a future
regathering of national Israel (Ezek. 22:17–22). This time, the Lord is “going to gather you
into the midst of Jerusalem” (Ezek. 22:19). Like the metallurgist, the Lord will use the fire of
the tribulation to purge out the unfaithful. The Lord is going to “gather you [Israel] and blow
on you with the fire of My wrath, and you will be melted in the midst of it” (Ezek. 22:21).
Once again, “My wrath” depicts the time of the tribulation. It also follows here that the nation
must be regathered before that event can take place. The outcome of this event will be
that the nation “will know that I, the LORD, have poured out My wrath on you” (Ezek. 22:22).
For this to occur, there must be a regathering by the Lord of Israel to the land, just like we
see happening with the modern state of Israel. God is at work through the current state of
Israel.

Surely, anyone who claims to believe in a national future for Israel would have to say
that the valley of dry bones prophecy in some way, shape, or form relates to modern Israel
(Ezek. 37:1–14). The prophet describes a future process through which the nation of Israel
will come to be reconstituted and (when the process is complete) enter into a faithful spiritual
relationship with the Lord. This multi stage process must surely include the current nation of
Israel, in unbelief, that is being prepared to go through a time that will lead to her conversion
to Jesus as their Messiah. This is said by Ezekiel to be a work of the Lord (Ezek. 37:14).
Thus, the modern state of Israel is a work of God and biblically significant.

Second World-Wide Gathering in Belief

Many passages in the Bible speak of Israel’s regathering, in belief, at the end of the
tribulation, in conjunction with Christ’s second coming, in preparation for commencement of
the millennium. These references are not being fulfilled by the modern state of Israel.
Some of the citations include: Deut. 4:29-31, 30:1-10; Isa. 27:12-13, 43:5-7; Jer. 16:14-
15; 31:7-10; Ezek. 11:14-18; Amos 9:14-15; Zech. 10:8-12; Matt. 24:31 and many more.
I think that this regathering will fulfill the Feast of Trumpets (
Rosh Hashanah) for the nation of Israel.

Matthew 24:31, records a future regathering of Israel, this time in belief. “And He will
send forth His angels with a great trumpet and they will gather together His elect from the
four winds, from one end of the sky to the other” (Matt. 24:31). This is said to take place
after the tribulation (Matt. 24:29), which would be the second coming.

CONCLUSION
The fact that the last fifty years has seen a world-wide regathering and reestablishment
of the nation of Israel, which is now poised in just the setting required for the revealing of the
Antichrist and the start of the tribulation, is God’s grand indicator that all of the other areas of
world development are prophetically significant. Dr. Walvoord says,
www.pre-trib.org 4

Of the many peculiar phenomena which characterize the present generation, few
events can claim equal significance as far as Biblical prophecy is concerned with
that of the return of Israel to their land. It constitutes a preparation for the end of
the age, the setting for the coming of the Lord for His church, and the fulfillment of
Israel's prophetic destiny.

It is true that the Bible predicts a future time when Israel will be regathered in belief and
will then enter into the kingdom for a thousand years. However, as I have demonstrated
above, the same Scriptures also tell us of a time when Israel will be regathered in unbelief,
before the tribulation in order that God may complete His plan for national Israel. The
current nation of Israel is the beginning of fulfillment of just such prophecy. Modern Israel is
the result of God’s direct intervention in history. I believe that those who speak contrary to
this will be found to be fighting God. Maranatha! https://berean-apologetics.community.forum/threads/modern-day-israel-on-gods-prophetic-calendar.228/

hope this helps !!!
 
I did glance over the source of your material and see they are Mid-Acts followers who followed the teachings Charles Baker (no kin to me) who followed C.I. Scofield, and maybe (not sure 100%) went beyond Scofield's teachings making him a hyper dispensational teacher. I'll do my homework later.
I'm not hyper dispensational, for I do not hold the Acts 28:28 position.

Perhaps I should make a thread to show believers as early as the 2nd Century, & onward, were in some way dispensational, given the word dispensation appears in the Bible four times. If we do away w/ the dispensation of the grace of God, you no longer have grace when placing yourself anywhere in the Hebrew epistles.



For if I do this thing willingly, I have a reward: but if against my will, a dispensation of the gospel is committed unto me.
(1 Corinthians 9:17)

That in the dispensation of the fulness of times he might gather together in one all things in Christ, both which are in heaven,
and which are on earth; even in him:

(Ephesians 1:10)

If ye have heard of the dispensation of the grace of God which is given me to you-ward:
(Ephesians 3:2)

Whereof I am made a minister, according to the dispensation of God which is given to me for you, to fulfil the word of God;
(Colossians 1:25)
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom