The butchering of John 1:1 by JW anti-Trinitarian Translators

“but he who came down from heaven.” Something was said to have come from God or come from heaven if God was its source. For example, James 1:17 says that every good gift is “from above” and “comes down” from God. What James means is clear. God is the Author and source of the good things in our lives. God works behind the scenes to provide what we need. The verse does not mean that the good things in our lives come directly down from heaven. The phrase “he who came down from heaven” in John 3:13 is to be understood in the same way we understand James’ words—that God is the source of Jesus Christ, which He was. Christ was God’s plan, and then God directly fathered Jesus.
 
Peterlag said:
“but he who came down from heaven.” Something was said to have come from God or come from heaven if God was its source. For example, James 1:17 says that every good gift is “from above” and “comes down” from God. What James means is clear. God is the Author and source of the good things in our lives. God works behind the scenes to provide what we need. The verse does not mean that the good things in our lives come directly down from heaven. The phrase “he who came down from heaven” in John 3:13 is to be understood in the same way we understand James’ words—that God is the source of Jesus Christ, which He was. Christ was God’s plan, and then God directly fathered Jesus.
Click to expand...
Is this what you're proposing: “but he God's plan who came down from heaven.”
 
synergy said:
If we did what you proposed that we do, we would be classified as Modalists. That shows that you're going from one heresy to another without thinking. Start thinking properly and then we can talk.

We've all given you more than enough material for you to be able to logically think things out properly.
Click to expand...
The heresy rose in the 2nd century=2Thess 2:3=turned into Catholicism, it was they who screwed it all up.
 
Keiw1 said:
The heresy rose in the 2nd century=2Thess 2:3=turned into Catholicism, it was they who screwed it all up.
Click to expand...
The bottom line is Jesus is not God and there's no such thing as the trinity. The fact that the Catholics believe this should have been a huge red flag since they have never been right about anything.
 
John 10:33
Had the translators rendered the Greek text in verse 33 as they did in verse 34 and 35, then it would read, "...you, a man, claim to be a god." In the next two verses, John 10:34 and 35, the exact same word (theos, without the article) is translated as "god" and not "God." In Acts 12:22, Herod is called theos without the article, so the translators translate it "god." The same is true in Acts 28:6, when Paul had been bitten by a viper and the people expected him to die. When he did not die, "...they changed their minds and said he was a god." Since theos has no article, and since it is clear from the context that the reference is not about the true God, theos is translated "a god." It is a general principle that theos without the article should be "a god," or "divine." Since there is no evidence that Jesus was teaching that he was God anywhere in the context, and since the Pharisees would have never believed that this man was somehow Yahweh, it makes no sense that they would be saying that he said he was "God." Now since Jesus was clearly teaching that he was sent by God and was doing God's work. Thus, it makes perfect sense that the Pharisees would say he was claiming to be "a god" or "divine."
 
Back
Top Bottom