civic
Active Member
A major failure outside of God being Plural as we read God indeed is in GenesisCan't He think for himself? Why talk to himself through his word? How many people talk to themselves around your circles?
A major failure outside of God being Plural as we read God indeed is in GenesisCan't He think for himself? Why talk to himself through his word? How many people talk to themselves around your circles?
prophecy? it's for us to KNOW. is it not spoken before anyone was here...... Isaiah 46:10 "Declaring the end from the beginning, and from ancient times the things that are not yet done, saying, My counsel shall stand, and I will do all my pleasure:"Can't He think for himself? Why talk to himself through his word? How many people talk to themselves around your circles?
ERROR he was alone at Genesis, especially at Genesis 1:26.A major failure outside of God being Plural as we read God indeed is in Genesis
No US, WE and OUR are all Plural pronouns.ERROR he was alone at Genesis, especially at Genesis 1:26.
101G.
ok, you do believe the Lord Jesus, correct. and you do believe that the Lord Jesus cannot LIE RIGHT? ... right. listen to the Lord Jesus. when the Pharisees came to him, tempting him about divorcement. Listen to what he said,No US, WE and OUR are all Plural pronouns.
Basics 101.
False dichotomy. It’s not either or it’s and and both.@civic,
I Know you and I believe the Lord Jesus, and we Know that he cannot LIE. so our task now is to understand why he, God said US and OUR in verse 27........ and when we fully understand, the the truth will make us FREE.
101G.
101G.
ok, so explain How God is a "HE" when he Made man male and female in the wake of verse 26.False dichotomy. It’s not either or it’s and and both.
You're the one who said "his creation of his word" which means that your God changed from no Word to Word present.So my 'Uni' God now changes for reasons you only know and you never explained them to me, and 'yours' does not, according to the mighty syn.
It's not my fault that you aligned yourself with Arians, Mormons, JWs who also believe in the "creation of his word".The creation of the word is now according to syn, an or only an Arian an not even a Tertullian thing, so now I'm labelled as this or that to then give yourself open permission to continue with a new attack on my words, not my intent and meaning. This was your crafty reason for asking me those two questions in the first place. Admit it you are deceitful in your intent here.
Keep promoting your humility...I would suggest you grow up and become more humble and listen to others more, as you know much less that myself in these spiritual matters,, with no pride afforded me
You're projecting again.Public embarrassment to self is not new to you I see.
Whatever grievance you have with John 1 can be registered at your nearest Church. I'm just the messenger.Until further notice you will not get my honest feedback to any of your queries because you display unpredictability and immaturity in your responses not worthy of any grown man.