I know this isn't going to be popular but "hear me out" for a moment. I remember as a young Christian trying to defend some of the actions of Christ that were contrary to what the Pharisees claimed were blaspheme. They often claimed that Christ broke the "law of Moses". Which He did. However, Christ was never bound by the law of Moses. Never.
The religious practice of blaming or accusing God, or those who God sent, of misconduct or incompetence is a popular tactic employed by men who profess to know God. It is employed for the purpose of justifying ones own selfish desire to feed their own flesh. The Scriptures first recorded instance of this popular tactic was when Adam was trying to justify his refusal to honor God with simple obedience.
Gen. 3: 12 And the man said, The woman "whom thou gavest to be with me", she gave me of the tree, and I did eat.
This same fleshy tactic was used against Moses several times, including judging Moses, who God sent to them, for marrying an Ethiopian woman, and therefore gave them an excuse to speak out against him.
Num. 12:1 And Miriam and Aaron spake against Moses because of the Ethiopian woman whom he had married: for he had married an Ethiopian woman.
Of course, God's law had already told them that any stranger that sojourned among them, "shall be unto you as one born among you". But it was never about God's Law, it was about justifying the feeding of their own wicked flesh.
The Pharisees also employed this tactic by accusing Jesus, who God sent, of breaking God's Laws and therefore unworthy of their honor and respect. And this to justify their own religion which transgresses God's Commandments by their own traditions. And they didn't like it that Jesus was exposing their religion as wrought in man, and not in God, even though HE grew up among them.
As Jesus Himself pointed out. Luke 4:24 And he said, Verily I say unto you, No prophet is accepted in his own country.
In like manner, the religions of this world I was born into, in their lust to justify their own religion, employ the same tactic. They promote the philosophy that Jesus rejected/broke God's Laws, which of course the entire Bible teaches HE didn't. They attempt to mask this by calling God's Law, "the Law of Moses". But as anyone who has ever actually read the Bible knows, Moses never created even one Law. The LAW this poster accuses Jesus of Breaking, was God's Law, which is to be expected behavior from the promoters of this world's religions, as clearly shown in the Holy Scriptures from the very beginning and throughout the Bible.
This in no way is an attempt to show Christ sinful. He is ABOVE sin. Impeccable and perfect. However, He did not become the perfect sacrifice for sin because He keep the law of Moses. He TOOK the penalty of the law and was judged for our sins. The approval of the Sacrificial offering of Jesus Christ was solely at the discretion of God the Father. It is the nature of Divinity with Christ Jesus that meet the requirement of God. Literally God Incarnate dying for mankind. Not an adherence to the law of Moses.
We can see this tactic clearly employed here. Sin is transgression of God's Law. Notice the subtle deception. Sin is not defined as transgression of the "Moses Law". Therefore, a man can justify any religious behavior or tradition by simply saying, "it's against the law of Moses", not the Law of God.
Furthermore, it has NEVER been a requirement for the "Lawgiver" to adhere to the law that He gives to those subject to Him. The LawGiver has right sand privileges not afforded to the subject of any law.
I refuse to make such a judgment against God, that HE placed burdens on the necks of men who trust Him, that HE Himself will not lift with one finger. Especially given the commandment given to us and Abraham, that the Son of God promoted.
Matt. 5: 48 Be ye therefore perfect, even as your Father which is in heaven is perfect.
Eze 18:4 Behold, all souls are mine;
John 16:15 All things that the Father hath are mine:
( what a wonderful proof of the Divinity of Jesus Christ. )
This is one of the reasons that Calvinism has such a hard time actually understanding Romans 9. Romans 9 isn't establishing their view of God's choice in them. It is setting forth God's choice in Himself. The work of Jesus Christ.
Rom 9:14 What shall we say then? Is there unrighteousness with God? God forbid.
Rom 9:15 For he saith to Moses, I will have mercy on whom I will have mercy, and I will have compassion on whom I will have compassion.
Rom 9:16 So then it is not of him that willeth, nor of him that runneth, but of God that sheweth mercy.
There are other examples but I ask of you. Show me how Jesus didn't break the law of Moses by claiming to be God.
This post is founded on several untruths.
#1. God's Law is the Law God gave to men through God's humble servant Moses. He didn't give Abraham Children "Moses Law". The accusation being made here in that Jesus broke God's Laws, which HE didn't.
#2. Jesus claimed to be the Son of God, not God the Father.
John 10: 36 Say ye of him, whom the Father hath sanctified, and sent into the world, Thou blasphemest; because I said, "I am the Son of God"?
Peter understood this, even if you don't.
Matt. 16: 16 And Simon Peter answered and said, Thou art the Christ, "the Son of the living God".
And God Himself, according to the eye witnesses.
Matt. 3: 17 And lo a voice from heaven, saying, This is my beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased.
Jesus didn't break God's Laws that God gave Him through Moses. And HE never called Himself God, rather, HE gave us the Words He Father gave Him. And HE saved those men who were "Learned of the Father" that His Father gave to Him At least this is what the Jesus "of the Bible" teaches.