101G
Well-known member
well let's see. did the Son of God come from heaven yes or no? just answer the question.There is no division in the Hypostatic Union. Your question is a misnomer.
101G.
well let's see. did the Son of God come from heaven yes or no? just answer the question.There is no division in the Hypostatic Union. Your question is a misnomer.
Finally a excellent question. yes, BEING. listen closely. Genesis 1:1 "In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth." the term "God" what is it's true meaning? answerDiversified ones is not bad. You just need to apply it to the being and not the person
Um another is two minimumFinally a excellent question. yes, BEING. listen closely. Genesis 1:1 "In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth." the term "God" what is it's true meaning? answer
God: H430 אֱלֹהִים 'elohiym (el-o-heem') n-m.
אֱלֹהֵי 'elohiy (el-o-hee') [alternate plural]
1. (literally) supreme ones.
2. (hence, in the ordinary sense) gods.
3. (specifically, in the plural, especially with the article) the Supreme God (i.e. the all supreme).
4. (sometimes) supreme, used as a superlative.
5. (occasionally, by way of deference) supreme magistrates, the highest magistrates of the land.
6. (also) the supreme angels (entities of unspecified type).
[plural of H433]
KJV: angels, X exceeding, God (gods)(-dess, -ly), X (very) great, judges, X mighty.
Root(s): H433
my Source, Mickelson's Enhanced Strong's Dictionaries of the Greek and Hebrew Testament
see this... [plural of H433] NOTE: plural of, of, of, of, .... NOT from, from, from h433... but OF, OF, OF, do you know what that means? not a separate and distinct PERSON, nor a Separate or distinct Being. but the term "OF" indicate the same source. the dictionary states, "expressing the relationship between a part and a whole". a part a WHOLE. answer... "a WHOLE as in a WHOLE SHARE". supportive scripture, Philippians 2:6 "Who, being in the form of God, thought it not robbery to be equal with God:" remember that word "WITH" as in First and Last? which is the same person. now the NATURE/BEING. Philippians 2:6 states, "Who, being in the form of God". now we're getting into the NATURE of, of, of, GOD as Genesis 1:1 states. and here it is. the term "FORM" here in Philippians 2:6 means,
G3444 μορφή morphe (mor-fee') n.
1. form.
2. (intrinsically) fundamental nature.
[perhaps from the base of G3313 (through the idea of adjustment of parts)]
KJV: form
Root(s): G3313
so, definition #2 is the answer to his NATURE, but the question is "WHAT KIND OF NATURE". the answer is in the root of the word "FORM/G3444 μορφή morphe (mor-fee') which is G3313 μέρος meros (me'-ros) n.1. a portion (i.e. an amount allotted, a part of something). a PORTION can be a PART or a WHOLE. now the answer. another word or a word that is synonyms with a portion is "SHARE" which is the "a WHOLE". bingo, there is the definition in ... "OF"... bingo.
the WHOLE of the Spirit is just as the scripture's states, " thought it not robbery to be equal with God:" there is that term "with" which means "ALSO" indicating the SAME one person. there it is.
and in the NT the equivalent term is "ANOTHER" in the GREEK term G243 Allos.
now all of 101G definition can be duplicated. for 101G is using the Mickelson's Enhanced Strong's Dictionaries of the Greek and Hebrew Testaments
a great example of non - comprehension.... ........ G243 Allos ... Another of the SAME, SAME, sort.Um another is two minimum
A globe is not a replica of a flat earth
Same sort means same type not same persona great example of non - comprehension.... ........ G243 Allos ... Another of the SAME, SAME, sort.
the scriptures are true. 2 Thessalonians 2:11 "And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie:" 2 Thessalonians 2:12 "That they all might be damned who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness."
101G
sound like? let's see what the bible say about what you said, "a logical fallacy in which a person begins with a conclusion" Isaiah 46:10 "Declaring the end from the beginning, and from ancient times the things that are not yet done, saying, My counsel shall stand, and I will do all my pleasure:" now why do you think we... Man is in HIS "IMAGE?" and remember God is a Spirit. was God in flesh at Genesis 1? ...... Hello? got it now?Sounds like... Circular reasoning is a logical fallacy in which a person begins with a conclusion and then uses that same conclusion as support for their argument. This type of reasoning is also referred to as “begging the question” or “assuming the initial point”. It is a fallacy because it does not provide any new evidence or information that could help to support the argument.
In his pre-incarnate state not as flesh - yesGINOLJC, to all.
@MTMattie, why are you angry.... (smile). because you cannot understand KNOWLEDGE. may 101G ask you a question? "do you really think the flesh and blood Christ, (Which was born later), was in the wilderness?". think man.
101G.