God's grace to forgive and transform is not conditioned to recognizing Jesus' deity, blood atonement or physical resurrection

Pancho Frijoles

Well-known member
I am opening the thread to discuss and refute the commonly held view that God's grace that forgives and changes the life of people is conditioned to their acceptance of doctrines such as Jesus' deity, blood atonement or physical resurrection.

I will do it following two main lines of argumentation: The analysis of reality, and the analysis of Scriptures.

  • Reality shows that people from all religions are forgiven and transformed.
  • Across the Bible, God never demanded the sinner to hold those beliefs in order to be forgiven and transformed. All references found in Scriptures to rituals or oral confessions as requisites for salvation do not represent a superstitious appeal to a salvation based on rituals or oral confessions. They must be understood within the context in which such references were made.
I'm inviting anyone interested in presenting arguments in a spirit of respect and brotherhood.
 
Let me start with defining the scope of the discussion.
God's grace operates in multiple levels throughout our existence. The very fact that we are alive now is the result of his grace.
I will focus, though, on two main processes that are essential in bringing a person from a non-saved to a saved condition.

One if forgiveness, that may be immediate, but necessary throughout our lives as long as we make things we need to repent for.
The other is the change, transformation or sanctification of a life, which implies a long-term spiritual process towards the standard of living that God expects from us. In other words, the process between being born again, and becoming spiritual adults.

My contention is that God extends his forgiveness without demanding from the sinner anything else that his humble self-identification as a creature in need, unable to heal himself, and the identification of his brothers and sisters as creatures in need, unable to heal themselves, so that the sinner is willing (at least willing) to extend to others the mercy he claims for himself.
God does not demand the payment of a ransom, or the adherence to a specific creed.

Same about the transformative power of God's grace. The Holy Spirit operates in the sinner to convert a violent person to a meek person, or a person who lives the life of the flesh into a person who lives the life of the spirit, without requiring the payment of a ransom, or the adherence to a specific creed. That's why we observe people holding different creeds bearing the fruit of the Spirit.
 
I am opening the thread to discuss and refute the commonly held view that God's grace that forgives and changes the life of people is conditioned to their acceptance of doctrines such as Jesus' deity, blood atonement or physical resurrection.
Are you sure you want to challenge and refute the core doctrines as written in Scripture on a Christian forum, @Pancho Frijoles?

These are non-negotiable truths. This is a very bold step you're taking.

As Scripture says, "If anyone comes to you and does not bring this teaching, do not receive him into your house or give him any greeting" (2 John 1:10).

J.
 
Are you sure you want to challenge and refute the core doctrines as written in Scripture on a Christian forum, @Pancho Frijoles?

No, the purpose of the thread is NOT to challenge or refute those doctrines.
The purpose of the thread is to refute the idea that God conditions his forgiveness and transformative power to believing in those doctrines.

So the scope of the discussion should be very different from the rest of the threads, which focus on the veracity of doctrine X or Y.

Let me give you an example of what I mean:

Suppose that a person believes with all her heart that God created the world in 6 literal days. Whether that's true or not is one kind of debate.​
Now, imagine that the same person believes that all people who think that God created the world over millions of years deserves to burn in hell for ever. Well, that's a different kind of debate.​

Not all Christians who believe that God created the world in 6 literal days consider that the non-believers in the 6-literal-days-doctrine should burn in hell.
Catholics, in their catechism, affirm that the grace of God can save Jews, Muslims and people from other religions, without forsaking the role of the Church in salvation.
 
Last edited:
No, the purpose of the thread is NOT to challenge or refute those doctrines.
The purpose of the thread is to refute the idea that God conditions his forgiveness and transformative power to believing in those doctrines.

So the scope of the discussion should be very different from the rest of the threads, which focus on the veracity of doctrine X or Y.
Be sure and prepared to use Scripture to address the concept of God's imperatives and indicatives, as I truly believe you're on a slippery slope. And don’t hesitate to include the writings of the Bahá'í faith as well, so your readers can have a fair opportunity to see how they should respond.

Since you are not a Christian, I fear this may not go well for you in refuting the imperatives of YHWH and Yeshua. As Scripture warns, “But even if we or an angel from heaven should preach a gospel other than the one we preached to you, let them be under God’s curse!” (Galatians 1:8).

Fair thee well.

J.
 
Dear all

Let me start with a question. Why does God want to forgive a person and change his life? What does He intend?

God wants us to turn to Him, forsaking a bad way to live, and adopting a new way.
That's salvation all about: going from the undesirable state of sin, spiritual death, separation from God, hell... to a desirable state of righteousness, joy, paradise in the presence of God.

This change from wickedness to holiness requires mercy, pardon.
This is how God expresses it in Isaiah 55:7


"Let the wicked forsake their ways
and the unrighteous their thoughts.
Let them turn to the Lord, and he will have mercy on them,

and to our God, for he will freely pardon."

Please notice in this verse two things:
  1. God expects from us a genuine willingness to change our bad ways, our bad thoughts, into good ways and good thoughts.
  2. God will "freely pardon" us. His pardon is FREE. Otherwise it would not be mercy. It would be just trade or justice. God pardons us even when He would have no reason to pardon us, based on sheer justice.
 
Last edited:
The FREE nature of God's pardon was explained by Jesus in one of the most beautiful parables, found in Matthew 18:21-35.
Please notice that the passage should get priority in our understanding of the topic because...
  • It was given by Jesus Himself, not by a disciple interpreting the teaching of Jesus
  • was explicitly addressing the topic in question
Then Peter came to Jesus and asked, “Lord, how many times shall I forgive my brother or sister who sins against me? Up to seven times?”
22 Jesus answered, “I tell you, not seven times, but seventy-seven times.
23 “Therefore, the kingdom of heaven is like a king who wanted to settle accounts with his servants. 24 As he began the settlement, a man who owed him ten thousand bags of gold was brought to him. 25 Since he was not able to pay, the master ordered that he and his wife and his children and all that he had be sold to repay the debt.
26 “At this the servant fell on his knees before him. ‘Be patient with me,’ he begged, ‘and I will pay back everything.’ 27 The servant’s master took pity on him, canceled the debt and let him go.
28 “But when that servant went out, he found one of his fellow servants who owed him a hundred silver coins. He grabbed him and began to choke him. ‘Pay back what you owe me!’ he demanded.
29 “His fellow servant fell to his knees and begged him, ‘Be patient with me, and I will pay it back.’
30 “But he refused. Instead, he went off and had the man thrown into prison until he could pay the debt. 31 When the other servants saw what had happened, they were outraged and went and told their master everything that had happened.
32 “Then the master called the servant in. ‘You wicked servant,’ he said, ‘I canceled all that debt of yours because you begged me to. 33 Shouldn’t you have had mercy on your fellow servant just as I had on you?’ 34 In anger his master handed him over to the jailers to be tortured, until he should pay back all he owed.
35 “This is how my heavenly Father will treat each of you unless you forgive your brother or sister from your heart.
Let me share with you some insights from Jesus teaching in this parable:

  • The king cancels the debt of his subject without asking a ransom. In fact, the good king forsakes the possibility of making an innocent pay for the guilty (in this case, selling his family as slaves).
  • The king stresses that the only reason He had forgiven the servant is because he had begged Him.
  • The only thing the king expected from his subject as a result was to show others the same mercy that he had been given.
Jesus could have told the story differently: for example, that one of the relatives or friends of the servant offers himself to the King as a payment, and that the king accepts that because "somebody had to pay the debt". That would be a good example of substitutionary atonement. However, Jesus didn't do it. Jesus wanted to stress that God cancels our debts without demanding any payment... just expecting His mercy to be extended to other human fellows in need of it.
 
Last edited:
Jesus taught us how to ask God for forgiveness.
What is the condition that the sinner should meet in order to expect God to forgive him/her?

This, then, is how you should pray:

“‘Our Father in heaven,
hallowed be your name,
10 your kingdom come,
your will be done,
on earth as it is in heaven.
11 Give us today our daily bread.
12 And forgive us our debts,
as we also have forgiven our debtors.

13 And lead us not into temptation,
but deliver us from the evil one.
14 For if you forgive other people when they sin against you, your heavenly Father will also forgive you. 15 But if you do not forgive others their sins, your Father will not forgive your sins.


As you see, the teaching goes perfectly in line with the parable of the king who cancels the debt of his servant.
We expect from God mercy, and therefore we should give others mercy. A genuine repentance means consistency in our attitudes. We ask for mercy, we give others mercy.

In the prayer, Jesus did not teach us to remind God that someone else has paid the debt for us. There is no ransom or substitutionary atonement here. Jesus could have worded the prayer differently:
"And forgive our debts, since the Savior has already paid for our debts". But Jesus didn't do it.
Jesus, the Son of David, was showing us the same route that King David had shown in Psalm 51. The route of trust in God's FREE pardon.
 
I am opening the thread to discuss and refute the commonly held view that God's grace that forgives and changes the life of people is conditioned to their acceptance of doctrines such as Jesus' deity, blood atonement or physical resurrection.

I will do it following two main lines of argumentation: The analysis of reality, and the analysis of Scriptures.

  • Reality shows that people from all religions are forgiven and transformed.
That appears to be nothing more than an unsupported opinion

And an argument without force



  • Across the Bible, God never demanded the sinner to hold those beliefs in order to be forgiven and transformed. All references found in Scriptures to rituals or oral confessions as requisites for salvation do not represent a superstitious appeal to a salvation based on rituals or oral confessions. They must be understood within the context in which such references were made.
I'm inviting anyone interested in presenting arguments in a spirit of respect and brotherhood.

John 8:24Thus I said to you that you will die in your sins. For if you do not believe that I am he, you will die in your sins.”

John 6:53 (LEB) — 53 Then Jesus said to them, “Truly, truly I say to you, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink his blood, you do not have life in yourselves!

John 17:3 (LEB) — 3 Now this is eternal life: that they know you, the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom you have sent.

John 14:6 (LEB) — 6 Jesus said to him, “I am the way, and the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.
 
That appears to be nothing more than an unsupported opinion
And an argument without force
Why do you think so?
What evidence could be more valid than the testimony of a life transformed?
By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you love one another.” John 13:35
“You are the light of the world. A town built on a hill cannot be hidden. 15 Neither do people light a lamp and put it under a bowl. Instead they put it on its stand, and it gives light to everyone in the house. 16 In the same way, let your light shine before others, that they may see your good deeds and glorify your Father in heaven.” Matthew 5:15-16


Memorizing the Bible and gaining a doctorate in Theology is not as important as the example of a life.

Who has not witnessed how people from different religions are freed from the slavery of their past life and live new lives?
I am one of them. My father, now dead, is another example.
If we went home by home, city by city, we would observe, objectively, thousands of cases. We can’t just deny them all.

John 8:24Thus I said to you that you will die in your sins. For if you do not believe that I am he, you will die in your sins.”
If people believed that Jesus was a fraud, a false Messiah, they would not repent and do what He asked them to do.
As Jesus repeatedly taught, intellectual assent and confesion was worthless.
We will examine that more in detail later on.


John 6:53 (LEB) — 53 Then Jesus said to them, “Truly, truly I say to you, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink his blood, you do not have life in yourselves!
In John 6:53 Jesus is not conditioning God’s mercy to believing in his deity, blood atonement or physical resurrection. Please read it again.
What is the meaning of eating his flesh and drinking his blood?
We eat his flesh and drink his blood when we live the life of Christ. Flesh and blood are symbols of his life, in the same way that the bread coming from heaven (manna) was a symbol of life.

John 17:3 (LEB) — 3 Now this is eternal life: that they know you, the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom you have sent.
In John 17:3 Jesus is not conditioning God’s forgiveness to acquiring theological knowledge.
To know Jesus is to do what he asks us to do: repent, be born again, loving our neighbor.
“Dear friends, let us love one another, for love comes from God. Everyone who loves has been born of God and knows God”. (1 John 4:7)

John 14:6 (LEB) — 6 Jesus said to him, “I am the way, and the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.
In John 14:6 Jesus is not conditioning God’s forgiveness to adhering to a set of beliefs. Please read the verse again.
 
The FREE nature of God's pardon was explained by Jesus in one of the most beautiful parables, found in Matthew 18:21-35.
Please notice that the passage should get priority in our understanding of the topic because...
  • It was given by Jesus Himself, not by a disciple interpreting the teaching of Jesus
  • was explicitly addressing the topic in question
Then Peter came to Jesus and asked, “Lord, how many times shall I forgive my brother or sister who sins against me? Up to seven times?”
22 Jesus answered, “I tell you, not seven times, but seventy-seven times.
23 “Therefore, the kingdom of heaven is like a king who wanted to settle accounts with his servants. 24 As he began the settlement, a man who owed him ten thousand bags of gold was brought to him. 25 Since he was not able to pay, the master ordered that he and his wife and his children and all that he had be sold to repay the debt.
26 “At this the servant fell on his knees before him. ‘Be patient with me,’ he begged, ‘and I will pay back everything.’ 27 The servant’s master took pity on him, canceled the debt and let him go.
How did Jesus cancel our debts?

Col 2:13 And you, being dead in the deviations and the uncircumcision of your flesh, He made alive together with Him, having forgiven you all the deviations,
Col 2:14 blotting out the handwriting in the ordinances against us, which was contrary to us, even He has taken it out of the midst, nailing it to the cross;
28 “But when that servant went out, he found one of his fellow servants who owed him a hundred silver coins. He grabbed him and began to choke him. ‘Pay back what you owe me!’ he demanded.
29 “His fellow servant fell to his knees and begged him, ‘Be patient with me, and I will pay it back.’
30 “But he refused. Instead, he went off and had the man thrown into prison until he could pay the debt. 31 When the other servants saw what had happened, they were outraged and went and told their master everything that had happened.
32 “Then the master called the servant in. ‘You wicked servant,’ he said, ‘I canceled all that debt of yours because you begged me to. 33 Shouldn’t you have had mercy on your fellow servant just as I had on you?’ 34 In anger his master handed him over to the jailers to be tortured, until he should pay back all he owed.
35 “This is how my heavenly Father will treat each of you unless you forgive your brother or sister from your heart.
Let me share with you some insights from Jesus teaching in this parable:

  • The king cancels the debt of his subject without asking a ransom. In fact, the good king forsakes the possibility of making an innocent pay for the guilty (in this case, selling his family as slaves).
  • The king stresses that the only reason He had forgiven the servant is because he had begged Him.
  • The only thing the king expected from his subject as a result was to show others the same mercy that he had been given.
Jesus could have told the story differently: for example, that one of the relatives or friends of the servant offers himself to the King as a payment, and that the king accepts that because "somebody had to pay the debt". That would be a good example of substitutionary atonement. However, Jesus didn't do it. Jesus wanted to stress that God cancels our debts without demanding any payment... just expecting His mercy to be extended to other human fellows in need of it.
I can only venture an opinion as to why Jesus didn't go into details about the Cross at that moment. I think that it would have distracted the Disciples immensely if they were told of the future Cross at that time. It had to wait for Paul to elaborate everything afterwards.

Thus, the Bible triumphs once again over the Islamic naive disdain and loathing of the Cross.
 
How did Jesus cancel our debts?
By teaching us to ask the Father to cancel our debts. He taught it very clearly.
Col 2:13 And you, being dead in the deviations and the uncircumcision of your flesh, He made alive together with Him, having forgiven you all the deviations,
Col 2:14 blotting out the handwriting in the ordinances against us, which was contrary to us, even He has taken it out of the midst, nailing it to the cross;

I can only venture an opinion as to why Jesus didn't go into details about the Cross at that moment. I think that it would have distracted the Disciples immensely if they were told of the future Cross at that time. It had to wait for Paul to elaborate everything afterwards.
Distracted? Wasn't salvation the most important topic of all? Didn’t Jesus come as a Savior?
Then, How could Jesus miss in a story about forgiveness the topic that YOU consider key requisite for salvation?
Why Jesus missed it not once, or twice, but systematically?

In regard to Paul, please remember

  • Jesus was not a disciple of Paul. Jesus was His Master.
  • Paul did not establish Christianism, but Jesus Christ.
  • Jesus chose Paul to take Jesus’ gospel to Gentiles, not to invent a new gospel.
  • Every writing from Paul must be analyzed and understood in the light of what Jesus said and did.
  • In short, in soteriology and in your personal life, Jesus comes first. Paul comes second.
 
By teaching us to ask the Father to cancel our debts. He taught it very clearly.

Distracted? Wasn't salvation the most important topic of all? Didn’t Jesus come as a Savior?
Wasn't Peter totally distracted by satan when he attempted to save Jesus from death? Read Matt 16:21-23.

21 From that time Jesus began to show to His disciples that He must go to Jerusalem, and suffer many things from the elders and chief priests and scribes, and be killed, and be raised the third day.

22 Then Peter took Him aside and began to rebuke Him, saying, [i]“Far be it from You, Lord; this shall not happen to You!”

23 But He turned and said to Peter, “Get behind Me, Satan! You are [j]an offense to Me, for you are not mindful of the things of God, but the things of men.
Then, How could Jesus miss in a story about forgiveness the topic that YOU consider key requisite for salvation?
Why Jesus missed it not once, or twice, but systematically?
It's a topic that the Bible considers key. Muslims are hell bent on eradicating any mention of the Cross.
In regard to Paul, please remember
  • Jesus was not a disciple of Paul. Jesus was His Master.
  • Paul did not establish Christianism, but Jesus Christ.
  • Jesus chose Paul to take Jesus’ gospel to Gentiles, not to invent a new gospel.
  • Every writing from Paul must be analyzed and understood in the light of what Jesus said and did.
  • In short, in soteriology and in your personal life, Jesus comes first. Paul comes second.
Huh? What did I say to precipitate these comments of yours?

Conclusion: Col 2:14 triumphs once again over the Islamic naive disdain and loathing of the Cross.
 
Why do you think so?
What evidence could be more valid than the testimony of a life transformed?
By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you love one another.” John 13:35
“You are the light of the world. A town built on a hill cannot be hidden. 15 Neither do people light a lamp and put it under a bowl. Instead they put it on its stand, and it gives light to everyone in the house. 16 In the same way, let your light shine before others, that they may see your good deeds and glorify your Father in heaven.” Matthew 5:15-16
You have not posted a single bit of evidence that anyone has received forgiveness and has been saved apart from Christ.

It is absurd that you imagine you can use Christian scriptures to justify non Christians

Memorizing the Bible and gaining a doctorate in Theology is not as important as the example of a life.

Who has not witnessed how people from different religions are freed from the slavery of their past life and live new lives?
I am one of them. My father, now dead, is another example.
If we went home by home, city by city, we would observe, objectively, thousands of cases. We can’t just deny them all.


If people believed that Jesus was a fraud, a false Messiah, they would not repent and do what He asked them to do.
As Jesus repeatedly taught, intellectual assent and confesion was worthless.
We will examine that more in detail later on.



In John 6:53 Jesus is not conditioning God’s mercy to believing in his deity, blood atonement or physical resurrection. Please read it again.
What is the meaning of eating his flesh and drinking his blood?
We eat his flesh and drink his blood when we live the life of Christ. Flesh and blood are symbols of his life, in the same way that the bread coming from heaven (manna) was a symbol of life.


In John 17:3 Jesus is not conditioning God’s forgiveness to acquiring theological knowledge.
To know Jesus is to do what he asks us to do: repent, be born again, loving our neighbor.
“Dear friends, let us love one another, for love comes from God. Everyone who loves has been born of God and knows God”. (1 John 4:7)


In John 14:6 Jesus is not conditioning God’s forgiveness to adhering to a set of beliefs. Please read the verse again.
Your claims are fallacious

Knowing Jesus is doctrine, and again you attempt to justify those who do not know Jesus and are not trusting in his for their salvation based upon their works

Ephesians 2:8–10 (KJV 1900) — 8 For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God: 9 Not of works, lest any man should boast. 10 For we are his workmanship, created in Christ Jesus unto good works, which God hath before ordained that we should walk in them.

Romans 3:20 (KJV 1900) — 20 Therefore by the deeds of the law there shall no flesh be justified in his sight: for by the law is the knowledge of sin.

Romans 4:2 (KJV 1900) — 2 For if Abraham were justified by works, he hath whereof to glory; but not before God.

And John 14:6 notes it is only through Jesus Christ men may come to the father and be saved yet you want to posit many ways
 
Last edited:
Wasn't Peter totally distracted by satan when he attempted to save Jesus from death? Read Matt 16:21-23.

21 From that time Jesus began to show to His disciples that He must go to Jerusalem, and suffer many things from the elders and chief priests and scribes, and be killed, and be raised the third day.

22 Then Peter took Him aside and began to rebuke Him, saying, [i]“Far be it from You, Lord; this shall not happen to You!”

23 But He turned and said to Peter, “Get behind Me, Satan! You are [j]an offense to Me, for you are not mindful of the things of God, but the things of men.

It's a topic that the Bible considers key. Muslims are hell bent on eradicating any mention of the Cross.

Huh? What did I say to precipitate these comments of yours?

Conclusion: Col 2:14 triumphs once again over the Islamic naive disdain and loathing of the Cross.
Stay sharp, @synergy-this is subtle manipulation and misuse of Scripture. Keep pointing back to Paul's epistles.

J.
 
Distracted? Wasn't salvation the most important topic of all? Didn’t Jesus come as a Savior?
Then, How could Jesus miss in a story about forgiveness the topic that YOU consider key requisite for salvation?
Why Jesus missed it not once, or twice, but systematically?
A savior for those who believe on him and are trusting in him for salvation, not another as your religion posits
 
I am opening the thread to discuss and refute the commonly held view that God's grace that forgives and changes the life of people is conditioned to their acceptance of doctrines such as Jesus' deity, blood atonement or physical resurrection.

I will do it following two main lines of argumentation: The analysis of reality, and the analysis of Scriptures.

  • Reality shows that people from all religions are forgiven and transformed.
  • Across the Bible, God never demanded the sinner to hold those beliefs in order to be forgiven and transformed. All references found in Scriptures to rituals or oral confessions as requisites for salvation do not represent a superstitious appeal to a salvation based on rituals or oral confessions. They must be understood within the context in which such references were made
Reality does not dictate God’s terms for grace or salvation.

Human experience is subjective and cannot define divine truths. While it is true that people from various religions may display moral improvement or a sense of forgiveness, these experiences do not necessarily equate to the salvation described in Scripture.

Transformation in behavior or feelings of peace can occur through psychological or cultural factors, but salvation, as revealed in the Bible, is a specific act of God's grace that reconciles sinners to Himself through Jesus Christ (Ephesians 2:8–9).

Biblical salvation is unique and specific. The Bible defines salvation as reconciliation with God through faith in Jesus Christ. It is not a generic sense of moral or spiritual improvement but involves justification (being declared righteous), sanctification (being transformed into Christ’s image), and glorification (eternal union with God). Without faith in Christ, this biblical concept of salvation does not occur, regardless of outward changes (John 14:6; Acts 4:12).

2. Scripture repeatedly emphasizes faith in Christ for forgiveness and transformation.

The exclusivity of Jesus in salvation. The Bible consistently teaches that forgiveness and transformation are possible only through faith in Jesus. For example, John 3:16–18 declares that eternal life is given to "whoever believes in Him" and warns that those who do not believe are condemned already.

Jesus Himself stated that belief in His identity and work is essential (John 8:24, “unless you believe that I am He, you will die in your sins”).

Forgiveness is through the blood of Jesus. The New Testament teaches that without the shedding of Christ’s blood, there is no forgiveness of sins (Hebrews 9:22).

Passages like Romans 3:23–25 and Ephesians 1:7 directly connect forgiveness with faith in Jesus’ atoning sacrifice.


Your argument that these doctrines are unnecessary ignores the centrality of Christ’s work in God’s plan for salvation.

3. The Old Testament foreshadows, but the New Testament fulfills.

Pre-Christ forgiveness pointed to Jesus’ ultimate sacrifice. It is true that in the Old Testament, God forgave people without explicit knowledge of Jesus’ deity, atonement, or resurrection. However, this forgiveness was based on their faith in God's promise and provision, which ultimately pointed to Jesus (Genesis 15:6; Romans 4:3).

The sacrificial system, for example, symbolized the need for atonement, which Jesus fulfilled (Hebrews 10:1–14)
.

After Christ’s coming, faith in Him is non-negotiable. Acts 17:30–31 makes it clear that with the revelation of Christ, God “commands all people everywhere to repent” because Jesus is the appointed judge. The new covenant established through Jesus requires explicit faith in Him as Lord and Savior (Romans 10:9–10).

4. Rituals and confessions are outward expressions of inward faith.
Salvation is by faith, not rituals or works. The Bible does not teach that rituals like baptism or oral confessions in themselves save anyone. Instead, they are outward expressions of an inward reality.

For instance, Romans 10:9–10 highlights confession and belief as interconnected aspects of faith: confessing with the mouth reflects the heart’s trust in Christ. Rituals like baptism symbolize union with Christ but do not replace faith (Romans 6:3–4; Ephesians 2:8–9).

Context matters in understanding Scripture. Your argument that references to rituals or confessions are "superstitious" misrepresents their biblical context. These acts are significant as they demonstrate obedience and faith, but they are not the means of salvation. Faith in Jesus, evidenced by repentance and trust in His work, remains central.

5. Transformation without Christ is insufficient.

Moral improvement is not salvation
. While people of various religions may experience personal change, the Bible differentiates between outward morality and true spiritual transformation.

Salvation involves being born again by the Spirit (John 3:3–8)
and becoming a new creation in Christ (2 Corinthians 5:17).

This kind of transformation only occurs through union with Jesus, which requires faith in His deity, atonement, and resurrection.

God’s standards are unchanging. The Bible emphasizes that all have sinned and fall short of God’s glory (Romans 3:23), and the only remedy is Jesus’ work on the cross. A changed life without reconciliation to God through Christ still leaves a person in their sins (Isaiah 64:6; John 14:6)
.

Your argument fails to account for the specificity of salvation as revealed in Scripture. While human experience and subjective transformation may seem compelling, they do not override the clear biblical teaching that forgiveness and eternal life are granted only through faith in Jesus Christ.

Scripture unequivocally presents the deity, atoning sacrifice, and resurrection of Jesus as essential to God's redemptive plan. To deny these doctrines is to reject the gospel itself (1 Corinthians 15:3–4; Galatians 1:6–9).

Thanks

J.
 
By teaching us to ask the Father to cancel our debts. He taught it very clearly.
I suggest you focus on responding to the Scriptures that @synergy has shared, rather than diverting with unrelated questions. Ignoring what’s presented and shifting the discussion is intellectually dishonest, @Pancho Frijoles.

Redemption through Jesus' Blood (Ephesians 1:7)
Text:
“In Him we have redemption through His blood, the forgiveness of our trespasses, according to the riches of His grace.”

Key Greek Terms:

Ἀπολύτρωσις (apolytrōsis): Redemption, a term used to describe the release or payment of a ransom to set captives free. Here it signifies that Jesus paid the price for our freedom from sin.
Ἄφεσις (aphesis): Forgiveness, meaning the release from debts or obligations. This term reflects the complete cancellation of our sin debt.
Χάρις (charis): Grace, highlighting that this forgiveness is not earned but is a gift from God.


Jesus forgives our sin debt by paying the ransom through His sacrificial death (His blood). Our trespasses (παραπτώματα, paraptōmata)-deviations from God’s law-are forgiven because His death satisfies the penalty we owed.

2. Justification by Faith (Romans 3:23–25)
Text:
“For all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God, and are justified by His grace as a gift, through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus, whom God put forward as a propitiation by His blood, to be received by faith.”

Key Greek Terms:

Δικαιόω (dikaioō): Justify, meaning to declare someone righteous or acquitted of guilt. It’s a legal term emphasizing the judicial nature of forgiveness.
Ἱλαστήριον (hilastērion): Propitiation, referring to an atoning sacrifice that satisfies God’s wrath against sin.
Πίστις (pistis): Faith, the means by which we receive this justification and forgiveness.


God presented Jesus as the hilastērion, a substitutionary atonement that absorbs His righteous wrath and enables the forgiveness of sins. Through faith, sinners are justified-declared not guilty-because Jesus bore the punishment we deserved.

@synergy, @civic I want us to stand together here and not go into the various other atonement theories-please.

3. The Canceling of Our Debt (Colossians 2:13–14)
Text:
“And you, who were dead in your trespasses and the uncircumcision of your flesh, God made alive together with Him, having forgiven us all our trespasses, by canceling the record of debt that stood against us with its legal demands. This He set aside, nailing it to the cross.”

Key Greek Terms:

Χειρόγραφον (cheirographon): Record of debt, a term describing a handwritten certificate acknowledging an obligation or debt. This refers to our sin debt before God.
Δόγμα (dogma): Legal demands, referring to the decrees or requirements of the law that condemn us.
Συγχωρέω (syngchōreō): Forgive, meaning to grant pardon or release.


Jesus forgives our sin debt by "nailing" the cheirographon (our record of sin) to the cross, symbolizing its complete cancellation. The legal demands of the law, which condemned us, were satisfied by His sacrifice.

4. Jesus’ Substitutionary Death (2 Corinthians 5:21)
Text:
“For our sake He made Him to be sin who knew no sin, so that in Him we might become the righteousness of God.”

Key Greek Terms:

Ἁμαρτία (hamartia): Sin, here representing both sin itself and its consequences. Jesus "became sin" in the sense that He bore our sin and its penalty.
Δικαιοσύνη (dikaiosynē): Righteousness, the state of being in right standing with God.


Jesus bore the full weight of our sin, taking upon Himself the penalty we deserved. In exchange, His perfect righteousness is imputed to believers, enabling forgiveness and reconciliation with God.

5. Reconciliation through the Cross (Romans 5:8–10)
Text:
“But God shows His love for us in that while we were still sinners, Christ died for us. Since, therefore, we have now been justified by His blood, much more shall we be saved by Him from the wrath of God. For if while we were enemies we were reconciled to God by the death of His Son, much more, now that we are reconciled, shall we be saved by His life.”

Key Greek Terms:

Καταλλάσσω (katallassō): Reconcile, meaning to restore a relationship that has been broken. This term emphasizes how Jesus' death ends the hostility between sinners and God.
Θυμός (thymos): Wrath, representing God’s righteous anger toward sin.


Jesus forgives our sin debt by reconciling us to God. His death satisfies God’s wrath, turning us from enemies into children of God. This reconciliation is the foundation of forgiveness and peace with God.


Paul's epistles consistently teach that Jesus forgives our sin debt through His atoning death, which pays the penalty for sin and satisfies God's justice. His sacrifice on the cross fulfills the requirements of the law and provides redemption, justification, and reconciliation for those who believe. The Greek terms used by Paul-such as apolytrōsis, hilastērion, and cheirographon-offer rich theological insights into the mechanics of forgiveness, emphasizing both the sufficiency of Christ's work and the necessity of faith for receiving it.

Thanks. @Grace ambassador

J.
 
Last edited:
No, the purpose of the thread is NOT to challenge or refute those doctrines.
The purpose of the thread is to refute the idea that God conditions his forgiveness and transformative power to believing in those doctrines.

So the scope of the discussion should be very different from the rest of the threads, which focus on the veracity of doctrine X or Y.

Let me give you an example of what I mean:

Suppose that a person believes with all her heart that God created the world in 6 literal days. Whether that's true or not is one kind of debate.​
Now, imagine that the same person believes that all people who think that God created the world over millions of years deserves to burn in hell for ever. Well, that's a different kind of debate.​

Not all Christians who believe that God created the world in 6 literal days consider that the non-believers in the 6-literal-days-doctrine should burn in hell.
Catholics, in their catechism, affirm that the grace of God can save Jews, Muslims and people from other religions, without forsaking the role of the Church in salvation.
Lets start with the gospel/resurrection of Christ which is essential to believe as Paul tells us below. The center of the gospel message is the Resurrection of Christ

Paul defines that Gospel by which we are saved below:

1 Corinthians 15:1-19
Now I make known to you, brethren, the gospel which I preached to you, which also you received, in which also you stand, 2 by which also you are saved, if you hold fast the word which I preached to you, unless you believed in vain.

3 For I delivered to you as of first importance what I also received, that Christ died for our sins according to the Scriptures, 4 and that He was buried, and that He was raised on the third day according to the Scriptures, 5 and that He appeared to Cephas, then to the twelve. 6 After that He appeared to more than five hundred brethren at one time, most of whom remain until now, but some have fallen asleep; 7 then He appeared to James, then to all the apostles; 8 and last of all, as to one untimely born, He appeared to me also. 9 For I am the least of the apostles, and not fit to be called an apostle, because I persecuted the church of God. 10 But by the grace of God I am what I am, and His grace toward me did not prove vain; but I labored even more than all of them, yet not I, but the grace of God with me. 11 Whether then it was I or they, so we preach and so you believed.

12 Now if Christ is preached, that He has been raised from the dead, how do some among you say that there is no resurrection of the dead? 13 But if there is no resurrection of the dead, not even Christ has been raised; 14 and if Christ has not been raised, then our preaching is vain, your faith also is vain. 15 Moreover we are even found to be false witnesses of God, because we testified against God that He raised Christ, whom He did not raise, if in fact the dead are not raised. 16 For if the dead are not raised, not even Christ has been raised; 17 and if Christ has not been raised, your faith is worthless; you are still in your sins. 18 Then those also who have fallen asleep in Christ have perished. 19 If we have hoped in Christ in this life only, we are of all men most to be pitied.

Only One way to be saved, by One Person, One Gospel and One Faith. In Him alone. Scripture is really very exclusive here but inclusive to all that come to Him freely!


Gospel Summary

1- Jesus died for our sins according to the scriptures
2- Jesus was buried , in a guarded tomb
3- Jesus was raised from the dead, resurrected on the 3rd day bodily
4- Jesus was seen by many witnesses over 40 days before His Ascension

Jesus died for the sin of the world as the Lamb of God who taketh them away ( John 1:29 ) and Rose from the dead as the only sign He would give an unbelieving people who rejected Him proving He was the promised Messiah who had the power over sin, death/grave and the devil having been raised from the dead conquering them all. The gospel is a historical fact verified by many witnesses. The biblical principle of letting every fact be confirmed by the testimony of 2 or 3 witnesses. This gospel is for all the world, for all sinners to come freely and receive the forgiveness of their sins by the atonement He made for ALL the WORLD as per 1 John 2:2.

John 1:12

But to all who did receive him, who believed in his name, he gave the right to become children of God,

John 3:16-18
“For God so loved the world,[i] that he gave his only Son, that whoever believes in him should not perish but have eternal life. 17 For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but in order that the world might be saved through him. 18 Whoever believes in him is not condemned, but whoever does not believe is condemned already, because he has not believed in the name of the only Son of God.

John 20:30-31
Now Jesus did many other signs in the presence of the disciples, which are not written in this book; 31 but these are written so that you may believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God, and that by believing you may have life in his name.

While gospel is often found alone, it is very often modified by various terms that focus on a particular aspect of the gospel.

It is modified by various descriptive phrases, such as, “the gospel of God” (Mk 1:14, ASV; Rom 15:16), “the gospel of Jesus Christ,” (Mk 1:1; I Cor 9:12), “the gospel of his Son” (Rom 1:9), “the gospel of the kingdom “ (Mt 4:23; 9:35; 24:14), “the gospel of the grace of God” (Acts 20:24), “the gospel of the glory of Christ” (II Cor 4:4, ASV), “the gospel of peace” (Eph 6:15), “an eternal gospel” (Rev 14:6, RSV). Although distinctive aspects of the message are indicated by the various modifiers, the gospel is essentially one. Paul speaks of “another gospel” which is not an equivalent, for the gospel of God is His revelation, not the result of discovery (Gal 1:6–11).5

In the New Testament, the various modifiers bring out some aspect of the gospel that is being stressed in the context and is a part of the good news of what God offers us in Christ. The gospel of Jesus Christ (Mark 1:1; 1 Cor. 9:12) and the gospel of His Son (Rom. 1:9). These two descriptions speak of the good news of salvation that comes through the person and work of Jesus Christ who is the very Son of God in human flesh. Again, this is a good news of deliverance from sin’s penalty, power and presence through the two advents of Christ.

The new birth being born again comes through the message of the gospel. It doesn't come before but after faith.

1 Peter 1:21-24
Through him you believe in God, who raised him from the dead and glorified him, and so your faith and hope are in God. 22 Now that you have purified yourselves by obeying the truth so that you have sincere love for each other, love one another deeply, from the heart. 23 For you have been born again, not of perishable seed, but of imperishable, through the living and enduring word of God. 24 For,

“All people are like grass,
and all their glory is like the flowers of the field;
the grass withers and the flowers fall,
25 but the word of the Lord endures forever.”
And this is the word that was preached to you.

So Faith comes by hearing and hearing by the word of Christ !

Romans 10
How, then, can they call on the one they have not believed in? And how can they believe in the one of whom they have not heard? And how can they hear without someone preaching to them? 15 And how can anyone preach unless they are sent? As it is written: “How beautiful are the feet of those who bring good news!” 16 But not all the Israelites accepted the good news. For Isaiah says, “Lord, who has believed our message?” 17 Consequently, faith comes from hearing the message, and the message is heard through the word about Christ.


hope this helps !!!
 
blood of the atonement the other half of the gospel message.

Blood is arguably one of the most important symbols of both the Old and New Testament. From the very first account of fratricide in the OT, blood plays a significant role in both the literal and symbolic sense:

  • The LORD said, ‘What have you done? Listen! Your brother’s blood cries out to me from the ground. Now you are under a curse and driven from the ground, which opened its mouth to receive your brother’s blood from your hand. (Gen 4:10-11)
The imagery is vivid – the personified blood of Abel cries out to God for justice. Justice in turn requires restitution. In the covenant that God makes with Noah and his descendants, God declares that when human blood is shed, restitution must also be made in blood:

  • ‘Whoever sheds human blood, by humans shall their blood be shed; for in the image of God has God made mankind. (Gen 9:6)
This principle of blood for blood or “life for life” is key to the system of justice and the rituals of atonement in the Old Testament. Blood represents both the life that is taken, as well as the life that is offered for the atonement of sin.

  • Anyone who takes the life of a human being is to be put to death. Anyone who takes the life of someone’s animal must make restitution – life for life. (Lev 24:17-18)
Figuratively, blood represents death, or sin and separation from God, on the one hand; and new life, or restitution and reconciliation with God, on the other. And just as sin can be said to leave the stain of blood, the blood that is offered in atonement washes away the stain of sin.

  • But your iniquities have separated you from your God; your sins have hidden his face from you, so that he will not hear. For your hands are stained with blood, your fingers with guilt. (Is 59:2-3)
  • “He shall take some of the bull’s blood and some of the goat’s blood and put it on all the horns of the altar. He shall sprinkle some of the blood on it with his finger seven times to cleanse it and to consecrate it from the uncleanness of the Israelites. (Lev 7: 18-19)
But in the NT, the blood of Christ represents both the sin and the offering, both the life that is taken and the life that is given and offered for the forgiveness of sins. His blood, alone unstained by sin, reconciles all who sin with God. Unlike the blood of Abel that cried out for justice, the blood of Christ opens the way for God's mercy. It is the blood of the new covenant and brings to fulfillment God’s ultimate vision of peace for mankind.

  • But you have come to… Jesus, the mediator of a new covenant, and to the sprinkled blood that speaks of something better than Abel’s does. (Heb 12:22-24)
  • For I desire mercy, not sacrifice, and acknowledgment of God rather than burnt offerings. (Hos 6:6) Nhi @ Biblical Hermenuetics Stack Exchange
hope this helps !!!
 
Back
Top Bottom