I don’t agree with your definition of free will, and here’s why.
You’re defining “free” as simply not being forced or coerced. But that doesn’t really deal with whether a person could have chosen differently.
If God determines the desires, then the choice follows from those desires. That means the outcome couldn’t have been otherwise. So even if it
feels like a free choice, it’s still fixed.
That’s why I brought up the Stepford Wives idea. The responses look real, but they’re ultimately determined.
On aseity, I don’t see how God is dependent on our choices to know anything. Knowing something doesn’t mean being caused by it. If God is outside of time and knows all things as a single, eternal reality, then He isn’t waiting on our decisions to “find out” what happens.
So I still see a real difference between God determining what I choose and God knowing what I freely choose.
And with Judas, if what he did was determined in such a way that he could not have done otherwise, then I don’t see how calling that “free” really means anything beyond how it feels.
So no, I don’t agree with your definition, because it doesn’t address whether any real alternative was possible.