Why Paul?

Subject Matter:-
1) 'Paul was a different apostle'
2) 'Paul has new information'

Hello @Victoria,

I thoroughly enjoyed listening to this, and agree with what is said within it, except sadly for one thing, which is important, so cannot be overlooked.

[The Scriptures referenced were, Gal.2:7-9; Matt.10:5; Rom.11:13; Rom.15:20; Acts 15:1; Rom. 6:14 (Gal.3:24-25) Acts 21:20;​
Eph. 3:1-5; [This is where my disagreement became apparent]1 Cor. 2:7-8; Matt.15:22, 26-27; Eph. 3:3,5; Acts 10:1,9,12-13, 16-17; Acts 10:44-45; Eph. 3:6-7; John 5:39; Eph. 3:8-9; Eph. 3:1-3; Gen. 1:1 & 1 Cor. 2-7-8; Eph. 3:9-10]​

Even as I am typing this, what I want to say is fading from my mind, but I pray that God will enable me to explain why I disagree with what was otherwise a very good address.

My point of disagreement is in regard to the fact that it is not acknowledged by the speaker that Ephesians was written by Paul from his imprisonment at Rome, therefore at the end of the 35-40 years of the Acts period. At his conversion the ascended Lord told Paul that he would appear unto him again (Acts 26:16) concerning 'other things': and sent him out as a minister and as a witness both to 'the people' (Israel) and to 'the Gentiles'; and Paul went always to the Jew first throughout his Acts ministry; and we can read what his ministry consisted of in Acts 26, when he, beginning with the words of the risen Lord at his conversion, says:-

'Delivering thee from the people, and from the Gentiles, unto whom now I send thee,
To open their eyes, and to turn them from darkness to light, and from the power of Satan unto God,
that they may receive forgiveness of sins,
and inheritance among them which are sanctified by faith that is in Me.'

Whereupon, O king Agrippa, I was not disobedient unto the heavenly vision:
But shewed first unto them of Damascus, and at Jerusalem,
and throughout all the coasts of Judaea,
and then to the Gentiles,
that they should repent and turn to God, and do works meet for repentance.
For these causes the Jews caught me in the temple, and went about to kill me.
Having therefore obtained help of God, I continue unto this day, witnessing both to small and great,
saying
none other things than those which the prophets and Moses did say should come:
That Christ should suffer, and that he should be the first that should rise from the dead,
and should shew light unto the people, and to the Gentiles.

(Act 26:17-23)

During the Acts period it was the repentance of Israel that was the main consideration, because of the words spoken by Peter in Acts 3:19-20:-

Repent ye therefore, and be converted,
that your sins may be blotted out,
when the times of refreshing shall come
from the presence of the Lord;
And He shall send Jesus Christ,
which before was preached unto you:'


It was not until the quotation of Isaiah 6:10 in Acts 28:26-28, that the darkness of unbelief finally descended and Israel was laid aside (temporarily) in unbelief, that salvation was sent to the Gentiles, independent of Israel, for they would hear it (Acts 28:28).

Ephesians, Philippians, Colossians, 2 Timothy, Titus and Philemon, are the epistles which give instruction concerning the Church which is the Body of Christ. Written by Paul from his imprisonment, as the Lord's Prisoner for the Gentiles.

Only at Acts 20:24 when Paul was on his way to imprisonment at Jerusalem was, 'the gospel of the grace of God' mentioned, when Paul said, 'But none of these things move me, neither count I my life dear unto myself, so that I might finish my course with joy, and the ministry, which I have received of the Lord Jesus, to testify the gospel of the grace of God.'

I am aware that there is much more that could be said, but this is as far as I can go at present.

Thank you
In Christ Jesus
Chris
 
Last edited:
@Grace ambassador @Complete :)

Due to the snow storm, there was no sermon this morning 😭
This one was so good, I just had to share!

Columbus Bible Church
Pastor David Reid
Jan. 18th, 2026


Why Paul?

1) Paul has a different apostleship.
2) Paul has new information.
The speaker makes a huge mistake right up front with respect to the very first quote from Galatians 2:7. It is true that Paul is making the clear distinction between the circumcised and the uncircumcised. But he mistakenly claims that means there are two different gospels. Galatians 2:7 does not say that. It only says that Peter was entrusted to present the gospel to the circumcised and Paul was entrusted to present the gospel to the uncircumcised. It is the same gospel.

I didn't listen to much beyond that point.
 
Subject Matter:-
1) 'Paul was a different apostle'
2) 'Paul has new information'

Hello @Victoria,

I thoroughly enjoyed listening to this, and agree with what is said within it, except sadly for one thing, which is important, so cannot be overlooked.

[The Scriptures referenced were, Gal.2:7-9; Matt.10:5; Rom.11:13; Rom.15:20; Acts 15:1; Rom. 6:14 (Gal.3:24-25) Acts 21:20;​
Eph. 3:1-5; [This is where my disagreement became apparent]1 Cor. 2:7-8; Matt.15:22, 26-27; Eph. 3:3,5; Acts 10:1,9,12-13, 16-17; Acts 10:44-45; Eph. 3:6-7; John 5:39; Eph. 3:8-9; Eph. 3:1-3; Gen. 1:1 & 1 Cor. 2-7-8; Eph. 3:9-10]​

Even as I am typing this, what I want to say is fading from my mind, but I pray that God will enable me to explain why I disagree with what was otherwise a very good address.

My point of disagreement is in regard to the fact that it is not acknowledged by the speaker that Ephesians was written by Paul from his imprisonment at Rome, therefore at the end of the 35-40 years of the Acts period. At his conversion the ascended Lord told Paul that he would appear unto him again (Acts 26:16) concerning 'other things': and sent him out as a minister and as a witness both to 'the people' (Israel) and to 'the Gentiles'; and Paul went always to the Jew first throughout his Acts ministry; and we can read what his ministry consisted of in Acts 26, when he, beginning with the words of the risen Lord at his conversion, says:-

'Delivering thee from the people, and from the Gentiles, unto whom now I send thee,
To open their eyes, and to turn them from darkness to light, and from the power of Satan unto God,
that they may receive forgiveness of sins,
and inheritance among them which are sanctified by faith that is in Me.'

Whereupon, O king Agrippa, I was not disobedient unto the heavenly vision:
But shewed first unto them of Damascus, and at Jerusalem,
and throughout all the coasts of Judaea,
and then to the Gentiles,
that they should repent and turn to God, and do works meet for repentance.
For these causes the Jews caught me in the temple, and went about to kill me.
Having therefore obtained help of God, I continue unto this day, witnessing both to small and great,
saying
none other things than those which the prophets and Moses did say should come:
That Christ should suffer, and that he should be the first that should rise from the dead,
and should shew light unto the people, and to the Gentiles.

(Act 26:17-23)

During the Acts period it was the repentance of Israel that was the main consideration, because of the words spoken by Peter in Acts 3:19-20:-

Repent ye therefore, and be converted,
that your sins may be blotted out,
when the times of refreshing shall come
from the presence of the Lord;
And He shall send Jesus Christ,
which before was preached unto you:'


It was not until the quotation of Isaiah 6:10 in Acts 28:26-28, that the darkness of unbelief finally descended and Israel was laid aside (temporarily) in unbelief, that salvation was sent to the Gentiles, independent of Israel, for they would hear it (Acts 28:28).

Ephesians, Philippians, Colossians, 2 Timothy, Titus and Philemon, are the epistles which give instruction concerning the Church which is the Body of Christ. Written by Paul from his imprisonment, as the Lord's Prisoner for the Gentiles.

Only at Acts 20:24 when Paul was on his way to imprisonment at Jerusalem was, 'the gospel of the grace of God' mentioned, when Paul said, 'But none of these things move me, neither count I my life dear unto myself, so that I might finish my course with joy, and the ministry, which I have received of the Lord Jesus, to testify the gospel of the grace of God.'

I am aware that there is much more that could be said, but this is as far as I can go at present.

Thank you
In Christ Jesus
Chris
Thank you for watching & sharing your thoughts w/ me, Chris. I know no other Dispensationalists to have any open dialog w/, so your feedback is very much appreciated :)
 
@Grace ambassador, do you think that there is one gospel for the Jew and another gospel for the Gentile as stated in that video?
A very good question my friend .
THERE be only ONE gospel . IT was and is OF Jesus Christ , all twelve apostels preached it
later paul would preach it .
For it is by faith in JESUS the CHRIST that a jew or a gentile is saved .
They all preached the one same gospel to both a jew and a gentile .
Any who says otherwise knows not what they are saying .
In fact i give us all this lovely challenge today . Go to and read in even the book of acts
and SEE . Peter and john and ot hers preached the gospel to the jews first
notice they always brought up also His ressurection , the dire need to beleive on Him .
Then later peter would be called by GOD to even the gentile house of cornelious .
AGAIN he preached that same gospel , that same ressurection .
Later paul , who once persecuted the church for the preaching of the ressurection , the gospel of Christ ,
would later be preaching THE ONE SAME gospel in ev ery jewish synagogue
where both jews and gentiles , greeks were present .
And again same gospel . There is only ONE KINGDOM of GOD and of CHRIST
and only once gospel by which if a jew or gentile does beleive , they are added into this ONE BODY
this ONE BRIDE . ITS all the same gospel and they always all preached it to both jew and gentile .
This people needs a return to the bible and quickly . This can easily be cleared up .
 
@Grace ambassador, do you think that there is one gospel for the Jew and another gospel for the Gentile as stated in that video?
Precious friend @Jim, thanks for the Great Question. Studying God's Precious Word Of Truth, Rightly
Divided Has
helped me "solve the Confusion" about this matter - ie.:

Agreement Of The Gospel!

Hope this helps...
-------------

And, precious friend(s), Please Be Very Richly Encouraged and Edified
In The Lord Jesus Christ and In His Precious Word Of Truth, Rightly
Divided:


The Bible: The BIG Picture

Amen.
 
@Grace ambassador @Complete :)

Due to the snow storm, there was no sermon this morning 😭
This one was so good, I just had to share!

Columbus Bible Church
Pastor David Reid
Jan. 18th, 2026


Why Paul?

1) Paul has a different apostleship.
2) Paul has new information.
Thank you Victoria,

This was very good.

We also did not have service yesterday morning so now I feel better as I am looking out in that frigid temperature and wanting to curse global warming for if there is much more I WILL freeze to death.

Blessings
 
@Grace ambassador @Complete :)
o
Due to the snow storm, there was no sermon this morning 😭
This one was so good, I just had to share!

Columbus Bible Church
Pastor David Reid
Jan. 18th, 2026


Why Paul?

1) Paul has a different apostleship.
2) Paul has new information.
The Gospel of the circumcision and of the uncircumcision does not refer to different Gospels but to different target audiences. In Matthew 28:16-20, Jesus commissioned his disciples to bring the Gospel that he taught to the Gentiles, so the Gospel went out first to the Jew and then to the Gentile (Romans 1:16).

In Matthew 4:15-23, Jesus began his ministry with the Gospel message to repent for the Kingdom of God is at hand, which was a light to the Gentiles, and the Law of God was how his audience knew what sin is (Romans 3:20), so repenting from our disobedience to it is a central part of the Gospel of the Kingdom/Grace, which Paul also taught based on the Law of God:

Acts 14:21-22 When they had preached the gospel to that city and had made many disciples, they returned to Lystra and to Iconium and to Antioch, 22 strengthening the souls of the disciples, encouraging them to continue in the faith, and saying that through many tribulations we must enter the kingdom of God.

Acts 20:24-25 But I do not account my life of any value nor as precious to myself, if only I may finish my course and the ministry that I received from the Lord Jesus, to testify to the gospel of the grace of God. 25 And now, behold, I know that none of you among whom I have gone about proclaiming the kingdom will see my face again. .

Acts 28:23 When they had appointed a day for him, they came to him at his lodging in greater numbers. From morning till evening he expounded to them, testifying to the kingdom of God and trying to convince them about Jesus both from the Law of Moses and from the Prophets.

Christ also set a sinless example for us to follow of how to walk in obedience to the Law of God and as his follower we are told to follow his example (1 Peter 2:21-22), that those who are in Christ are obligated to walk in the same way that he walked (1 John 2:6), and to be imitators of Paul as he was of Christ (1 Corinthians 11:1). So Jesus and Paul both taught to follow the Law of God by word and by example and the topic being debated in Acts 15 was not whether we should follow what they taught but whether salvation is by circumcision or by grace (Acts 15:1, 11). In Psalms 119:29-30, he want to put false ways far from him, for God to be gracious to him by teaching him to obey His law, and he chose the way of faith by setting it before him, so this has always been the one and only way of salvation by grace through faith. In Titus 2:14, Jesus gave himself to redeem us from all lawlessness and to purify for himself a people of his own possession who are zealous for doing good works, so the way to believe in the Gospel that Jesu spent his ministry teaching by word and by example and in what he accomplished through the cross is by repenting and becoming zealous for doing good works in obedience to the Law of God (Acts 21:20)

Galatians was not written to combat the idea that we should follow what Jesus and Paul taught and the way to be pleasing to God is certainly not by refusing to obey what He has commanded. It is by the Law of God that we have knowledge of what is, so the way for sin to have dominion over someone is by them refusing to come under the Law of God. In Romans 6:15, being under grace does not mean that we are permitted to sin, so we are still required to obey the Law of God. In Matthew 7:23, Jesus said that he would tell those who are workers of lawlessness to depart from him because he never knew them, so the reason why the Law of God leads us to Christ is that it was given to teach us how to know him, but the reason why it leads us to Christ is not so that we can then reject everything he taught and go back to being doers of what it reveals to be sin. Someone who disregarded everything that their tutor taught them after the purpose of a tutor has been fulfilled would be missing the whole point of a tutor.

The Hebrew word "shatnez" refers specifically to wearing garments made from mixing wool and linen, not to garments made of diverse threads. The command to have a parapet on roofs is in the context where the roof was the treated as being a floor of a house. I recently purchased a house that has a door off of the master bedroom that leads outside to a flat roof and I plan to put up a parapet.

In Romans 10:5-8, Paul referred to Deuteronomy 30 as the word of faith that we proclaim in regard to proclaiming that the Law of God is not too difficult for us to obey and that obedience to it brings life and a blessing while disobedience brings death and a curse, so choose life! So it was presented as a possibility and as choice and to show us the way to life, not to show us that God can command things that are too difficult for us to obey. God did not give us His law as a way of earning His favor on our own even as the result of perfect obedience.

The Bible using the word "dispensation" is not the same as the whole doctrine that has been concocted around that word. For example, Paul didn't say anything about there being seven dispensations or about what those are.

The mystery is not a different Gospel, but about the inclusion of Gentiles as being join heirs and of the same body, so again it is a different audience. It doesn't work to argue that God always intended to bless Gentiles while arguing against Gentiles following God's instructions for how to be blessed.

In regard to Peter's vision, he did not just object by saying that he had eaten anything that was unclean but also added that he had never eaten anything that was common and God only rebuked Peter for referring to what He had made clean as being common, but did not rebuke him for referring to what He had made clean as being unclean. So Peter correctly identified the unclean animals as unclean and correctly knew that the Law of God prohibits eating them, but he incorrectly identified the clean animals as common and incorrectly declined to eat them in disobedience to God's command to kill and eat. Peter interpreted his vision on three different occasions as being in record to incorrectly identifying Gentiles without saying a word about now being able to eat unclean animals, so his vision had nothing to do with a change in their status, yet his vision is commonly misinterpreted as if God had rebuked Peter for referring to what He has made clean and as if the point that God was making was that we can now eat unclean animals.

The Spirit has the role of leading us to obey the Law of God (Ezekiel 36:26-27), so the Spirit falling on Gentiles means that they were obeying it.
 
Back
Top Bottom