101G
Active Member
well search it out. see if 101G is in ERROR.Nah, you're really wrong on this. I've literally never in my entire life see a person say this before.
101G.
well search it out. see if 101G is in ERROR.Nah, you're really wrong on this. I've literally never in my entire life see a person say this before.
YepNah, you're really wrong on this. I've literally never in my entire life see a person say this before.
No matter what clear evidence you give, 101G will blubber out something like, "Yeah, but prove it"!
well search it out. see if 101G is in ERROR.
101G.
God..... (smile). and LISTEN to HIM. Ezekiel 16:48 "As I live, saith the Lord GOD, Sodom thy sister hath not done, she nor her daughters, as thou hast done, thou and thy daughters." Ezekiel 16:49 "Behold, this was the iniquity of thy sister Sodom, pride, fulness of bread, and abundance of idleness was in her and in her daughters, neither did she strengthen the hand of the poor and needy." Ezekiel 16:50 "And they were haughty, and committed abomination before me: therefore I took them away as I saw good."I'm not going to hunt down whatever evidence you think you have.
You are the outlier here.
Name one scholar anywhere that agrees with you...
Again, only my opinion but I have run across similar before in other forums and in those cases it was clear those peopleNo matter what clear evidence you give, 101G will blubber out something like, "Yeah, but prove it"!
do you believe this scholar ...... God?
(smile) lol, lol, lol, nor do 101G////// now did you find out why Lot and the old man in Judges offered their daughters?You're making a simple logical error.
The text does not say that was their ONLY sin.
(smile) lol, lol, lol, nor do 101G////// now did you find out why Lot and the old man in Judges offered their daughters?
101G
Let it be ... "KNOWN" .... that 101G do not support nor care about anyone's agenda, but GOD'S agenda here. nor do 101G care if one or many are Homosexual, Bisexual, or heterosexual. this is not the point of the topic. the point is was the men Homosexual based on the term "KNOW". and that Hebrew terms here at Genesis 19 do not carry the use of Homosexual.Again, only my opinion but I have run across similar before in other forums and in those cases it was clear those people
were trying to prove that said act was not a sin and definitely not an abomination.
Also came out that there was some family involved with one and they were quite upset, as you can imagine. (a daughter)
to use a euphemism, don't say strange .... say peculiar. 1 Peter 2:9 "But ye are a chosen generation, a royal priesthood, an holy nation, a peculiar people; that ye should shew forth the praises of him who hath called you out of darkness into his marvellous light:" ..... (smile)I have no idea what strange things you are thinking in your head.
did not, now prove the rape.It was rape bro.
They were not shooting the breeze.
give supportive proof to your decision...... (smile)...lol, oh boy
101G.
did not, now prove the rape.
was they in line with God word? did God word say that in CONTEXT?When I quoted from two Hebrew lexicons about what a Hebrew word means in post #14 you didn't believe them.
is it used here in Context of a sexual nature? NO, because verse 9 disprove that notion.... in CONTEXT.I don't even understand why you would doubt it in the first place.
You know this idiom is used many places in Scripture and in the cultural context of it?
Do you believe Adam read an encyclopedia article about Even in Genesis 4?
was they in line with God word?