Matthias
Well-known member
then a vast majority of Christians are in ERROR. see, or read above post.
101G.
You’re preaching to the choir.
then a vast majority of Christians are in ERROR. see, or read above post.
101G.
is that's why the FAT Lady is singing?...... (smile).You’re preaching to the choir.
Matthew 3:16-17your answer please. book chapter, and verse.
the Ordinal First, God, Jesus the "LORD", anointing" himself" with power because the Ordinal Last wasMatthew 3:16-17
What is going on here?
who said God was in Heaven Speaking? or did you assume that by what was said? ...... (smile).Is God in heaven speaking?
ONE "LORD", notice the Title, not God, but his TITLE is ONE ..... "LORD"... (smile)... Oh dear.Are there THREE GODS, or is Deuteronomy 6:4 and Mark 12:29 true … “the Lord is our God, the Lord is one”.
Respectfully, I do not feel enlightened. If you had a point that you were making, I regretfully confess that it went right past me. All I got from your post was confusion.the Ordinal First, God, Jesus the "LORD", anointing" himself" with power because the Ordinal Last was
G2758 κενόω kenoo (ke-no-ō') v.
1. to make empty.
2. (figuratively) to abase, neutralize, falsify.
[from G2756]
KJV: make (of none effect, of no reputation, void), be in vain
Root(s): G2756
(smile), now that same NATURE that you say cannot be divided is in that body of flesh at it, the flesh birth, and not here anointed. well what's going on is that your assessment of God is INCORRECT.
who said God was in Heaven Speaking? or did you assume that by what was said? ...... (smile).
ONE "LORD", notice the Title, not God, but his TITLE is ONE ..... "LORD"... (smile)... Oh dear.
101G.
GINOLJC, to all.Respectfully, I do not feel enlightened. If you had a point that you were making, I regretfully confess that it went right past me. All I got from your post was confusion.
Sorry.
You are typing nonsense.GINOLJC, to all.
GINOLJC? just a Greeting....... just as PICJAG, the opposite.You are typing nonsense.
1 Corinthians 14:10 [NASB] There are, perhaps, a great many kinds of languages in the world, and none is incapable of meaning ... [until now.]
Was-never had a beginning or end-hayaok, that's catholic (universal) faith, but my question still stand, "explain How God was "WITH" the God, and the Word "WAS" God?"
101G.
correctWas-never had a beginning or end-haya
With-Pros-face to face.
V-IIA-3S (BSB Morphology)correct
PROS
with the acc[usative] of a person, after verbs of remaining, dwelling, tarrying, etc. (which require one to be conceived of as always turned towards one)...after EIMI...Jn i.1 (Thayer).
be (in company) with someone...J 1:1f (BAGD).
a marker of association, often with the implication of interrelationships...'the Word was with God' Jn 1:1 (Louw & Nida)