I will have to see what the bible says about subject structures of Bullinger being unbreakable. Can you share how that happens even when the interpretation of a letter has been inaccurate?Hello Chris,
You're exactly correct! The Structures are based on the subjects and subject matter, they are objective and the greatest work of Linguistic Science and Literary Science ever written, nothing mankind has ever done compares.
This subjective opinion and what is being inserted into your thread about the Structures is a false doctrine that is nothing new, it's based on imagination. The Subject Structures are unbreakable and a problem for the false doctrinal narrative, and the use of tactics that are the same as satan uses, shown as the same method of operation in post # 15, first is shown the ego trying to appear humble as if we are to receive what has been said as if it was said by a messenger of light with something important to say and to correct all who disagree and are in error.
Are you not cleaning to the Bullinger tradition rather than accepting that he was not the final arbiter of what scripture says? Hopefully God treats you more like Jonah who was thrown off a ship that was heading the wrong direction but God had prepared a fish to take him the right direction."I'm just giving feedback based on the actual text and meaning. People have missed the context of Romans and thus misconstrued the topics addressed in Romans." - mikesw
Yeah right, he wants to give the "context" except here comes the con of the text in his next attack on the word of God as he asserts himself and his subjective opinions further, as if he's some authority to create doubt and sew confusion upon the word.
"To follow the misconstrued topics in such an outline of Romans is to hold the letter in perpetual confusion." - mikesw
He just sewed "perpetual confusion" upon himself and falsely attributes it to the Subject Structures based on and aligned with the very subjects of the word of God that are presented so simple a child can understand. Copy cat's and their false doctrines are nothing new and neither are their ways in which they operate with their words! It is written, who is the author of confusion, babel and who sews it?
Now more "context" except it's a con of the text,
"The reading of the letter remains in chains of earlier perception which make it harder to read the letter on its own terms -- a task that has already been difficult and next to impossible due to the way Paul made it. He sought to avoid clear statements of error by any group he mentioned." mikesw
Now the subjective opinion puts "chains of earlier perception" upon the text and blames Paul its own subjective opinion of self delusion of false doctrine and even to assert Paul as being unclear in Romans, calling the word of God unclear and asserting more doubt. The subjective opinion should've just quoted their mentors style and example of attack and said, "hath God said....".
This last little bit from post 15 is funny, more self appointed authority gives caution. Lol
"If not a caution to you, this can be a caution to others. If you cling to the life-preserver, you miss the lifeboat. If you cling to the lifeboat, you miss the large shipping vessel. If you cling to the large vessel, you miss settling on dry land." -mikesw
Row, row, row your boat...I'd take a dingy over this guys opinion and lame metaphor!
Yeshua/Jesus dealt with the adversary this guy mimmicks with "it is written".
"It is written, man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word that proceedeth out of the mouth of God"
It is written, Romans 1:17 "For therein is the righteousness of God revealed from faith to faith: as it is written, the just shall live by faith."
Romans is one of seven epistles and the beginning of teaching(doctrinal) a follower of Christ how to be a follower and how to practice(practical) their belief and faith, all seven epistles go together. "The school of Grace" as Bullinger calls it in his note at the bottom of the Structure of all the epistles together before Romans in the Companion Bible.
It is written, "Love thy neighbor as thyself" which applies to all people not just a certain group like the nonsense from mikesw.
It is written,
Romans 2:11 "For there is no respect of persons with God"
He is not impartial yet James 2 talks about men who falsely teach impartiality with God.
Google mikesw's false doctrine that teaches the epistle of Romans is about giving benevolence to the jews and you'll see where his false doctrine comes from and where he gets it from.
By the way, have you read Bullinger's "The Church Epistles" , here's the link if you haven't The Church Epistles Link
Hope this helps!
God Bless,
Love Fountain
I have shared an observation I can capably demonstrate. It may go against people's traditions but my goal is not to promote people's traditions. If people feel comfortable with Bullinger's findings and feel that all knowledge gains have stopped there, I suppose that is an option they can take.
You are not reflecting a love of your neighbor here. I would hope that you would promote a more loving and benevolent attitude and thus stop sharing libelous statements against what I have introduced.